Napster: To Be or Not To Be
Napster (Napster) is a company that operates exclusively online as a virtual music forum. Napster not only allows its visitors the ability to participate in ongoing discussions through its message board forums and online virtual chat rooms, but it also allows its visitors the capability to exchange music files (MP3s) with other Internet users. Because Napster is a “virtual” online public forum, Napster should be protected under the First Amendment. Under the First Amendment, “we the people,” are protected by these rights of freedom of speech and assembly. The idea of people coming together in one specific area of the Internet and being able to talk about music is essentially a right of all Americans. We have the right to “freedom of assembly” and the right to “freedom of speech.” This is why Napster should not be shut down. Napster should be protected under the First Amendment.
Wait!!!! What is a Napster? Shawn Fanning was a nineteen-year-old college student at Northeast University, when he first introduced his program Napster. Fanning had two loves: one was sports and the other was computers. As his curiosity grew for computers, he decided to stop playing sports. He then concentrated most of his time working with computers. He primarily focused on two aspects of the computer, programming and the Internet. During his freshman year at Northeast University, in 1998, Fanning was trying to enter computer science classes higher than the entry level (Jones, 2001, 1A). Not finding anything challenging about the courses he was enrolled in, Fanning decided to start writing a Windows based program in his spare time. He spent most of his time in chat rooms with experienced programmers who knew the ?tricks of the trade,? so to speak, of computer networking. Shawn?s roommate loved music files, most commonly known as MP3?s, but disliked most music sites that had limited music files available. He also disliked the idea of having to search endlessly from Website to Website for songs. Fanning, having this in mind, and his programming skills at hand, he wrote a program that he entitled Napster. He used the idea of all users being connected to one central computer server, and having access to each other?s music files that users wished to share (?MTV News,? 2000, 1). Spoken in a more technical manner ?Napster makes its application software freely available for download by consumers from its website. This software allows users to connect their PCs to and participate in the Napster peer-to-peer file indexing system. Users are not required to share any files with others, either as a condition of using the Napster system or in order to obtain files from other users? (Reuters, 1999). In short, Napster is a facilitator that allows its users to trade music files. It was created by Fanning because other music-trading sites were in his view, unreliable.
The idea of program sharing MP3s and giving people the ability to make customized compilation CDs (also known as burning a CD) of their favorite artists songs may sound brilliant to the users of Napster, but to the musicians whom creatively write the music, this is in their view, is a form of stealing. They have not only spent hours producing and writing music, but music is something that is published and copy-written. The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is currently representing the band Metallica, rapper Dr. Dre, and five other major record labels, which are all plaintiffs in a copyright infringement and piracy lawsuit against Napster (Reuters, 1999). When the Napster software is downloaded on a computer hard drive, Napter serves as an online music community, where you can conduct a search of the other users songs (MP3 files) that are currently online. According to Fanning, ?There are consistently eight hundred thousand people using the Napster service, limited only by their resources? (?MTV News,? 2001, 1). This statement is the exact argument that the RIAA is using to sue Napster. On May 8, 2000, the RIAA sued Napster for copyright infringement (Heilemann, 2000, 1-2). In their opinion they feel that there are over eight hundred thousand people stealing music at any given time. The RIAA believes that Napster and its founders are promoting the illegal reproduction of copyrighted music, and not giving any royalties to the owners of the songs (Reuters, 1999). Their theory behind the lawsuit is that there is no reason for a lover of music to go out and buy a compact disc that they like, why would a person want to buy a CD, when they could get it for free? They belief that Napster should be shut down until it compensates the artists for lost revenues for copyrighted music that was ?stolen.? ?There is not a First Amendment right to take someone else?s copyrighted expression and duplicate it? (Freedom Forum Staff, 2000,1).
On the flip side, Napster believes that shutting their company down is in violation of ?1008 of the Audio Home Recording Act (AHRA), which immunizes all noncommercial consumer copying of music in digital or analog form? (Reuters, 1999). This basically means that since Napster is not profiting off of the music, and the sharing of music is intended for the soul purpose of the ?noncommercial consumer? usage, therefore, it is protected by the AHRA. According to Napster?s newsletters, ?as a condition to your account with Napster, you agree that you will not use the Napster service to infringe the intellectual property rights of others in any way? (Earp, 2001, 1). Napster believes that they are just the facilitators in an online exchange forum. Napster is the program that links computers together, not the program that ?steals music.? They contest that they have done nothing wrong and that they shall not be shut down by a court of law. As to this day, the litigation between the two parties (RIAA and Napster) still has not been fully resolved. The CEO of Napster, Hank Barry, and Andrea Schmidt, the executive at Bertlesmann, (one of the world biggest media conglomerates and a plaintiff) went to the zoo one day and as odd as this may sound, “during a critical point in their eight-week-long secret negotiations” about the current lawsuit that Napster was involved in were looking at the exhibit with Lily the polar bear. All of a sudden, “to their horror, Lily shot out a paw and savagely crushed the bird. The metaphors presented themselves immediately. “I don’t want Napster to end up like that pigeon,” Barry recalls saying” (Stone, 2000, 1). Napster is taking this lawsuit very seriously and is throwing everything in its arsenal to stop the destruction of itself. They are presenting statistics that strengthen their power, for example “in the past year, the recording industry has posted a ten percent increase in album sales” (Earp, 2001, 2). They claim that there is an increase in CD sales despite the fact that Napster still exists. Napster is not hurting the music industry, in fact they believe it is helping them, so why bother shutting the program down. Shutting down Napster is the crime that will be committed; Napster is not the one committing the crime.
The current lawsuit that is still pending between Napster and the RIAA is should not be considered in the argument that Napster should be protected by the First Amendment; the lawsuit is irrelevant to my argument. I believe that Napster should be protected under the First Amendment. Napster is a ?virtual? public forum. In this forum people assemble together, they talk about music, read about music, and most importantly they trade music. This idea brings up the point that Napster and its users have the right to assemble, and have the freedom of speech to talk about music. If the courts send down a decision in favor of the plaintiffs, the court is essentially contradicting a right that has been instilled in this country ever since it was formed. It will be contradicting a right that was the main reason for the foundation of this country, the freedom of speech.
Americans have the freedom of speech. Napster users also have this freedom. ??In order to implement the District Court?s order, Napster would be forced to terminate is Internet directory, despite the fact that the directory serves numerous lawful purposes. Napster has the First Amendment rights to publish a directory, Napster users have First Amendment rights to have access to such a directory? (Reuters, 1999). This statement explicitly states that Napster and its users have the First amendment right to use Napster. In this program thousand of people assemble together at one time to talk about music and trade music. If Napster is shut down, the courts will be infringing on the First Amendment rights of Napster and its users.
In concern to the lawsuit, the RIAA is suing Napster for copyright infringement. They are suing for copyright infringement because Napster users are trading music and then burning the music onto CDs without ever having to buy them. Napster has presented a proposal that it would charge a flat one-time fee for the use of Napster (?MTV News,? 2001, 2).
The idea of having to pay for a service may not leave a good taste in some users mouths, but on the other hand, ?some local users of Napster say they would be interested in subscribing to the popular music-file-sharing Web site if an appellate court shuts down the free service? (McWilliams, 2001, 1A). The idea of having to pay or not to use the service is irrelevant to the argument, but if having to pay the artists is the only thing that is going to keep Napster alive and to stop the government from crushing their First Amendment rights, then the act of paying should be enforced, and both side will be satisfied.
In conclusion, Napster should be protected under the First Amendment. Napster is a public forum where people can get together to talk to each other and trade music files. The First Amendment clearly states ?Congress shall make no law ? abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble? (Bill of Rights). These are the rights that Napster and its users all have, for they are members of the United States. Regardless of the current lawsuit about copyrights that is still pending, or whether or not the users of Napster should have to pay for the services, Napster should be protected under the First Amendment.
Bibliography
References
Earp, J. (2001). Napster online. Napster copyright policy. Retrieved February 8, 2001 from the World Wide Web: napster/terms.
Freedom Forum Staff. (2000). Freedom forum. Napster shutdown not a free-speech issue, experts say. Retrieved February 8, 2001 from the World Wide Web: freedomforum/news/2000/07/2000-07-27-05.htm.
Heilemann, J. (2000). Wired interviews. Boise, the wired interview. Retrieved February 8, 2001 from the World Wide Web: wired/wired/archive/8.10/boise.html.
Jones, T. & Carlozo, L. (2001, February 12). Song-swap service vows to keep fighting. Chicago Tribune, A:1
McWilliams, M. (2001, February 12). Court may pull plug on free Napster. The Daily Iowan, A:1, 8.
MTV news interview: Fanning speaks. (2001). MTV News. Retrieved February 8, 2001 from the World Wide Web: mtv/nav/intro_news.html.
Reuters. (1999). The business of information. Napster brief. Retrieved February 8, 2001 from the World wide Web: reuters/news.jhtml?types=internet
Stone, B. & Miller, K. L. (2000, November 13). The odd couple. Newsweek, 46, 49-51.
Другие работы по теме:
Napster Essay Research Paper The problems faced
Napster Essay, Research Paper The problems faced by Napster and how it affects us. INTRODUCTION Shawn Fanning let his closely cropped coiffure grow a bit shaggy, so his friends started calling him “nappy.” That evolved into a new nickname, “Napster,” which became the Internet handle he used in chat rooms.
Cyber Battle The People Versus Napstercom Essay
, Research Paper Napster is a music search engine founded by Shawn Fanning about a year ago. It is a software program that allows individuals to search for their favorite music selection by connecting to millions of other users around the world. Napster is basically the simplest way to find MP3?s that you want anytime and the same time be able to share the selections with the world?s largest community of music lovers.
Go Napster Essay Research Paper Shawn Fanning
Go Napster Essay, Research Paper Shawn Fanning, a freshman in college, launched Napster in the beginning of 1999.Napster allows Internet users to share and download MP3 (music) files directly from any computer connected to the Napster network, which could be hundreds of thousands of people.You can use Napster by downloading the software from the Internet site, and then connecting to the network using this software, which allows the sharing of all your MP3 files with anyone else on the network.Unlike many other file sharing networks, Napster limits their users to only download MP3 files.The advantage of these files are that they can be very close to CD quality and are one-tenth the size of a wave file.This is the main reason that many artists and record labels are concerned with the MP3 file format and programs like Napster that makes it very easy to share copyrighted material.The fact
Napster Controversy Essay Research Paper NapsterWhat is
Napster Controversy Essay, Research Paper Napster What is the big deal with the whole napster controversy? All it is is a network, which allows millions of people to share files, which are already available on the Internet.
Napster Essay Research Paper Ruling could doom
Napster Essay, Research Paper Ruling could doom Napster A federal court ruled yesterday that Napster must stop allowing users to swap copyrighted music. Napster officials said they would keep operating while they fought in court. Napster was created by a teenager in 1999. Napster’s software lets computer users trade audio files by connecting with one another.
Napster Essay Research Paper Napster is an
Napster Essay, Research Paper Napster is an integrated browser and communications system provided by Napster, Inc., to enable musicians and music fans to locate bands and music available in the MP3 and WMA music formats. The MP3 and WMA files that you locate using Napster are not stored on Napster’s servers.
Is Napster Illegal Essay Research Paper Is
Is Napster Illegal Essay, Research Paper Is Napster illegal? Tough question… Actually, the issue really isn’t whether Napster is legal or not. The corporate suits and rich-bitch musicians would argue so, but it’s just a cover for their fears. They’re basically afraid of Napster because its done something that hasn’t happened in a while, but so desperately needed to happen.
1St Amendment Essay Research Paper HE FIRST
1St Amendment Essay, Research Paper HE FIRST AMENDMENT “Congress shall make no laws respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the
Napster Essay Research Paper NapsterWhat would you
Napster Essay, Research Paper Napster What would you do if had a access to all the music that you wanted and it was free? Well, in the age of the internet this situation is possible with mp3 s. Mp3 s are compressed digital audio files which has near cd quality sound. It was developed by a German engineering form called Fraunhofer IIS in 1987.
14th Amendment Essay Essay Research Paper More
14th Amendment Essay Essay, Research Paper More often than not, most Americans look upon the constitution as the guiding light of our country. Recent events occurring in our national election no doubt prove that. There are many important amendments to our Constitution regarding our rights as citizens and the delegation of powers to branches and states.
Napsters Problem Essay Research Paper The Problem
Napsters Problem Essay, Research Paper The Problem with Napster The sole reason behind anybody’s discrepency with Napster is because there is a group, maybe even the majority its users abuse what it is capable of.
XNapster Essay Research Paper XNapsterThe infamous Napster
X-Napster Essay, Research Paper X-Napster The infamous Napster under attack for it s pirating of music from famous musician s needs to be shut down. Piracy is a major issue of moral standards, right, and wrong in the entertainment world. Napster is well known for it s sharing of MP3 files through the Internet; taking, receiving, and bootlegging.
British Constitution Essay Research Paper Amendment IIRight
British Constitution Essay, Research Paper Amendment II [Right of people to bear arms not to be infringed.] A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
Equal Rights Amendment Essay Research Paper The
Equal Rights Amendment Essay, Research Paper The Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) was designed mainly to invalidate many state and federal laws that discriminate against women; its central underlying principle was that sex should not determine the legal rights of American men or women.
Dark As Hell Essay Research Paper The
Dark As Hell Essay, Research Paper The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is suing Napster for allegedly enabling music piracy through its proprietary MusicShare program. MusicShare allows music lovers to open up their stores of MP3 files to all other Napster users. Whenever a user is online, his MP3s are up for grabs, with the only stipulation being that users upload a file for each one that they download.
Napster And Musician Rights Essay Research Paper
Music copyright is something that will always be in question. Many people believe that music is for all to hear and should not be restricted on how we obtain it. Napster is the greatest controversy in the United States at current. Many musicians and people believe others should have free access to all music.
Shutting Down Napster Is Not The
Solution Essay, Research Paper Shutting Down Napster is Not the Solution Almost everyone has heard of Napster and its long debated issue s of file swapping and sharing. Considering Napster s short-lived existence of about a year and a half, they have certainly opened many people s eyes. Some say the file swapping that Napster allows everyone to do is illegal; others says it s just another thing to do on the internet.
The Great Napster Essay Research Paper THE
The Great Napster Essay, Research Paper THE GREAT NAPSTER Napster is innovative file-sharing software that lets an online community of music lovers trade MP3 files free of charge. You search for a song by name, and a list of people who have it pops up and you can choose whomever you want to get it from, and in addition, you can see and download any other songs that they may have in their files.
Rogerian Argument
– Pronapster Essay, Research Paper Simple Solution for Napster Lately, there has been a significant amount of concern regarding software programs that promote the sharing of songs at a minimal cost to the consumer. These networks allow users to swap computer files in the form of MP3s among one another via the World Wide Web.
Napster Vs Riaa Essay Research Paper Napster
Napster Vs Riaa Essay, Research Paper Napster vs. Music Industry Napster is an ongoing controversy on the Web. Napster is a software program that allows anyone to find their favorite music by connecting them to the computers of millions of other users. It is the simplest way to find the MP3s they want, whenever they want, and share them with the world’s largest community of music lovers.
The Mp3 Controversy Essay Research Paper A
The Mp3 Controversy Essay, Research Paper A major news item lately has been what is called The MP3 Controversy. It is based on the free trade of music files known as MP3s, which are small enough to be easily downloaded but have the same quality as a compact disc. Computer users are able to download these files from the internet and then burn them onto CDs that can be played in any regular CD player.
Napster Debate Essay Research Paper Napster DebateFor
Napster Debate Essay, Research Paper Napster Debate For a project in college eighteen-year old Shawn Fanning wrote a program for a way to download music off the internet. He later put the program on the internet and Napster was born. Napster is a program that allows you to download music on the internet. Since this program is free, many people have downloaded Napster.
Napster1 Essay Research Paper Napster The Napster
Napster1 Essay, Research Paper Napster The Napster Controversy In the controversy against Napster, many supporters fight to keep their freedom alive. This case is about whether the plaintiffs can use their control of music copyrights to achieve control over Napster’s decentralized technology and prevent it from transforming the Internet in ways that might undermine their present chokehold on music promotion and distribution.
RIAA Vs Napster Essay Research Paper The
RIAA Vs Napster Essay, Research Paper The debate over whether or not Napster Inc. is in violation of existing copyright infringement laws is a complex issue. Napster?s defense attorneys
Napster Essay Essay Research Paper Who wouldn
Napster Essay Essay, Research Paper Who wouldn t want to get free music off the Internet? I know I would jump at the chance to be able to get all the music I ve ever wanted for free. This is what the program Napster has attempted to do. But, you have to as yourself, what about copyright laws? What would happen if everybody stopped buying albums because they could get it for free? Napster has broken copyright laws, and album sales have decreased because of Napster.
Napster
’S Upshot Essay, Research Paper Napster’s Upshot Bickering, oh the endless bickering! It seems like that has become the pastime of the record industry and the estimated 32 million Napster users. All this frustration was brought about when Napster revolutionized the use of person-to-person file sharing over the net.
Napster Essay Research Paper The Napster RevolutionHave
Napster Essay, Research Paper The Napster Revolution Have you ever listened to your favorite song on the radio and recorded it? I remember when I would sit next to the radio and listen to it for hours at-a-time, just so that I could record my favorite songs off the radio. Now with computers and the Internet, I would go all over the Internet to look for songs, but only some of the time I was successful.
Napster Essay Research Paper There are many
Napster Essay, Research Paper There are many different controversies when consulting the topic on Napster. Napster is a computer program that lets people download mp3 music files from other people with the program. Lots of people and music companies believe that this is bad and Napster should be stopped or should charge people.
Pornography Essay Research Paper Susan JacobyA First
Pornography Essay, Research Paper Susan Jacoby ?A First Amendment Junkie? Censoring pornography is wrong. Pornography should not be censored just be cause some people find it offensive. I cannot recall the last time someone made me look at a pornographic picture, or made me buy a pornographic magazine or movie.
Mobile PhonesInternet Essay Research Paper MobileCell PhonesMobile
Mobile Phones/Internet Essay, Research Paper Mobile/Cell Phones Mobile phones have changed the way the world communicates. With the invention of the cellular phone service in 1983, personal telephones no longer depended on wires. In the 90’s it was now possible to connect to the Internet from virtually anywhere in the world from your cellular phone using satellite services.
Napster Essay Research Paper Napster By Alexis
Napster Essay, Research Paper Napster By: Alexis Alexis Frank IST 333 August 9,2000 Napster In less than one year Napster has become the hot application that has some 20 million users running to their computer. Napster is currently fighting for its life against a court ordered shutdown, but it seems that people will find a way to share and downloud on line music no matter what.
Napster Company Meltdown Essay Research Paper Napster
Napster: Company Meltdown Essay, Research Paper Napster: Company Meltdown? A nineteen-year-old entrepreneur, named Shawn Fanning, created Napster in 1999 as an elaborate plan to download music better from the Internet. Since its creation, Napster has caught on in the cyber world like wildfire. Ask any college student if he or she has heard of this company and you will hear a resounding YES! .