State Of Nature Essay, Research Paper
Robbie Dagg
4/22/99
State of Nature
To trigger off any philosophy on what should be the characteristics of the state we
must first imagine living in a state of nature (living with the lack of a state). Since we
cannot trace back to any time that we?ve been without government, we must imagine what
it would be like in a state of nature. What are people like with the absence of a state? there
have been many views in answering this question, therefore there have been many
differences in views for what the ?ideal? state should be and serve as.
A character of a state is described to best remedy for the deficiency of the ?State
of Nature?, as Hobbes came up with his pessimistic state of nature in which life is solitary,
poor, nasty, brutish, and short. Hobbes’ view started off when he stated that the first
principle of human behavior was egoism, or self-interest, and it was this egoism, that was
the root of all social conflict. Although Hobbes stated that all people are roughly equal,
still, if someone has more, others have less. The insecurity regarding what you can keep
leads to violence. ?where there are no restraints on people?s actions, it leads to the war of
?all against all?? says Hobbes. So, Hobbes is basically saying, any state is better than the
state of nature, be glad that the state is there. Even if it is a corrupt state, you will benefit
more from the corrupt state than you would from the State of Nature which is completely
lawless. However, this vision of society which leaves power out of the hands of the people
and leads to criticisms from philosophers such as Locke and Rousseau, who counters
Hobbes with their own ideas of the ?state of nature?. In Locke’s ?State of Nature? the
?State of Nature? is ordered by the Laws of Nature, including your Natural Rights to Life,
Liberty, and Property. If a man works a piece of land and makes it better and more
valuable or useful, it becomes his property. This possession can only be freely contracted
away to others, and government. Although Locke said that the political society is the
result of agreements made between people living in a ?State of Nature?, he says that the
state must have permission by a person to enforce the law on him, however if you acquire
any property which falls under the jurisdiction of the state, you thereby become a tacit
member of that state. Thus, by using the benefits of the state, you have consented to being
a member of the state. On a more liberal and appealing philosophy than both Locke and
Hobbes, Rousseau maintained that human beings were essentially good and equal in the
?State of Nature? but were corrupted by the introduction of property, agriculture, science,
and commerce. People entered into a social contract among themselves, establishing
governments and educational systems to correct the inequalities brought about by the rise
of civilization. All of the differences between Rousseau?s theories when compared to
Locke and Hobbes, begin with different interpretations of the state of nature. Since
Hobbes had the impression that all people were egoists and were only interested in their
own good, he figured it would lead to the war of ?all against all?, therefore any
government was better than the ?state of nature?. Locke believed that most people got
along pretty well for the most part by rational intuition, but were always a few ?bad
apples? in the group that forced others to give up their natural rights in a law system in
order to be able to punish the exceptions in the society. Rousseau criticizes Hobbes and
Locke by saying that they weren?t really looking at the real ?State of Nature?, and that all
of the negative qualities of human beings that they had mentioned to be present in the
?State of Nature? was in fact, a quality brought on by the state of their time. The
Rousseau version of the ?State of Nature? differs greatly from Locke, but from Hobbes
especially, in that he makes no mention of the constant fear which Hobbes believed would
control man?s life in the state of nature, rather he describes the State of Nature as pleasant
and peaceful. He described the people in this primitive state as living free, healthy, honest
and happy lives, and felt that man was timid, and would always avoid conflict, rather than
seek it out. ?So why a form of social organization? Rousseau asks? He recognized
simply, that it would be impossible for man to shake the society and return to a state of
nature.
Now for the least popular view of all that just happens to be my favorite, the
anarchist view. Even though I can?t say it is the best view or it would even work, it is the
view that makes me think the most. It is the most optimistic view of all because it simply
states that the ?State of Nature? would be the best state to live in, a state would not be
necessary. Anarchists view that there are no ?rotten apples?. So far as there are ?rotten
apples? in the society, as Rousseau even suggests, this is a creation of the government.
Anarchists propose that governments are a cause of anti-social behavior, even though they
are created in order to remedy it. In the anarchist?s system the anti-social person will be
abandoned, in a sense left out of the cooperative society. In the anarchist?s view, people
become ?perfected? because they become cooperative and non-aggressive. But if there
were ?bad apples? in a state of anarchism, wouldn?t they become a threat to the society if
their anti-social behavior lead to violence? (which comes back to Hobbes? theory of the
State of Nature that would lead to the war of ?all against all?) And it leads to even more
questions of insecurity like: without coercion or authority would people obey the law or
does the threat of punishment work to promote more crime? Would you want to live in a
society where there were no punishments for crimes? Maybe public opinion would be
enough to keep the society in line… It is allot to think about and the arguments go around
in circles forever just because no system works out to be perfect because, their are
arguments for every gap or flaw in every rule or theory.
After I?ve been corrupted by so many different ideas of the ?State of Nature?, It?s
hard to state my own idea of it without repeating someone else. But anyhow, In the ?State
of Nature? I?d think of people as generally being cooperative, and smart enough to try and
keep the peace and order. Sure, people are concerned with their own interests, but they
are rational enough to think of ways for reaching their interests without causing conflict
with others, after all, keeping the peace with people would be a self interest of mine. In
this case you?d ask again, why is government necessary? however, I?m not sure I would
like to try the anarchist?s system just because of uncertainties of mine about the ?State of
Nature?. We?ve never been in the ?State of Nature? so it would be scary to simply ?try it
out?.
Другие работы по теме:
Locke And Equality Essay Research Paper First
Locke And Equality Essay, Research Paper First of all,the basis for understanding Locke is that he sees all people as having natural God given rights. As God’s creations, this denotes a certain equality.
Romantics Vs Realists Essay Research Paper Views
Romantics Vs Realists Essay, Research Paper Views of Nature Romantics verse Realists and Naturalists have different views of nature. In this essay I will portray how Romantics see nature, and then how Realists and Naturalists together see nature. It will show how Romantics had a deepened appreciation of the beauties of nature.
State Of Nature Essay Research Paper If
State Of Nature Essay, Research Paper If human beings lived in a state of nature they would be free. Free from any form of government. Free from people telling them how to live and how to do their job. These people would have no boss or parents to deal with. Ideally this would be the kind of environment that people would like to live in.
Freedom Essay Research Paper State of Nature
Freedom Essay, Research Paper State of Nature To trigger off any philosophy on what should be the characteristics of the state we must first imagine living in a state of nature (living with the lack of a state). Since we cannot trace back to any time that we’ve been without government, we must imagine what it would be like in a state of nature.
Where I Lived
&What I Lived For–Thoreau Essay, Research Paper In ?Where I Lived & What I Lived For,? Thoreau?s response towards nature is of admiration and value. His respect for nature is almost religious. This is depicted in the way he describes his love and adoration for nature.
Ovid Essay Research Paper OVID
Ovid Essay, Research Paper OVID ‘n KAFKA:METAMORPH Nature controls people’s emotions and causes tragic disruptions in nature. Money and emotions control each individual. Besides the fact all the great pleasures of life money, nature and emotions can bring in people, they can also expose callowness greed and extirpate all common good on the face of the earth.
Locke Essay Research Paper In the Second
Locke Essay, Research Paper In the Second Treatise of Government, Locke explains different ways in which human beings can live together. He suggests there are two ways and he describes them as “the state of nature” and “civil (or political) society.” “Civil Society” can exist in many forms although there is only one “state of nature.” The determination of the best form of government is dependent on the recognition of these two types of societies.
Transcendentalism Essay Research Paper I believe in
Transcendentalism Essay, Research Paper I believe in the mystical idea of transcendentalism, but I do not consider myself a full transcendentalist because I also have faith in logic and reason. I feel that I have the characteristics of being a transcendentalist, such as being one with nature and being self-reliant.
Debate Over Man Being Inherently Good Or
Evil Essay, Research Paper The debate over man being inherently good or evil is a debate which has raged since the beginning of time. Rousseau and William Golding do not shy away from taking a stance on the subject. But while Rousseau believes “nothing can be more gentle than man in his primitive state,” Golding’s believes quite the opposite.
Human Nature Essay Research Paper My belief
Human Nature Essay, Research Paper My belief about human nature is best summarized by the thoughts of Fr. Montaigne. I think that the idea that man is a hypocritical and contradictory is
Nature Essay Research Paper In the essay
Nature Essay, Research Paper In the essay “Nature” by Ralph Waldo Emerson, he talks about the wonders of nature that are commonly overlooked by man. He sees these wonders every day and is desensitized to them. Emerson tells how the same things that we think as normal amaze a child. The first time children experience something they are dumbfounded, as we should be, yet nature stays overlooked.
The State Essay Research Paper The state
The State Essay, Research Paper The state is like God, some believe that it?s the all mighty powerful being that controls all and others just think it?s a big overblown idea. The idea of the state (and God) is fairly confusing but rarely ever challenged, except by those rare few who seem to form their own opinions.
Famous People And Their Philosophies Essay Research
Paper 1. Thomas Hobbes - State of Nature- The state of nature is war. There are no morals in the state of nature, justice is non-existent. He claims that the supreme power determines justice, in a state of nature, there is no power.
Leviathan By Hobbes Essay Research Paper Thomas
Leviathan By Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes in his book Leviathan, during the course of his argument about the social contract we make to surrender our rights of nature a sovereign in
The Nature Of Love Essay Research Paper
the nature of love is essentially the nature of man. The nature of love is multidimensional,universal, all encompassing, natural. Unobstructed, love is a natural state, the natural state. Let me give a little background here…
Locke And Hobbes Essay Research Paper Hobbes
Locke And Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Hobbes point of view on human nature and how a government should be run is a more realistic way of looking at things than John Locke?s theory. Both Hobbes and Locke see human nature differently, Hobbes sees people as being run by selfishness whereas Locke says that people are naturally kind.
Locke VsHobbes Essay Research Paper Locke versus
Locke Vs.Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Locke versus Hobbes Locke and Hobbes were both social contract theorists, and both natural law theorists, but there the resemblance ends. All other natural law theorists assumed that man was by nature a social animal. Hobbes assumed otherwise, thus his conclusions are strikingly different from those of other natural law theorists.
Thomas 2
Thomas & Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, a mathematician, and John Locke, a philosopher both had great ideas on human society. Hobbes had a more pessamistic outlook on on human nature. Locke saw men living in a state of nature which was basically reasonable an cooperative. In my opinion hobbes ideas on human nature as being competitive prove more true.
Poem My Journey Essay Research Paper My
Poem: My Journey Essay, Research Paper My Journey My journey through Nature’s community, A community of green Aging giants of nature. Standing in brown dead needles,
Impressionism And Postimpressionism Essay Research Paper Impressionism
Impressionism And Postimpressionism Essay, Research Paper Impressionism was a form of art in the late nineteenth century that used luminosity, subtlety of tone and preoccupation with sensation. The impressionist subject matter preserved the romantic fascination with nature and the realist preoccupation with late century French society.
Locke Essay Research Paper There were many
Locke Essay, Research Paper There were many philosophers throughout the Enlightenment period. Some of these great thinkers shared similar views on related ideas, others differed completely. I
John Locke 4 Essay Research Paper John
John Locke 4 Essay, Research Paper John Locke embraced many ideas Hobbes presented in his theories on the state of nature and the rise of government and society. They differed however, in that Locke believed that God was the prime factor in politics. He believed that individuals were born with certain natural rights given not by government or society, but by God.
Miller Spring Essay Essay Research Paper Miller
Miller Spring Essay Essay, Research Paper Miller Springs Essay My science class and I went to Miller Springs to learn about sediments and nature a few days ago. The good and bad sides of the trip I will explain below.
Rousseau Origin Of Inequality Essay Research Paper
The Origin of Inequality In Rousseau s Discourse on the Origin of Inequalities , Rousseau tries to explain the birth and evolution of inequality between humans dating back to savage man in the pure state of nature. Rousseau proposes that it was not man that progressed toward inequality as much as it was the state of nature itself.
Jim Morrison Essay Research Paper Jim MorrisonAmerican
Jim Morrison Essay, Research Paper Jim Morrison*****American singer and songwriter, born in Melbourne, Florida, and educated at the University of California at Los Angeles. In 1966, he formed a group called the Doors with Ray Manzarek, John Densmore, and Robbie Krieger. The group became known for its extravagant performing style, combining sensual movements and a hard-hitting sound, amplified to huge proportions.
Mother Nature Essay Research Paper Nature has
Mother Nature Essay, Research Paper Nature has a certain presence or spirit. It s an almost indescribable feeling just to go out to the middle of the sea or into a forest and just sit there in awe of its beauty. Nature has a certain mystique and mystery to it that draws people to it. Nature, described as mysterious and secretive, is a recurrent theme throughout many stories.
Laws
– Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Laws. We all must obey them, but why? For fear of going to jail, or being fined? Those are the individual effects of civil disobedience, but what happens what is the purpose of law in society? Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all attempted to interpret the need for laws in society, in order to maintain the good of the whole and the individual.
Mavis Gallant
’s Bernadette Essay, Research Paper Mavis Gallant’s Bernadette Fear, it has a way of controlling everything that it comes in contact with. As young children we are introduced to this intimidating desire with intrigue
Federalism Essay Research Paper The Change of
Federalism Essay, Research Paper The Change of Federalism Federalism is derived from the meaning of federal; which is defined as: pertaining to the nature of a union of states under a central government distinct from the individual governments of the separate states. What this explanation means in everyday terms is that, federalism consists of the national government, the state government and the local government all having one central body of government.
Hobbes Locke Rousseau Essay Research Paper Thomas
Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, all became three of the most influential political theorists in the world.
Human Nature Essay Research Paper Human NatureThere
Human Nature Essay, Research Paper Human Nature There is no perfect person in the world, but the celestial and most sacred person has their faults. But my belief is that everyone was born free of sin, because of course, when you’re a baby, you don’t do anything wrong. But I believe that humans aren’t essentially good or bad, but rather, both.