Paper
Hobbes state of war is the basis for his philosophical discourse on human nature. Where Rousseau says that man is compassionate and good to others in his nature, Hobbes argues that man is only out for himself.
When the point comes where two men want the same thing, they become enemies of each other. Since men often want the same things, they will try to take whatever they can get from each other. Therefore, any man s possession is not safe as long as someone else wants it. From this comes the constant state of war of everyone wanting what another possesses. With no government instituted every man is against the other with no median in which to protect anyone. Because everyone is against the other in war, there is no right or wrong, or any basis for these. There is no justice or injustice because these come from laws, and there is no government.
Rousseau would then argue that men come to peace and work together instead of against each other because it is good for them, and wouldn t like to see another man hurt. Hobbes says that man comes to an agreement of peace purely on fear. Man realizes that each person has the ability to kill the other, and therefore wants to be protected; so they declare peace to not kill one another. Whereas Rousseau says that man comes to peace because each cares about the next, Hobbes says that it occurs because it is in the best interest of a person for personal gain.
The difference between Rousseau and Hobbes is the factor of sympathy. Rousseau would argue that man would help another man who was injured because he would feel bad and want to help him. Hobbes would say that the only reason a man would help another if he were to get a reward for the deed. If a man is hurt, then one could possibly become hurt in the same way if he helped him, so why should he?
In the same way, Rousseau would say that if a man s neighbor needed food, he would give it to him because he was compassionate for the man and sympathized with him. Hobbes would say that man would be thinking the question in his head, What will I get in return, and is it worth me doing it? If it is not, then man will not help his neighbor and give food. Even acts of kindness such as charity; Hobbes would say that they are done because they make the individual feel good for doing something else, or it allows for others to look upon that person with esteem. Both the former and the latter are personal benefits.
Rousseau believes that in order for peace and order to be in a society, compassion and natural kindness for others are essential. Man has these natural qualities and therefore is able to live in peace. Hobbes argues that man doesn t care that he is living in peace per se, but simply realizes that it is beneficial to him to live in a way that he can benefit from others. War is harmful to the individual, so it is necessary for government to keep order among people for everyone s individual interest. Therefore, since only self-interest is wanted, the natural state of man is war.
Rousseau claims that there are no new forces in man, just old ones, and old ones that change into new ones. If man changes states, for instance, from the state of nature to a civil state, there isn t a change in forces at work among man, but a change in the old force. It is a redirected force because care has changed from the individual to the whole.
When man chooses to become a society, there is a sovereign leader and the rest of society. The whole civil state can be seen as a body that needs each part to work properly and work together. The body can live without it s ear, but it causes problems when it must cut off one of its parts, or when a part conflicts with another. Therefore, for each individual to live as a part of this body, he must redirect his thinking from being purely of his own needs, to those of the group.
An individual, when in the state of nature, bases his actions on personal instinct. These actions are amorally selfish because he has no other reason to act in any other way, but to better himself. He eventually realizes that he must live together with others because it is most beneficial to him and that coincides with his instincts. But upon entering the civil state, he must worry about acting properly in it. To act properly, he must worry about the rights, needs, problems, and attributes of other individuals in order to sustain the rest of the body.
Since man must now worry about everyone else, that is not natural; only self-interest is a natural instinctual thought. Instinct is then replaced with reason in order to cope with the needs of others as well as his own. Reason must try to take into consideration what actions are good for the whole, not just the immediate positive effects onto man himself. But the advantages to the jump into reason are that his faculties are exercised and developed, his ideas broadened, his feelings are ennobled, (and) his entire soul is elevated . (Rousseau 153). Man becomes smarter through reason as he moves away from his state of nature.
As in the state of nature, there was no right or wrong, but simply beneficial to oneself, or harmful. It made man happy if he did the right thing, and unhappy if he did the wrong. Instinct told him to do the right thing. In the body of a civil society, there is no one action that is good for everyone. Therefore, in order to make the best decisions that will make the most amount of people happy, reason must be used. Out of reason comes certain laws and norms that face man when in the presence of a civil state. Things that are considered good for the civil state as a body are considered just, and the inverse is considered unjust.
So reasoning in accordance with justice that produce moral or immoral decisions, has replaced instinct in the state of nature that had produced amoral decisions. Justice is a redirection of instinct, not a new force. The force of the instinct always existed, but it was transformed to become justice through the transition of nature to the civil state. Justice is not natural to man, and so nothing natural is either moral or immoral, or even looked at in those terms. They are simply actions.
Kant believes that man must use his reason to become mature. He says that so many people accept dogmas and beliefs passed down to them from other people, and don t reason for themselves, but simply accept ideas because they seem okay. Similarly, Rousseau says that one must prescribe(d) to oneself (Rousseau 151) in obedience to the law. Rousseau s argument supports that of Kant s because living in accordance to one s own laws means that you live as a mature human being.
It is much easier to accept someone else s idea or belief then to come up with one for oneself. Therefore it takes courage to get rid of dogmas and doubt all of one s beliefs and build up one s own ideas from them. It is also hard to break down ideas and come up with personal beliefs. It may turn out that a person comes up with the same idea that he started out with, they are two separate things, even though seemingly the same. The former idea as dogma is just any idea; no dogma means more than another. The latter evaluation of the idea is a belief that becomes an argument with backing. It takes courage for one to doubt one s beliefs, but also if the new idea contradicts the norm, it takes courage to stick with it.
Rousseau says that one must prescribe the law for himself. In this he means that one must use his acquired reason to make laws and morals for himself, similarly to how Kant described it. Reason should be well developed and put into use by forming strong beliefs. These beliefs can shape a person, and a person should live by them at all times. The ability to live by one s own beliefs is similar to when Kant talks about courage.
Both men clearly state that beliefs should be determined on an individual basis with no help from anyone else. Once a belief system is obtained, Kant calls it being mature, and Rousseau calls it obedience of one s own law. Kant simply means that one is not using his full capabilities as a grown person if they allow themselves to remain in the dark. Therefore, they become a mature adult when they can come to these ideas. Rousseau visualizes a value and belief system being set up by the person, and then it should be followed with strict obedience.
So Rousseau s sovereignty supports Kant s idea of the Enlightenment. Rousseau is speaking in terms of sovereignty in being able to rule oneself, while Kant is talking about the same thing in a different way: Kant just says that once enlightened, a person is whole, and is able to stand on his own. It may be a safe statement to say that not only does Rousseau support Kant s idea of enlightenment, but that he also has a very similar idea stated differently. Both are based on maturity of knowing oneself, one s beliefs, and using reason as the tool in which to gain this knowledge.
Другие работы по теме:
Comparison Contrast Essay Research Paper When one
Comparison Contrast Essay, Research Paper When one is deciding to purchase new furniture there are many options that one can take. One can buy furniture unassembled and assemble it themselves, or you can buy it pre-assembled. But which way is the most efficient way? I feel that buying pre-assembled furniture is a much more efficient method.
Freedom Essay Research Paper State of Nature
Freedom Essay, Research Paper State of Nature To trigger off any philosophy on what should be the characteristics of the state we must first imagine living in a state of nature (living with the lack of a state). Since we cannot trace back to any time that we’ve been without government, we must imagine what it would be like in a state of nature.
Leviathan
& Lord Of The Flies Essay, Research Paper Hobbes Leviathan & The Lord of the Flies A society is defined as a group of people uniting in a common interest. Even though some people do not always seem to have parallel perspectives, they do share one common interest, which is survival. The survival of man is dependent on man s ability to adapt to their needs and surroundings.
Leviathon Essay Research Paper Thomas Hobbes wrote
Leviathon Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes wrote Leviathan as a testament on how to run a country. In fact, it is very comparable to Machiavelli and his works. Hobbes is a monarchist, and an absolutist as his works reflect. His work came about during political instability, as it was published in 1651. Though his philosophy of the universe is fairly elementary, his views on absolute sovereignty and commonwealths are brilliant.
Hobbes
’ State Of Nature Essay, Research Paper When one examines the maxim of Thomas Hobbes as set forth in Leviathan it becomes obvious that Hobbes believes the nature of man to be bad. According to Hobbes, if we as men were left to exercise our own private judgement regarding our affairs we would most assuredly collapse into a state of war.
Thomas Hobbes Essay Research Paper In 1651
Thomas Hobbes Essay, Research Paper In 1651, Thomas Hobbes published Leviathan, his famous work that detailed his physicalist outlook and his concept of the value of a social contract for a peaceful society and the nature of man. His major belief was that man is a beast that defines his identity through the need to be controlled under some kind of external, oppressive power.
Thomas Hobbes Paper Essay Research Paper Thomas
Thomas Hobbes Paper Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes Paper – What is the difference betweenobligations in foro interno and in foro externo, and when do wehave such obligations? According to Thomas Hobbes, there are certain laws of nature whichexist in the absence of an organized government. These laws are extremelycut throat, and place people in extremely dangerous situations where theirlives are in danger.
Hobbes And Locke Differing Views Essay Research
Paper What justifies the authority of government? Under what conditions is revolution against that government justified? How does Locke’s answer to the previous differ from Hobbes’s? What difference in their “social contract” theories results in that difference? Each of these questions will be addressed in order to further understand the governmental philosophies of the “Dynamic Duo” and their implications.
Bishop Bossuet Thomas Hobbes Essay Research Paper
English Civil War and Glorious Revolution followed the Dutch revolt against Spain as the second of the Western Revolutions that ended absolute monarchy and finally led to democratic representative government. As
Support Of Hobbes Version Of The Social
Contract ( Essay, Research Paper The purpose of this paper is to interpret and support Hobbes’ version of the social contract. I will support Hobbes’ version of the social contract based upon the opinion that it seems logical in that men are, by nature, egocentric. Humans spend their lives looking for what makes them happiest, this includes charity works.
Jon Locke Essay Research Paper 4 John
Jon Locke Essay, Research Paper 4. John Locke was opposed to an absolute monarchy; Hobbes thought they were a good system. John Locke believed that the individual should be responsible for his own justice; Hobbes thought that a society needed an absolute ruler. The differences that appear lye in regard to their thoughts on mankind in general.
Leviathan By Hobbes Essay Research Paper Thomas
Leviathan By Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes in his book Leviathan, during the course of his argument about the social contract we make to surrender our rights of nature a sovereign in
Hobbes The Fool Essay Research Paper A
Hobbes ?The Fool? Essay, Research Paper A covenant is a contracted agreement in which it is trusted that both persons will carry out their responsibility in time. This can be referred to as the keeping of a promise. ?The mutual transferring of right, is that which men call CONTRACT.? This means that when you exchange something in return for something else you are binding yourself to the agreement of the exchange. ?One of the contractors, may deliver the thing contracted for on his part, and leave the other to perform his part at some determinate time after, and in the mean time be trusted; and then the contract on his part, is called PACT or COVENANT.? When a person agrees to do something at a time in the future for someone or to someone they are being trusted to follow through, therefore giving their trusted word, making a promise. ?To promise that which is known to be impossible, is
Thomas Hobbes Essay Research Paper Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher who was lived from 1588-1679. He attended Oxford University where he studied classics. His occupation was a tutor, but he also traveled around Europe to meet with scientists and to study different forms of government. He became interested in why people allowed themselves to be ruled, and what would be the best form of government for England.
Hume Hobbes And Descartes Essay Research Paper
Hume, Hobbes, and Descartes Rene Descartes, Thomas Hobbes and David Hume are well known philosophers of the time. These three men were after the truth. The truth about life. The truth about how one exists. The truth about the world around them. They questioned, thought, and reasoned. This is what they did.
Hobbes Vs Descartes Essay Research Paper The
Hobbes Vs Descartes Essay, Research Paper The question I chose to answer was number 3. Contrast Descartes thoughts of the mind against Hobbes thoughts. The paper will consist of the strengths and weaknesses of Cartesian Dualism. Cartesian Dualism claims the independent existence of a non-physical realm and a physical realm.
Comparison Essay Essay Research Paper Comparison EssayThere
Comparison Essay Essay, Research Paper Comparison Essay There are many different ways to explain the beginning and creation. Genesis and Edith Hamilton?s ?Mythology,? are two of many literary works you can find. Both show how characters were created and formed. They give detailed understanding and examples of creation.
Locke And Hobbes Essay Research Paper Hobbes
Locke And Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Hobbes point of view on human nature and how a government should be run is a more realistic way of looking at things than John Locke?s theory. Both Hobbes and Locke see human nature differently, Hobbes sees people as being run by selfishness whereas Locke says that people are naturally kind.
Locke VsHobbes Essay Research Paper Locke versus
Locke Vs.Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Locke versus Hobbes Locke and Hobbes were both social contract theorists, and both natural law theorists, but there the resemblance ends. All other natural law theorists assumed that man was by nature a social animal. Hobbes assumed otherwise, thus his conclusions are strikingly different from those of other natural law theorists.
Thomas 2
Thomas & Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, a mathematician, and John Locke, a philosopher both had great ideas on human society. Hobbes had a more pessamistic outlook on on human nature. Locke saw men living in a state of nature which was basically reasonable an cooperative. In my opinion hobbes ideas on human nature as being competitive prove more true.
Get In Essay Research Paper Click Here
Get In Essay, Research Paper Click Here If YOU Have Friends! Can’t find the paper you need? Try Collegiate Care Comparing Casablanca to 1984 Charlie Parker at Storyville
Social Contract Theory Essay Research Paper Hobbes
Social Contract Theory Essay, Research Paper Hobbes Social Contract Theory Thomas Hobbes starts his argument by discussing the nature of mankind. One man can be better in something than another man, but in the end their
John Locke 4 Essay Research Paper John
John Locke 4 Essay, Research Paper John Locke embraced many ideas Hobbes presented in his theories on the state of nature and the rise of government and society. They differed however, in that Locke believed that God was the prime factor in politics. He believed that individuals were born with certain natural rights given not by government or society, but by God.
Comparison Essay Essay Research Paper Comparison EssayTwo
Comparison Essay Essay, Research Paper Comparison Essay Two individuals dominate the late night airwaves, Jay Leno and David Letterman. Leno uses a conservative humor and Letterman’s humor is progressive. While the two shows claim to be different, they both follow the same format. Both shows include a ten-minute stand up routine, strange co-hosts and interviews with celebrity guests.
Thomas Hobbes John Locke And Montesquieu Essay
, Research Paper Many men and women had significant impacts on the historical period known as the Enlightenment. Three men that had such an impact on the Enlightenment were Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Montesquieu. Each of these men had different theories and ideas about what type of government there should be.
John Locke And Thomas Hobbes Two Views
Of The Social Contract Essay, Research Paper John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were two English thinkers who contributed their ideas to the Enlightenment. There are a few similarities between these two. They were both English thinkers, and they both lived in the 1600s. Locke and Hobbes both lived through the upheavals in England early in the 17th century.
Thomas Hobbes And Jonh Locke Essay Research
Paper Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are two philosophers who have thought extensively on the subject human nature and conflict in human society. The question that arises from a discussion of these two men is who is more logical? The best way to answer this question is to compare their arguments and to juxtapose their views.
The Philosophies Of John Locke And Thomas
Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were two philosophers with completely different ideas. One tended to be more conservative and prejudice, whilst the other was free of spirit and
Laws
– Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Laws. We all must obey them, but why? For fear of going to jail, or being fined? Those are the individual effects of civil disobedience, but what happens what is the purpose of law in society? Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all attempted to interpret the need for laws in society, in order to maintain the good of the whole and the individual.
Hobbes Vs Locke Essay Research Paper Thomas
Hobbes Vs Locke Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes, and Locke, became two of the most influential political theorists in the world.
Political Theories Of Hobbes And Locke Essay
, Research Paper The Political Theories of Hobbes and Locke In the sixteenth century, the rise of the state and decline of the feudal system brought about the question of authority, whose is absolute, God or man? Should the state have power over its subjects or the subjects over the state? Soon after the theory of sovereignty and the theory of social contract were developed, but even these still drew debate.
Hobbes Locke Rousseau Essay Research Paper Thomas
Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, all became three of the most influential political theorists in the world.
The Political Theories Of Locke And Hobbes
Essay, Research Paper Political Theories of Locke and Hobbes John Locke influenced Western political thought immensely. He lived during the age of political upheaval, the Glorious Revolution. During this time, the Tories and the Whigs, England?s first two political parties, joined together to rid their country of the tyrannical James II and welcomed as their new co-rulers his daughter, Mary, and her Dutch husband, William.