– Hobbes Essay, Research Paper
The first three laws of nature were described by Thomas Hobbes as a possible way to put an end to war. These three laws are based on the notion of a contract between two beings that holds a mutual transference of right between the involved parties. In this paper I will define and elaborate on the three laws of nature and how these laws, as described by Hobbes, can contribute to bringing peace in a society.
Since Hobbes sees peace as the cooperation of the three laws of nature it is only fitting that the first law deals with the seeking out of peace. He explains the first law to be where one must seek out peace where possible and if it is not possible to use war. Using war would be necessary as a defense mechanism if the initial promotion of peace isn t accepted. Since using war, according to Hobbes, is one of our natural rights, he states that this be agreed as a natural law.
The second law of nature deals with the surrendering of our natural right in order to achieve peace. The basis behind the law is that one must be willing to lay down their natural right so far as others do as well. If one does not give up their natural right, they are considered a threat to the existence of peace among a society and therefore cannot coexist without the constant threat of war.
The third law of nature is made up from the idea that men perform their covenants made which essentially describes the notion that to ensure peace all individuals will stand by their contracts and fulfill their obligations. If one does not fulfill their obligations they are subject to the consequences of a coercive higher power.
The underlying themes between these three laws is the fact that peace comes about from the fear of death and that man is constantly engaging in self improvement. According to Hobbes, if all individuals in a society strictly followed these laws than the chances for peace are greatly increased. I believe his social contract theory to be the rope that ties all these laws together and that is where the true possibility for peace comes about.
The social contract theory comprises, in one way or another, the three laws of nature and it offers a deeper explanation of how these laws work together to promote peace among individuals in a society. In a social contract there is an agreement that peace will be the outcome of individuals who simultaneously give up their natural rights and follow through with the pacts that they have previously agreed to. Hobbes uses this theory to explain the relationship between an individual and others in a society and how they can live free from constant conflicts. This theory describes that people can be bound morally by a set of rules that will benefit each individual and the group as a whole if they are followed. These rules can be broken under the terms of reciprocity in that the individual can now be subjected to consequences or punishment. This punishment is therefore justified since the initial moral rules were disobeyed.
The relationship between these rules and the social contract theory is best described by Hobbes as he states that in order for everyone to coexist they must allow for a government or mortal god to be established that can offer the security and enforcement of laws and regulations.
In his attempt to persuade Socrates to flee Athens, Crito realizes part of the thought process that Socrates uses in making this important decision. Throughout their dialogue, Socrates is challenged with valid reasons for escaping before his death and he successfully disputes each point. In the following paragraphs, I will attempt to interpret what I found in the Crito, and offer my viewpoint on Socrates arguments.
The barrage of arguments for Socrates to flee Athens was initiated with Crito s explanation that he and his friends would gladly pay off whoever needs to be compensated and take the possible risk of losing their property and suffering punishment. Crito is insistent that Socrates could easily escape to Thessaly and be out of harms way and backs this up with the argument that Socrates would not be acting in a right way if he did not take him up on his offer. The issue of right and wrong was elaborated upon by Socrates but I didn’t see it applied to Crito s next argument. I believe this to be the most valid of the dialogue as he explains to Socrates that one must not have children, or one should share with them to the end the toil of upbringing and education. (pg. 48) It is difficult to see that Socrates did not even address this argument directly and rather discussed whether he should value the opinions of one man and not others. Or good opinions from wise men over bad opinions from foolish men. This avoidance of an incredibly valid point for fleeing captivity is something that cannot be overlooked as it says something about Socrates character. Can by doing one right act cause you to create an unjust act? This is a question I wish Crito brought up, because in no fashion can Socrates justify leaving his sons to obey the majority s rulings. Even if Socrates had successfully escaped to Thessaly, he would still have a say in the education and upbringing of his sons. There is a bond that is created when you become a father and unless Socrates had done an act that justified death, you should do all in your power to maintain that bond with your children.
Socrates then goes on to point out the reasons why he should continue to do the right thing since this is what he and Crito have done to this point. He admits he was wrong in his actions and justifies his decision to stay by stating you must never return a wrong action with another wrong action. (pg. 51) This is a valid point that Socrates applies to his current situation, however, he never clearly states if what he did was wrong in his eyes. He only stated that the majority thought he was wrong in his actions and therefore he must suffer the consequences.
He also justifies his decision by ideas that relate to the Social Contract theory when he stated that he came to an agreement that is just with someone and he must fulfill that agreement. (pg. 52) He refuses to harm the city and states that he has a contract with the city and by fleeing would break that contract. I found his foresight into what the city would say of his escaping imprisonment his most profound and well thought justification for staying and facing his execution. The statements Socrates made regarding his loyalty to Athens portrayed the apologetic side of Socrates much deeper than any other part of the dialogue between he and Crito. He stated on what the city would say, …you have no desire to know another city or other laws; we and our city satisfied you. (pg. 54) He continues with, You are breaking the undertakings and agreements that you made with us without compulsion or deceit, and under no pressure of time for deliberation. It is clear that the city has been more congenial to you than to other Athenians. (pg. 55) These statements seem to be the core of Socrates thinking in why he should face the execution and avoid any persuasion by Crito. He has an incredible loyalty to Athens and he should for it has brought him to his highest successes and to his lowest failures.
The last dialogue between Socrates and Crito ended with the words: … and let us act in this way, since this is the way god is leading us. (pg. 56) This statement clearly showed how Socrates attaches what he believes to God, and how he believes what he chooses will be justified by God. This is not surprising considering the times, but it helps to see how Socrates thinks and how he formed his well stated arguments to Crito. Socrates is clearly arguing that he would rather do right as in obeying the city s request and leave his sons than flee and bring them up and educate them. This, according to Socrates, is what God wants and it is the way God is leading Socrates. So if I understand the reading correctly, he puts his priorities in doing the just action and obeying the city that was so loyal to him over the upbringing of his sons. As I stated earlier, this does not make a clear justification in my eyes and it should not have been overlooked.
On page 56, Socrates proclaims he is consumed by the reasoning he just described and therefore must follow them to his execution. Socrates explained his justification for staying very well and has clearly altered Crito s opinion towards the matter. I found myself agreeing with Socrates words in all but one of his theories where he neglects to mention the fate of his children and how they will be affected by his absence. This, in my opinion, should have been the one factor that caused Socrates to rethink his decision and to avoid execution at all costs.
Другие работы по теме:
Hume On Miracles Essay Research Paper Hume
Hume On Miracles Essay, Research Paper Hume On Miracles It is evident in David Hume’s writing of “An Equity Concerning Human Understanding” that he does not believe that miracles take place. Hume is a man of logic, who believes in experience over knowledge. Of course it is hard for such a man to believe in extraordinary claims without being there to witness them.
Romantics Vs Realists Essay Research Paper Views
Romantics Vs Realists Essay, Research Paper Views of Nature Romantics verse Realists and Naturalists have different views of nature. In this essay I will portray how Romantics see nature, and then how Realists and Naturalists together see nature. It will show how Romantics had a deepened appreciation of the beauties of nature.
Cloning Or Clowning Essay Research Paper Cloning
Cloning Or Clowning? Essay, Research Paper Cloning or Clowning Around? Just like in the fictional book Jurassic Park they cloned dinosaurs for the purpose of entertainment. They thought they could control them like zoo animals, but they were wrong. They also only made female dinosaurs so that they couldn’t reproduce, but in the end nature found a way.
Justice Essay Research Paper The concept of
Justice Essay, Research Paper The concept of justness is a subjective reality. Justice is not present in any one person, justice appears to be present only in consensus. There is no just,
Where I Lived
&What I Lived For–Thoreau Essay, Research Paper In ?Where I Lived & What I Lived For,? Thoreau?s response towards nature is of admiration and value. His respect for nature is almost religious. This is depicted in the way he describes his love and adoration for nature.
American Scholar By Ralph Waldo Emerson Essay
, Research Paper The American Scholar by Ralph Waldo Emerson In the essay the American Scholar, Emerson portrays the scholar as a person who learns from three main things. These things by which a scholar is educated are by nature, by books (the past) and by action.
Thomas Hobbes Paper Essay Research Paper Thomas
Thomas Hobbes Paper Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes Paper – What is the difference betweenobligations in foro interno and in foro externo, and when do wehave such obligations? According to Thomas Hobbes, there are certain laws of nature whichexist in the absence of an organized government. These laws are extremelycut throat, and place people in extremely dangerous situations where theirlives are in danger.
Eminem Essay Research Paper With the difference
Eminem Essay, Research Paper With the difference between the majority and minority parities being so narrow the pork-barrel legislation will have a major impact on the next section of Congress. Pork barrel is local laws that are passed to help out your local areas.
What Makes Smith Run Essay Research Paper
What makes Smith run??? The theme of honesty is widely developed in ?The Loneliness of the Long Distant Runner,? in which Smith tells us what honesty means according to him, and according to the governor. To be honest is interpreted by the governor as the easiest and most common way to win the race, to get out of the jail, and to have a family.
La Croix On Descartes Essay Research Paper
La Croix in his essay disputes the position set forth by Harry Frankfurt in his article “Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths” (The Philosophical Review, 1977), charging that Frankfurt misrepresents Descartes? view of God?s nature and power. According to La Croix, Frankfurt holds that, in claiming that God created the eternal truths and could have done the opposite with respect to establishing the law of contradiction, Descartes conceived of God?s power as extending beyond the laws of logic.
Hume
’S Views On Kant’S Concept Of God Essay, Research Paper For Hume, all objects of human reason are divided into two kinds: Relations of Ideas and Matters of fact. All reasoning of matters of fact are founded on Cause and Effect. Cause and Effect play a big role in Hume’s philosophy. David Hume is a man of logic, who believes in experience over knowledge.
Is It Reasonable To Expect People To
Believe In Miracles In A Modern Scientific World? Essay, Research Paper The idea of miracles came under attack in the eighteenth century when science began to reveal a universe which seemed to follow fixed laws. This left little room for the supernatural or for the events, which supposedly transcended or even contradicted the laws of nature.
How Science And PseudoScience Differ Essay Research
Paper In the history of mankind, we have strived to understand the world around us, to know and understand how and why things happen. Thus, science was born. Pseudo-science was born, as well. A science tries to explain how and why things happen by creating laws that dictate what Nature does. A pseudo-science is something that claims to be scientific, but really isn’t.
Theory Of Knowledge
– Mathematics Essay, Research Paper “As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.” — Albert Einstein
David Hume Essay Research Paper In reading
David Hume Essay, Research Paper In reading the ideas of David Hume, I have came to believe that he was telling us the miracles don?t exist. They are sort of a ?Mission impossible.? We
Hammurabi
’s Law Code Essay, Research Paper Hammurabi was more than just a man. Hammurabi managed to organize the world’s first code of laws for all and establish Babylon as the dominant and successful city of its time. The people of his empire could learn these laws, and the whole civilization would be a better place.
Born To Be Good Essay Research Paper
Born To Be Good Over the entire human existence, human nature has been based on ones own survival. The minute a human life enters the world, they are born with the most pureity and innocients that they will ever have. As a human baby grows to learn more about life they are introduce to the most imporant athourity that they will ever know.
Social Contract Theory Essay Research Paper Hobbes
Social Contract Theory Essay, Research Paper Hobbes Social Contract Theory Thomas Hobbes starts his argument by discussing the nature of mankind. One man can be better in something than another man, but in the end their
The Laws Of Hammerabi Essay Research Paper
The Laws of Hammurabi The best method of finding out about a certain culture is to look at their laws and other court records. The Laws of Hammurabi are the best preserved legal document
Symbolism In Moby Dick Essay Research Paper
Moby-Dick Symbolism is using a person, place, or thing to represent something else which is larger and often untouchable. It is used in literature to allow authors to be objective while still expressing his/her views. Symbols in a story can be interpreted differently by different people Some symbols stand for things that are obvious while others need a more involved explanation.
Second Treatise Of Government By John Locke
Essay, Research Paper n the Second Treatise of Government by John Locke, he writes about the right to private property. In the chapter which is titled ?Of Property? he tells how the right to private property originated, the role it plays in the state of nature, the limitations that are set on the rights of private property, the role the invention of money played in property rights and the role property rights play after the establishment of government..
Mother Nature Essay Research Paper Nature has
Mother Nature Essay, Research Paper Nature has a certain presence or spirit. It s an almost indescribable feeling just to go out to the middle of the sea or into a forest and just sit there in awe of its beauty. Nature has a certain mystique and mystery to it that draws people to it. Nature, described as mysterious and secretive, is a recurrent theme throughout many stories.
Laws
– Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Laws. We all must obey them, but why? For fear of going to jail, or being fined? Those are the individual effects of civil disobedience, but what happens what is the purpose of law in society? Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all attempted to interpret the need for laws in society, in order to maintain the good of the whole and the individual.
Critical Essay On Billy Budd Essay Research
Paper Critical Essay on Billy Budd Charles Reich’s assessment of the conflict in Billy Budd focuses on the distinction between the laws of society and the laws of nature. Human law says
Argument About The Exist Of God Essay
, Research Paper Argument About The Exist of God The following paper will provide a sound argument in favor of the existence of God. By demonstrating that an Atheist world cannot account for the
Locke And The American Political System Essay
, Research Paper John Locke and his ideas about philosophy was a major influence on the American political system, not to mention many other political systems, too. His ideas were very
LAW Ceciro Plato Aristotle St Thomas Essay
, Research Paper QUESTION: Define the origins of natural law and the contributions of the following theorist. PLATO ? The idea that law should strive to reflect certain universal, absolute, and eternal truths or virtues.
Gun Control Essay Research Paper Gun EssayShould
Gun Control Essay, Research Paper Gun Essay Should we really just keep adding gun control laws? Well, I don’t think so. I think that Senator Larry E. Craig said it best “the criminal that wasn’t stopped by 20,000 laws won’t stop at 20,001.“ My viewpoint is that we should have better law enforcemnt.
The French Sociologists Essay Research Paper The
The French Sociologists Essay, Research Paper The French sociologists (holistic approach), during the eighteenth and nineteenth century were much concerned with the nature of society and of the human social institutions. Their interests
Montesquieus Definition Of Law Essay Research Paper
The following was completed for a Political Thought and Theory Class in my Senior Year of Highschool..my grade was an 85 Montesquieu: Definition of Law Into the first three chapters of Book 1, The Spirit of Laws, Montesquieu