Truth and Nature
As I read more of Nietzsche and Loa Tzu, there is an increasing similarity between the basic structures of both philosophical hypotheses than there is difference. Though the outcomes differ, and even the rational of both men?s thought process are plotted differently, and suggest drastically different ideal lifestyles, both works, the Tao Te Ching and the Will to Power argue for first an acceptance of an immoral world, a world with no true good nor evil, nor up nor down, but rather just man as he is and nature, connected to man, just the way it is.
Originally its thought that human nature dictates a nature of man, a habit of man?s control, whereas others side with thoughts that man patterns after nature, and that nature controls both man and material. As said earlier, both theorists execute their theories differently although here the similarity paradoxically arrives by contrast. Will to Power explains man?s tendency to act in accordance to desire and, ?(putting it most mildly), exploitation,? as ways of human nature. The nature belongs to man. Man becomes the creator of his own self-image; he aims to become the ?creator of values,? among his subjects, and thus takes nature into his own control. He thus becomes powerful through the control of others. Power, wisdom, strength, the essence of living here is established through conquest.
Now power, (though to even state such definite assertions is clearly defiant of Lao Tzu?s attempts to explain the detriment of definition) is gained, or accepted by quietism, and meekness looked down on by the Will to Power. Power, or true strength and nobility is understood through the Tao as achieved by inaction, or flow (e.g. Tao?s illusion to water), and not Nietzchian aggression or will. To will in Toa is to expect, and expectation defines both gain and loss, not power. Both gain and loss flux but pure gain comes without expectation. Power, wisdom and strength is revealed through acceptance of a nature outside man?s control, a cycle of season, ying and yang in the cosmos of life that cannot be altered, or controlled, but understood. Here nature changes man, and man gains power through acceptance of it.
Now to tie the two ideas of power is to prove how similar their conclusion in practice can be. Let us pretend there are two men. The first man holds social power, the second a man of poverty holds wisdom, and let us say that the first man as gain what is thought to be part of a ?select class of beings? able to elevate themselves to their higher duties, and in general to a higher existence? to Nietzsche and chooses to kill another man. The other man could be the second the poor man introduced above. Now the first man is happy, he has followed his will, his need to hate perhaps temporarily extinguished, he has killed without mourning, and killed in order to threaten others, and to climb closer into the light (e.g. ?like those sun-seeking climbing plants in Java? called Sipo mataodr,?) and become the ?complete man.? But if the roles had reversed and the first man had died, perhaps by the poor man?s accidentally and through self defense, then the second man would too find solace in following the way of Tao. The second man has followed the flux, and death and life again revolve. Being so close the nature, but never really becoming just energy, a both empty and fullness of Tao he struggles too, like the fist man to be fulfilled. The powerful man, though perhaps rich, perhaps an aristocrat, perhaps even the master in Nietzsche?s ideal, struggles with balance. He cannot be complete power, he cannot become god because man and beast divide his conscious and actions.
So ironically both men suffer as well as prosper in trying to acclimate into more perfect beings.
Nietzche believes that the world is broken into good and bad strictly controlled by selected few who are able to create this truth. These few dictate and are prime examples of complete men/beasts who follow an individual self centered order void of god, or master (to thus become a master). To follow this will, this liberating desire to live in the pursuit of power is the essence of living. The will claims Nietzche is life, and those who succeed in its pursuit, live to make the distinctions between good and evil. Therefore good and evil does not exist (unless by religion) but rather the outcome (to succeed or not to succeed).
Whereas with the Lao Tzu, the identical belief system that things are neither good or bad, large or small, but compliments, and overlapments of one another until nothing can be distinguished, or determined, believes that it is not the separation of master and slave morality that defines us, but the combination and void of both that creates the ideal man, a man of what Nietzche would believe as weak, and drawn to slave tendencies. To Lao Tzu, there is no master without slave. Indeed, the Tao Te Ching?s man lives through virtue, silence and, passivity. He draws his strength through acceptance (e.g. to bend is to be straight).
Therefore, to Nietzche one who lives, and accepts the will to power is not branded the coward, but the better man devoted to his self-preservation. And to Lao Tzu, to truly understand the oneness, and nothingness of nature is to be closer to it, farther away from power, (eg similar to water, to order, to the nature of things which he believes as faithfulness and love of humanity). Two very different philosophies based upon the linked concepts of metaphysics, the ideas of what is real, if good is really definite or can be gauged. Hence the real question and distinction lies with the idea of (human) nature; whether he must act like his nature, or if his nature is reliant upon the physical nature that has preexisted. To decide if the will to power and the social Darwinism of people is the inclination to self-egotism is the right, or if the act of immortality is unredeemable is the most interesting. Can one who kills with respect to order be healthier than on who accepts the killing?
In fact, the exploitation of the Will to Power and the acceptance of the Tao Te Ching is modern society. Some people are caught up in the whir of business and finance, and others become art teachers. Some are presidents and lawyers, others underage and on welfare. How one approaches the world is how one see the truth, both men claim to see it, but what really pertains is anyone?s guess. Relatively speaking, Nietzsche?s was speaking in response to the conflicts of the late eighteen hundreds and the social structures of learned experience his era provided, where as Lao Tzu?s contemporary were possible 551-479 BCE, Confucius!
It could be seen that Taoism is a resolved, complete in thought. The cycles of Tao?s pluralistic ideas satisfies the problematic gaps in Nietzsche?s goal and conquest, power as freedom as the means to a resolution (conclusion). His will to power, and assertion of man psyche, is a well articulated and psychologically sound but limited explanation that works in microcosmic perspective, though in comparison is far more detailed than the undeterminable Tao. The cosmic and ever changing Toa that though complete remains still unclear and attempts through poetic ambiguity, flowery imager, and moral to imply meaning. Unfortunately the Tao too is unable to answers questions of the universe, ying and yang a valiant attempt in describing change but not why the change, why the flux and void, perhaps because it too cannot reach resolution, the Tao in fact was not made to reach one.
Both theses are particularly interested in God, or rather the absence of it. Tao does not even approach the subject, and Nietzche, an avid atheist repeatedly insists on the hindrance of religion, in particular Christianity (as it promoted the weak slave mentality and introduced the difference of evil and good verses bad and good). In fact Nietzche is famous for saying that God is dead and the Tao famous for being unaware of any single deity.
The holes and accidents of living, the unpredictable emotional inconsistency of living isn?t explained simply through power and best interest alone, instead let us take accidents and mistakes as the foundation of living. Not all things follow power, nor does power the end needs of human ambition obtain complete happiness, but rather promotes the impossible. Something must be said for pity, for the sight of someone in pain that condemns both concepts. Neither weakness nor passivity, nor the understanding of nature would do in describing our actions when faced with starvation, the holocaust, or dying.
Другие работы по теме:
Romeo An Juliet Essay Research Paper hi
Romeo An Juliet Essay, Research Paper hi i need an essay about a character in romeo and juliet that demonsrtated maturity. in a well developed multi pagraph essay and say why you think the character’s maturity was greater than the other characters in the play.
Superman And The Little Pastor Essay Research
Paper Superman and the little pastor Nietzsche: A Philosophical Biography by Rudiger Safranski 412pp, Granta, Ј25 Zarathustra’s Secret by Joachim Kohler 278pp, Yale, Ј19.95 No single adjective captures the rich, strange genius of Friedrich Nietzsche. Enigmatic, vatic, emphatic, passionate, sometimes absurd, occasionally nauseating, and often breathtakingly insightful, his works together make a unique statement in the literature of European ideas.
The Passage For Nietzsche On Religion Rhetorical
Devices Essay, Research Paper Following is an excerpt from Twilight of the Idols by Nietzsche. The most general formula at the basis of every religion and morality is: ‘Do this and this, refrain from this and this – and you will be happy! Otherwise….’ Every morality, every religion is this imperative – I call it the great original sin of reason, immortal unreason.
Life Or AntiLife Nietzsche V Essay Research
Paper Life or Anti-Life: Nietzsche vs Socrates Nietzsche s charge that Socrates is anti-life appears to be driven merely by disgust and not proven by fact. I say this mainly because the majority of Nietzsche s accusations in The Problem of Socrates were either negative statements against Socrates physical appearance or inaccurate accounts that he possibly just misunderstood.
Nietzsche And Platonism Essay Research Paper In
Nietzsche And Platonism Essay, Research Paper In Twilight of the Idols Nietzsche writes, “My objection against the whole of sociology in England and France remains that it knows from experience only the forms of decay, and with perfect innocence accepts its instincts of decay as the norm of sociological value-judgments.
Decline Of Religion In 20th Century Neitzsche
Essay, Research Paper In this paper I am supposed to choose an existential or nihilist thinker and apply their thoughts to the 20th century problems that we identified at the beginning of class. I?m not going to do this. What I?m going to write about is one of, if not the biggest, problem mankind has ever created for itself.
Epistemology Essay Research Paper In Philosophy many
Epistemology Essay, Research Paper In Philosophy, many thinkers search for the nature and grounds of human knowledge. We call this area of study Epistemology. Two important epistemological philosophers are Friedrich Nietzsche and Charles Sanders Peirce. Nietzsche’s work has had a lasting fascination for many, and has developed an almost cult following although his work has found little significance among fellow academicians.
Primal Will Essay Research Paper How the
Primal Will Essay, Research Paper How the ‘Primal Will’ evolves in Thus Spoke Zarathustra This principle of life remains throughout Nietzsche’s writings. Although he will later criticize virtually all of Schopenhauer’s contributions as being either “pessimistic” or still under the sway of the Christian Moral Ideal, his initial conception of the will as primal becoming sustains itself into the later writings.
Innamorta Essay Research Paper Just a string
Innamorta Essay, Research Paper Just a string of thoughts… Life. A sparkling myriad of light, a multi-faceted gem, an opal basking in the sun… the ever dancing shadows flicker off the walls as the inconstant light ever changes with the tides. As fickle as the woman that lies with fate and Lear’s witches, life is; and yet is not.
Oh Really Essay Research Paper Oh Reallyyou
Oh Really? Essay, Research Paper Oh Really, you think i am a lark, the dogs they run and bark, but when i say to them, shut up shut up shut up, you say to be nice to them,
Nishilism
& Nietzsche Essay, Research Paper You’re Really Nothing at All Nihilism is the characteristic value-disease of our times. The word comesfrom the Latin root for “nothing”, with more ancient connexions with theword for “trifle”. Nihilism is the general phenomenon of human valueshaving no evocatory power, in that questions about meaning fail to yieldanswers that are trustworthy or in the truth, but rather a void ofsenseless silence.
Nietzsche Essay Research Paper On NietzscheI think
Nietzsche Essay, Research Paper On Nietzsche I think that the three questions that I will try to find answers are highly interconnected with each other and because of this reason, I will not answer them separately. I will be answering them without order.
Philosophy Goal In My Life Essay Research
Paper PHILOSOPHY: I have a goal in my life… to read and understand the works of the greatest philosophers of all cultures. For now, I am trying to get more familiar to them, to their ideologies. Nietzsche is the one I strongest admire at the moment, for the strength he proves to have in everything he writes
Nietzche Marx And Kierkegaard Essay Research Paper
Professor Foltz 20th Ce. Philosophy Nietzsche, Marx, and Kierkegaard Zarathustra is always a favorite, with the ringing of God is dead throughout the mountains. Re-evaluating our idols, discovering the significance of their dethroning and how it relates to the intricate web that we create for our lives.
Shane Essay Research Paper Sometimes I need
Shane Essay, Research Paper Sometimes, I need you more than I need air And sometimes I miss you more than I will forever, never forget the times that we have shaared. The are priceless
Nietzsche Essay Research Paper Who is Friedrich
Nietzsche Essay, Research Paper Who is Friedrich Nietzsche? Can a man born in 1844 really tell us anything of relevance in the twenty-first century? To simply say Nietzsche was a German philosopher would be an injustice? let’s stay clear of labels, I’ll simply describe Nietzsche as a man with an incredible metal penetration of situations covering all walks of life? Friedrich Nietzsche challenged the foundations of traditional morality and Christianity.
Will To Power By Friedrich Nietzsche Essay
, Research Paper The existential philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche believed that humanity nedded to be overcome. He viewed humans as weak creatures and slaves to the Christian
Nietzche The Man Essay Research Paper Nietzche
Nietzche -The Man Essay, Research Paper Nietzche Nietzsche on Religion: Rhetorical Devices In Twilight of the Idols Nietzsche discusses his views on Christianity, other philosophers, and authors of his time. Nietzsche’s main focus, however, is on Christianity and how its actions and views are means to an end.
Nihilism Essay Research Paper The word Nihilism
Nihilism Essay, Research Paper The word Nihilism comes from the Latin root for nothing , with more ancient connections withthe word for trifle . Nihilism is the general phenomenon of human values having no power, inthat questions about meaning fail to yield answers that are trustworthy or in the truth, but rather avoid of senseless silence.
Nietzsche Essay Research Paper My name is
Nietzsche Essay, Research Paper My name is Friedrich Nietzsche and I would like to explain the concepts of my work, On the Genealogy of Morality, to you. “Good” initially designated only the right of those individuals with social and political power to live their lives by sheer force of will. But a social class, motivated by their resentment of their natural superiors, generated a corrupt alternative that would appeal to those who were less capable, which turned values inside out.
Nietzsche Beyond Good And Evi Essay Research
Paper Master morality and Slave Morality Master morality is so named because it was created by the ruling class, the distinguished, the aristocrats, and it essentially considers strength, power, and bravery to be “good.” The “good” was created out of an affirmation and pride of their own power and honor.
Nietzsche Essay Research Paper The Morality of
Nietzsche Essay, Research Paper The Morality of Passions by Nietzsche presents a view of man s relationship with passion contrary to the tradition and thought of major religion and proclaimed moral gurus. His main criticism of the way the church deals with passion is that it does not suggest spiritualizing the feelings that we all have approaching them as beautiful and good, but makes a thoughtless and quick judgement immediately.
Poem She Sat Essay Research Paper She
Poem: She Sat Essay, Research Paper She sat… helpless in her room praying to whatever god there may be to let her call to him. could god ignore such a painful cry?
Absurd Essay Research Paper Absurd The Absurd
Absurd Essay, Research Paper Absurd: The Absurd is a much misunderstood philosophical category, primarily due to its sense of linguistic finality both in French and English. To use the expression “that’s absurd!” brings with it an automatic negative judgement and a feeling that all further discussion is thereby closed.
Comparing Nietzsche And Freud Essay Research Paper
Nietzsche and Freud both had the same idea that society was a major factor effecting ones behavior. However they differed in their perception of the innate qualities of humans and how human progress is best achieved. It will be shown in this paper how Nietzsche and Freud differ in their perception of the innate qualities of humans.
Freidrich Nietzsche Essay Research Paper Friedrich Nietzsche
Freidrich Nietzsche Essay, Research Paper Friedrich Nietzsche, a unique philosopher had some very interesting ideas about people?s human values and personality types. In this essay I will explain what I like and dislike about his ?Master Morality? & his antithesis to this, ?Slave Morality?.
Plato Vs Nietzche- The Nature Of
Good Essay, Research Paper Plato Vs. Nietzsche: The Nature of Good Plato and Nietzsche have opposing views on the nature of good. Plato, as demonstrated in the “The Cave” and “Apology,” believes that Good is absolute. This means that he is of the opinion that there is one perfect version of Good for all people, whether they are rich or poor, powerful or weak.
Nietzche Vs Socrates And Plato Essay Research
Paper Nietzsche s thoughts on finite differed dramatically from Socrates and Plato. Nietzsche believes that everyone should embrace the finite because you will enhance this life and make it more beautiful. He rejects the theory that eternity is of more importance than the present life. To Nietzsche, pursuing what you love to do is the only way to excellence.
Outline For Inclass Essay
“Comparing Early To Late Modernity” Essay, Research Paper Compare and Contrast Early and Late Modernity I. Summary of Ideas A. Early Modernity 1. Natural Rights