And Rousseau Essay, Research Paper
Realism or Idealism: Responses to Locke, Montesqieu,
Rousseau and Marx regarding human nature
In the history of the western intellectual tradition, a simple (though not simplistic) way of seeing philosophers of social thought is to place them in one of two categories: realism or idealism. Depending on what category they best fit in, one can draw conclusions about their respective theories of human nature, which in turn influences their whole philosophical project s ends. The four philosophers covered in this seminar all have distinct theories of human nature, and while reading and thinking about them, it was helpful for me to ask the following questions: What is the basic view of human nature of the philosopher? (i.e. is man basically cooperative and nonviolent or is he basically at his core an aggressor and selfish), Does he think human nature can be changed? and If it can be changed (or if it is perfectable), does the change come voluntarily or through coercion?
First, I define my terms. By “realism” I mean the trajectory of thought in the western intellectual and philosophical tradition that emphasizes the here-and-now, and posits that there is not an ideal image or way of doing things to which we must conform our agendas of rule and justice. I propose that “realism” is related to concepts like conflict as a fact of life, and aggression as a factor in man s motivations, and materialism (that people and everything else is constituted of matter only, and not, say, “spirit” as per Plato s idealism or the dualism of Christianity).
By “idealism,” I mean that train of thought in the west that identifies with ideas like there being a dualism of reality (matter and spirit) and that the world of ideals is a model for us to imitate, toward the end of moral or social perfection. Idealism at once holds that human nature is basically good and that when it is bad, it can be changed, perfected, improved. It sees people as being basically giving and socially interested, and interested in the good of the whole, if they would just have the right kind of education. It allows that conflict exists but that it doesn t need to exist that peace is possible through education.
Of the four philosophers none fits wholly into one of these two camps. Still, the two categories are useful for my reflection on the philosophers. Looking at Rousseau first, I see him as the most idealistic, the one evincing “idealism” most, of the four. He sees the distant past of man, as an animal in nature, as being man s natural state, a state he has left with society s development. Rousseau argues that this natural man has basically two kinds of drives within him: first, he is selfish toward the end of self-preservation, and yet, secondly, he also feels a repugnance to seeing any other living thing suffer. He sees man as being basically good. The problem in human nature crops up through the existence of private property, which is contrary to the state mankind was in nature. Rousseau solves this problem through the social contract, which is government consented by the masses for the common interest.
My response to his theory of human nature is twofold. (1) Contrary to Rousseau s theories, new knowledge about the nature of man in the wild (from ethologists like Conrad Lorenz or Lionel Tiger Men in Groups) provides evidence that man in his basic nature is an aggressor. This evidence is powerfully explanatory of many of our social ills, asserting that homo sapiens has a will to dominate and achieve an ever increasing standing in the social hierarchy, and that this factor and not the mere possession of private property, is largely responsible for inequality. Rousseau seems to think that politics alone is enough to change human nature that the government can legislate away the equality vs. freedom dilemma. (2) I also see that Rousseau in his glorification of the natural man fails to acknowledge that even man in society is natural per se, since man doesn t become “supernatural” or “unnatural” in society. Using increasingly complex tools to fashion increasingly complex ways of living doesn t change the fact that man is still essentially natural, for he isn t unnatural or supernatural, but merely more complex. This line of thought anticipates later critiques on “state of nature” theories which altogether dismiss them as bifurcating the sensible world into natural and unnatural, which is the same slippery slope as dividing it between natural and supernatural (as in the postmodern and post-Nietzschean critiques of “nature” and “natural law.”)
Marx s critique of capitalism and his solution of communism starts at the same place as Rousseau that we live in a corrupt society and are plagued by problems and challenges that the modern world presents. Marx, like Rousseau, has a basically positive view of human nature, and his theory of the natural state of man being one of cooperation can be seen in the same line as Rousseau s. Marx, like Rousseau, has three states of man. The first of these categories of man is like Rousseau s “natural man” in a state of natural society. The same holds for the second category, much like Rousseau s modern man who is alienated because of economic inequality (though Marx adds to and tweaks this part of Rousseau to emphasize economic and not social inequality, still blaming private property even if not fully). The third category is Marx s fulfilled man in the communist society. Like Rousseau, he sees private property and its acquisition as the major problem.
My response to Marx is twofold: (1) he falls into the same faulty idealism as Rousseau, since he doesn t allow that man s nature may be something other than perfectable and naturally good. Marx has the idealism of Hegel without the supernaturalism or the dualism. He cannot seem to accept that capitalism may be a “natural” outgrowth of man s human nature, and instead hopes to transform human selfishness into altruism (or excise unnatural selfishness through his brand of communism) by removing from man the opportunity to have anything to be selfish over. (2) Marx, while criticizing the idealism of religion as the “opiate of the masses” is guilty of providing an equally sating opiate: that man can have heaven here on this earth by following his precepts.
Locke and Montesqieu, in their critiques of the status quo and consequentially of the human nature that got us here are less idealistic and more realistic than Rousseau and Marx. While they can be seen more as realist, they are not wholly so. Locke, for instance, has an idealism which only comes out in his assertion that human reason alone, and not emotion, is the “right” way to solve problems confronting mankind. In his Second Treatise on Government, Locke implies a theory of human nature which is simple enough: merely than man likes happiness and doesn t like unhappiness. Man s desire for happiness and resistance of unhappiness, says Locke, should be kept in line with a reward or punishment system, a token economy. He denies that man is born either good or bad, and this part of his human nature theory is contrasted with typical idealist theories, which posit than man is born good and diverged from his natural goodness because of society s negative influence.
I liked Locke because he resists natural law positions, and seems well grounded in the here and now, even if he appeals to the theism of his time. My reservation is that in his optimism, he falls into the trap of positing that man is naturally reasonable enough to seek what is best for him, even at temporary pain or displeasure. He argues that man will naturally impose upon himself evident laws for his own good, and the good of society. The history of the western cultural project seems to show that this is not the natural sate of man, but that instead, man is naturally resistant to change and short-sided, unable to take into his reason the conflicting principles of good-for-all and good-for-himself. Still, Locke was able to exert an amazing influence in the western political tradition because he furthered the historical questions How should man be governed, etc.
By contrast, Montesqieu s theory of human nature is largely relativistic, humanistic and especially realist in its scope. In his Persian Letters, he sets out to show his opinions on his world, from the outside. By seeming to see the his world from the outside looking in, he forces his contemporary reader to at once develop a sense of self-consciousness, and to show that there is no one way of doing things, but rather a multitude of options. His “comparative culture” approach denies that there is an absolute, either morally or politically. His demonstration of viable alternatives flies in the face of the idealisms that say with emphasis that there is only one path, one true political system, one best way of behaving. Examples of this include his description of the Persian sexual mores in letter 20 and the letters concerning marriage and harems, and the letters discussing politics and subtly critiquing the France of his day,
Montesqieu was my favorite of the four philosophers we studied. I feel this way for three reasons. One, his literary expression of his philosophical and political insights made them more enjoyable to read than straight philosophical tracts would be. Favorite passages that show glimpses of his ability to provide political insight with literary acumen include letter 94, in which he talks about the origins of society. Letter 88, which shows his wit in relation to who has the real influence in French society, which comes from birth and really is not influential at all, also is a literary expression of his critique. Montesqieu denies the need for god but requires justice to stave off mankind s natural selfishness, which is realistic in viewpoint.
I appreciated the foundation that reading these four philosophers gave me in thinking about politics and social problems in the West. By looking at them through the lense of human nature questions, I was able to frame them in a way that helped me compare and contrast them in order to see whom I resonated most with.
Другие работы по теме:
Karl Marx Biography Essay Research Paper Karl
Karl Marx Biography Essay, Research Paper Karl Marx Karl Marx was born on May 5, 1818 in the city of Trier, Germany. Marx was a revolutionary who advocated “merciless criticism of
Locke And Newton Essay Research Paper Locke
Locke And Newton Essay, Research Paper Locke and Newton The scientific revolution was used to describe a change in intellectual thought during the 16th and 17th centuries. This change formed the dividing line between the medieval world and the early modern world. Science basically became invented during this revolution.
The Nature Of Government Essay Research Paper
John Locke, an influential early liberal English philosopher, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, a brilliant political theorist and one of the main figures of the enlightenment, have a considerable importance in political thought, for which they are best known.
Natural Rights Theory According To Burke And
Marx Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, author of Leviathan, claims that peace and unity can best be achieved by setting up a society by having humans agree to a covenant (Hobbes: Ch.18 pg.548). A sovereign who is in charge of protecting the society or state rules Hobbes?s society. In his introduction, Hobbes describes this commonwealth as an “artificial person” and as a body politic that mimics the human body.
Karl Marx 4 Essay Research Paper Marx
Karl Marx 4 Essay, Research Paper Marx, Karl (1818-1883), German political philosopher and revolutionist, cofounder with Friedrich Engels of scientific socialism (modern communism) and, as such, one of the most influential thinkers of all times. Marx was born in Trier. In 1842 he became editor of the Cologne newspaper Rheinische Zeitung.
Pateman On Locke Essay Research Paper For
Pateman On Locke Essay, Research Paper For years social contract theorists had monopolized the explanation of modern society. John Locke was among those who advocated this theory of a collectively
Locke Essay Research Paper In the Second
Locke Essay, Research Paper In the Second Treatise of Government, Locke explains different ways in which human beings can live together. He suggests there are two ways and he describes them as “the state of nature” and “civil (or political) society.” “Civil Society” can exist in many forms although there is only one “state of nature.” The determination of the best form of government is dependent on the recognition of these two types of societies.
Lawgrtt Essay Research Paper The Constitution of
Lawgrtt Essay, Research Paper The Constitution of the United States and Madison’s Federalist Paper 51 draw upon the philosophy of John Locke, as expressed in his Second Treatise of Government. Madison and the framers of the Constitution looked to Locke’s ideas for justification and guidance. The Preamble of the Constitution reflects the intentions of its authors and shows the influence of Locke’s ideas.
Bishop Bossuet Thomas Hobbes Essay Research Paper
English Civil War and Glorious Revolution followed the Dutch revolt against Spain as the second of the Western Revolutions that ended absolute monarchy and finally led to democratic representative government. As
Locke And Decartes Essay Research Paper In
Locke And Decartes Essay, Research Paper In comparing the argument for the existence of God there are two views, Decartes and Locke. Decartes believes there is innate knowledge that everybody already has a perfect being acquired knowledge. Locke believes that all ideas come from experience. I believe truth lies between both of these theories.
John Locke Summary Essay Research Paper John
John Locke: Summary Essay, Research Paper John Locke: The Empiricist Theory of Knowledge: Summary Understanding and knowledge is what makes man superior to all other beings according to John Locke. However, the bounds of this understanding and knowledge are questionable. Is some knowledge innate? How certain can we be about beliefs and the knowledge we have? John Locke attempts to give some insight as to the answers of these questions in his work, The Empiricist Theory of Knowledge.
John Locke Essay Research Paper John LockeJohn
John Locke Essay, Research Paper John Locke John Locke was an English philosopher and political theorist during the 1600s. He was also the founder of British empiricism. He is known for his great contribution to
Paine Vs Marx Essay Research Paper The
Paine Vs. Marx Essay, Research Paper The debate over the distribution of property and the unnatural inequality it produces has long troubled political thinkers, as Jean-Jacques Rousseau mused in his Discourse on the Origins of Inequality: It is obviously contrary to the law of nature, however it may be defined for a child to command an old man, for an imbecile to lead a wise man, and for a handful of people to gorge themselves on superfluities while the starving multitude lacks necessities. (Rousseau, p. 869) Thomas Paine wrote in his classic The Rights of Man that he wished to “[restore] justice among families by a distribution of property ” (Paine, p. 177) This sentiment was seemingly echoed by Karl Marx in The Communist Manifesto when he spoke of the ” the crying inequalities in the distribution of wealth ” (Marx, p. 34).
Natural Laws Essay Research Paper Natural LawsJohn
Natural Laws Essay, Research Paper Natural Laws John Locke?s piece called Second Treatise Government, was written to express his beliefs on how a government should be established. John Locke was born in 1632 and died in 1704. He was a statesman as well as a philosopher, a political theorist and a main contributor to the Enlightenment period.
Locke And Hobbes Essay Research Paper Hobbes
Locke And Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Hobbes point of view on human nature and how a government should be run is a more realistic way of looking at things than John Locke?s theory. Both Hobbes and Locke see human nature differently, Hobbes sees people as being run by selfishness whereas Locke says that people are naturally kind.
The Development Of Property From The Second
Treatise Of Government By John Locke Essay, Research Paper The Beginning of Property Private property plays an important role in the theory of Locke.Locke answers several questions in his discussion of property. At what point does an item become private property? How does man acquire property? What amount of private property can a person have? How do you measure this amount? Locke also looks at how value and communities emerged from the establishment of property.
Enlightenment Essay Research Paper PhilosophersIdeas of enlightenment
Enlightenment Essay, Research Paper Philosophers Ideas of enlightenment have been seen across the world for centuries now, but the first real movements started around 1669. With the majority of its great thinkers in Europe, particularly England and France, enlightenment became a great philosophic movement marked by a rejection of traditional social, religious, and political ideas.
Locke And Rousseau Essay Research Paper The
Locke And Rousseau Essay, Research Paper The idea of consent is a key element in the works of John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. In the ?Second Treatise of Government,? Locke puts forth his
Karl Marx 2 Essay Research Paper Karl
Karl Marx 2 Essay, Research Paper Karl Marx (1818-1883) Karl Marx is a German philosopher and most important figure in socialist history. Marx is known as a Communist, but should be known for his great philosophy. He also is said to be the founder of economic history and sociology.
Karl Marx 5 Essay Research Paper Karl
Karl Marx 5 Essay, Research Paper Karl Marx The work of Marx, like that of other philosophers and thinkers in the 19th century, owed a great deal to the social context into which he was born and thus the issues he tackled were often similar to those of concern to his contemporaries. It was Marx who decided to go beyond the academia and theoretical study and produce an active theory or a practical philosophy which could provide a basis for political action.
Locke Essay Research Paper John Locke
Locke Essay, Research Paper John Locke John Locke was an English philosopher. He was born at Wrington, Somerset, on August 29, 1932. He had attended the University of Oxford. Locke had spent his boyhood in Beluton, near the village of Pensford. But the house no longer stands there. Locke s parents, John Locke and Agnes Keene, were married in 1630 and John was said to be a pious woman and Locke speaks of her with affection.
Marx And His Theory Of Alienation Essay
, Research Paper Marx and His Theory of Alienation Marx wrote “On The Jewish Question” in 1844. It was a written response to Bauer’s works. In his works, Bauer said that Jews should give up their religion and fight for their civil rights. Bauer believed the Jews should become emancipated from the Germans and Christians.
Individuality Essay Research Paper IndividualityKarl Marx and
Individuality Essay, Research Paper Individuality Karl Marx and John Locke both analyzed individuality using different concepts. Marx s ideas concerned species being, alienation, and private property. Whereas, Locke s ideas dealt with human nature, state of war, and property. Both Marx and Locke only looked at men as individual.
John Locke Philosophy Essay Research Paper The
John Locke Philosophy Essay, Research Paper The basic elements in John Locke’s political theory are natural rights, social contract, and government by consent, and right of revolution. Locke was very concerned with the “property right” and derived property right from higher law. He also declared that natural law remained valuable in civil society as the fundamental measure of men’s rights.
Locke Vs Marx Essay Research Paper For
Locke Vs. Marx Essay, Research Paper For many political theorists and thinkers, the ideas of labor and property are central to the evolution of governments or states, and henceforth, very important aspects of human life. For some writers, the development of property is a direct result of labor, and government is set up to ensure the property rights of those who own property.
Karl Marx Essay Research Paper Karl MarxKarl
Karl Marx Essay, Research Paper Karl Marx Karl Marx was a German political philosopher and a revolutionist, confounder with Friedrich Engles of scientific socialism and is one of the most influential thinkers of all times.
Marx Essay Research Paper Karl Marx and
Marx Essay, Research Paper Karl Marx and Max Weber have agreed and disagreed on numerous issues during their years as sociologists and political economists. An issue that they
Utopian World Essay Research Paper Philosophers have
Utopian World Essay, Research Paper Philosophers have forever been concerned with political and social matters. Not only have they asked how politics work but mainly, how they should work. These philosophers have been concerned with the nature and justification of political obligation and authority and the goals of political action.
Locke And The American Political System Essay
, Research Paper John Locke and his ideas about philosophy was a major influence on the American political system, not to mention many other political systems, too. His ideas were very
Political Theories Of Hobbes And Locke Essay
, Research Paper The Political Theories of Hobbes and Locke In the sixteenth century, the rise of the state and decline of the feudal system brought about the question of authority, whose is absolute, God or man? Should the state have power over its subjects or the subjects over the state? Soon after the theory of sovereignty and the theory of social contract were developed, but even these still drew debate.
Hobbes Locke Rousseau Essay Research Paper Thomas
Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, all became three of the most influential political theorists in the world.
Political Power Essay Research Paper Political power
Political Power Political power can simply be defined as the power to influence. The power to influence is essentially the power to control. When pertaining to political matters, the most influential people in any form of government have the most power. The underlying argument is between who has the most influence.