Courts Descriminate Essay, Research Paper
Witte
1
In the last ten years, the federal courts have turned away every claim for protection under
the Constitution
made by lesbians and gay men. If lesbians and gay men want protection from
discrimination, the courts said, they
should look to legislatures, governors, city councils — the political branches — not to
the courts.
To a very large extent, the movement for lesbian and gay rights has taken the courts at
their word. The movement
has gone to the political branches for protection against discrimination. And while
lesbians and gay men have not
won every political battle in the past ten years, we have won a fair number. Between
1989 and 1995, eight states
passed laws outlawing discrimination, as did scores and scores of cities. At the urging
of their gay and lesbian
employees, many businesses adopted their own nondiscrimination policies, and many
cities and businesses began
to recognize lesbian and gay relationships.
Colorado’s Amendment 2 is the opposition’s answer to the gay rights movement’s
partial legislative success.
Amendment 2 says the state of Colorado will have two different rules for passing civil
rights laws–the usual one
Witte
2
for most citizens, which lets the legislature or a city council decide who ought to be
protected from discrimination,
and a special rule for lesbians, gay men and bisexuals, which says they can never be
protected.
Amendment 2 is designed, quite simply, to end the political debate about whether
lesbians and gay men should be
protected by civil rights laws for good. The opposition’s answer, since it can not defeat
us every time, is to change
the rules.
In Romer v. Evans, the Supreme Court will decide if Amendment 2 violates the equal
protection clause of the
federal Constitution, as the Colorado Supreme Court said it did. The decision could
potentially affect the lesbian
and gay rights movement in three significant ways.
First, the result itself will be important, of course. The effort to obtain state laws
protecting lesbians and gay men
from discrimination continues. If the U.S. Supreme Court upholds the Colorado
Supreme Court’s decision, we
will be guaranteed the right to ask for the same civil rights protection that any other
group in America can ask for.
If it does not, in Colorado lesbians and gay men alone will be prevented from ever
getting civil rights protection
Witte
3
unless we convince the voters to change the rules again. A decision like that would also
allow other states to
adopt similar changes in the rules for making laws, and in at least a few states,
opponents of the lesbian-gay rights
movement are sure to try to have similar rules changes adopted.
Second, the Court’s reasoning will be important. Our challenge to Amendment 2 makes
two arguments. First, we
say, the federal Constitution guarantees everyone the fundamental right to have an
equal voice in democratic self
government. Everyone should get the same chance to convince a state to adopt any
particular kind of law. That
means that any change in the structure of a state’s government that creates different
rules about how laws can be
passed for different groups of citizens ought to be examined by the courts with deep
suspicion, and should be
upheld only if it is absolutely necessary to achieve some compelling nondiscriminatory
public purpose.
This is the argument the Colorado Supreme Court accepted. If the U.S. Supreme
Court accepts it, it means an
end to the recent rash of anti-gay initiatives that try to change the rules. Moreover, it
would prevent this kind of
device from being used against any other minority in the future (it has been used once
in the past, against
Witte
4
African-Americans in the 1960s).
Our second argument is that the discrimination built into Amendment 2 — that civil
rights laws can be passed to
protect anyone but lesbians and gay men — can not be explained by anything other than
hostility to lesbians and
gay men. Dislike of a group of citizens, we argue, is never a legitimate reason for
treating them differently. This
argument — that dislike is never a “rational basis” for different treatment — has been
developed in the last ten years
as a way of obtaining at least some minimum protection from federal courts that are
unwilling to see government
policies that explicitly discriminate against lesbians and gay men as any more suspicious
than discrimination
between different sized-buildings in zoning regulations.
There are many cases in federal courts now where the issue is the constitutionality of
discriminating against lesbian
and gay Americans because other Americans do not like them. Among them are the
“don’t ask, don’t tell” military
cases, which are likely to reach the Supreme Court in the next year; employment cases;
cases from lesbian and
gay student groups, and anti-gay violence cases, among others. If the Court in Romer
reaches the rational basis
Witte
5
issue, and agrees that hostility is not a legitimate basis for discrimination by
government, the anti-gay policies
involved in all those cases will be much more vulnerable.
Finally, the Court’s tone will be very important. While it is not true that the Court’s
1986 decision in Bowers v.
Hardwick completely explains the unwillingness of the federal courts to protect
lesbians and gay men from
discrimination, it has been a major part of it. In Bowers, the Court took a case about a
law that regulated the
private sexual behavior of everyone and made it into a case about “homosexual
sodomy.” The court’s opinion was
laced with invective and contempt.
The tone was not lost on federal courts, which took Bowers as an answer not just to
privacy questions involving
lesbians and gay men, but as an answer to virtually every constitutional question
involving lesbians and gay men,
implicitly deciding that the court which delivered the opinion in Bowers would be
hostile to any “gay” case. If the
Court in Romer continues to treat lesbians and gay men with the respect it showed last
term in the Hurley case,
that is sure to signal the lower federal courts that at least this part of the Bowers v.
Hardwick era is coming to an
Witte
6
end, that the federal courts are not effectively closed to the constitutional claims of gay
men and lesbians.
Perhaps more important, the tone of Bowers was not lost on the nation. Many
Americans see the Supreme Court
as something of a constitutional conscience for the country. The message of Bowers
was that there is nothing
immoral about raw hostility to lesbians and gay men. If the Court adopts the tone of
Hurley and if it embraces that
basic American notion of a level playing field in politics and upholds the Colorado
Supreme Court, the public
debate about lesbians and gay men is likely to change significantly, and become much
more open to our plea for
equal treatment.
Другие работы по теме:
Judicial Precedent Essay Research Paper ESSAY a
Judicial Precedent Essay, Research Paper ESSAY: a) Explain and illustrate the operation of the doctrine of judicial precedent. b) How far is it true to say judges are bound by decisions in earlier cases?
World Court Essay Research Paper World CourtThe
World Court Essay, Research Paper World Court The World Court has developed as an arena where states can solve legal disagreements between each other. The development of international law gave need to such a venue and therefore the United Nations facilitated to this need by creating the World Court. The World Court hears grievances between states only; no outside parties may be represented within this justice system, such as individuals or corporations.
Romeo An Juliet Essay Research Paper hi
Romeo An Juliet Essay, Research Paper hi i need an essay about a character in romeo and juliet that demonsrtated maturity. in a well developed multi pagraph essay and say why you think the character’s maturity was greater than the other characters in the play.
Kafka Essay Research Paper In The Trial
Kafka Essay, Research Paper In The Trial by Franz Kafka, the Law, its courts, and its people seem to make up a kind of poorly run, secret society. It appears that the purpose of this secret society is to uphold the Law, although using very different methods of enforcement than what most people are used to. The arrest of Josef K. and the manner in which his trial is conducted attests to the unusual workings of this Law.
Common Law Essay Research Paper Communications LawIn
Common Law Essay, Research Paper Communications Law In San Franciso, two of Alameda County’s six municipal courts have limited public access to criminal court records after a Legal Aid Society lawyer requested it; others are waiting an opinion from the county counsel about its constitutionality.
Case Study Amoco Oil Co V Borden
, Inc Essay, Research Paper Amoco Oil Co. v. Borden, Inc. 889 F.2d 664 (5th Cir. 1989) Plantiff and Defendants: The Plantiff is Amoco Oil Company. The defendant is Borden, Inc.
Law Essay Research Paper 1 The trial
Law Essay, Research Paper 1. The trial court is bound by the Supreme Court s decision under Stare Decisis. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the judicial system. All other courts are most likely to follow a higher courts decision. The only time a precedent would change is if it is out of date, the situation is different, or if the ruling is found invalid.
The Guardian Ad Litem Program Essay Research
Paper The Guardian Ad Litem Program represents children who appear in the state courts. These children have not committed any crime but are victims of abuse, neglect or abandonment. The program is comprised of volunteers who represent children in the courts, making sure they do not become victims of “the system”.
Guardian Ad Litem Essay Research Paper Guardian
Guardian Ad Litem Essay, Research Paper Guardian Ad LitemThe Guardian Ad Litem Program represents children who appear in thestate courts. These children have not committed any crime but are victims ofabuse, neglect or abandonment. The program is comprised of volunteers whorepresent children in the courts, making sure they do not become victims of thesystem .
Ammendment 5 Essay Research Paper The fifth
Ammendment 5 Essay, Research Paper The fifth ammendment. Today in America, criminals have the right to self incrimination. Criminals should not be allowed to have this right. This allows criminals to hide the truth from the jury. Amendment five should should not stand today because it gives criminals protection, under law, that they should not have.
Oh Really Essay Research Paper Oh Reallyyou
Oh Really? Essay, Research Paper Oh Really, you think i am a lark, the dogs they run and bark, but when i say to them, shut up shut up shut up, you say to be nice to them,
Mcsorley Essay Research Paper Marty McSorleyMarty McSorley
Mcsorley Essay, Research Paper Marty McSorley Marty McSorley was convicted of assult on Oct 6 1988. The assult happened on the ice one night with 3 seconds left in the game. When Brashear, the Canucks tough guy, was skating into his own end with back to McSorley. McSorley who has logged the equivalent to 21 + days in the penalty box in his 17 seasons, skated up behind Brashear and slashed at his upper body, the blade caught him in the side of the head.
Strict Or Loose Constructionism Essay Research Paper
Strict or Loose Constructionism Today our courts are faced with many hard decesions, but the decision that is the hardest is the way that the justices conform to the constitution. There is a spectrum of interpretation. Some justices believe in strict constructionalism, but others believe in loose constructionalism.
The Hutu And Tutsi Tribes In Rwanda
Essay, Research Paper The Hutu and Tutsi Tribes In Rwanda The Hutu and Tutsi’s tribes of Rwanda have been at war for centuries. The fighting began 5 centuries ago when the Tutsi a warrior tribe of Hamatic
In The Penal Colony By Franz Kafka
Essay, Research Paper ” In the Penal Colony” “In The Penal Colony”, Kafka illustrates the capital punishment of a colony run by a governor. Throughout the story, the officer who performs the execution reinforces all his actions by saying that this was how the previous governor used to do it or that this his how the previous governor would have liked it done.
Right To Attorney Essay Research Paper Winston
Right To Attorney Essay, Research Paper Winston Churchill once said that the true measure of a civilized society is how it treats people accused of crimes. Although the Bill of Rights included a number of protections for people accused of crime, many of these guarantees went unenforced in state courts, which were held to be outside the reach of the federal Bill of Rights.
Examination Of The Federal Judiciary Essay Research
Paper The federal judiciary of the United States is split into, essentially, one court system for the national government and one for each of the states. The federal courts are then split up further. The first level of federal courts are the district courts, including the U.S. Tax Court, followed by the U.S. courts of appeal, which includes the U.S.
Teenage Mothers Essay Research Paper Dear Judges
Teenage Mothers Essay, Research Paper Dear Judges of Criminal Courts: I m writing in concern of unmarried teenage mothers who mistreat their child or cause the death of their newborn. There are alternatives available for the teenage mother so she can avoid bringing a newborn to society. Something must be done to protect the helpless newborns.
Appeal Court Essay Research Paper Most legal
Appeal Court Essay, Research Paper Most legal disputes involving state law are initially decided in the trial courts or by an administrative agency. But after such a decision, an individual may turn to the state’s appeal courts if he or she believes a legal error occurred that harmed the case. In fact, thousands of cases are appealed every year.(1) They include criminal convictions as well as civil cases involving personal injury, contracts, employment, real estate, probate, divorce, child custody and many other issues.
Federal Courts State Courts And Concurrent Jurisdiction
Essay, Research Paper The United States court system has seen a trend of increased involvement of the federal courts in criminal matters, which used to fall within the exclusive domain of the state courts. Most criminal cases violate only state law, and therefore are tried only in the state courts. Henry Glick would agree that counterfeiting, treason, and illegal immigration are some of the unique cases, which can only be tried by the federal courts.
Egyptian Temple Essay Research Paper When talking
Egyptian Temple Essay, Research Paper When talking about the basic type of Egyptian temple, it is all about heavy columns, walls, pylons, big courts, and the use of axis, symmetrically and made of stones or mud bricks. The plan of the Egyptian temple is rectangular, symmetrical and set on the longitudual axis approaching through courts and halls.
Juvenille Courts Essay Research Paper The Juvenile
Juvenille Courts Essay, Research Paper The Juvenile Court system was a system set up to deal with minors who find themselves in trouble. In trouble with their parents, or the law. This system has its benefits and its
Executive Privelage Essay Research Paper exemption of
Executive Privelage Essay, Research Paper exemption of the executive branch of government, or its officers, from having to give evidence, specifically, in U.S. law, the exemption of the president from disclosing information to congressional inquiries or the judiciary. Claims of executive privilege are usually invoked to protect confidential military or diplomatic operations or to protect the private discussions and debates of the president with close aides.
Gore Or Bush Essay Research Paper Gore
Gore Or Bush Essay, Research Paper Gore or Bush Should Al Gore or George Bush be the president of the United States. Bush is the man that should and will fill the position. Out of all the candidates Bush stands out as the
Judicial Precedent Essay Plan Essay Research Paper
Judicial Precedent Essay planIntro Say what precedent is: ?Stare decesis et non quieta movere? = Stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established. Which means a decision made in one case is binding on all
Tennis Essay Research Paper tennisindoor or outdoor
Tennis Essay, Research Paper tennis indoor or outdoor game for two players (singles) or four players (doubles). Although originally lawn tennis was played only on grass courts, today the surfaces are more often of clay, asphalt, or synthetics. The court measures 78 ft by 27 ft (23.8 m by 8.2 m) for singles play; it is 4.5 ft (1.4 m) wider for doubles.
Comparison Of Crucible And The Scarlet Letter
Essay, Research Paper Sofia Kaufman E-Block 12/15/99 Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter and Arthur Miller’s The Crucible are both distinctly different narratives of the Salem Witch trials. The Scarlet Letter is a novel and The Crucible is a play. While The Scarlet Letter deals mainly with the sin of adultery, The Crucible mainly deals with witchcraft.
Macbeath Essay Research Paper Anthony Sears12298Period 2Macbeth
Macbeath Essay, Research Paper Anthony Sears 12-2-98 Period 2 Macbeth Macbeth and Lady Macbeth are two megalomaniacs. Their actions in the first two acts are very childish and selfish. Their lust for power and control over runs their lives and becomes something to die for. Lady Macbeth is very persuasive, and Macbeth will almost follow her very word.
Contract Essay Research Paper Exclusion and Exemption
Contract Essay, Research Paper Exclusion and Exemption Clauses. 166-170, 278, 281, 288, 355-356 (i) The position at Common Law. An exclusion clauses is a term of the contract which limits or excludes a liability from one party which would otherwise be subjected to. The function of an exclusion clause is to limit or exclude liability for breach of an express or implied term or even negligence in a contract.