Freedom Essay, Research Paper
State of Nature To trigger off any philosophy on what should be the characteristics of the state we must first imagine living in a state of nature (living with the lack of a state). Since we cannot trace back to any time that we’ve been without government, we must imagine what it would be like in a state of nature. What are people like with the absence of a state? there have been many views in answering this question, therefore there have been many differences in views for what the “ideal” state should be and serve as. A character of a state is described to best remedy for the deficiency of the “State of Nature”, as Hobbes came up with his pessimistic state of nature in which life is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. Hobbes’ view started off when he stated that the first principle of human behavior was egoism, or self-interest, and it was this egoism, that was the root of all social conflict. Although Hobbes stated that all people are roughly equal, still, if someone has more, others have less. The insecurity regarding what you can keep leads to violence. “where there are no restraints on people’s actions, it leads to the war of ‘all against all’” says Hobbes. So, Hobbes is basically saying, any state is better than the state of nature, be glad that the state is there. Even if it is a corrupt state, you will benefit more from the corrupt state than you would from the State of Nature which is completely lawless. However, this vision of society which leaves power out of the hands of the people and leads to criticisms from philosophers such as Locke and Rousseau, who counters Hobbes with their own ideas of the “state of nature”. In Locke’s “State of Nature” the “State of Nature” is ordered by the Laws of Nature, including your Natural Rights to Life, Liberty, and Property. If a man works a piece of land and makes it better and more valuable or useful, it becomes his property. This possession can only be freely contracted away to others, and government. Although Locke said that the political society is the result of agreements made between people living in a “State of Nature”, he says that the state must have permission by a person to enforce the law on him, however if you acquire any property which falls under the jurisdiction of the state, you thereby become a tacit member of that state. Thus, by using the benefits of the state, you have consented to being a member of the state. On a more liberal and appealing philosophy than both Locke and Hobbes, Rousseau maintained that human beings were essentially good and equal in the “State of Nature” but were corrupted by the introduction of property, agriculture, science, and commerce. People entered into a social contract among themselves, establishing governments and educational systems to correct the inequalities brought about by the rise of civilization. All of the differences between Rousseau’s theories when compared to Locke and Hobbes, begin with different interpretations of the state of nature. Since Hobbes had the impression that all people were egoists and were only interested in their own good, he figured it would lead to the war of “all against all”, therefore any government was better than the “state of nature”. Locke believed that most people got along pretty well for the most part by rational intuition, but were always a few “bad apples” in the group that forced others to give up their natural rights in a law system in order to be able to punish the exceptions in the society. Rousseau criticizes Hobbes and Locke by saying that they weren’t really looking at the real “State of Nature”, and that all of the negative qualities of human beings that they had mentioned to be present in the “State of Nature” was in fact, a quality brought on by the state of their time. The Rousseau version of the “State of Nature” differs greatly from Locke, but from Hobbes especially, in that he makes no mention of the constant fear which Hobbes believed would control man’s life in the state of nature, rather he describes the State of Nature as pleasant and peaceful. He described the people in this primitive state as living free, healthy, honest and happy lives, and felt that man was timid, and would always avoid conflict, rather than seek it out. “So why a form of social organization” Rousseau asks? He recognized simply, that it would be impossible for man to shake the society and return to a state of nature. Now for the least popular view of all that just happens to be my favorite, the anarchist view. Even though I can’t say it is the best view or it would even work, it is the view that makes me think the most. It is the most optimistic view of all because it simply states that the “State of Nature” would be the best state to live in, a state would not be necessary. Anarchists view that there are no “rotten apples”. So far as there are “rotten apples” in the society, as Rousseau even suggests, this is a creation of the government. Anarchists propose that governments are a cause of anti-social behavior, even though they are created in order to remedy it. In the anarchist’s system the anti-social person will be abandoned, in a sense left out of the cooperative society. In the anarchist’s view, people become ‘perfected’ because they become cooperative and non-aggressive. But if there were “bad apples” in a state of anarchism, wouldn’t they become a threat to the society if their anti-social behavior lead to violence? (which comes back to Hobbes’ theory of the State of Nature that would lead to the war of “all against all”) And it leads to even more questions of insecurity like: without coercion or authority would people obey the law or does the threat of punishment work to promote more crime? Would you want to live in a society where there were no punishments for crimes? Maybe public opinion would be enough to keep the society in line… It is allot to think about and the arguments go around in circles forever just because no system works out to be perfect because, their are arguments for every gap or flaw in every rule or theory. After I’ve been corrupted by so many different ideas of the “State of Nature”, It’s hard to state my own idea of it without repeating someone else. But anyhow, In the “State of Nature” I’d think of people as generally being cooperative, and smart enough to try and keep the peace and order. Sure, people are concerned with their own interests, but they are rational enough to think of ways for reaching their interests without causing conflict with others, after all, keeping the peace with people would be a self interest of mine. In this case you’d ask again, why is government necessary? however, I’m not sure I would like to try the anarchist’s system just because of uncertainties of mine about the “State of Nature”. We’ve never been in the “State of Nature” so it would be scary to simply “try it out”.
Другие работы по теме:
God Essay Research Paper God is allgood
God Essay, Research Paper ?God is all-good, God is all-powerful, and yet evil exists.? (Mackie, 90) The stated are three premises that are true. Truth lies in the explanation for why evil exists. The origin of sin is the explanation for the evil and suffering that people and nature bring on mankind. Once cannot doubt the existence of God based on principles that He has permitted to exist in mankind.
Church And State Essay Research Paper The
Church And State Essay, Research Paper The issue of church and state has become more important in the 20th century. There are many reasons for this, because in this century people are becoming more outspoken then in earlier centuries. People are now willing to stand up for their beliefs and views, as in the past people weren?t brave enough to stand up and speak up on how they felt.
Romantics Vs Realists Essay Research Paper Views
Romantics Vs Realists Essay, Research Paper Views of Nature Romantics verse Realists and Naturalists have different views of nature. In this essay I will portray how Romantics see nature, and then how Realists and Naturalists together see nature. It will show how Romantics had a deepened appreciation of the beauties of nature.
Freedom Of Religion Essay Research Paper The
?Freedom Of Religion? Essay, Research Paper The price of religion to a human in one of the most important factors in one’s life, as well is their own being. People practice religion for several reasons, throughout the world it is practiced as it being part of their heritage. However many people seek religion for the feeling of security.
State Of Nature Essay Research Paper If
State Of Nature Essay, Research Paper If human beings lived in a state of nature they would be free. Free from any form of government. Free from people telling them how to live and how to do their job. These people would have no boss or parents to deal with. Ideally this would be the kind of environment that people would like to live in.
The American Dream Essay Research Paper Americans
The American Dream Essay, Research Paper Americans have always had a universal dream ranging from marriage to freedom, and of course, money. Some Americans pursue them more diligently than others, while the others just sit and dream.
Where Would I Be Without Freedom Essay
, Research Paper I walk upon the earth and marvel at the ability to let the grass cushion my wandering feet. What if my feet could not wander? What if I were a slave to this rich soil, then where would
Freedom Essay Research Paper As with any
Freedom Essay, Research Paper As with any government, there is the necessity of an economy, or else the government would fail because economy is one of the basic necessities of a government. With a democracy like we have in a country of our size, managing this economy becomes a big problem. One important factor is; In a country based on freedom, how much are we willing to give up to keep the economy stable? None? A little bit? All of it? The answer is not as simple as any of those.
Locke Essay Research Paper In the Second
Locke Essay, Research Paper In the Second Treatise of Government, Locke explains different ways in which human beings can live together. He suggests there are two ways and he describes them as “the state of nature” and “civil (or political) society.” “Civil Society” can exist in many forms although there is only one “state of nature.” The determination of the best form of government is dependent on the recognition of these two types of societies.
Rousseau Essay Research Paper Jean Jacques Rousseau
Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Jean Jacques Rousseau a French philosopher and theorist, has had an effect on societies of in the past by his expression of general will. In the general will freedom and equality are presupposed. Governments of the past and present have had Roussean content. Freedom and equality have presupposed each other by way of the general will and compelled obedience.
Ancient Greece Essay Research Paper Sparta one
Ancient Greece Essay, Research Paper Sparta, one of the powerful city-states, retains this name for good reason. They took over Messenia and used the land wisely, by making a government using the Code of Lycurgus. The Spartan women were given a lot more freedom compared to other Greek city-states; thus, every person provided a part in the development of their city.
Freedom Essay Research Paper English 9
Freedom Essay, Research Paper English 9 – 2January 11 , 1999 What Freedom Means to Me When I think of freedom I think of courage. In order for us to receivefreedom our country has gone through a great deal of courageous fighting towin the battles that most of us take for granted. If our forefathers hadn’tfought we might live in a world where there was a ruler, and we would not beallowed to make up our own minds.
Famous People And Their Philosophies Essay Research
Paper 1. Thomas Hobbes - State of Nature- The state of nature is war. There are no morals in the state of nature, justice is non-existent. He claims that the supreme power determines justice, in a state of nature, there is no power.
Freedom Essay Research Paper Free to me
Freedom Essay, Research Paper Free to me means that you have no restrictions, no laws, and no boundaries controlling you. You can do basically what you want, when you want. If people were to follow my idea of freedom though, the world would be a chaotic place to live.
Freedom Essay Research Paper What Freedom Means
Freedom Essay, Research Paper What Freedom Means to Me Free*dom (noun) First appeared before 12th Century 1 : the quality or state of being free: as a : the absence of necessity, or constraint in choice or action
Handmaid 2 Essay Research Paper freedom mean
Handmaid 2 Essay, Research Paper freedom mean to you? The meaning of freedom is different for each individual. For some it may be the freedom offered to immigrants fleeing torment of their home countries to seek refuge in other countries. To a sixteen-year-old boy, freedom has only one true definition, driver s license.
Freedom Essay Research Paper How can one
Freedom Essay, Research Paper How can one measure the meaning of freedom without understanding the torment of confinement. The dark, unfathomable reaches of a dank pit, the deep, unknown regions of a large tree, even the confines of school, all can be the breach of freedom.
Leviathan By Hobbes Essay Research Paper Thomas
Leviathan By Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes in his book Leviathan, during the course of his argument about the social contract we make to surrender our rights of nature a sovereign in
The Nature Of Love Essay Research Paper
the nature of love is essentially the nature of man. The nature of love is multidimensional,universal, all encompassing, natural. Unobstructed, love is a natural state, the natural state. Let me give a little background here…
Thomas 2
Thomas & Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, a mathematician, and John Locke, a philosopher both had great ideas on human society. Hobbes had a more pessamistic outlook on on human nature. Locke saw men living in a state of nature which was basically reasonable an cooperative. In my opinion hobbes ideas on human nature as being competitive prove more true.
Slavery Essay Research Paper SlaveryWhen I think
Slavery! Essay, Research Paper Slavery! When I think of government, the first type that comes to mind is a democratic government. I am most used to it because I live in, theoretically, a democratic society. So with that, my views are based on a democratic ideal. First, the reason I think people establish governments is so that they can work together as a whole to attain a better life.
Locke In Rousseau
’s Eye Essay, Research Paper The state of nature, as described by Locke, is a state of perfect freedom, a state in which man is completely free, but would Rousseau agree with this? The answer to this question is more complex than it seems. Locke and Rousseau, both great philosophers of their time, have similar ideas, but the similarities between them end at that.
Freedom Today Essay Research Paper Freedom TodayWhat
Freedom Today Essay, Research Paper Freedom Today What exactly is freedom today and how does it affect us? The Oxford English Dictionary defines freedom as ?The state of being able to act without hindrance or restraint, liberty of action? (524). More often than not, people do not take the time to realize all of the freedoms in existence around the world today.
Allen Ginsberg Essay Research Paper What exactly
Allen Ginsberg Essay, Research Paper What exactly does it mean to be American? What are the boundaries of freedom and liberty? Do we have the freedom to speak from the heart? Allen Ginsberg believed so, and he did just that.
Jack Kerouac Essay Research Paper The novel
Jack Kerouac Essay, Research Paper The novel On The Road written by Jack Kerouac is a book that can be read as a quest taken by Sal Paradise who sets out to test the American Dream by trying to pin down its promise of unlimited freedom by following the example of Dean Morairty. In the book ? the road? becomes a symbol of freedom or escape for Sal and his friends.
Mother Nature Essay Research Paper Nature has
Mother Nature Essay, Research Paper Nature has a certain presence or spirit. It s an almost indescribable feeling just to go out to the middle of the sea or into a forest and just sit there in awe of its beauty. Nature has a certain mystique and mystery to it that draws people to it. Nature, described as mysterious and secretive, is a recurrent theme throughout many stories.
Laws
– Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Laws. We all must obey them, but why? For fear of going to jail, or being fined? Those are the individual effects of civil disobedience, but what happens what is the purpose of law in society? Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all attempted to interpret the need for laws in society, in order to maintain the good of the whole and the individual.
Rogers Essay Research Paper Drawing from our
Rogers Essay, Research Paper Drawing from our experiances with formal education , we have come to agree with Rogers to some degree, but also disagree with some of the points that he made concerning freedom in the classroom. There are many components of the theory that would be helpful to the learning process of the student.
Freedom VS Destiny Essay Research Paper People
Freedom VS Destiny Essay, Research Paper People like to believe that they have the freedom to choose what they want to do, however it is quite the opposite. Freedom has its limitations to what people are allowed to do, but predestination has no limits of any kind. Freedom is in fact used to cover up predestination, to keep people content in following absurd rules.
The Enlightenment Writers Essay Research Paper The
The Enlightenment Writers Essay, Research Paper The Enlightenment Writers The central ideas of the Enlightenment writers were similar to, yet very different from, those of the writers of earlier periods. Four major
Hobbes Locke Rousseau Essay Research Paper Thomas
Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, all became three of the most influential political theorists in the world.