12 Angry Men Essay, Research Paper
Social Psychology
The movie 12 Angry Men gives us an inside look at our system of justice at work. It portrays the roles of our peers in deciding our fate after a trial. In the movie, we see twelve men from very different backgrounds and occupations come together to decide on the guilt or innocence of an eighteen-year-old boy. If he is found guilty, he will be sentenced to the electric chair. Each of the individual jurors can be compared in some way to the subjects we studied in class.
For starters, I noticed one thing in the very beginning of the movie that interested me. The very first vote was taken by a show of hands. Being a Criminal Justice major, I know that the first vote is usually taken by secret ballot, to reduce bias and to increase the chances of honest answers. Nevertheless, the first vote was by an anything but secret show of hands. The part that interested me the most was the vote for guilty. When asked to raise their hands for guilty, some jurors raised theirs right away. However, I began to see some hands that were going up slowly, only after their owners had looked at the other jury members.
This seems to have a resemblance to Asch’s line experiment, in which Asch tested levels of conformity. In Asch’s experiment, subjects were more likely to give the same answer that everyone else gave, even if it was obviously wrong. This seems to explain the behavior of the first vote in the movie. As more and more hands went up for guilty, jurors who had not yet voted observed those who had, and timidly raised their hands to conform.
The foreman starts off trying his best to do his job. He tries to do what he thinks is right and always asks if the others agree with him. He also seems to be in good spirits. However, at one point in the movie someone remarks on the order in which they were supposed to go, and said it was not important. This seems to upset him, and he suggests that somebody else try running things if they don’t like the way he is doing it. At the end of the ensuing argument, he sits down and looks away. When Henry Fonda asks to explain something, he says “Brother I don’t care what you do.”
One thing worth noting about the foreman is that he says that he is a football coach. Coaches aren’t usually used to having their methods questioned. They give out instructions to their players, and expect them to be followed. The idea is that he is the expert, and he knows what’s best for the “team” in the long run. But as our studies this semester have shown, experts should sometimes be challenged.
Juror number two, the bank teller, is just the opposite. He is one of the conformists in the original vote. He is a soft-spoken man, and he gets picked on and pushed around a lot. At one point he discusses an incident he had with a coworker, and says he got “really mad and almost said something”. In the jury room too, he has an altercation with somebody when he tries to stand up for himself, the other participant walks away. His response is to mumble “loudmouth” very softly, as if to make sure the other man does not hear. Juror two doesn’t seem to have much self-esteem either, and in our text we find that people who have low self-esteem are more likely to conform, because they fear rejection or punishment from the group.
Lee J. Cobb plays the third juror, who is interested in the “facts”. He seems to be more susceptible to the central, or factual, route to persuasion, rather than the peripheral, or emotional, route. He is unconvinced by the discussion of the others, but does not give a reason why. He begins to talk about kids, and how you can’t teach them anything. We then find out that he has not spoken to his son in 2 years because of a fight they had.
Cobb’s character exhibits how situational factors can influence one’s opinion on matters. He appears to be stereotyping the youth of his time. The case of the boy’s life actually resembles his own, as the boy on trial had been beaten by his father. It is as if by punishing the boy, he can in some way get back at his son.
E.G. Marshall plays the stockbroker with glasses, juror number four. His profession seems to find its way into his dealings with the trial. He is also, like Cobb’s character, more persuaded by the central route. His main argument at first is that the boy said he was at the movies but couldn’t remember what movie he saw or who starred in it. He failed to understand the effects that the situational factors had played. He did not believe that the fact that the boy’s father was lying dead in the next room while he was being questioned had anything to do with it.
However, when juror nine asked him about a movie he saw just three nights earlier, he was unable to accurately recall it. This would seem to suggest the “that could never happen to me” attitude. This idea is popular, but when the situation arises, most people find that they react much differently than they thought they would. The fact that he had never been in that situation before gave him no empathy for the way the boy was feeling.
Juror number five, played by Jack Klugman, grew up in the ghetto. He is extremely offended by the comments of juror number ten about people who grew up in his neighborhood. He suggests that not all people who grow up in the ghetto are bad, and that social status means nothing. He is the combatant to stereotypical thinking. When the discussion of the knife comes into play, he uses his personal knowledge of the way in which people knife-fight to refute the ideas suggested by the prosecuting attorney.
Juror six is a working man; his boss makes all the decisions. Naturally, when his turn comes up to explain why he voted guilty, he uses the ideas that the experts have given. Because his situational factors have never led him to have to make his own decisions, he relies on someone else to do it for him.
This juror is obviously following the Yale Attitude Change Approach. In this case, the man is focusing on the source of the information. Since the source is seemingly an expert, he lends a great deal more credit to the information. However, as we have seen before, experts should be questioned. We should take care not to let someone’s expertise on a subject become the sole reason we believe it.
Jack Worden plays a baseball nut as juror number seven. He is constantly remarking about how long it is taking, and how they should simply vote guilty and get it over with. When the not guilty vote begins to gain more support, he immediately suggests they go to the judge and declare a hung jury. We find out that he has tickets to that night’s baseball game, and wants to get there.
He is constantly frustrated by the discussion, and at one point changes his vote for the sole reason that he is sick of talking about it. He obviously does not take seriously what he is supposed to be doing there. This seems like a poor excuse for deciding someone’s life so quickly, but it is his situational factor.
Henry Fonda plays an architect, and is juror number eight. His job of architect is apparent in the way in which he treats the case. He suggests that something just doesn’t “fit”. He begins to examine every little piece one by one, instead of simply looking at the big picture. As he discredits each fact of the case, he gains more and more support.
Fonda’s character is perhaps the strongest in the movie, as he resists the ever-powerful forces of conformity and peer-pressure. During the first vote eleven jurors have already voted guilty, but Fonda stands his ground and does not give in. He is wary of sending somebody off to die before it has been discussed. He is suggesting that maybe the experts are wrong. Throughout his argument, he constantly says “I’m not saying that’s how it is, I’m just saying it’s possible.”
Number nine is a white haired old man, and he helps Fonda when he rallies for support. Because of his age however, he is also the subject of ageism discrimination. The old man displays empathy for the old man in the trial, saying that he, being old as well, knows how it feels to be unknown. He says the old witness may have convinced himself of something that wasn’t true so that people would listen to him. This suggests one of our basic human needs as social animals, the need to be liked. He is attempting to become a part of the group to which he has no real belonging.
Ed Begley plays the bigot with a cold, juror number ten. This character is the most stereotypical of all, and is the one who remarks about the ghetto. He uses phrases like “they’re all the same” and “you know how those people are”. He suggests that people who grow up in ghettos are trash and are inevitably criminals. He is not only discriminating based on the ghetto aspect, but also suggests ageism as well. “Those kids are all the same.” he says, and refuses to believe that such a person could be innocent.
Begley’s bigoted character exhibits the highest form of stereotyping, the ultimate attribution error, making dispositional attributions about an entire group of people.
Juror eleven is a watchmaker with a foreign accent. Because of his situation, he understands the effects that prejudice can have. He sticks up for the man from the ghetto when the others are discriminating. This is indicative of the idea that birds of a feather flock together. He is stereotyped because of his occupation and his background, because it is said that all Europeans are good watchmakers. This juror is also an example of altruism, feeling a sense of duty and respect for the justice system.
The salesman, juror twelve, is the epitome of conformity. He at first votes guilty with almost all the others, but changes his vote when others start siding with Fonda’s character for not guilty. But that’s not all, when one of the jurors brings up the testimony of the woman who said she saw the boy stab his father, he changes his vote back to guilty. Then, when the idea of the glasses comes out, he changes his vote yet again, to not guilty.
One explanation for his behavior may be his situational factors, namely his job. Being a salesman means having to convince someone that they need something even when they sometimes don’t. To do this, most salesmen simply tell people what they think they want to hear, whether it is true or not. This may be the reason for his oscillation between guilty and not guilty votes.
In sum, there are many different factors that lead us to behave the way we do. Things such as our upbringing, our jobs and ranging as far as to what we had for breakfast may influence the ways we respond to situations. Our system of justice understands this, and that is why the jury of our peers has the number of members that it does. All it takes is one person sometimes to speak out against something in order for others to see the error of their ways. Luckily for the boy in this movie, Henry Fonda’s character was just such a person.
Другие работы по теме:
Phobias Essay Research Paper Do you ever
Phobias Essay, Research Paper Do you ever fear objects, public places, or embarrassment? If so, you may have a certain type of phobia. A phobia is an intense and persistent fear of a specific object, situation, or activity. Three major types of phobias that psychiatrists recognize are simple phobia, agoraphobia, and social phobia.
Social Ills Essay Research Paper Every society
Social Ills Essay, Research Paper Every society of every civilization known to man has had its share of social ills. Even dating back to biblical times people have struggled with an ever-increasing number of hardships. All of which have led to the downfall of its social structure. As we all know, nothing lasts forever, but with the help of strong minds and able bodies, societies can curb their ills and ?clean up their act?.
Bad Temper Essay Research Paper My father
Bad Temper Essay, Research Paper My father Khalid has a very bad temper. First of all at home he yells at everybody specially me. One day when I was taking a shower he knocked the door real hard. In a angry way asked me to get my butt out of the rest room quickly. So I came out of the rest room in a hurry. Another time my mom had made pancakes and omelets.
12 Angry Men Essay Research Paper A
12 Angry Men Essay, Research Paper A persons surroundings can influence him. In “12 Angry Men” by Reginald Rose a young mans life is held by twelve men with contrasting views.
Twelve Angry Men Essay Research Paper In
Twelve Angry Men Essay, Research Paper In the story “Twelve Angry Men”, Reginald Rose shows how making one’s own decisions is one very important aspect in life. He also showed that one’s decisions should
Taking Fate
’s Hand Essay, Research Paper Angry red welts mar the paper Not unlike those that cover my body And those that scar my mind I am my own victim The pen strokes bring me more pain
Twelve Angry Men Essay Research Paper 1
Twelve Angry Men Essay, Research Paper 1. The evidence presented in court was pretty strong. A woman said she saw the boy kill his father from across the train tracks through a window. A man in the apartment below the boys said he heard the boy say ” I am going to kill you, ” and then hear a body hit the ground. After that the man ran to the door and said that he saw the boy running down the stairs.
Beowulf Essay Research Paper 2
Beowulf Essay, Research Paper “Beowulf” Beowulf had a lot of anger in his battles. He used the rush of energy to conquer his most horrid opponents. I will show a few things in these paragraphs. Beowulf’s anger helped in his battles, hurt him in his battles, and fueled him to fight the battles. His anger is a source of winning and losing.
Social Security 2 Essay Research Paper Social
Social Security 2 Essay, Research Paper Social security is very essential for most of today s older Americans. Since it was begun, it has been a sort of protection for retired workers, and for disabled workers. Social Security allows people to live independently and still have their dignity. There are about 150 million workers protected by Social security and more then 44 million people receive Social Security benefits.
12 Angry Men Essay Research Paper Every
12 Angry Men Essay, Research Paper Every man put on trial is considered innocent until proven guilty. In 12 Angry Men this theory can almost be considered false to the jurors involved in this murder case. But one man can be credited with sticking to the innocent until proven guilty theory that most likely saved a man?s life.
Curly
’s Wife–Of Mice And Men Essay, Research Paper Curley s wife in Of Mice and Men is given a fairly one-dimensional portrayal throughout the novella, as her character stays, for the most part, enigmatic. The most obvious example would be her lack of a name. She is continually referred to as a possession of her husband and without a name she becomes almost insignificant.
Archeo Essay Research Paper A Cross Cultural
Archeo Essay, Research Paper A Cross Cultural Perspective of Polygyny As an institution, polygyny, the social arrangement that permits a man to have more than one wife at the same
Poetry A Poison Tree Essay Research Paper
A Poison Tree I was angry with my friend: I told my wrath, my wrath did end. I was angry with my foe: I told it not, my wrath did grow. And I water’d it in fears, Night & morning with my tears;
Social Work Essay Research Paper Social Workers
Social Work Essay, Research Paper Social Workers in the United States have many roles and needs to fill in society. They are seen as the people that nurse the homeless, unemployed, hunger-stricken, and destitute back to life. It is their choice to help those more unfortunate than themselves, and although it is considered a “job”, it is really a way of life.
Twelve Angry Men Essay Research Paper Twelve
Twelve Angry Men Essay, Research Paper Twelve Angry Men This play is about twelve jurors who are to decide the verdict of a 19 year old boy who is accused of killing his father. The jurors go into a room with the foreman to talk about the case and decide on a verdict. The vote has to be unanimous either guilty or not guilty for the case to end.
Social Security Essay Research Paper Social securityThe
Social Security Essay, Research Paper Social security The issue I am addressing today is what to do about social security. There is going to be a large problem with our social security in years to come. Both Al Gore and Bush
12 Angry Men Essay Research Paper English12
12 Angry Men Essay, Research Paper English: 12 angery men essay 2000-07-15 12 Angry Men Paper The jury member I chose to do my paper on was Mr. Davis (the member who voted not guilty first), because he used many task messages, did not allow physical factors to affect his decisions, and was a successful emergent leader at some points in the case.These three points made Mr.
School Essay Research Paper School Where
School Essay, Research Paper School! Where did they come up with that name? I guess because it rhymes with lame Now this rhyme you read will be quite corny Please don’t get upset, mad, or horny
Deviance Essay Research Paper Theories of Deviant
Deviance Essay, Research Paper Theories of Deviant Behavior examines various theories and perspectives on conforming and deviant behavior which are products of Western scholarly thought: anomie, functionalism, social disorganization, social conflict, social control, psychoanalysis, status politics, differential association, labeling theory, etc.
SOCIAL PROBLEMS Essay Research Paper SOCIAL PROBLEMSJOURNALFall
SOCIAL PROBLEMS Essay, Research Paper SOCIAL PROBLEMS JOURNAL Fall 1998 Professor Milton Social Problems Personal Essay 8/27/98 Over 21 years ago I was born in a little town in Iowa. Because of my dad??s work we moved to Illinois. It was there where I spent most of my childhood years, with my dad, mom, two brothers and two sisters.
Journal On Importance Of Being Earnest Essay
, Research Paper In this play, being earnest is made as superficial a trait as possible; it means simply having the name Earnest. The characters are motivated and controlled by a hollow and artificial set of social standards that have little substance but are used to maintain social distinctions and social class privileges.
Greek Gods 2 Essay Research Paper Greek
Greek Gods 2 Essay, Research Paper Greek Gods Zeus is the king of all the gods. Zeus had to kill his father who eats Zeus s brothers and sisters, so that he can free them. He than had to marry his sister Hera. He was not always with Hera, but with mortal women. Hera the wife of Zeus is always jealous of Zeus sneaking of to another women and gets angry all the time.
Echo Essay Research Paper Echo was a
Echo Essay, Research Paper Echo was a nymph who lived in the forest. She romped and played with all of her fellow nymphs. One day she came across a beautifull man named Narcissus. At first she was scared of him, but soon grew quite attached. The gods looked down upon an infatuated Narcissus with disdain. They sentenced him and his new love to horrible fates.
Social Role Essay Research Paper About Its
Social Role Essay, Research Paper About Its Social Role Waxing eloquent about stakeholder management and corporate social responsibility is in some circles the surest way to stifle a business conversation, if not a business career. Corporate philanthropy brings satisfaction to those who give and receive, the argument goes, but let us not get carried away by talk of give-aways.
American Dream Essay Research Paper scribes the
American Dream Essay, Research Paper scribes the defeat of the American dream, and that the American ideals differ with the actual social conditions that exist in society. For the American constitutions stands for the freedom, and equality among people, but the truth of the matter is that social discrimination still exists and the grouping among the classes can never be overcome.
Suicide Essay Research Paper Social Problem Teen
Suicide Essay, Research Paper -Social Problem: Teen Suicide -Social Problem- Any problem that may cause pain and may affect a person?s life. ? Teen Suicide- Intentional and self-inflicted death.
Mythology And Policy Essay Research Paper Mythology
Mythology And Policy Essay, Research Paper Mythology and policy has been a part of human culture for as long as there has been civilization . Day provides us with a history of the beginnings of social welfare. She speaks how social policy as well as social welfare has effected individuals, families, and the larger society of today.
Rise Of Sociology Essay Research Paper The
Rise Of Sociology Essay, Research Paper The Rise of Sociology The field of sociology evolved as a response to the impact of profound social and political fragmentation experienced in the West. A fundamental shift in both social and intellectual patterns created by the economic evolution of the eighteenth century led to great concern among scholars of the period.
Social Realism Essay Research Paper Social Realism
Social Realism Essay, Research Paper Social Realism In Art Social realism, in art, describes both a specific stylistic approach and an overall attitude toward the subject. Social realism aims toward the not so lovely part of life. Its goal is not to amuse but to show the observer the evils of poverty , immorality and war.
Social Darwinism Essay Research Paper Social DarwinismSocial
Social Darwinism Essay, Research Paper Social Darwinism Social Darwinism was a late nineteenth-century social theory that was based on the theories of evolution of scientist Charles Darwin. The ideas and behind Social Darwinism came directly from his theories of evolution and, ?survival of the fittest.? The theory was used to explain how the economic growth of America was coming along.
Medicare Essay Research Paper How To Fix
Medicare Essay, Research Paper How To Fix Medicare Is The Greatest Challenge. This Issue Is A Very Important One That Will Eventually Come Under Fire As We Approach That Year 2001 When Medicare Is Projected To Go Bankrupt. This Issue Might Not Be Resolved And We Could Be Seeing The End Of Medicare. I This Issue Will Get Solved Some How The Taxpayers Will Pay Medicare Out Of Trouble.