Napster Essay, Research Paper
Napster s Battle
Napster has become a part of all most every individuals vocabulary. It can be argued that Napster is the same blank tapes, meaning that both can record music from the original format and be used to play later. Also, people who think that Napster should be shut down say that it is taking money away from the artist and their royalties. It is subject debated; whether or not Napster has violated the copyright laws set forth by the record companies. This is to be determined by a court of law.
When blank tapes came onto the market, the record business thought that they would be the downfall of the industry. As people look back they realize that this was incorrect, blank tapes actually helped the industry rather then hurt it. The major fight then was that blank tapes were violating copyright laws and wee wanted to be removed from the market. Now Napster is having the same problem as the blank tape industry; people believe that this Internet application is violating copyright laws in every way possible. Napster allows people to download an application connecting them to a server so that they can share music files with others on their computers.
How this is any different than the blank tape dispute is quite interesting. The basic idea of Napster is the same as a blank tape, both allow the general public to listen to their choice of music, without spending much money. Now that technology is growing at a fast pace, the industry is scared that it may lose out on some of the income. This has been proven to be false from the results from blank audiotape sales in which there was no change in income. Many people claim that they use Napster as a preview application, so that they can actually listen to the band before buying the CD. Napster also indorses bands, by providing a free tour this shows that, not everyone believes that Napster is hurting the record industry. Napster, as seen by most is something like a blank audiotape for your computer and nothing more. It does not violate copyright laws and allows people to enjoy the music before actually purchasing it.
The dirty little secrets of those trying to shut down Napster ignore that, historically, technology often rewards those who fear it and fight it most vigorously. This practice is particularly true in the entertainment area. Television was supposed to drive the movies out of business; along with the radio, audiocassette recorder and VCR s there were expectations of the entertainment industry being ruined. In the early 1980 s, Motion Picture Association President Jack Valenti, who now leads the fight against Napster, claimed the VCR was to film as the Boston strangler is to the woman alone (Macko, Lia). Unfortunately, for Valenti it was not just a bad line, it also turned out to be completely inaccurate in the long run. Though the movie industry lost its bid for laws requiring video stores to pay a royalty each time a customer rents a video cassette, the film business won the substantial financial benefits tied to the expanded sale and distribution of videos. These revenues now account for a healthy portion of the movie industries profits (Macko, Lia). Napster could bring similar rewards to the music industry. Nearly three-quarters of all Napster users say their use of the service has widened their musical horizons, encouraging them to purchase music from different artists or from different categories of music (www.insightexpress). An online research service according to a survey conducted in late July by Insight Express.
If a technology exists that encourages people to purchase more of something, it won t be long before that revenue will quickly fall into the industry s pockets. In fact, a cash blend might actually enable the recording industry to take more risks when hiring talent. This could spur the revitalization of what now is a creatively crippled industry riding the coattails of one-hit wonders and an endless supply of boy bands. By ignoring these basic economic and creative realities regarding Napster the recording industry is actually encouraging a revolution that might not leave the music business standing. Striking a deal with the Web Site would provide the recording industry with the opportunity to exploit Napster s staggering user base of 20 million. AOL never had the quick success as Napster has found; it took AOL nearly a decade to acquire a user base of that size (Greenfield, Karl). On the other hand, shutting down Napster will not kill the practice of sharing digitalized music, but will instead push the process underground; there are a number of alternatives poised to fill if Napster shutdown. One of the programs that shows that it may have better success then Napster in the copyright battle is Gnutella. Gnutella, for example, is a Napster-like service that eliminates the middleman, or central Web site. Users just share music they ve obtained with each other. Other programs, such as Freenet, go a step further than Gnutella, these services use encryption codes that keep the identities of users concealed (Macko, Lia). The existence and widespread use of such programs would make it difficult for record companies to figure out who is using one of these services to share music files because there is no base server.
Should people be encouraged to steal music files just because they can? Perhaps, there is a difference between sharing and stealing, but how should this effect the way we define intellectual property rights? Though most legal analysts believe the law is on the music industry s side, there is a pro-Napster interpretation supported by the legal authority and case law that governs the intellectual property rights at stake.
According to Greenfield, the right to copy songs for personal, non-commercial use is protected by the 1992 Audio Home Recording Act (AHRA) (Greenfield, Karl). This law makes it legal to create a tape of your very own new Eminem CD so you can listen to Slim Shady in your car on your way to work. The same theory would permit downloading audio files from your computer to a disk so that you can listen to a compilation of your favorite funk songs while working out at the gym. Moreover, since Congress relied on a report by the Office of Technology Assessment (OTA) to determine that personal use includes sharing with friends, the widespread sharing of Napster acquired compilations, particularly on college campuses, would be protected by the Act (Greenfield, Karl). In other words, burning CD compilations to share with friends or play at parties via Napster downloads is no different than making tapes from the radio. Along with recording soundtracks, is something college students have spent the better part of many evenings doing for decades. This hobby hasn t harmed the music industry or artists yet. Though the Digital Millennium Act of 1998 exists to address software piracy and the posting of copyrighted material on Web sites (Epperson, Sharon).
It is not clear why or how it applies to Napster; as a business, Napster technically doesn t make any copies of the music. Why then should Napster be held liable, if Xerox isn t? When an individual uses one of the company s machines to copy and distribute protected material? Copyright protections are not absolute, they are made to encourage improvement, while at the same time to, protect the artist. The determining VCR ruling found that a technology is capable of substantial non-infringing uses (Epperson, Sharon). The technology provider cannot be liable for copyright infringement even if it encourages and facilitates infringing activities. In other words, just as the VCR served the legitimate and legal purpose of taping a protected television or movie for personal viewing, Napster permits personal uses protected by current copyright law.
The recording industry should wake up to the realties of the Internet, strike a deal with Napster and consider licensing options that will help recondition the way the public pays for music. Over time, as the Napster technology becomes universal, the public might decide it does not want to pay $16 for a CD with three good tracks; however, it might be willing to pay more for a good song. The recording industry should already be beyond this instead of throwing dollars and energy into a legal battle, it should be plotting a revised e-commerce strategy that is consistent with the rules of the new economy. A compromise would convert Napster s online fan base into a financial and creative victory for all. Napster has also had to deal with being sued. The music industry’s trade group has sued a small start-up company, claiming it is operating as a “haven” for music piracy on the Internet by making illegal copies of MP3 files freely available.
Napster software allows users to log onto its servers and make their personal MP3 collections available to be downloaded by other users. The services, as the RIAA says, “enable and encourage Napster users to download millions of pirated songs as well as make available their own music library for others to copy” (Macko, Lia). The RIAA has fought the pirated use of MP3 files and has been active in the establishment of a group to set standards for digital compression that ensures copyright protection. “Litigation is never our first choice,” Sherman said in the statement. “After a random sampling of thousands of recordings available on Napster revealed the overwhelming majority of recordings Napster was making available were pirated, we contacted the company a number of times, including in writing. But the same recordings we advised Napster were infringing then, are still available today.” (Macko, Lia) However, Napster Chief Executive Officer Eileen Richardson on Wednesday said there had been recent negotiations. “We spent the last ten days writing letters back and forth through our lawyers trying to agree on ground rules for settlement negotiations,” Richardson said (www.napster) She declined to discuss details of the lawsuit. Napster publishes a disclaimer on its Web site that says copying or distributing unauthorized MP3 files may violate U.S. and foreign copyright, adding that compliance with the law is the responsibility of the end user. “We index MP3 files, much like Lycos and Yahoo index the Internet,” Richardson said. “I’m not sure why they are picking on us. We’re still in beta test stage.” (www.napster). However, the extent of Napster’s involvement in facilitating pirated MP3 files may have to be established in court, says Michael Sobel, an intellectual property lawyer with the firm Graham and James of Palo Alto, California. “If all they did was make a list of MP3 files that exist, it would be hard to make a claim of copyright infringement,” Sobel says. “The question becomes how close they come to allowing other parties to copy files that are copyrighted.” (Macko, Lia) Last year, RIAA sued Diamond Multimedia Systems and its subsidiary Rio Port, claiming MP3-like devices such as the company’s Rio unit facilitated pirating. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled in June of this year that Rio did not violate the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992, which governs digital recording devices. (Macko, Lia) However, the Napster lawsuit hinges on copyright law rather than a statutory act, Sobel says. “The Napster claim is much broader,” he adds. (Macko, Lia) The RIAA is also moving forward with the Secure Digital Music Initiative. A group established with music companies and manufacturers to set a standard for music compression that ensures copyright protection. (Macko, Lia)
The facts that weigh in and make the final decision make the difference in the end. The way that the court looks at the information provided and what has been determined from prior experiences will also prove crucial in the verdict. Whether the court sees it as what happened with the blank tape ordeal or that Napster is just plain out violating copyright laws. Many of the facts both strongly support and oppose Napster staying up and running. From what has been determined from now the efforts of Napster won t end with out a long stretched out battle that will take day possibly years to resolve and the outcome is still unknown and could go either way.
Другие работы по теме:
Napster Essay Research Paper The problems faced
Napster Essay, Research Paper The problems faced by Napster and how it affects us. INTRODUCTION Shawn Fanning let his closely cropped coiffure grow a bit shaggy, so his friends started calling him “nappy.” That evolved into a new nickname, “Napster,” which became the Internet handle he used in chat rooms.
Cyber Battle The People Versus Napstercom Essay
, Research Paper Napster is a music search engine founded by Shawn Fanning about a year ago. It is a software program that allows individuals to search for their favorite music selection by connecting to millions of other users around the world. Napster is basically the simplest way to find MP3?s that you want anytime and the same time be able to share the selections with the world?s largest community of music lovers.
Go Napster Essay Research Paper Shawn Fanning
Go Napster Essay, Research Paper Shawn Fanning, a freshman in college, launched Napster in the beginning of 1999.Napster allows Internet users to share and download MP3 (music) files directly from any computer connected to the Napster network, which could be hundreds of thousands of people.You can use Napster by downloading the software from the Internet site, and then connecting to the network using this software, which allows the sharing of all your MP3 files with anyone else on the network.Unlike many other file sharing networks, Napster limits their users to only download MP3 files.The advantage of these files are that they can be very close to CD quality and are one-tenth the size of a wave file.This is the main reason that many artists and record labels are concerned with the MP3 file format and programs like Napster that makes it very easy to share copyrighted material.The fact
Napster Controversy Essay Research Paper NapsterWhat is
Napster Controversy Essay, Research Paper Napster What is the big deal with the whole napster controversy? All it is is a network, which allows millions of people to share files, which are already available on the Internet.
Napster Essay Research Paper Ruling could doom
Napster Essay, Research Paper Ruling could doom Napster A federal court ruled yesterday that Napster must stop allowing users to swap copyrighted music. Napster officials said they would keep operating while they fought in court. Napster was created by a teenager in 1999. Napster’s software lets computer users trade audio files by connecting with one another.
Napster Essay Research Paper Napster is an
Napster Essay, Research Paper Napster is an integrated browser and communications system provided by Napster, Inc., to enable musicians and music fans to locate bands and music available in the MP3 and WMA music formats. The MP3 and WMA files that you locate using Napster are not stored on Napster’s servers.
Is Napster Illegal Essay Research Paper Is
Is Napster Illegal Essay, Research Paper Is Napster illegal? Tough question… Actually, the issue really isn’t whether Napster is legal or not. The corporate suits and rich-bitch musicians would argue so, but it’s just a cover for their fears. They’re basically afraid of Napster because its done something that hasn’t happened in a while, but so desperately needed to happen.
Napster Essay Research Paper NapsterWhat would you
Napster Essay, Research Paper Napster What would you do if had a access to all the music that you wanted and it was free? Well, in the age of the internet this situation is possible with mp3 s. Mp3 s are compressed digital audio files which has near cd quality sound. It was developed by a German engineering form called Fraunhofer IIS in 1987.
Napsters Problem Essay Research Paper The Problem
Napsters Problem Essay, Research Paper The Problem with Napster The sole reason behind anybody’s discrepency with Napster is because there is a group, maybe even the majority its users abuse what it is capable of.
XNapster Essay Research Paper XNapsterThe infamous Napster
X-Napster Essay, Research Paper X-Napster The infamous Napster under attack for it s pirating of music from famous musician s needs to be shut down. Piracy is a major issue of moral standards, right, and wrong in the entertainment world. Napster is well known for it s sharing of MP3 files through the Internet; taking, receiving, and bootlegging.
Legal Vs Illegal Essay Research Paper Legal
Legal Vs. Illegal Essay, Research Paper Legal vs. Illegal (Napster vs. Music Industry) The issues that will be slugged out in federal district court in San Francisco sound a little too pop culture to be all that serious. How many music CDs are people buying these days in record stores throughout the nation because of Napster? Is the technology that Napster uses legal? Napster is, of course, the wildly popular file-sharing service whose 20 million users have downloaded some half a billion songs–most copyrighted for free.
Dark As Hell Essay Research Paper The
Dark As Hell Essay, Research Paper The Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) is suing Napster for allegedly enabling music piracy through its proprietary MusicShare program. MusicShare allows music lovers to open up their stores of MP3 files to all other Napster users. Whenever a user is online, his MP3s are up for grabs, with the only stipulation being that users upload a file for each one that they download.
Napster And Musician Rights Essay Research Paper
Music copyright is something that will always be in question. Many people believe that music is for all to hear and should not be restricted on how we obtain it. Napster is the greatest controversy in the United States at current. Many musicians and people believe others should have free access to all music.
The Federal Reserve System Essay Research Paper
Should Napster be prosecuted? Napster a free music sharing software is in the mist of being sued by many music corporation for copyright infringement. Napster users download and upload copyright music without the permission of the copyright owners which is illegal. People who write, perform, and produce the music don’t even recieve a royality from there work which is considered stealing.
How And What Is Napster Doing To
Infringe On Copyright Laws? Essay, Research Paper Re: How and What is Napster doing to infringe on Copyright Laws? Issue: What is Napster? Why is Napster causing such a commotion? What
Shutting Down Napster Is Not The
Solution Essay, Research Paper Shutting Down Napster is Not the Solution Almost everyone has heard of Napster and its long debated issue s of file swapping and sharing. Considering Napster s short-lived existence of about a year and a half, they have certainly opened many people s eyes. Some say the file swapping that Napster allows everyone to do is illegal; others says it s just another thing to do on the internet.
The Great Napster Essay Research Paper THE
The Great Napster Essay, Research Paper THE GREAT NAPSTER Napster is innovative file-sharing software that lets an online community of music lovers trade MP3 files free of charge. You search for a song by name, and a list of people who have it pops up and you can choose whomever you want to get it from, and in addition, you can see and download any other songs that they may have in their files.
Rogerian Argument
– Pronapster Essay, Research Paper Simple Solution for Napster Lately, there has been a significant amount of concern regarding software programs that promote the sharing of songs at a minimal cost to the consumer. These networks allow users to swap computer files in the form of MP3s among one another via the World Wide Web.
Napster Vs Riaa Essay Research Paper Napster
Napster Vs Riaa Essay, Research Paper Napster vs. Music Industry Napster is an ongoing controversy on the Web. Napster is a software program that allows anyone to find their favorite music by connecting them to the computers of millions of other users. It is the simplest way to find the MP3s they want, whenever they want, and share them with the world’s largest community of music lovers.
The Mp3 Controversy Essay Research Paper A
The Mp3 Controversy Essay, Research Paper A major news item lately has been what is called The MP3 Controversy. It is based on the free trade of music files known as MP3s, which are small enough to be easily downloaded but have the same quality as a compact disc. Computer users are able to download these files from the internet and then burn them onto CDs that can be played in any regular CD player.
The Legality Of Mp3
’s Essay, Research Paper You can hardly own a computer today and not know about MP3 files. MP3 is shorthand for Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG) 1 Layer 3. It is a compression technique that makes large files smaller for easier storage and downloading. They are widely used and have become very popular recently, especially with the emergence of the file-sharing program Napster.
Napster Debate Essay Research Paper Napster DebateFor
Napster Debate Essay, Research Paper Napster Debate For a project in college eighteen-year old Shawn Fanning wrote a program for a way to download music off the internet. He later put the program on the internet and Napster was born. Napster is a program that allows you to download music on the internet. Since this program is free, many people have downloaded Napster.
Napster1 Essay Research Paper Napster The Napster
Napster1 Essay, Research Paper Napster The Napster Controversy In the controversy against Napster, many supporters fight to keep their freedom alive. This case is about whether the plaintiffs can use their control of music copyrights to achieve control over Napster’s decentralized technology and prevent it from transforming the Internet in ways that might undermine their present chokehold on music promotion and distribution.
RIAA Vs Napster Essay Research Paper The
RIAA Vs Napster Essay, Research Paper The debate over whether or not Napster Inc. is in violation of existing copyright infringement laws is a complex issue. Napster?s defense attorneys
Napster Essay Essay Research Paper Who wouldn
Napster Essay Essay, Research Paper Who wouldn t want to get free music off the Internet? I know I would jump at the chance to be able to get all the music I ve ever wanted for free. This is what the program Napster has attempted to do. But, you have to as yourself, what about copyright laws? What would happen if everybody stopped buying albums because they could get it for free? Napster has broken copyright laws, and album sales have decreased because of Napster.
Napster
’S Upshot Essay, Research Paper Napster’s Upshot Bickering, oh the endless bickering! It seems like that has become the pastime of the record industry and the estimated 32 million Napster users. All this frustration was brought about when Napster revolutionized the use of person-to-person file sharing over the net.
Napster Essay Research Paper The Napster RevolutionHave
Napster Essay, Research Paper The Napster Revolution Have you ever listened to your favorite song on the radio and recorded it? I remember when I would sit next to the radio and listen to it for hours at-a-time, just so that I could record my favorite songs off the radio. Now with computers and the Internet, I would go all over the Internet to look for songs, but only some of the time I was successful.
Napster Essay Research Paper There are many
Napster Essay, Research Paper There are many different controversies when consulting the topic on Napster. Napster is a computer program that lets people download mp3 music files from other people with the program. Lots of people and music companies believe that this is bad and Napster should be stopped or should charge people.
Napster Essay Research Paper Napster is continuing
Napster Essay, Research Paper Napster is continuing to comply with the District Court?s injunction and to prevent the record companies from shutting down file sharing. In the process of doing so, we have implemented a range of filters designed to remove from the Napster service all copyrighted works for which we have received notice.
Napster Essay Research Paper For many years
Napster Essay, Research Paper For many years the record companies have fixed record prices to avoid competing with each other and to maximize their profits. Currently, the record companies are collaborating in order to force Napster to shut down. The record companies are claiming that Napster is breaking copyright laws.
Mobile PhonesInternet Essay Research Paper MobileCell PhonesMobile
Mobile Phones/Internet Essay, Research Paper Mobile/Cell Phones Mobile phones have changed the way the world communicates. With the invention of the cellular phone service in 1983, personal telephones no longer depended on wires. In the 90’s it was now possible to connect to the Internet from virtually anywhere in the world from your cellular phone using satellite services.
Napster Essay Research Paper Napster By Alexis
Napster Essay, Research Paper Napster By: Alexis Alexis Frank IST 333 August 9,2000 Napster In less than one year Napster has become the hot application that has some 20 million users running to their computer. Napster is currently fighting for its life against a court ordered shutdown, but it seems that people will find a way to share and downloud on line music no matter what.
Napster Company Meltdown Essay Research Paper Napster
Napster: Company Meltdown Essay, Research Paper Napster: Company Meltdown? A nineteen-year-old entrepreneur, named Shawn Fanning, created Napster in 1999 as an elaborate plan to download music better from the Internet. Since its creation, Napster has caught on in the cyber world like wildfire. Ask any college student if he or she has heard of this company and you will hear a resounding YES! .