How Much Of It They Have? Essay, Research Paper
There are many theories of power, and one crucial factor in determining who has political power is in defining what political power actually is. Many concentrated on studying power relationships within communities: community power. Polsby related the notion of community power to “decisions affecting large parts of the population of local communities” and sees “power”, influence” or “control” as the “capacity of one actor to do something affecting another actor, which changes the probable pattern of specified future events”. Here then, power is to do with decisions. “Who rules?” is analogous to “Who participates?” or “Who prevails in decision – making?”. Power is embedded in decision – making so that it is held by those who make decisions that can affect the community in general. Someone who involved in making the key choices shaping a community have power in the sense that what they decide on changes peopleґs lives and in this way, these decision – makers have power or control over other people. This is typical of pluralist theories of power. They focus their attention on the exercise of power, rather than its sources. Hunter, on the other hand, felt that there was dominant elite in the community, that power is concentrated in the hands of a few. His might be called a “stratification theory” of power, where power is a “subsidiary aspect of the communityґs social structure” (Polsby) and the main determinant of the distribution of power within a community is its social stratification. Stratification studies assert that communities are divided into classes. The upper class, or the group with the highest social – economic standing, hold the most power. They are the “power elite” and can exercise influence over a large number of community decisions, thus “ruling” the local community. Hunterґs studies, as he saw them, showed that Regional City in Atlanta was run by a small group of powerful men who were able to shape policies both informally and behind the scenes. Admission into the “power elite” here is determined almost solely on their position within the local business community. The economic elites Hunter views as the power behind politicians. The topmost political leaders, he says, are the men with the most important economic connections. Who these influential people are was determined by Hunterґs “reputational method”, asking a panel of judges who they felt to be the most powerful in the community. While these people may be commonly held by he community as having the most influence and power, they rarely initiate or execute policies. These tasks they delegate to those lower down in the power hierarchy or pyramid. There are many criticisms of the elitist approach. Firstly, it is unclear whether Hunterґs reputational method can be completely accurate. People understand power in different ways. They see different people as powerful in different ways. It is unlikely that everyone understands or knows the ways in which Hunter believes the economic elite to hold power over the community. Rose argues that the economic elite is indeed important and very influential, but there are many other factors involved in the distribution of power in communities. According to Rose, there are several elites who are not united. While some have economic power, others have military, religious, political or association-based powers. Pluralists in general also reject the elitistsґ basic premise that there is a power structure in every human institution reflecting the organisationґs stratification. Such categorical assumptions about community power cannot be made at all and it is doubtful whether, fundamentally, anyone dominates in a community. The question then is not “Who runs this community?” but “Does anyone run this community?” Elitists also assume that their power structure stays stable over time. There is some sort of longitudinal stability in that the same people hold the power over time. The pluralists, however, argue that particularly where power is specifically linked to issues, it tends to be only momentary or, at best, semi – permanent. In addition, there is a distinction between reputed and actual power that the elitists ignore. A panel of judges may view one particular person as being especially powerful. Whether this person actually exercises their influence, however, is another question. While elitists might presume that the members of their power elite are in fact involved in running the community, they may not be. Thus pluralists feel that theirs is far more “scientific” approach, based not on mere speculation, but on visible and specific empirical facts. The methodology of the pluralists contrasts with the elitists in that they use case studies in their findings, consisting in research that might be more anthropological or journalistic in character. They first distinguish between the routine and the key decisions that are made in a community. Once they have determined which the “key” or “important” decisions are, they can find out who was involved in the making of these decisions, their role and the nature of their participation during the decision – making process and, finally, how they have affected the specific outcome. Once such pluralist is Dahl, who studied the distribution of power in New Haven, and discovered that there was no evidence of any one ruling elite, or one group dominating decision-making. Rather, he found that there were several groups, each with different interests, who were able to influence key policy decisions. There is thus no simple “power elite” and he rejects the economic elite argument. The pluralist theory of power is subject to many weaknesses and is by no means absolute. One major failing of the pluralists approach is in their determination of the “key” or “important” decisions that are made in a community. It is unclear how anyone is to be able to objectively decide what can and cannot be classed as a decision or a policy that is “important”. Dahl has proposed a definition of key decisions as those where they involve an “actual disagreement in preferences among two or more groups”. Yet Bachrach and Baratz argue that it is not just the important decisions that involve disagreements. Many unimportant and trivial decisions can also be founded on basic and fundamental divergences in the preferences and interests of different groups. Thus it is difficult to say how there can be consistency between pluralists in their choices of key and routine decisions. Since this serves as the basis and the starting point of all their findings, this considerable flaw undermines their theory significantly. Domhoff argues against the pluralists in the way that they have no specific definition of the economic elite. They neither specify nor describe the elite. Nor do they take account of the many ways in which economically powerful members of society are able to influence and involve themselves in politics. The predominance of the economic elite within the executive branch of the US government and in Congress is underemphasized in pluralist theories, through political campaign funds, for example. In this way, businesses do indeed play a large part in shaping domestic legislation. Clintonґs health reforms regarding health insurance, for example, were defeated and many have attributed this failure to insurance companies in the US who were opposed to the reforms. In addition, the reliance of political parties on business for funding in the US means that they have to reflect the interests of the patrons in their policy decisions. Thus it is likely that the pluralists have indeed underplayed the role of the economic elite in politics. The power of the economic elite in the UK, however, may be quite different. In the UK there is not the reliance of the government and political parties on businesses and so they may be able to exercise less influence over politicians, and not act as the “power” behind political leaders. In addition, Bachrach and Baratz feel that the both the pluralists and the elitists have missed out on a crucial aspect of power that is “non-decision making”. This refers to the ability to limit the scope of what people can do. People can have power in the sense that they can have influence over what areas decisions are made in. If someone can enforce rules or practices so that certain issues are rendered unfeasible or so that some issues are prevented from ever arising, they have power. They are not directly making decisions, but they are in some way deciding what happens even before the supposed decision – makers choose the ultimate outcome. Take the teacher who gives her pupils a choice. The pupils may think that they hold the power in this instance, but in reality the teacher holds the ultimate power. Pluralists cannot detect this form of power because it is very often invisible. When non-decision – making is at its most successful, it is impossible to even link the instigator to what happens. Lukes goes even further in his definition of power. There are three faces of power, he says. The first is in participation in the decision-making process, the second in non-decision – making, and the third in shaping the preferences of others. To the extent that one may be able to change the values, interests and preferences of others so that the decisions they make may be affected, they can be said to hold power over these people. Someone, then, may hold power simply in their ability to manipulate the consciousnesses of other people. By shaping their preferences, he is making them think in the way that he might want them to think, and thus controlling the decisions they may make. The difficulty with both the second and the third faces of power, however, is that they cannot be proven empirically. There is no way anyone can prove that anyone else has been manipulated, or that there is some invisible force behind it all that controls what happens. Though this is undoubtedly a weakness of some sort, the fact that this theory is based on speculation, however, and not empirical facts, as Bachrach and Baratz said, makes it no less valid. There are thus many different conceptions of power. Generally, it is the ability of one person to affect others and make them do things in a way that they might not have chosen. According to the different theories, power is held variously by the economic elites of a community, different interest groups and several power elites. Thus what determines who has political power and how much depends very much both on how you go about doing the research, and also on how you define power. It is unlikely that there is any one group that holds all the power in any community. The power is distributed among many, some have more than others, but everyone has, to an extent, some power. The wider the definition of power, the more plausible this is. How much power they have, too, is determined by these factors. Influence can be both direct and indirect. If one is to view power merely as participation in the decision – making process, one is limiting the studies to a very narrow approach. It is not only the politicians, nor the economic elite that may stand behind them, that hold political power. At the very least, each and every adult citizen has some influence, albeit indirect, over what choices are made through their ability to vote. In addition, communities are very different. People act differently in different societies. Because many of theorists have concentrated their studies on only one community, their theories may be applicable to that one community. There will inevitably be some distinctive features in that society, however, and these will have contributed to how power is distributed within it. Thus it is very difficult to say decisively who ultimately has the power in any one community, nor how much of it they have. Power is held to some extent by even ordinary members of society, but to determine how much of it each individual or group may hold will depend on what areas one studies and which definition of power one holds.
Другие работы по теме:
Machiavelli Opinions Of A Perfect Princedom Essay
, Research Paper Niccolo Machiavelli?s work The Prince is a letter he wrote, while he was in exile to Lorenzo Medici. In his work he sought to establish a state capable of resisting foreign attack. His writings are concerned with the principles on which a state is founded, and how they are maintained. He describes the methods by which a prince can acquire and maintain political power.
A Successful Administration Essay Research Paper A
A Successful Administration Essay, Research Paper A Successful Administration Each president elected desires a smoothly operating administration run by competent officials in order to accomplish his goals and prerogatives and shared political ideologies between head administration members are vital to a successful government.
Niccolo Machiavelli Essay Research Paper Machaivelli was
Niccolo Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper Machaivelli was an Italian statesmen and writer. He was born in Florence on May 3, 1469 and he died on June 22, 1527 at the age of 58. He is considered by many to be the father of modern politics. The Renaissance was a time of great intellectual activity and Machaivelli was one of the greatest political thinkers of that time.
Castles Essay Research Paper Politicians have debated
Castles Essay, Research Paper Politicians have debated the focus of American foreign policy for decades. Of all the focal points of foreign policy, perhaps the most important should contain maintaining a strong United States dollar value. The value of the dollar determines the purchasing power of the dollar.
Machiavelli Essay Research Paper The first great
Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper The first great political philosopher of the Renaissance was Nicolo Machiavelli (1469-1527). His famous treatise, The Prince, stands apart from all other political
Social Stratification Essay Research Paper In Manifesto
Social Stratification Essay, Research Paper In Manifesto of the Communist Party by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, both authors believe that society had rapidly splitting into only two classes: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat as result of a long historical process and social revolutionary of machineries and large scale productions.
Party Politics In Africa Essay Research Paper
Political parties are a group of people with a defined programme organised to capture political power or stay in it through elections to control personnel and policies of government. This form of government was introduced to africa in general and ghana in particular by the colonial imperialists and it?s a form of western ideology which was not known to the ghanaian society until the advent of colonialism and it?s aftermath.
Colonialsim In India Essay Research Paper The
Colonialsim In India Essay, Research Paper The term colonialism is often used interchangeable with imperialism, but colonialism – the conquest and dominance of indigenous people by a foreign nation – can be regarded as a special form of imperialism.1 In the writing of modern history, the usage of the terms imperialism and colonialism is linked to the development of political and economic power overseas, and to the formation of capitalism.
Germany
’s Government: Chancellor Democracy Essay, Research Paper Germany’s Government: Chancellor Democracy Steve Rice Political Science 90 Computer Project
Compromises Of Political Ideals In Favor Of
Political Expediency Essay, Research Paper Compromises of Political Ideals in Favor of Political Expediency The Constitution of the United States of America was a document that contained many compromises the balanced political idealism with political expediency. Political idealism is the set of beliefs that the Constitutionalists ultimately wanted to achieve in the new government.
Raise The Red Lantern Essay Research Paper
In “Raise the Red Lantern”, the symbolic implications of the ancestral altar in the central reception hall go beyond the family walls, because it displays the portraits of all the powerful officals in the Chen family, thus suggesting the entire patriarchal tradition and its political power.
Nativism Essay Research Paper US NativismIn 1854
Nativism Essay, Research Paper US Nativism In 1854 there was a rise in a political party called the Know Nothings and they were against the immigration of Catholics into the United States. They re belief was they didn t want foreigners to hold political positions, influencing their communities they lived in, and affecting their lifestyle.
Freed Slaves Voting The Good And The
Bad Essay, Research Paper Many freed slaves were denied the right to vote through many of the following techniques: literacy tests that were impossible for freed slaves to pass, grandfather clauses which were futile to freed slaves, poll taxes, and Jim Crow laws. If these were all erased and freed slaves were able to vote freely, the attitude and political power of the South would of been greatly altered.
The State Essay Research Paper The state
The State Essay, Research Paper The state is like God, some believe that it?s the all mighty powerful being that controls all and others just think it?s a big overblown idea. The idea of the state (and God) is fairly confusing but rarely ever challenged, except by those rare few who seem to form their own opinions.
Famous People And Their Philosophies Essay Research
Paper 1. Thomas Hobbes - State of Nature- The state of nature is war. There are no morals in the state of nature, justice is non-existent. He claims that the supreme power determines justice, in a state of nature, there is no power.
Discover The Impact Of Puritanism Of Colonial
Society. Essay, Research Paper The puritans were a prime example of religious development of America. They had become social outcast in England, where they had little voice in matters, and so they migrated to America. There they set up the Massachusetts Bay colony, which flourished. With religious motivation too fulfill a ?Covenant? with God to establish the ?New Jerusalem,? successful model colony in America, they laid many of the foundations that would later be of great political importance.
Age Of The Bosses Essay Research Paper
As industrialization caused cites to grow in leaps and bounds, political bosses started to take power. As the 19th Century came to a close, almost every sizable city had a political boss, or at least had one rising to power. Tons of immigrants from every part of the world began to pour into the major cities. Cities have had diversity in the past, but the huge diversity of the American cities was unique.
Reconstruction Essay Research Paper The ReconstructionThe Reconstruction
Reconstruction Essay, Research Paper The Reconstruction The Reconstruction held out the promise to rectify racial injustices in America. The Reconstruction, rising out of the Civil War had as its goals equality for blacks in voting, politics, and use of public services. Even though movement, was born of high hopes it failed in bringing about their goals.
Santa Anna Antonio Lopez De Essay Research
Paper 1794?1876, Mexican general and politician. He fought in the royalist army, but later joined Iturbide in the struggle that won independence for Mexico (1821). Santa Anna then entered upon a long and tortuous political career. His actions were governed by opportunism rather than by any fixed principle, and he shifted his allegiance from party to party, his fortunes rising and falling with bewildering rapidity.
The Importance Of Balance Of Power In
Europe Essay, Research Paper B.O.P. essay Without losers, there would be no winners. Moreover, if there were no evil in the world, then kindness would not exist. This is exactly the way the principle of balance of power in Europe operates. It prevented empires, and helped to aid lesser states in their times of need.
Diplomacy At Work Essay Research Paper Diplomacy
Diplomacy At Work Essay, Research Paper Diplomacy at Work In today?s world political society, the use of diplomacy is a tool that allows countries to work out their differences in an attempt to avoid war. Diplomacy is
Machiavelli 2 Essay Research Paper Niccolo Machiavelli
Machiavelli 2 Essay, Research Paper Niccolo Machiavelli was born in Florence on May 3, 1469. While working as a clerk in the government, he gained stature when the Florentine Republic was established in 1498. Machiavelli supervised the military operations of the republic. He also was the secretary of the ten-man council that conducted the diplomatic negotiations.
Comparison Of Political Machines And The Reform
Movement Essay, Research Paper Compare and contrast political machines and the reform movement in terms of their views of the purposes of politics and government, the role of the average citizen in public affairs, and the appropriate processes of decision making.
Path Of Least Resistance Implicit Power
Essay, Research Paper Path of Least Resistance: Implicit Power In his book, Power and Choice, W. Phillips Shively introduces to students of political science the importance of power within the framework of politics. According to him, Politics consists of the making of a common decision for a group of people through the use of power (Shively 9).
Forms Of Government Essay Research Paper Forms
Forms Of Government Essay, Research Paper Forms of Government Communism: A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.
The Prince Essay Research Paper The PrinceNiccolo
The Prince Essay, Research Paper The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince examines the nature of power and his views of power are still somewhat in existence today. I’ll discuss this in this essay, emphasizing the following theses. Machiavelli discusses power over the people, dictatorial power, and power with people, shared power.
Government Essay Research Paper 2 We know
Government Essay, Research Paper 2. We know that the fundamental difference between ancient political science and modern political science has to do with the relationship of the individual to the state. For Aristotle, a person was an inherently political animal. For modern political philosophers (social contract theorists), individual rights existed prior to the formation of government.
Politics Of Modern Latin America Essay Research
Paper As a North American Latin woman, I have gone through the educational system (14 years of schooling) without every learning much about the political system of Latin America. Most of my knowledge has become available to me by my parents who are loyal viewers of channel 41 and 47. These two channels are Spanish-speaking channels that along with the traditional game shows, talk shows, and soap operas also include a news broadcast that covers stories and events of all of America.
Federalism In Political Culture Essay Research Paper
The Significance of Federalism in Political Culture The United States government is constructed of many systems and ideas which, when bound together, create the Democratic government utilized by the country. All of
Black Power Essay Research Paper BLACK POWER
Black Power Essay, Research Paper BLACK POWER The book “Black Power” was one of the most clearest manifestations of the movement s change of direction in the late 1960 s. Black Power was a change set out by one man to give rights back to black people and to put an end to prejudice and imperialism. One of the goals set out by Kwame Ture and Charles Hamilton, the authors of Black Power was to make black people stronger and overcome the subjection of a white society.
English Parliament
’s Rise Ot Power- Essay, Research Paper English Parliament’s Rise ot Power- In the seventeenth century, the political power of the Parliament in England, and the Monarchy in France increased greatly.
Political Power Essay Research Paper Political power
Political Power Political power can simply be defined as the power to influence. The power to influence is essentially the power to control. When pertaining to political matters, the most influential people in any form of government have the most power. The underlying argument is between who has the most influence.