’s Pieta A Better Work Of Art Than Duchamp’s Fountain Would Kant And Hume Agree??? Essay, Research Paper
When one looks at two
very different works of art like Michelangelo?s Pieta and Duchamp?s Fountain
the question is often posed as to which is the better piece of art. The
question is also asked at times, what verdict would two different philosophers
give to the works? Would Kant and Hume for example agree on whether or not the
two pieces were both good works, or would they say that neither piece was very
good, or would they say that one work was better then the other. Most critics
who wanted to play it safe would most likely jump to the position that
Michelangelos?s Pieta was a example of ?good? art while Duchamp?s Fountain was
an example of ?bad? art. For the simple reasons that it is not a good idea to
call any piece of art by Michelangelo bad if you want to have any sort of
career as an art critic. The general consensus of the art world is that
Michelangelo was a master, and it would be folly for anyone to say otherwise.
Duchamp?s work on the other hand leaves more room for the critic to pronounce
that it is either good or bad. This could be due in part to the fact that
Duchamp?s work can be considered controversial. People and or critics are more
likely to jump onto either of the bandwagons when there is no universal
acceptance of an piece, or of an artist. In a way it is almost impossible to
compare the two different pieces due to the fact that the relationship between
Michelangelo and his audience is much different then the relationship that
Duchamp has with his audience. Kant and Hume I believe
would both concur with this, but they would also have their own opinions of
whether each piece of art was good on its own. Hume and Kant both seem to agree
that Aesthetic judgements are logically dependant, in that they are dependant
on the sensations of pleasure and liking, but they are also removed from these
feelings and transcend judgements of pleasure and liking.? This may seem to contradict itself, but at
the same time it does not. Most peoples decisions on how they feel about a work
depend on what type of a response they have to that work, the response is based
on their judgements of pleasure and liking. However a learned critics will
often come to the same conclusion about an object in that there is a universal
judgement of what is beautiful and what is not, that all learned and educated
critics will come too. Of the two of them Hume
would be considered more the subjectivist then Kant. Hume states that there is
a different internal fabric in his mind then there is in the mind of the
critic. This leads him to beg the question ?Why ought I give precedence to the
judgement of the critic? I am not the critic and his responses are not my
responses, what sense is there that his pronouncements have a stronger
influence then mine?? He states that the sentiments of men can often differ
with regard to beauty and deformity of all kinds. This is most definitely the
argument of most subjectivists. The belief that the idea of beauty is different
in every individual and that taste in general is relative to the party viewing
the work. So this evidence could almost say that Hume?s viewpoint on whether or
not the one work is better then the other is almost irrelevant to his
philosophies. He believes that the idea of beauty is in the eye of the
beholder, and who is to say that this viewpoint is incorrect? When people say
that beauty is in the eye of the beholder about a man who loves a woman
regardless of what she looks like he is considered noble and to be
admired.? Where as when that same
philosophy is applied to the judgement of art, many consider that it is a cop
out for people who don?t want to make a decision on what is good and what is
bad art.? Hume states that ?Beauty is no
quality in things themselves: It exists merely in the mind, which contemplates
them; and each mind perceives a different beauty. One person may even perceive
deformity, where another is sensible of beauty, and every individual ought to
acquiesce in his own sentiment, without pretending to regulate those of
others.? Kant on the other hand
would be considered more the objectivist of the two of them. Kant argues that
judgements of beauty itself are synthetic. He would argue that the bare
perceptual form of the object and its interaction with our basic universally
shared mental powers of perception and understanding, are what the decision of
whether or not an object is aesthetically pleasing. Every good critic will come
to the same basic conclusion as to whether or not a work is good since all good
and learned critics will come to the same universal standpoint on what is good
art. Kant states that this universal standpoint can be reached through freeing
our awareness of the object from desire and practical concern, what he calls a
?disinterestedness? of the object. That way we can judge the merits of the work
based on its form and concept, not getting tied up in the conventions of the
day or our first response. Kant believes that there are two judgements
implicitly when a object is pronounced beautiful. A) A judgement of the object,
and B) a judgement of the pleasure given by the object, that it is valid for
everyone. Kant also advances a metaphysical interpretation of an aesthetic
experience. He states that the experience should make us conscious of our
connection that we share with the world, and the connection that we share with
each other, the connection which lies beyond the empirical world. Kant also
argues that the frame of mind that is involved in the judgement of aesthetic
beauty and the appreciation thereof is analogous to the state of mind that is
involved in the awareness of moral obligation. Beauty therefore seems to hold a
moral significance for Kant. He calls it the symbol of the good. I will not
however try to state what Kant?s view on whether or not one of the
above-mentioned works is better then the other. It is possible to look at his
philosophy and try to draw inferences to what he might have thought of the
work, however it is also very possible to miss something in the work that he
may have seen and admired. Duchamp?s work obviously holds social meaning that
is relevant to our time that Kant would not have even understood just due to
the fact that he would not have even recognised what the subject of the work
was, or is. This I believe would have greatly affected his or any critics? view
of the work. Most of the controversy over the work is over its subject. Some
look at the work and say that it is tasteless due to its very subject matter.
However this decision is not entirely based on an evaluation that is
?disinterested? rather it is very culturally loaded. This leads the evaluation
to be considered by some, even by Kant himself to be flawed in that it is not a
?disinterested? opinion. The question as to whether or not those works are good
should be left in the mind of the viewer in my opinion.
Другие работы по теме:
Agony Ang The Extacy Ethical Considerations Concerning
Michelangelo Buonarroti Essay, Research Paper Michelangelo Buonarroti was a natural born artist. As an artist he was capable of different mediums of expressing his artistic talent. However he much preferred sculpting out of them all, it made him most satisfied. When Pope Julius II experienced Michelangelo s painting he insisted that Michelangelo share his talent with the rest of Italy.
Statue Of David Essay Research Paper Awe
Statue Of David Essay, Research Paper Awe inspiring is the only way to describe Michelangelos statue of David. Probably the most recognized sculpture in the world, it was created during thethree year period between the years 1501 and 1504. During this period in timeEurope was going through the Renaissance.
Michaelangelo Essay Research Paper Summary Michelangelo
Michaelangelo Essay, Research Paper Summary Michelangelo was a genius. He was among the few, if not the only artists to create multiple masterpieces. His skills in art were not limited to just one medium, such as stone, but he exploited himself with paper, plaster, and stone. His talent was to an extent where he would be referred to as divine, during his lifetime.
La Pieta Essay Research Paper To see
La Pieta Essay, Research Paper To see a scorned, beaten, and crucified man lying dead in the arms of his mother is an image, which can inspire overwhelming emotions within the heart of an observer. Yet, for the longest time I’ve had such difficulty looking at Michelangelo’s Pieta or any piece of art in this way.
Magnificent Minds Of The Renaissance Essay Research
Paper The high renaissance of the 1500’s was a time of scientific, philosophic, and artistic awe and inspiration. Many new discoveries were being made in the field of science, and philosophers expressed their assumptions on the world and universe around them. In addition, many individuals were gifted with artistic dexterity and skill.
Agony And Extacy Essay Research Paper THEMES
Agony And Extacy Essay, Research Paper THEME(S) Major ?Art surpassing life? and ?The agony and ecstasy of an artist? are the two significant themes of the novel. Michelangelo waits for
Art Related To Popes Essay Research Paper
The three pieces discussed in this essay are all closely related to popes of the Roman Catholic Church. Michelangelo s The Last Judgment , Raphael s School of Athens and Pietro da Cortona s Glorification of the Reign of Urban VIII not only have their relation to a particular pope in common, but also are very good reflections of the artistic movements and historical events of the time in which each work was done.
Life Of Raphael Sanzio Essay Research Paper
During a time when Michelangelo and Leonardo Da Vinci were the prime artists in Europe, a young man by the name of Raffaello Sanzio was starting to attract major attention with his artworks.
Michelangelo Essay Research Paper Michelangelo was one
Michelangelo Essay, Research Paper Michelangelo was one of the greatest artists of all time. He excelled in architecture, sculpture, painting, poetry, and engineering. He was a true Renaissance man who lived a long emotional life. In painting “The Last Judgment,” Michelangelo was able to incorporate all that he had learned about the human body.
Sitine Chapel Essay Research Paper The Sitine
Sitine Chapel Essay, Research Paper The Sitine Chapel There are many different pieces and many different style of art in the world. But none may hold more power and creativity than the one about to be discussed. This piecs of art is known to us as The Sistine Chapel. The Encylapedia of America says “this chapel was built by Giovannia de’ Dolci between 1471 and 1484 for Sixtus IV” .”This masterpiece” as it was called by Carlo Pietrangeli the writer of the report on the Sistine Chapel.
Sistine Chapel Essay Research Paper papal chapel
Sistine Chapel Essay, Research Paper papal chapel in the Vatican Palace that was erected in 1473-81 by the architect Giovanni dei Dolci for Pope Sixtus IV (hence its name). It is famous for its Renaissance frescoes by Michelangelo.
Sistine Chapel Essay Research Paper Michelangelo Sistine
Sistine Chapel Essay, Research Paper Michelangelo Sistine Chapel Ceiling Without question the most recognized work of the Renaissance is Michelangelo’s Sistine Chapel. Named for Pope Sixtus IV della Rovere (1471-1484), the chapel is simple in shape. Its measurements repeat those given in the Bible for the temple of Solomon.
Michelangelo S Sistine Chapel Essay Research Paper
Michelangelo s Sistine Chapel During the Renaissance period, there were many great artistic achievements that were incredible. Michelangelo Buonarroti was one of the most famous personalities from this era. He was an accomplished artist, sculptor, architect, and poet who created many astounding works.
Micheangelo Essay Research Paper Michelangelo Michelangelo
Micheangelo Essay, Research Paper Michelangelo Michelangelo Buonarroti born March 6, 1475 in the small village of Caprese Italy. A sculptor, architect, painter, and poet in the Italian high renaissance. Michelangelo’s father Ludovico Buonarroti had connections to the raining Medici family, Michelangelo studied at the gardens when he was 15 years old, shortly after he was invited into the household of Lorenzo de’ Medici, the magnificent.
Michelangelo 2 Essay Research Paper Michelangelo Buonarroti
Michelangelo 2 Essay, Research Paper Michelangelo Buonarroti is arguably one of the most inspired creators in the history of art and the most potent force in the Italian High Renaissance. As a sculptor, architect, painter, and poet, he exerted a tremendous influence on his contemporaries and on subsequent Western art in general.
Michelangelo Buonarroti The Artist Essay Research Paper
“Arguably one of the most inspired creators in the history of art and, with Leonardo da Vinci, the most potent force in the Italian High Renaissance. As a sculptor, architect, painter, and poet, he exerted a tremendous influence on his contemporaries and on subsequent Western art in general.”
Pope Julius II Essay Research Paper POPE
Pope Julius II Essay, Research Paper POPE JULIUS II Pope Julius II was a powerful ruler and also the greatest art patron among the popes. His reign is considered one of the most brilliant in the Renaissance period. He was born Giuliano della Rovere, in Albisola, Italy in 1443. He became a Franciscan priest in 1468.
Bible Art Essay Research Paper Art in
Bible: Art Essay, Research Paper Art in the Bible An abstract look at a renaissance perception of the Bible Table of Contents Part 1 The Painting Part 2 A compalation of abstract ideas
David Awaiting Goliath Essay Research Paper David
David Awaiting Goliath Essay, Research Paper David Awaiting Goliath Before going to Eleganza, the only sculpture that I had ever seen, besides the small statues in neighbors’ yards, was in books that I had looked at. When I entered the museum I noticed the many sculptures that occupied the small space. After walking around, observing the different sculptures and listening to Dr.
David Sculptures Essay Research Paper David SculpturesDavid
David Sculptures Essay, Research Paper David Sculptures David, who was destined to be the second king of Israel, destroyed the Philistine giant Goliath with stone and a sling. Donatello, Verrocchio, Michelangelo, and Bernini each designed a sculpture of David. However, the sculptures are drastically different from one another.
Renaissance Essay Research Paper Essay written by
Renaissance Essay, Research Paper Essay written by Stephen Sanchagrin The Renaissance was “A revival or rebirth of cultural awareness and learning that took place during the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries, particularly in Italy,” according to Art In Focus. It followed the Middle Ages, and was basically a time of the revival of learning after the Middle Ages, or Dark Ages, a time with little increase of ideas, inventions or developments.
Michelangelo Essay Research Paper MichelangeloMichelangelo is easily
Michelangelo Essay, Research Paper Michelangelo Michelangelo is easily one of the greatest artists of all time. His name has been synonymous with the word masterpiece. Other artists works are no match for Michelangelo s amazing creations. He created works of extreme beauty, which expressed the full extent of the human condition.
Italian Renaissance Essay Research Paper How was
Italian Renaissance Essay, Research Paper ?How was the Italian Renaissance an age in which life was a work of art?? The Renaissance was an important time. It was a time when new ideas were formed, worldly
Michelangelo S Young Slave Essay Research Paper
Michelangelo s Young Slave Michelangelo s Young Slave is a sculpture depicting slavery. The Young Slave is based on The Dying Slave. The medium Michelangelo used is marble, and is currently located in The Florence Academy of Art. This work was done for the tomb of Pope Julius II of 1516. The Young Slave is one of four slaves completed for Pope Julius II.
Michelangelo Essay Research Paper Michelangelo Michelangelo lived
Michelangelo Essay, Research Paper Michelangelo Michelangelo lived from 1475-1564. He was arguably one of the most inspired creators in the history of art. As a sculptor, architect, painter, and poet, he had a tremendous influence on his contemporaries and on following Western art in general.Michelangelo s father, a Florentine official named Ludovico Buonarroti with connections to the ruling Medici family, placed his 13-year-old son in the workshop of the painter Domenico Ghirlandaio.
Michelangelo Essay Research Paper Michelangelo Michelangelo was
Michelangelo Essay, Research Paper Michelangelo Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo’s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it’s natural state. Michelangelo’s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him.
Michelangelo Essay Research Paper Michelangelo was an
Michelangelo Essay, Research Paper Michelangelo was an optimist in his artwork and his sculptures. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings that showed humanity in its natural state. Michelangelo?s showed optimism in every figure he sculpted. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his true feelings of the world and how he viewed it.
Sculptures Of David Essay Research Paper From
Sculptures Of David Essay, Research Paper From 1430 to 1623A.D., four sculptures of the Biblical David were created. From the master artists Bernini, Donatello, Michelangelo, and Verrocchio came the
Leonardo Di Vinci Essay Research Paper Other
Leonardo Di Vinci Essay, Research Paper Other than the well-known artists Michelangelo, Raphael, and Titan, Leonardo Da Vinci was probably the most famous and influential Florentine artist of the High Renaissance period. Not only did Leonardo Da Vinci create magnificent paintings and sculptures still celebrated today as astonishing and masterful works of art, but he also produced noteworthy innovations in the fields of architecture, engineering, and science.