Utilitarianism Or Kantianism Essay, Research Paper
Utilitarianism or Kantianism, Which theory of ethics is correct?
In choosing an ethical theory one must ascertain which is right to them
mentally because, To choose one over the other must mean that you believe in
that one to the fullest extent. That?s why I believe the only true Ethical
Theory in life ?today? is Utilitarianism. The main Utilitarian value is
happiness not for one person but for all of society. Utilitarianism is a very
rational way of thought, in which we consider all people as equals among
themselves.
(I say today because, a theory is only as good for as long as it last and no
one knows if a new theory will be discovered tomorrow.)
As all ethical theories, Utilitarianism is based on rights and wrongs of
human society. One principle of Utilitarianism is, the ultimate good (end or
purpose) of human life is happiness, not simply of a single individual in
isolation from others, but of all individuals together. This principle is very
important because it starts many disputes between people about what is good for
the majority of a society.
Utilitarianism has many principles but for this paper I will only be
discussing a few of the major points, such as actions of rights and wrongs. What
makes an act right is its consequences. ?Actions are right in proportion as
they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of
happiness.? How an action affects individuals, whether it causes them
pleasures or pain. One?s actions towards anything in life causes consequences,
these consequences are most of the time overlooked by the action maker, and its
results will be felt by others in the near future.
The Utilitarian standard is a social standard. What is right is not what
brings happiness to one, but what brings happiness to the majority. Many of the
Utilitarian principles are geared to an almost perfect world for all of
humanity. This orientation towards a Utopia society is one of the major reasons
why I believe Utilitarianism will prove to be the right theory of Ethics.
Utilitarianism is not without faults. One major point of this argument is
about happiness and good for the many as apposed to the few. Although we all
agree that happiness should be maximized for all, most of us cannot agree on
what is happiness and what is good and who decided. Utilitarianism offers us a
small look into this question by stating that, what is good is what society
defines good to be. For example, No one would ever disagree that helping someone
is wrong, but if helping someone shows your weakness towards others most people
would see you as weak hearted.
Kantianism is another theory of ethics, which believes that a human life
cannot be measured by quantity. This view on ethics is very interesting to
consider because it?s a one-eighty twist from Utilitarianism. In which we
notice that quantity is a main issue in life and its choices. Kantianism is
school of thought in which one life cannot be compared to another or many more.
One principle of Kantianism is "Act only according to that maxim by
which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."
This simple means that, one should do something that at the same time if done to
you would be acceptable by you. This argument is right on a fundamental level,
but we all know in life most people don’t feel this way about there choices,
they feel that they should do whatever brings them the most good.
Kantianism has a view of ethics that consist mainly of someone’s intentions
rather than the consequences. The good will factor is what Immanuel Kant argues
about. Suppose, A young child decides to help an old lady with her bags, but in
haste to rush up the stairs the young child spills the bags and breaks some of
the glass jars. Now the old lady is in total despair because all of her food is
lost because the child ran up the stairs. The older woman doesn’t stop to think
that the child had "good intentions" but decides to notify the child’s
parents and see to it that she is punished for her mistake. This is just an
example of how people today see life’s consequences and not someone’s good
intentions.
Kant proposes a very radical way of thought to our society today, and he
maybe right on the long run but the common practice today is Utilitarianism and
it’s consequence theory. Utilitarianism is used all around us today and over
history as well. The United States used this theory in its assault on Hiroshima,
Japan during World War II. They dropped an atomic bomb on Japan that they knew
was going to kill hundreds of thousands of people in a matter of minutes. This
act alone was justified in America because it was calculated at being able to
end the War and save the lives of millions of Allied soldiers. The United States
sacrificed the few for the many. The United States had bad intentions on
dropping that bomb but the consequences were good at the end because many more
lives were saved. Now I know that it’s still wrong and the United States could
have approached Japan with an ultimatum, but that plain might have failed and
taken the lives of other Americans down with it.
The Utilitarian approach may have been over kill but the fact that’s at hand
is that the War came to a rapped end after the bomb was dropped in fear of
losing more lives. Kantianism would have see this act as being wrong because of
the death at the end and would have said that no one should judge the value of
many lives over the value of many other lives. Although the actions of the
United States against Japan were sad and somewhat evil, the action was taken and
the United States of America is probably better off now with peace with Japan
even though it came at such a hard price.
Although Kantianism is mentally correct it in practice is a failure. Even the
most devoted Kantianist believer will sometimes lean towards Utilitarianism when
the stakes are placed on a higher platform. For example, Most people wouldn’t
kill one person to save three others, but would if it was to save three million
people. Like wise that such person wouldn’t kill one to save ten people, but
would if those ten people saved were apart of her family. Why is this? I believe
this exist because once the situation changes against them the person sees life
in a personal way and her rational mind kicks-in. Once the person knows the
decision will effect her privately and personally, her Utilitarian thought rises
and blossoms.
My preference from the start has been in favor of Utilitarianism, because I
feel that Utilitarianism is the proper way of thought in making major decisions
that will effect other people’s life. Although Kantianism seems to be the proper
ethical theory, one must ask himself, would you want someone to do the same to
you. By this I mean would want another person to do exactly what you have done.
I feel if you were to ask most people this, they would probably respond with a
smart answer or with no answer at all. My opinion on this topic is one of wonder
because if some one doesn’t believe in Utilitarianism, I feel she is being
utterly thick headed not to see that Kantianism is wrong if you don’t support
all sides of it. Kantianism is good though, for small situations as in daily
life, but for major issues such as War, the only way to follow is
Utilitarianism.
33f
Другие работы по теме:
Right Theory Essay Research Paper Right Theory1
Right Theory Essay, Research Paper Right Theory: 1. Rights create obligations, type of moral discourse & involve agents, being who act & are acted upon. People are given obligations to respect your rights. There is no right to obligate other people rights. (Conventional rights: Created by group of people as law or regulation in our society.
MILLS UTILITARIANISM Essay Research Paper In discussing
MILL?S UTILITARIANISM Essay, Research Paper In discussing matters of right and wrong, it is essential to first lay down the foundation of these concepts. These terms are indeed concepts because they hold no certain truth to the general society. True, righteousness may be a measurement of happiness, lack of pain, or a circumstantial mode of contentment, however, if you consider one persons? happiness to be another persons? pain, then what is the true measurement of right? We see that there are actually two distinct aspects to this question, a practical concern and a moral dilemma.
Masturbation Essay Research Paper They
Masturbation Essay, Research Paper They’re not blind. They don’t have hair on their palms. Even so, they still masturbate. Of all the topics that continually find themselves under attack, none seems to be restricted solely to quiet, taboo conversations as often as masturbation. For countless generations, this subject has been put down, looked down on, and kept behind closed doors, and no one is really sure why. “It’s immoral”, or “its dirty” are the best anyone has come up with.
Utiliatariasm And Its Authors Essay Research Paper
Utilitarianism is the principle idea for the greatest happiness for the greatest numbers. In other words, maximize the pleasure while minimizing the pain. One such philosopher and believer of Utilitarianism is Jeremy Bentham, who lived from 1748 until 1832. He believed that there should be a moral system, and that it should do two things.
Describe The Affect Of Utilitarianism On Our
Lives Essay, Research Paper The importance of human life, is really relative to the person is evaluating it. It differs from person to person. To me, I value life dearly, because everything which has happened to me is pleasant so far. But to some other people, it may not have been such an enjoyable experience.
Why Has JS Mill
ґs Version Of Utilitarianism Proved To Be More Acceptable Than Benthamґ Essay, Research Paper Utilitarianism began life as an ethical principle under Jeremy Bentham who theorised that an action if right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number of people. In its original form the argument had many flaws so John Stuart Mill decided to defend the principle of Utility against itґs critics by refining itґs ideas making them more practical in society.
Js Mill Essay Research Paper The principle
Js Mill Essay, Research Paper The principle of utility is that pleasure and happiness are valuable, pain and suffering are disvaluable, and anything else only causes the happiness or adds to the suffering. A utilitarian is someone who believes the principle of utility to be correct, and is therefore concerned with maximizing the utility of the universe.
Capital Punishment 22 Essay Research Paper What
Capital Punishment 22 Essay, Research Paper What would the world be like if the guilty was punished? Great; if in that world we could punish only the guilty and not the innocent. Thousands of innocent people have found their demise through our justice system. For this reason, and this reason alone, we should not allow capital punishment to implement itself on society.
Writings Of Thomas Hobbes And J.J.C. Smart
Essay, Research Paper Surpassing the Obvious: Analysis of the Writings of Thomas Hobbes and J.J.C. Smart A term paper contrived is only as good as the sources from which it is assembled. It is from these reservoirs of knowledge that the bulk of a paper is developed. That is why it is absolutely imperative that the qualities of these sources are immaculate and relevant to the subject matter.
Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper UtilitarianismThe main idea
Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper Utilitarianism The main idea of utilitarianism, according to Adam Morton s book Philosophy in Practice is to follow the action that brings about the greatest amount of pleasure or the least amount of pain. This idea at first seems simple but when applied to some examples the edges blur.
Glass Ceiling Summary Essay Research Paper Utilitarianism
Glass Ceiling Summary Essay, Research Paper Utilitarianism favors unequal treatment in the work place.CONTROLLING IDEA: Big corporations should be forced into applying affirmative action to equal out the male/female ratio in management positions.
Raskolnikov And Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper One
Raskolnikov And Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper One death, and a thousand lives in exchange–it s simple arithmetic. -Raskolnikov Raskolnikov s mathematical evaluation of the moral dilemma presented to him in Dostoevsky s Crime and Punishment exemplifies the empirical view of utilitarianism.
Mill Essay Research Paper Over time the
Mill Essay, Research Paper Over time, the actions of mankind have been the victim of two vague labels, right and wrong. The criteria for these labels are not clearly defined, but they still seem to be the standard by which the actions of man are judged. There are some people that abide by a deontological view when it comes to judging the nature of actions; the deontological view holds that it is a person’s intention that makes an action right or wrong.
Utilitarianism The Survival Lottery Essay Research Paper
It is better to give than to receive . I believe I was about nine years old when I heard that statement for the first time . It was in church. It was one of those things that I randomly chose to hear while sitting in church every Sunday. Normally anything that was said in that building never made sense to me and I never had any use for retaining it.
John Stuart Mill Essay Research Paper John
John Stuart Mill Essay, Research Paper John Stuart Mill 1806-1873 John had a teleological view of ethics. He is also known as the 1st advocate for women. Lived during the time of the Industrial Revolution. Born to a rich man, he was the youngest, Mr. Mill retired after having John and deticated his life to making John a genius.
Ethics 4 Essay Research Paper Connie Science
Ethics 4 Essay, Research Paper Connie Science s moral dilemma of whether or not to break government ethics laws regarding the acceptance of lobbyist s gifts has come to its climax where she must choose if she will jump on the bandwagon or not. Ms. Science could use a number of methods to come to a logical and morally sound conclusion.
Kant And Mill Essay Research Paper Kant
Kant And Mill Essay, Research Paper Kant: Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative Mill: Utilitarianism Immanuel Kant?s philosophy frames the Universal Law Formation of the Categorical Imperative as a procedure for determining morality of actions. This method contains two vital components.
Kant And Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper First
Kant And Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper First of all I want to state the Kantian and the Utilitarian views butt heads on this issue. The Kantian view is nonconsequential, that is as a matter of
Utilitarianism 2 Essay Research Paper When first
Utilitarianism 2 Essay, Research Paper When first introduced to Utilitarianism one would think that it is pretty straightforward and easy to swallow. Utilitarianism relates to the greatest happiness of the greatest number. Although there are some problems with this theory. In the paragraphs to follow I will illustrate what Utilitarianism is, discuss why it is important to society, and discuss some of the problems related to Utilitarianism.
Mill
’s Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper “Utilitarianism” is the ethical doctrine, which essentially states that which is good is that which brings about the most happiness to the most people. John Stuart Mill believed that the decisions we make should always benefit the most people as much as possible regardless of the consequences to the minority or even yourself.
John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper
JOHN STUART MILL S UTILITARIANISM Along with other noted philosophers, John Stuart Mill developed the nineteenth century philosophy known as Utilitarianism – the contention that man should judge everything in life based upon its ability to promote the greatest individual happiness. While Bentham, in particular, is acknowledged as the philosophy s founder, it was Mill who justified the axiom through reason.
Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper UtilitarianismWhat things are
Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper Utilitarianism What things are good? What actions are right? Utilitarianism is a moral principle defined by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill that can help answer these questions. The whole basis of Utilitarianism is that pleasure is good, pain is bad and every action one takes should maximize pleasure and minimize pain.
Classical Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper
“Classical Utilitarianism,” by John Rawls This short piece by Rawls makes the point that “utilitarianism does not take seriously the distinction between persons.” This is an intriguing statement and warrants discussion. Rawls view of utilitarianism is that the goal for society is the fulfillment of the maximum satisfaction of all its members.
Utilitarianism Vs Cultural Ethical Relativism Essay Research
Paper Utilitarianism is an example of Consequentialist Ethics, where the morality of an action is determined by its accomplishing its desired results. In both scenarios the desired result was to save the lives of thousands of people in the community. Therefore, a Utilitarian would say that the actions taken in both of the scenarios are moral.
Kantianism V Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper Ethics
Kantianism V. Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper Ethics can be defined as the conscious reflection on our moral beliefs with the aim of improving, extending or refining those beliefs in some way. (Dodds, Lecture 2) Kantian moral theory and Utilitarianism are two theories that attempt to answer the ethical nature of human beings.
John Stuart Mills Essay Research Paper Is
John Stuart Mills Essay, Research Paper Is ignorance bliss? Would human beings, without higher thought processes, lead a happier existence? Or, is it better to be a human dissatisfied, than a pig satisfied ?(Mill, 335). These are questions that plagued the mind of John Stuart Mill. These are questions that help us look into ourselves and form our own opinions of pleasure, happiness, and utility.
Mills Theory Of Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper
MILLS THEORY OF UTILITARIANISM AND HOW IT EFFECTS LIVING A DECENT OR JUST LIFE When faced with a moral dilemma, utilitarianism identifies the appropriate considerations, but offers no realistic way to gather the necessary information to make the required calculations. This lack of information is a problem both in evaluating the welfare issues and in evaluating the consequentialist issues which utilitarianism requires
LAW Ceciro Plato Socrates St Thomas Essay
, Research Paper REVIEWING KEY CONCEPTS 1) Define natural and positive law. Identify the fundamental differences between the theories of natural and positive law. Give an example to illustrate each of these theories.