’ Guilt In The Apology Essay, Research Paper
A Brief Comment on the Query:
“Is Socrates Guilty As Charged?”
History of Political Thought 47.230 B Mini-Essay for Discussion Group #3
In any case of law, when one is considering truth and justice, one must first look at the validity of the court and of the entity of
authority itself. In Socrates case, the situation is no different. One may be said to be guilty or not of any said crime, but the true
measure of guilt or innocence is only as valid as the court structure to which it is subject to. Therefore, in considering whether Socrates
is ‘guilty or not’, we must keep in mind the societal norms and standards of Athens at the time, and the legitimacy of his accusers and
the validity of the crimes that he allegedly committed. Having said this, we must first look at the affidavit of the trial, what exactly
Socrates was being accused with: “Socrates does injustice and is meddlesome, by investigating the things under the earth and the
heavenly things, and by making the weaker speech the stronger, and by teaching others these same things.”1 In breaking this
charge down, we see that it is two-fold. Firstly, Socrates is charges with impiety, a person who does not believe in the state gods of
Athens and, not only that, but by its literal meaning, does not believe in the authority of gods at all. To this, Socrates seems baffled. He
states that the reason behind the ‘criminal meddling’, the questioning of people’s wisdom, was commissioned to him by the gods through
the Oracle of Delphi. As Socrates said, “…but when god stationed me, as I supposed and assumed, ordering me to live philosophizing and
examining myself and others…that my whole care is to commit no unjust or impious deed.”2He even seems to win a victory over one of
his accusers, Meletus, in questioning this point. As Socrates points out, it is impossible for him to be both atheistic and to believe in
demons, or false gods, for if he believes in the latter, then that would contradict his not believing in gods at all (since even demons are
considered to be at least demi-gods).
The second part of the charge was that Socrates was attacking the very fabric of the Athenian society by corrupting its citizens,
namely the youth. In other words, Meletus and the other accusers are accusing Socrates of a crime of ‘non-conformity’ – instead of
page 2
bowing to those who are held in places of authority and those who have reputations of being wise, Socrates believes that it is his role in
life to question these people in their wisdom, and to expose those who claim that they are knowledgeable and wise, but who really are
not. This nation of questioning the legitimacy of those in power would certainly not be called a ‘crime’ by today’s standards, nor would
it really have in Athenian time. The true nature of this charge was vengeance carried out on the part of the power-holders of Athenian
society: the politicians, poets, manual artisans. Socrates, in effect, made fools out of these people, exposing their speeches are mere
rhetoric than actual wisdom and knowledge. By being a teacher as such, but never collecting any fees and therefore innocent from
profiting from such ventures, he was said to have been corrupting and citizens of Athens into believing that these so-called people of
wisdom were not actually wise at all. As Socrates says, “…and this is what will convict me, if it does convict me: not Meletus of Antyus,
but the envy and slander of the many. This has convicted many other good men too, and I suppose it will also convict me. And there is
no danger that it will stop me.”3 Another point to be made is that Socrates proves that if what he has done has actually been
corrupting society, and could be considered a crime, then he has not caused any harm voluntarily. In any criminal charge, the fact of the
accused’s mens rea, or ‘guilty mind’, would be compulsory to prove on a guilty charge. But Socrates states that, at least for him,
voluntarily corrupting any human being would simply be impossible, “…I am not even cognizant that if I ever do something wretched to
any of my associates, I will risk getting back something bad from him?”4 Although his ‘guilty mind’ was never proved, Socrates does
realize that he will be found guilty of this charge, although he does say that justly this would never have been a criminal charge, but
could have been dealt with
privately, “…and if I corrupt involuntarily, the law is not that you bring me in here for such
page 3
involuntary wrongs, but that you take me aside in private to teach and admonish me…where the law is to bring in those in need of
punishment, not learning.”5 There is one other point that might be raised in questioning the legitimacy of the trial, and that is the
fact that it was carried out in only one day. Socrates says after his verdict has been read that if his trial could have carried on for a
longer period of time, as it might have in other cities such as Sparta, then he might have been able to convince the jury of his innocence.
Alas, Socrates quickly became the victim of the wealthy elites in Athenian society, who did not want their hold on the power and minds
of the rest of society who be tampered with. If justice is to be questioned in the charge of Socrates, then I do think that Socrates should
have been found innocent, since no real crimes were committed. As for a question of the Athenian laws, and the structure of the
Athenian justice system, one could say that Socrates might have dabbled in a bit of treason in a way, since those who he was publicly
making a mockery out of were those who were in positions of authority. But overall, it cannot be denied that Socrates suffered a great
injustice by being found guilty, by being put on trial in the first place. The true substance of the trial was never a criminal matter nor a
strain on democracy, but a challenge to an oppressive and oligarcical ruling class, and Socrates became an symbol of true wisdom and
knowledge, a symbol that needed to be disposed of for the elites to remain the power-holders in society.
List of Works Cited
Plato. “The Apology of Socrates.” West, Thomas G. and West, Grace Starry, eds. Plato and Aristophanes: Four Texts on Socrates.
Itacha, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.
1Plato, “The Apology of Socrates,” Thomas G. West and Grace Starry West, eds., Plato and Aristophanes: Four Texts on Socrates. (Ithaca,
NY: Cornell University Press, 1984), s.19c, p.66.
2Ibid, s.29a/32d, p.80/p.85.
3Ibid, s.28b, p.79.
4Ibid, s.25e, p.75.
5Ibid, s.26a, p.75.
Другие работы по теме:
K Essay Research Paper 2a Why does
K Essay, Research Paper 2.a) Why does the Athenian jury convict Socrates, and why does Socrates maintain his innocence? b) Do you think it was right for Socrates to accept his punishment of death without fleeing, even though he thought he was innocent?
Cicero Vs Socrates Essay Research Paper Socrates
Cicero Vs Socrates Essay, Research Paper Socrates and Marcus Tullius Cicero were both two great philosophers of their time. They both had great intellectual and highly philosophical ideas on many things, but the complexity of their ideas do not generally agree each others. One reason why there may be a distinct difference in belief is simply because Cicero was a Greek and Socrates was a Roman men.
Not Hearing Socrates Essay Research Paper Writing
Not Hearing Socrates Essay, Research Paper Writing and speaking are two very different, yet extremely important activities to any educated person. Socrates, from Phaedrus and Letters VII and VIII, seems to think that spoken word holds great precedence over writing. His explanation of choosing speech over text is two fold.
Why Does Socrates Claim That No Person
Ever Desires What Is Bad? Essay, Research Paper Why Does Socrates claim that no person ever desires what is bad? The arguments to support the claim that Socrates believes that no man ever desires what is bad may be found in the Meno. In this conversation, Socrates and his fellow man Meno are in search of true knowledge (or the form) of virtue.
Socrates Apology Essay Research Paper Socrates made
Socrates Apology Essay, Research Paper Socrates made the correct choice to continue with his “Apology” after he received this guilty verdict. Socrates continued his defense after he received the guilty verdict for several reasons. I think the reasons why he continued his defense are: he wanted to acknowledge the Athenians who voted for his acquittal and guilt, and the jury still had to decide Socrates’ punishment.
Socrates Essay Research Paper Socrates believed in
Socrates Essay, Research Paper Socrates believed in speaking the truth. In his speeches, his true character is revealed. He is an individual, who lived only to spread knowledge. Socrates was humble, knowing that he was no wiser than anyone. In not recording his knowledge, he was able to devote more time to thought.
Was Socrates Wise Or A Wise Guy
Essay, Research Paper Socrates was a unique individual with an unordinary style of living. One main goal everyday for Socrates was to determine wheter or not what the oracle said was true. He would do this by asking questions to individaulas. What he wanted us to know was if he was actually the wises man in Greece.
The Death Of Socrates Essay Research Paper
“Crito, you and other people who claimed to be friends to Socrates are all useless! How could you have been so cowardly, or lazy, or stingy, as to allow you ‘friend’ to die? Surely, with a little courage, energy, and money, you could have saved him.”Those are strong accusations coming from someone who obviously did not know Socrates as well as his other students or me.
Socrates And Thoreau Essay Research Paper The
Socrates And Thoreau Essay, Research Paper The main difference between Socrates and Thoreau was the their views on the relationship between people and government. Socrates believed that the people are work for the government. They are supposed to obey the orders of the government and serve the government to the best of their abilities.
Knowledge Essay Research Paper Intro to PhilKnowledge
Knowledge Essay, Research Paper Intro to Phil Knowledge as Justified True Belief Reprinted from The Collected Dialogues of Plato (1961) edited by Edith Hamilton and Huntington Cairns. Plato (ca. 428 to 348 B.C.) a student of Socrates, teacher of Aristotle and a giant of Western philosophy, best know for his classical theory of ideal forms.
Dialogue Of Plato And Meno Essay Research
Paper Summary of Meno In the “Meno” dialogue, Meno asks Socrates if he knows how virtue is acquired: by nature, or by teaching. Socrates replies that one cannot know how virtue is acquired unless one has a solid definition of ‘virtue.’ Socrates then charges Meno with the task of offering him a sufficient and whole definition of what virtue really is.
The Trial Of Socrates 2 Essay Research
Paper The Trial of Socrates Socrates is certainly not guilty of the crimes he is accused of. He is not corrupting the youth of Athens and he does indeed believe in gods. His manner is uncommon and because of that he is feared by his accusers (Meletus, Anytus, Lycon, et al.). Justice will be miscarried if he is put to death.
Analysis Of A Socratic Dialogue Essay Research
Paper Analysis of a Socratic Dialogue It is known that Socrates has many dialogues that involve a single thought or point of his. This early dialogue, Hippias Minor, is a great example of that. The dialogue goes along very detailed and methodically surrounding one point. It shows us, the readers, a different way to go about understanding Socrates? thought process.
Compare And Contrast Socrates And Krishna Essay
, Research Paper Plato?s Socrates and, The Bhagavad Gita?s Krishna are two very important characters who have strongly impacted the lives of many. These two characters share many similar qualities, as well as many contrasting qualities. In this essay, I will thoroughly compare and contrast these two remarkable characters.
The Apology Essay Research Paper The ApologyIn
The Apology Essay, Research Paper The Apology In The Apology by Plato, Socrates was giving his testimony before he was forced to commit suicide. He was trying to prove that death is better than living without one?s beliefs. He believed that he was innocent, going to a better place, and he was going to die anyway.
Socrates On Democracy Essay Research Paper In
Socrates On Democracy Essay, Research Paper In Plato?s Euthyphro, Crito and the Apology, we learn of Socrates? highly critical view of the democracy. Socrates believed that democracy was a flawed
Socrates Arguments Regarding Moral Conventionalism Essay Research
Paper In assessing the validity of Socrates? arguments regarding moral conventionalism, Plato presents a multitude of premises on which Socrates? argument is based. These premises both support and weaken Socrates? beliefs against Sophist teachings. Using The Crito and The Apology, it is relatively easy to understand Socrates? reasoning in opposing the sophistic position of moral relativism.
Socrates Accepts His Fate Essay Research Paper
Socrates Accepts His Fate Socrates was condemned to death for corrupting the youth of Athens. One of his students, Crito, visited Socrates in prison and tried to convince him to escape. Socrates refused, warranting that laws are meant to be obeyed. Socrates argued by stating that without the laws, he would not be the man he was.
Apology Essay Research Paper Apology PaperSocrates states
Apology Essay, Research Paper Apology Paper Socrates states that the only thing he knows is that he knows nothing. I feel that Socrates is saying that he recognizes the fact that he does not know much. Socrates does not try to pretend that he is this almighty person who pretends that they know things they don t know.
The Apology Of Socrates Essay Research Paper
The Apology of Socrates,by Plato,is an important work of literature. Although written some two-thousand years ago,it shows us how our society is much like the one of Socrates.It shows how the equities and inequities of his time are like the one’s today.In reading the Apology of Socrates,one can learn how consistency can lead to equitableness.
Crito Essay Research Paper While awaiting his
Crito Essay, Research Paper While awaiting his execution in prison, Socrates was confronted by his friend Crito, and given an opportunity to escape. Crito offered a multitude of reasons to support his proposal, however Socrates refused to leave on the basis of four premises:- One must never do wrong, even in return for wrong.- It is wrong to break a just agreement.- The agreement between the laws of Athens and its citizens is just because all citizens are allowed two alternatives to obeying the laws.- Leaving would constitute breaking the agreement.Supported my these four premises, Socrates claimed that escaping from prison would be morally wrong.
Crito Essay Research Paper 1 Crito
Crito Essay, Research Paper 1. Crito’s ArgumentsThe arguments of Crito are centred and clear. He uses simple persuasion to try and convince Socrates to escape. His arguments push the idea that Socrates should attempt escape for the sake of others, namely his children, friends and the many.Crito points out that other men would have no hesitation in escaping, despite their age.
Dialogue Phaedo Death Of Socrates By Phaedo
To Echecrates Essay, Research Paper The dialogue Phaedo is a narration of the death of Socrates by Phaedo to Echecrates. One of the themes in the dialogue Phaedo is Socrates perception of death. He and those who come to visit him on the day of his execution discuss this idea of his. Socrates believes that every philosopher awaits death because it is coupled with being a philosopher.
Socrates Essay Research Paper Socrates arguments that
Socrates Essay, Research Paper Socrates arguments that it would be wrong to escape from prison is as follows. In Critos, Socrates explains to his friend Crito that escaping from prison would go against many of the thins that he (Socrates) believes in; seeking virtue, seeking the truth, not repaying an evil with another evil, obeying the laws of the state and so on.
Plata The Trial And Death Of Socrates
Essay, Research Paper Plato The Trial and Death of Socrates Book 4: Phaedo Socrates is admired for his willingness to explore an argument wherever it would lead as well as having the moral courage to follow its conclusion. Socrates, the master of argumentation, manages to make his points through creative word choices and his eloquent speeches.
The Crito Essay Research Paper The dialogue
The Crito Essay, Research Paper The dialogue of The Crito, by Plato, recounts the last days of Socrates, immediately before his execution was going to take place in Athens. In the dialogue, Socrates friend, Crito, proposes that Socrates escape from prison. Socrates considers this proposal, trying to decide if escaping would be just and morally justified.
Crito Essay Research Paper Crito Days before
Crito Essay, Research Paper Crito Days before the ship arrives in the city of Athens, to take away the life of Socrates, after he has been sentence to death by an unjust jury. Crito one of the closest friends of Socrates tells Socrates to escape and not die because of an unfair cause. Crito also tells Socrates that he has many friends that are willing to sacrifice everything to see him live.
Question Can A Person Perform Evil Acts
Voluntarily? Essay, Research Paper Question: Can a person perform evil acts voluntarily? ?Evil corrupts the evil doer.? ?Is there anyone, then, who wishes to be harmed by those he associates with, rather than to be benefited?? In defending himself against accusations of corruption and evil, Socrates argues in his apology that no person performs evil acts voluntarily.
The Noble Lie Essay Research Paper The
The Noble Lie Essay, Research Paper The Noble Lie In book III, Socrates begins to describe criteria for an ideal city. Socrates begins by describing who should rule this ideal city. He feels that they must choose guardians who have the state s interest at heart, because they see it identical with their own interest.
What Is Piety Essay Research Paper What
What Is Piety Essay, Research Paper What is Piety During the Periclean age (around 400 B.C.) in Athens Greece there was a man named Socrates. He was considered a very wise man by the Athenians. However
Socrates Essay Research Paper Socrates Socrates as
Socrates Essay, Research Paper Socrates Socrates, as known by Renault, was a beautiful creature. Not physically beautiful, but internally and fundamentally beautiful. It was he who said: When you assume the show of any virtue, you open a credit account, which one day you will have to meet or go broke (pp. 398).
Socrates Essay Research Paper An Apology From
Socrates Essay, Research Paper An Apology From Socrates’ The Apology is Socrates’ defense at his trial. As the dialogue begins, Socrates notes that his accusers have cautioned the jury against Socrates’ eloquence, according to Socrates, the difference between him and his accusers is that Socrates speaks the truth.
Antigone Vs Socrates Essay Research Paper Antigone
Antigone Vs. Socrates Essay, Research Paper Antigone vs. Socrates In the plays Antigone and the Crito the two lead characters, Antigone and Socrates, showed completely different ideas regarding their responsibilities to the State. Antigone believes in divine law and does what she thinks that the Gods would want her to do.