Human Cloning Essay, Research Paper
Human Cloning
In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted? John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.
John A. Robertson s article Human Cloning and the Challenge of Regulation raises three important reasons on why there shouldn t be a ban on Human Cloning but that it should be regulated. Couples who are infertile might choose to clone one of the partners instead of using sperm, eggs, or embryo s from anonymous donors. In conventional in vitro fertilization, doctors attempt to start with many ova, fertilize each with sperm and implant all of them in the woman’s womb in the hope that one will result in pregnancy. (Robertson) But some women can only supply a single egg. Through the use of embryo cloning, that egg might be divisible into, say 8 zygotes for implanting. The chance of those women becoming pregnant would be much greater. (Kassirer) Secondly, it would benefit a couple at high risk of having offspring with a genetic disease choose weather to risk the birth of an affected child. (Robertson) Parents who are known to be at risk of passing a genetic defect to a child could make use of cloning. A fertilized ovum could be cloned, and the duplicate tested for the disease or disorder. If the clone were free of genetic defects, then the other clone would be as well. Then this could be implanted in the woman and allowed to mature to term. (Heyd) Thirdly, it would be used to obtain tissue or organs for transplantation. (Robertson) Cloning could produce a reservoir of “spare parts”. Fertilized ova could be cloned into multiple zygotes; one could be implanted in the woman and allowed to develop into a normal baby; the other zygotes could be frozen for future use. In the event that the child required a bone marrow transplant, one of the zygotes could be taken out of storage, implanted, allowed to mature to a baby and then contribute some of its spare bone marrow to its (earlier) identical twin. Bone marrow can be harvested from a person without injuring them. (Kearney) All three of these points are well documented in medical literature today and will help people greatly. He then brings up the National Bioethics Advisory Commissions concern about physical safety and eugenics.
He also brings up the reasons why cloning humans can be harmful. Some people have expressed concern about the effects that cloning would have on relationships. For example, a child born from an adult DNA cloning from his father would be, in effect, a delayed twin of one of his parents. That has never happened before and may lead to emotional difficulties. Also that this child would lack individuality and the freedom to create his or her own expectations. He than goes on to disprove this by bringing up the fact that monozygotic twins are essentially clones of each other and have different personalities entirely. Also that these twins have a unique closeness that others don t. Differences in mitochondria, the uterus, and a childhood environment will minimize the risk of overidentification with the first twin. (Robertson)
The second fear that he expresses is that parents who choose their child s genome through somatic-cell cloning will view the child as a commodity or an object to serve their own ends. (Robertson) He goes on to disprove this issue by saying what really counts is how a child is treated after birth, not on how the were actually conceived.
I believe that most of Robertson s article was well documented and had relevant supporting data. I don t see any propaganda being used by him in order to influence the reader. I see that he put both positive and negative aspects of cloning into his article and explained both parts equally if not more on the negative side. I can see where someone with strong feelings on this issue can be bias on the readings due to the fact that their mind is already made up, but I think that he make a much more convincing argument than does Annas. I believe that the use of explaining why he was for it and giving concrete examples as to why it shouldn t be banned were the best ways to make his article effective.
George J. Annas article Why we should ban Human cloning brings up many different issues on why Human cloning should banned. After reading his article it doesn t really give any concrete reason other than cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness. Even with this issue he kind of beats around the bush and doesn t explain it well. He brings up fictional books and compares the creation of dolly the sheep to that of Frankenstein. He than goes into saying that this would lead to parents cloning a recently dead child as a means of bereavement. He doesn t really document his opinions well, he brings up issues and compares them to others that have either opposed him or that he agrees with. His work, I think is biased due to the fact that he is a medical ethicist and that in his own words says that physicians, scientists, and those with strong medical opinions should not make up a national committee on this subject. He in turn uses strong opinion to try to convince the reader that cloning is immoral and that it should be banned. He doesn t supply us with the positive effects that cloning embryos can give us but only focuses on the negative aspects while Robertson should both views and disputed the negative ones. I think that he is looking at the extreme cases in which human cloning would be abused and doesn t really consider the possible benefits. Maybe he never knew anyone with cancer, a genetic disorder, or an autoimmune disease. I also think that he played into the cultural implications too much. I don t think that his opinion was upheld very well and that it would tend to get the undecided onto his side. I think that Robertson did a must better job in his article and made it more effective.
A clone would not be a “real human “: But a clone would have exactly the same status that an identical twin already does. Both are derived from a single fertilized ovum.Cloning is “playing God”: They have visions of Dr. Frankenstein creating life from inanimate matter. But “cloning creates life from life” and is just an extension of routine in vitro fertilization procedures. Cloning is not “natural”: People have very different views of what is “natural”. Embryo cloning still depends on a human egg from a woman and sperm from a man. Human embryo cloning just tweaks apart a zygote at the two-cell stage, changing a single two-cell form of life into two one-cell forms of life. One can argue that God did not intend cloning to be done. But the same argument was used, largely in the past, to oppose such techniques as in vitro fertilization. It all depends upon what one is used to, and what one considers being “natural.”
(religioustolerance/cloning.htm)
In conclusion I believe strongly in the issue at hand. I believe that human cloning should be allowed but should be strictly regulated. I don t think that parents should be allowed to go to a geneticist and order a baby. I think that a lot of good can come out of this type of research and hope that it continues. As a person who knows what it is like to watch my grandfather die of cancer and to see my father go through a bone-marrow transplant and a stem-cell transplant due to the fact that he has a myelodysplastic disorder and to know that a cure can come out of this research only makes me favor it more. I think that no matter how you regulate it you will always have a person like Richard Seed who will cause a problem. I think that the benefits greatly outweigh the consequences and that due to this it should be allowed to continue. The position that I support is the one to allow human cloning to continue but to have a regulation against cloning human embryo s for those who want to genetically alter their children for no apparent cause or to replace a dead child or person. I think that Robertson s article shows us that a lot of good can come out of this type of research and that only those that really need it will attempt it not anyone looking to clone a human. I think that Annas really didn t convince anyone by just stating his facts, he never really said why he believes it should be banned but gave other peoples opinions and backed those up. He didn t argue his opponent s side very well and brought irrelevant material into his argument. I think that Robertson s article will help those who are middle of the road accept it better and hope that those who strongly oppose it see his viewpoint. Hopefully a lot of good will come out of research like this and it will benefit millions of people from giving them new life to giving them extended life.
Works Cited
1) Robertson, John A. Human Cloning and the Challenge of Regulation, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 2 (July 9, 1998), pp. 119-122.
2) Annas, George J. Why We Should Ban Human Cloning, The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 339, no. 2 (July 9, 1998), pp. 118-125.
3) Kearney W, Caplan AL. Parity for the donation of bone marrow: ethical and policy considerations. Emerging issues in biomedical policy: an annul review, vol. 1. New York: Columbia University Press, 1992; 262-85
4) Kassirer JP, Should human cloning be off limits? The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 338, no. 2 (June 1998), pp. 905-906
5) Heyd D. Genethics: moral issues in the creation of people. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.
6) religioustolerance/cloning.htm
7) bioethics.gov/pubs/cloning1/executive.htm
8) humancloning/
Другие работы по теме:
Cloning Essay Research Paper Nicole Pluta November
Cloning Essay, Research Paper Nicole Pluta November 29, 1998 Scientific experimentation has led us to many great discoveries such as: Chemotherapy, heart surgery, and bone marrow transplants. Recently scientists have discovered a new way to heal humans. This is known as cloning. Although they have yet to clone a human they have cloned sheep.
Cloning 2 Essay Research Paper Cloning
Cloning 2 Essay, Research Paper Cloning The new breakthrough of cloning is a great advance in biotechnology. The use of cloning can be both beneficial and harmful to society. There are many reasonable ways to use the methods of cloning. For instance, the use for medical purposes can be helpful in cases such as producing animals with human body systems that could be used for transplanting organs.
Is Cloning Of Humans Just Essay Research
Paper Recently there was a major breakthrough in the scientific research ? the mapping of all DNA in a human gene is complete. Couple of years ago, this seems an impossible task for scientist to triumph over. All this revolution in science leads us to believe that the day, when the human being will be cloned, is not far away.
Cloning Or Clowning Essay Research Paper Cloning
Cloning Or Clowning? Essay, Research Paper Cloning or Clowning Around? Just like in the fictional book Jurassic Park they cloned dinosaurs for the purpose of entertainment. They thought they could control them like zoo animals, but they were wrong. They also only made female dinosaurs so that they couldn’t reproduce, but in the end nature found a way.
Cloning Essay Research Paper CloningIn the past
Cloning Essay, Research Paper Cloning In the past few years, the topic of cloning has been in the news a lot. It is a very controversial issue, with many opposing viewpoints. While some find it acceptable, others object for religious reasons. A big concern is the possibility of abuse of this new technology.
Cloning Essay Research Paper Human Cloning Ever
Cloning Essay, Research Paper Human Cloning Ever since the cloning of the sheep, people have been wondering weather it is morally right to clone. Now the time has come where we can clone human beings and now people are even more worried about weather it is right or wrong. The thing that many religious people don t like, is that cloning was never mentioned in the Bible.
Cloning Essay Research Paper When Dr Ian
Cloning Essay, Research Paper When Dr. Ian Wilmut created Dolly, a fully formed life from another sheep’s cell, it generated many different questions around the world. Among these topics is the heated questions of whether or not humans should be cloned. With the new technology called “human cloning,” we are trying to find a way so that it would be beneficial to society.
AntiCloning Essay Research Paper Many people have
Anti-Cloning Essay, Research Paper Many people have different views about cloning. Some believe it to be a good thing. I think cloning is one of the worst things to come into the millennium. Cloning is very dangerous to humans. Not only could it kill a human being, but it could effect a family or others around them.
Romeo And Juliet Essay Research Paper Engineers
Romeo And Juliet Essay, Research Paper Engineers have devoted their time and efforts in making great technological advancements for the human race. They have proposed many options and ideas in making the world a great place to live in. The engineers of the 21st Century will follow in the same path. The engineering community must think about change and plan for the coming century.
Cloning Essay Research Paper A couple that
Cloning Essay, Research Paper A couple that had been married for only two years was in a terrible car accident. The husband, however, was unconscious when the paramedics arrived. He went into a coma shortly after arriving at the nearby hospital. He came out of the coma but never was the same again. It turns out that when he was in the accident, he had severe head trauma, and would be a vegetable the rest of his life.
Human Cloning 2 Essay Research Paper The
Human Cloning 2 Essay, Research Paper The creation of life has often been the focus of many novels from Frankenstein to Brave New World. This former unconceivable chimera has now been transformed into a reality, with the science of genetics and cloning expanding much more rapidly than any other facet of today s technology.
Human Cloning Essay Research Paper Alvin A
Human Cloning Essay, Research Paper Alvin A. Soriano February 14, 2000 A pleasant morning Ladies and Gentlemen. I would like to share my views on why cloning should be legalized in the Philippines. We, the experts in the Institute of Technological Technologies feel that with the careful continuation of research, the technological benefits of cloning clearly outweigh the possible social consequences.
Fabricating Humans Essay Research Paper Cloning is
Fabricating Humans Essay, Research Paper Cloning is unethical and is not needed in society. Many, if not all, religions agree with the ban of cloning human beings. It has also been argued that cloning would diminish individuality as well. Whether or not cloning is ethical, at this time cloning human beings should be, and is, banned.
Cloning Human Beings Essay Research Paper The
Cloning Human Beings Essay, Research Paper The cloning of human beings has been an issue that many people believe strongly in. The cloning of animals such as cows and sheep have already been successful, and many people think that the cloning of human beings is just the next step. This, however, has not gone over well with the government of the United States.
Technology Essay Research Paper People very often
Technology Essay, Research Paper People very often debate whether technology is good or bad. Many people believe that technology can only cause harm to their lives and society, while many others strongly defend the technologies which have made their lives much more leisurely and enriching than it could have been several hundred years ago.
To Clone Or Not To Clone Essay 2
To Clone Or Not To Clone Essay, Research Paper The discovery of cloning can be both beneficial and harmful to society. There are many reasonable methods of cloning. For instance, the use of cloning for medical purposes can be helpful in taking human DNA and creating new body parts. Because of the shortage of donors, this could become a valuable asset to our society.
Cloning Is Morally Wrong Essay Research Paper
Cloning is an issue that touches upon the most profound ethical issues. If humans even consider cloning each other then they should revise what is morally and ethically right and wrong. The cloning of any species, whether it s human or non-human is by all means wrong.
Ethics Of Cloning Essay Research Paper Cloning
Ethics Of Cloning Essay, Research Paper Cloning humans is unethical because the clone is not born the normal way, but is created from one parent instead of two by duplicating someone s DNA. Therefore it is causing the clone to be neglected the two-parent family. Some of the scientist that cloned the sheep Dolly says cloning the sheep was a complete success but all are convinced that cloning humans is ethically wrong and should not be allowed. (Kestenbaum, David, 1965) Frank Monton explains that there is now worldwide recognition from governments, professional medical bodies and bioethics committees that to clone a human would be unethical (Monton, Frank, C4).
Human Cloning Essay Research Paper Cloning humans
Human Cloning Essay, Research Paper Cloning humans can be very beneficial. Although cloning has a low success rate, with more research and support, it can become very useful to our society. We will be able to clone people for adoption and clone organs for transplants that would save lives. We could also use research on animals to cure or help diseases and disease research.
Cloning Essay Research Paper Cloning Humans Is
Cloning Essay, Research Paper Cloning Humans Is Ethically Permissible The question whether it is ethically permissible to clone humans has been a debate in the U.S. and in other parts of the world for some time. There are some good reasons that human cloning is relevant in our society, and there are some goods reasons that we shouldn’t practice human cloning.
Cloning Essay Research Paper A clone is
Cloning Essay, Research Paper A clone is really just a time-delayed identical twin of another animal or person. Cloning is accomplished by getting two cells to fuse to become one. The egg gains a full set of genes from the adult and thinks it has been fertilized. Then it begins to divide and become identical twin or clone of the adult.
Cloning Essay Research Paper Cloning 1999 Cloning
Cloning Essay, Research Paper Cloning 1999 Cloning is the process of creating a genetic duplicate of an individual. Since the February 1997 announcement of the birth of Dolly, a sheep cloned by Ian Wilmut, cloning research
Cloning Essay Research Paper Today there are
Cloning Essay, Research Paper Today there are many scientist that want to clone humans and other organisms in order to make the world a better place. Scientist think that if they can
Cloning Essay Research Paper CloningCloning is the
Cloning Essay, Research Paper Cloning Cloning is the production of duplicate copies of genetic material, cells, or entire multicellular living organisms. The copies are referred to as clones. Cloning occurs naturally and is also engineered by human beings. The possibility that people might be cloned from the cells of a single adult human being had long been a subject primarily of fantasy and science fiction but became very definite at the end of the 20th century.
Cloning Is Wrong Essay Research Paper Cloning
Cloning Is Wrong Essay, Research Paper Cloning is Wrong Cloning should never be done to humans or any other of Gods creations. The internet has many examples of why cloning should not be done. even the encyclopedia has articles against cloning. Cloning is a threat to the human race, immoral, and we should never allow it to take place.
Cloning Aspects Essay Research Paper The legal
Cloning Aspects Essay, Research Paper The legal aspects of Human Cloning are quite simple and straight forward, and I will outline them for you in the next few minutes and explain to you what they
Cloning Essay Research Paper CLONINGCloning is an
Cloning Essay, Research Paper CLONING Cloning is an issue that only recently has come to light. The technology, still in its infancy, has roused strong views in opposition. Supporters feel that, with the careful continuation of research, the technological benefits of cloning clearly outweigh the possible social consequences.
A Report On Cloning (A Little Biased)
) Essay, Research Paper Cloning is a new technology that humans have just acquired. Before, cloning was something that you could read about in a science-fiction book for a buck. Now, we have seen proof of cloning with the sheeps called Dolly. The big question is if we should clone humans. There are only two ways this could be possible. ?The first way involves splitting an embryo into several halves and creating many new individuals from that embryo.
Human Cloning Essay Research Paper Human CloningHuman
Human Cloning Essay, Research Paper Human Cloning Human cloning is now possible as a result of recent advancements in medicine and technology. Human cloning, however, raises many ethical and moral issues that need to be addressed before this experiment can be fulfilled. The success rate is another issue that should be addressed before proceeding with cloning.
Cloning Technology Essay Research Paper IntroductionAs technology
Cloning Technology Essay, Research Paper Introduction As technology keeps advancing each year we are left with nothing else but to learn how to use it. In 1997 history was made when Dolly – the first cloned sheep – was born. Questions arose about whether or not it was possible to clone humans. Nobody knows for certain how far cloning can go but nobody can stop technology from becoming advancing.