Federalist Vs. Anti-Federalist Essay, Research Paper
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalist: The Constitutional Debate
The road to accepting the Constitution of the United
States was neither easy nor predetermined. In fact during
and after its drafting a wide-ranging debate was held
between those who supported the Constitution, the
Federalists, and those who were against it, the
Anti-Federalists. The basis of this debate regarded the
kind of government the Constitution was proposing, a
centralized republic. Included in the debate over a
centralized government were issues concerning the affect the
Constitution would have on state power, the power of the
different branches of government that the Constitution would
create, and the issue of a standing army.
One of the most important concerns of the
Anti-Federalists was that the new form of government would
strip the states of their own power. The Anti-Federalists
feared that by combining the previously independent states
under one government that, “…the states, once sovereign,
would retain but a shadow of their former power…”(Main
120). The Anti-Federalist claimed that if the sovereignty
of the states was to be maintained then the states must be
granted the vital powers of government and the power of
Congress limited. However, they claimed that this was not
so under the Constitution. The Constitution gave Congress
unlimited power and did not explicitly detail any control
that the states would be able to exercise over the Federal
government. The Anti-Federalists stated that since both the
state and Federal government would frequently legislate on
the same matters, if a conflict among their decisions arose
the Federal government would win out because of its
connection to the Supreme Court (Main 124). They feared
that “the result of (this connection) might be eventual
abolition of the state governments”(Main 124).
In Federalist Paper No. 46, James Madison addresses
these concerns about the well being of the state governments
under the Constitution. Madison argues that the interests
of the states will not be lost in Congress, because the
loyalty of the legislator will be first to the people of his
district and then secondly to the benefit of the whole
country. Madison says that the “members of the Federal
Legislature will be likely to attach themselves too much to
local objects”(Madison 239). Madison tried to alleviate the
concerns of the Anti-Federalist concerning what type of
recourse the states would have against Federal legislation
by saying that the states would have powerful means of
opposition to any unfavorable or unwarranted legislation.
The powerful means of opposition Madison talks about is the
displeasure of the people, whom Madison believes to be the
fountain from which the Federal government draws its power.
The second major concern of the Anti-Federalists was the
power of Congress. It worried the Anti-Federalists a great
deal that the Constitution would grant Congress the power to
tax in “necessary and proper” circumstances (Main 122). Not
only could Congress pass new taxes without the consent of
the people or state governments, the Anti-Federalist also
felt that the Congress would have control over the judiciary
branch. If Congress had influence over the judicial system,
what recourse would the state have against unfair
legislation? The executive’s ability to veto also
displeased the Anti-Federalist, for they feared that such
power was too reminiscent of a monarchy. The
Anti-Federalists debated with the Federalists about the
duration of the terms that Congressmen would have. They
believed that the elections should be held annually, as to
keep the legislators in touch with their constituents. The
Constitution, instead, called for House representatives to
be elected every two years and for Senators to have a term
of six years.
The Federalist answer to these concerns was a system of
checks and balances. Whereas the Anti-Federalists saw all
branches of government working in accordance with each
other, the Federalists believed that the different branches
of government would be able to check the power of each
other. In Federalist Paper No. 51, Madison details why he
thinks the separation of power among three branches will
create checks and balances among those branches. Madison
states that “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition”
(Madison 262). Madison believed that by dividing the power
of the people between two distinct governments and then
subdividing this power among distinct and separate
departments, that a high level of security would be able to
be maintained for the rights of the people (Madison 264).
The Anti-Federalists addressed the issue of a standing army
under the control of the Federal government, they feared
that Congress’ control over both taxes and a standing army
could result in an oppression of the people. This also
factored into the debate over state power, because it was
obvious that the state militias would be no match for the
federal army, if it decided to encroach into the state.
Anti-Federalist John Smilie declared that, “…In a free
Government there never will be Need of standing Armies, for
it depends on the Confidence of the People. If it does not
so depend, it is not free…” (Main 147).
Madison contradicts the arguments of the Anti-Federalist
concerning this issue in Federalist Paper No. 46. He points
out two reasons that the states need not worry about a
standing army. His first argument is that it would be
incredibly unlikely that the people would consistently elect
traitors that would, “…pursue some fixed plan for the
extension of the military establishment…”(Madison 241).
Secondly, Madison points out that Americans are armed and
that the states control of militias will, “…form a barrier
against the enterprizes of ambition…”(Madison 242). Again
in this argument Madison goes back to his belief that the
Federal government is unlikely to become oppressive because
the people grant its power.
Both the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists believed
strongly in their convictions about the Constitution.
However, in the end, it was the Federalists who won, and the
Constitution was ratified. Looking back in hindsight, it is
easy to see that both groups were right. The Constitution
created a government that has, for the most part, protected
the rights and freedom of its people, but there have also
been moments in American history where the fears of the
Anti-Federalists were realized and corruption was found in
the government. Admiration is felt for both of these
groups, because their debates over that fledgling government
gave rise to a strong Constitution and a strong
representative republic.
Evers 5
342
Другие работы по теме:
Marbury Vs Madison Essay Research Paper Under
Marbury Vs Madison Essay, Research Paper Under the administrations of Washington and his successor, John Adams, only members of the ruling Federalist Party were allowed to be on the bench, and under the Constitution, they held office for life during “good behavior.” So when the Republicans won the election of 1800, the Jeffersonians found out that even though they controlled the presidency and Congress, the Federalists still had control of the judiciary.
AnitFederalism Essay Research Paper Perhaps the greatest
Anit-Federalism Essay, Research Paper Perhaps the greatest document of all time, the Constitution of the United States of America was not easily created. Fifty-five great men were needed to hammer out all the details of the Constitution in a long grueling process. As James Madison, architect of the constitution said, ?The [writing of the Constitution] formed a task more difficult than can be well conceived by those who were not concerned in the execution of it.
Whigs V Federalists Essay Research Paper Although
Whigs V. Federalists Essay, Research Paper Although historically represented as distinct parties, the Federalists and the Whigs in fact shared a common political ideology, represented many of the
Federalist Party Essay Research Paper
“Seldom in the nation’s history has there been a period so extraordinary in accomplishment as the first decade under the Constitution….” This paper is going to be a step by step evaluation of arguably the most important decade in American History. The time period covered in this paper is 1789-1801. These are the years in which the Federalists had the most influence in the new government.
Federalists Vs Antifederalists Essay Research Paper Federalists
Federalists Vs. Antifederalists Essay, Research Paper Federalists vs. Antifederalists To amend the Articles of Confederation, unanimous approval by all thirteen colonies was a necessity. Instead of reforming the preexisting document, it was decided that once approved by nine states, a newly written document would become the supreme law of the land.
Untitled Essay Research Paper Essay on Jefferson
Untitled Essay, Research Paper Essay on Jefferson Jefferson had destroyed political traditions. From his contradictions and defecting his priciples, Jefferson destroyed the political precedent and is a exemplatory hypocrite, which can be seen throughout his administration. Jefferson was an admired statesman who was grappling unsuccessfully with the moral issue of slavery.
Benefits Of Federalists Essay Research Paper Benefits
Benefits Of Federalists Essay, Research Paper Benefits of Federalists It is beneficial that Federalists had the most power in the American government for a time before the Republicans gained power. During the Federalist s rule they were successful in creating foundations that allowed others to build upon, but not radically change, the progress of the nation.
Lawgrtt Essay Research Paper The Constitution of
Lawgrtt Essay, Research Paper The Constitution of the United States and Madison’s Federalist Paper 51 draw upon the philosophy of John Locke, as expressed in his Second Treatise of Government. Madison and the framers of the Constitution looked to Locke’s ideas for justification and guidance. The Preamble of the Constitution reflects the intentions of its authors and shows the influence of Locke’s ideas.
John Quincy Adams Essay Research Paper John
John Quincy Adams Essay, Research Paper John Quincy Adams was a major influence in the history of the United States. John Quincy took part in more important events, and held more important positions than any person in United States history. Some of the important positions he held were he was American Ministers to four different European Countries (Hague, Prussia, Russia and England), a State Senator representing Massachusetts, peace negotiator to England, a member of the House of Representatives, Secretary of the State, and President of the United States.
The Regan Ruth Essay Research Paper The
The Regan Ruth Essay, Research Paper The American Revolution, arguably the most significant era in United States history, is what is mainly responsible in shaping our country into what the strong nation it
How The United States Government Does Not
Truly Reflect A Federalist System Essay, Research Paper I believe that the United States Constitution does not truly reflect a federalist system. In fact, I believe that the federalist system, in which states have
Federalist Papers Essay Research Paper 1 The
Federalist Papers Essay, Research Paper 1. The Federalist #10, Madison’s problems with factions. According to Madison, a faction is a number of citizens, whether a majority or a minority of the whole, who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community.
House Of Representatives Essay Research Paper The
House Of Representatives Essay, Research Paper The House of Representatives One of the biggest disagreements between the federalist and the anti-federalist was the issue of the separation of powers, that the executive, judicial, and legislative branches should be separate and distinct. The anti-federalists were afraid that the mixing of the powers would enable the government to hold all of the power and trample on the rights of the individual.
Federalist Policies Essay Research Paper After the
Federalist Policies Essay, Research Paper After the establishment of the constitution, the Federalist administrations faces many significant challenges when dealing with the economics of the United States; much of the country was divided over issues such as how to raise money, establishing a public credit system, how to pay the national debt, and whether or not a national bank should be established.
Characterization Of Democratic Republicans Essay Research Paper
The Democratic Republicans were almost always characterized as believing in following the strict construction of the constitution. They were opposed to the loose interpretation the Federalists used. The presidencies of Jefferson and Madison proved this characterization to be somewhat accurate. It is true that both Jefferson and Madison supported the ideas of the Democratic Rebublicans but, they also did many things that contradicted them.
A Definite Difference Of Opinions Essay Research
Paper During the development of the young country of the United States of America, everyone had the ability to include their opinions on any subject. But many times, only a few voices were actually listened
AntiFederalists Essay Research Paper AntiFederalists were people
Anti-Federalists Essay, Research Paper Anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the Constitution. They believed strongly that the Constitution would not be able toe maintain a system of republican government because the Federalists were proposing a government that was the opposite of what they believed in.
AntiFederalists Vs Federalists Essay Research Paper Essay
Anti-Federalists Vs. Federalists Essay, Research Paper Essay Question # 7: Federalists v. Anti-Federalists The Constitution of the United States is the system of fundamental laws of the United States of America. The Constitution was drawn up by 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia during the summer of 1787 and ratified by the states in 1788.
Federalists Vs AntiFederalists And Their Common Arguments
Essay, Research Paper Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists, and Their Common Arguments The Constitution, when first introduced, set the stage for much controversy in the United States. The two major parties in this battle were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, such as James Madison, were in favor of ratifying the Constitution.
Comparing And Contrasting Federalists And Antifederalists Essay
, Research Paper 1. The federalist and anti-federalists were very different in the opinions they shared on how the government should be run. The Federalists had very high class and social men while the Anti-federalists had farmers. The Federalists wanted a republican government with a strong executive branch, while the Anti-Federalists wanted a participatory democracy with a minimum executive branch.
Federalists Vs Jeffersonian Republicans Essay Research Paper
The Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans held opposing views on many issues. The Federalists, who included Hamilton and Adams, and the Republicans, who included Jefferson and Madison, had contrasting ideas and beliefs. Four of these issues were their idea of who should rule the government, the power of the government, national debt, and banks.
Devolution Essay Research Paper President Ronald Reagan
Devolution Essay, Research Paper President Ronald Reagan was in his sixth year of office in 1985 when the Supreme Court held 5-4, and against a previous 1976 decision, that federal minimum wage standards covered public transportation workers. The case was Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit, and it once again confirmed the power of the federal government to regulate the states.
Governmental Parties Essay Research Paper The Federalist
Governmental Parties Essay, Research Paper The Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties fought for control over the government in the early 1800s. Although these two parties had great differences, they each had many supporters.
Differences In The Whig And Federalist Parties
Essay, Research Paper I believe that the Whigs and Federalists, although historically represented as distinct parties, in fact shared common political ideology, represented many of the same interest groups and proposed similar programs and policies. Although there were some differences.
US Constitution Ratification Debates Essay Research Paper
On September 28, 1787, after three days of bitter debate, the Confederation Congress sent the Constitution to the states with neither an endorsement nor a condemnation. This action, a compromise engineered by Federalist members, disposed of the argument that the convention had exceeded its mandate; in the tacit opinion of Congress, the Constitution was validly before the people.
Did The Federalists Believe In Democracy Essay
, Research Paper The idea of democracy is both vague and is often over-simplified to mean majority rules . In theory, such a notion sounds both just and efficient. However, in practice, the concept of majority rules is much more complex and often difficult to implement. Modern-day versions of democracy, such as the one utilized in the United States, simply guarantees a person s right to voice his or her opinion in all matters involving the public.
Federalist Paper
#51 Essay, Research Paper Federalist Paper #51 I believe there should be a Constitutional Convention because many of us find the government structure defective. The only answer that can be given is that as all these exterior provisions are found to be inadequate the defect must be supplied, by so contriving the interior structure of the government as that its several constituent parts may, by their mutual relations, be the means of keeping each other in their proper places.”
Federalist NoS 10 51 By James
Madison Essay, Research Paper The Federalist No.?s 10 and 51 The Federalist, No. 10, by James Madison is a clear expression of views and policies for a new government. Madison was a strong supporter and member of the Federalists whose main beliefs favored the Constitution. They also believed that the Articles of Confederation needed to be rewritten so that a new central government would control the power of the states.
Federalists Vs Anti Federalists Essay Research Paper
Federalists vs Anti Federalists The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists When the revolutionary war was over, the American colonists had found themselves free of British domination. Due to the fact that they were free
Articles Of Confed V The Constitution Essay
, Research Paper The Great Debate After the ratification of the Articles of Confederation, many problems arose due to its weaknesses. This form of government was created to unite the states under one law, and was intended to strengthen patriotism as well as the economy. Ironically, it had the opposite effect- economic and social depression spread throughout the country.
Exploration Essay Research Paper Ratificating the constitutionThe
Exploration Essay, Research Paper Ratificating the constitution The US Constitution was written and ratified in 1787. It is over 200 years old. People think that this document has always been honored, but this is not true. There were many people who supported this Constitution who they were called the Federalists and people who opposed it who were called the Antifederalists.
The Alien And Sedition Acts Essay Research
Paper The Alien and Sedition Acts were four laws passed in 1798. The Naturalization Act raised the number of years of United States residency required for naturalization from 5 to 14. The Alien Act empowered the president to arrest and deport aliens considered dangerous. The Alien Enemies Act provided for the deportation of subjects of foreign powers at war with the United States.
Bill Of Rights Essay Research Paper The
Bill Of Rights Essay, Research Paper The Bill of Righs was written for the American people for two reasons. The first was to pacify the Anti-Federalist’s fears of an overwhelmingly powerful central government provided by the Constitution and the second was, in fact, to protect the freedoms secured by the Americans after their war for independence.