The Ebonics Debate Essay, Research Paper
The Ebonics Debate
On December 18th, 1996, the Oakland Unified School District adopted Ebonics, a terms which is a combination of the words ebony and phonics used to describe the African-American vernacular, as a language. Since then it seems wether on talk shows, newspaper editorials or television news, everyone wants to offer their opinion. This paper will examine two very different points of view, and decide which arguments proves to be stronger. In Charles J. Fillmore=s article AA Linguist Looks at the Ebonics Debate@ the enthymeme states this resolution is necessary in A(b)uilding on the language the children have to help them acquire the language they need to learn in school@(2). He states that most people are misinformed about the intentions of the school district as well as the problem at hand. In Chuck Sambar=s article AEbonics@ a contrasting view is offered. The enthymeme of the article is as follows: AThe decision of the Oakland School District to put itself on the map of educational nonsense has been fast, broad based, and unrelenting@(1). He argues that everyone=s time and money could be much better spent on more important issues in today=s school system. The following three paragraph=s will examine the ethos, pathos, and logos elements of the two debates. I will then examine the two articles using Toulmin=s scheme, to decide which arguments is most sound by examining the claims, grounds, backing, warrant, and then the qualifier of each article.
Before examining the two articles in question, it is necessary to establish whether the two authors have the credibility needed to write the articles. Charles Fillmore, being a professor of linguistics at the University of California at Berkeley, a master in the field of linguistics and language, holds a unique position to offer his views of the situation. Chuck Sambar, a newspaper columnist, may have the ability to capture a reader in emotional appeal and sensationalistic headlines, he is hardly in a position to offer an intellectual take on this issue. This only confuses facts for his audience just as the news media often jumps to grab the big headlines and hastily reports on only part of the story at hand.
Sambar relies purely on emotional appeal to convince his reader. He uses terms such as Ahair brained@ and Asingle-minded@ to describe the school board=s resolution and offers no cause to warrant his name calling(1). He tells about the amazing sense of accomplishment that students of English feel when they conquer the difficult concepts of the language and implies that with the resolution these children would be deprived of such feelings. Fillmore, believing the issue is strictly empirical, chooses not to evoke emotional appeal but relies on the common sense of the reader backing his views even further.
Upon initial scrutiny of the logical structure of each argument, the validity of Fillmore=s debate becomes evident. Alternately, from the beginning of Sambar=s argument his logic shows flaws that continue throughout the article. From Fillmore=s opening paragraph his logic is stated in a clear and up-front manner. He explains that the root of the debate lies in the confusion of the term=s dialect and language. He then goes on to explain the two in a manner that sets up the logical shell for the rest of the argument. His logic is grounded not only by the understanding of the terms in question but in his understanding of the Oakland school system=s resolution itself. It is unclear if Sambar has even read the resolution much less if he understands its objective. His logic is based on the idea that Ebonics should be kept in the home of the students and out of the schools. He states that A(t)his land of the free and home of the brave was built on the cultural richness and diversity of many people…(A)nd regardless where they went or what they did, they learned to talk to their neighbor in a language which is common and understandable. It happens to be English@(2). With this statement it becomes obvious that he missed the objective of the resolution entirely. As Fillmore explains, it is the understandability factor that yields the necessity of the resolution. When Children arrive into the school system, teachers must have a tool to bridge the gap between Ebonics and the standard English vernacular. This will provide many of the skills lacking in students needed to be successful in school and in the outside world. In an area where the average grade is a D something must be done to improve the situation. Fillmore believes this must Abe an empirical question, not an issue for tapping people=s opinion@(2). By the end of the article his structured logic has built a strong, solid argument.
Sambar=s claims state that the resolution is filled with underlying nonsense and only offers a big step backwards in language, being that Ebonics is only a collection of mistakes. He believes the resolution will only have negative repercussions for both sides involved. In contrast, Fillmore claims that the resolution only stands to improve conditions for both sides, making it easier for students to learn, and teachers to teach. The grounds for his argument rely on the necessity of the situation. Simply, something must be done and this school system has come up with not only the best, but the only solution. The only grounds for Sambar=s argument is the possibility that he will somehow have to pay for this program with extra tax dollars. Fillmore is quick to explain that this program would cost very little compared to Welfare and child care programs which are a direct result of poor schooling.
Although unstated, Sambar=s backing is clearly personal in nature. To offer his bold commentary would require sufficient evidence for validity, but he offers none, relying on the view of his parents who, when upon immigration, struggled with specific speech patterns. This can hardly compare with the problems occurring in most urban areas. Special programs and tax funds are already in place to assist students whose first language is not English. Fillmore offers more than sufficient backing for his claims. His experience and research have shown that some African-American student=s speech varies so much from standardized American English, that when entering the class room for the first time, teachers often do not understand the vernacular which in turn leads to poor grades and typically the students do not gain the ways of speech needed in order to succeed in the outside world. He uses statistics to back up this claim. Fillmore believes the solution of the problem lies in equipping teachers with the ability to teach the students that their language is a base to build on just as the other students possess and compare the way they speak with the way they will be required to speak in school. AThere is a common-sense core to the Oakland school board=s plans. All over the world children show up in school speaking a variety of language that differs in some great or small way from the variety they=re about to learn@(4). His claims are clearly grounded, giving educated reasons for each claim, as well as specific passages cited from the resolution itself. All this is further backed by his expertise in the field of linguistics as well as his experience in the classroom.
Fillmore=s warrant is quite simply that something must be done to solve the growing problem of the differing Ahome languages@ in the school system. Sambar=s warrant is that the basic idea of Ebonics is ignorant, and any school official recognizing this nonsense as a language is teaching ignorance. Neither author chose to limit the force of their claims.
Fillmore offers specific conditions of rebuttal to his argument. Using opposing views ranging from public figures such as Jesse Jackson to newspaper columnists and he responds to each separately. He attacks the grounds of each opposing opinion, explaining how in each instance the person is either misinformed or confused about the intent of the resolution, proving these opinions do not hold. He urges these claims need to be qualified to be valid, but states they offer none to do so. Sambar offers no conditions of rebuttal and assumes that any other opinion is unwarranted without providing any reasoning, which makes the whole in his argument stretch even further apart, seeming now almost preposterous.
Upon close examination of the two arguments it becomes evident Charles Fillmore=s article AA Linguistic Looks at the Ebonics Debate@ proves to be the stronger of the two by far. His logic is valid and his careful backing of each claim made, not to mention his credentials, present a clear unbiased view on the pro-ebonics side of the issue. He pays specific attention to any element of rebuttal, leaving any opposing views as merely a confusion of the facts, as is the case with Chuck Sambar=s editorial AEbonics.@ Sambar clearly has not taken an educated look at the resolution itself and is caught up in hot-headed emotion which blinds his ability to see the true problem at hand. Something must be done to stop these students falling through the cracks of the education system. As Fillmore points out, no one is suggesting that Ebonics be taught in the classroom, they only suggest that something must be done to give these students the tools necessary to bridge the gap from the African-American vernacular to the standard American English the students will be required to speak and write in the classroom and later on in life, giving them the same opportunities the school system should provide for every American.
Другие работы по теме:
Da Peoplz Language Essay Research Paper I
Da Peoplz Language Essay, Research Paper I wuz goin to da markit ta pik up sum food, when I said “yo G, wus up wit you.” He got pot an dope all ova ‘is coat, he got unuf *censored* ta fill up a boat. He took out a joint an a huge-ass gat, I said,”Yo man, thas phat!” He gave it ta me so I could look at it, and I said, ” yo, ware dyou get dat *censored*?” He tol me ware he got it, an got my ass ova dare, but wen I arived, it wuz a *censored*in nightmare. big tuf guys all ova da plase, I got scared, so grabbed my mace.
Anwr Essay Research Paper This web article
Anwr Essay, Research Paper This web article written by Ian Christopher, from CNN is a great reason why Bush is out to diminish our natural areas. This article is titled; In Debate Preview, Candidates outline Competing Energy Policies. This is about the energy portion of the debate. Gore is for environmental preservation; therefore, I am on Gore s side of the argument.
Ebonics 3 Essay Research Paper This week
Ebonics 3 Essay, Research Paper This week s reading about race questioned the common idea of what race is. Most people would think of race as a physical, concrete identity stemming from ancestry. Superficial qualities, such as skin color, dominate the common views of race. Fields, however, throws out the idea of race being a concrete entity, and instead says that race is purely ideological.
The Miranda Debate Essay Research Paper The
The Miranda Debate Essay, Research Paper The Miranda Debate Miranda is one of the best-known cases in the history of the Supreme Court. It represents the Court’s determination to treat even the lowliest of criminals with the same dignity and respect as the wealthiest celebrity. This case established the Fifth Amendment right of the accused to be informed of their right to counsel and their right not to answer questions.
Debate Over Man Being Inherently Good Or
Evil Essay, Research Paper The debate over man being inherently good or evil is a debate which has raged since the beginning of time. Rousseau and William Golding do not shy away from taking a stance on the subject. But while Rousseau believes “nothing can be more gentle than man in his primitive state,” Golding’s believes quite the opposite.
Great Compromise Essay Research Paper After arriving
Great Compromise Essay, Research Paper After arriving at Philadelphia the representatives from the thirteen colonies decided to scrap the old Articles of the Confederation, even with explicit instructions form Congress to only adjust. Many ideas were tossed around including the plan by the heavily populated colony of Virginia, which was called “the large-state plan”.
HOOKED ON EBONICS Essay Research Paper 15
HOOKED ON EBONICS Essay, Research Paper 15 Feb 97 dayz: Today?s Lesson: Hooked on Ebonics: 15 Feb 97 dayz: Today?s Lesson: Hooked on Ebonics: Leroy is a 20 year old 9th grader. This be Leroy?s homework assignment. He must use each vocabulary word in a sentence.
Technology Essay Research Paper People very often
Technology Essay, Research Paper People very often debate whether technology is good or bad. Many people believe that technology can only cause harm to their lives and society, while many others strongly defend the technologies which have made their lives much more leisurely and enriching than it could have been several hundred years ago.
Paradise Lost The Debate In Hell
Essay, Research Paper Henry Latham, 23.4.99. Paradise Lost: The Debate in Hell. The debate starts with Satan speaking and flattering the Devils and saying ?Powers and dominions?. He talks about how someone will have to take charge and lead the group to victory, and to do this they will need someone who can take pain, stress and strife.
Debate Essay Research Paper residential Debates are
Debate Essay, Research Paper residential Debates are a very important part of the electoral process in the United States. These debates help the people of the country understand where each candidate stands on several current issues that the United States faces, as well as to show the people what they plan on doing while in office.
Facism Essay Research Paper Throughout time the
Facism Essay, Research Paper Throughout time the debate upon which is the best system of government has been ongoing. Somewhere between the realms of democracy, socialism, fascism, communism, and monarchism lies the answer to the perfect system. Traditionally speaking, North America has always tried to remain democratic.
Ebonics Essay Research Paper Ebonics or Black
Ebonics Essay, Research Paper Ebonics, or Black English, was recently a controversial topic in the United States, when the Oakland School District school board attempted to classify ebonics as a completely different language from Standard American English (SAE). There was further controversy when the school board stated that ebonics was genetic.
Effective Use Or Debates To Gain Voters
Essay, Research Paper Analysis: “ Effective use of debates to gain voters “ The Vice president Al Gore and the Governor G.W Bush are both in a rivalry to be the President of the United States. The conventional wisdom held that in their first presidential debate which was held on Oct.4th , Mr. Gore showed voters a warm and fuzzy side while Mr.
Network Debate Essay Research Paper It was
Network Debate Essay, Research Paper It was a brutal race. They interrupted our daily scheduled shows with boisterous promises they could never fulfill. They invaded our towns and cities with their advertisements; their faces defaced our buses and benches. And still, no one has emerged as the clean victor.
Abortion Essay Research Paper wwwpottersschoolcomabortionIs it right
Abortion Essay, Research Paper www.pottersschool/abortion/ Is it right or is it wrong? Is it murder or is it a woman’s choice. There are so many conflicting views, but who is right? The debate over abortion will probably never be settled in my life time. As with many computer literate people, the author of this site gives us an objective view on abortion.
Cloning Essay Research Paper Today there are
Cloning Essay, Research Paper Today there are many scientist that want to clone humans and other organisms in order to make the world a better place. Scientist think that if they can
Napster Debate Essay Research Paper Napster DebateFor
Napster Debate Essay, Research Paper Napster Debate For a project in college eighteen-year old Shawn Fanning wrote a program for a way to download music off the internet. He later put the program on the internet and Napster was born. Napster is a program that allows you to download music on the internet. Since this program is free, many people have downloaded Napster.
Black Feminists Debate Essay Research Paper Black
Black Feminists Debate Essay, Research Paper Black Feminists Debate Whiteness Stephanie Philipovich & Angela Torchia Passage #1: “Here is the house. It is green and white. It has a red door. It is very pretty. Here is the family. Mother, Father, Dick, and Jane live in the green-and-white house. They are very happy.
Debate Gore Bush Essay Research Paper Debate
Debate Gore Bush Essay, Research Paper Debate of Gore/Bush: Tuesday October 17, 2000 Topics Discussed: Education: Gore: Gore believes that teachers should be able to have one on one sessions with their students and in order to do so he believes that classrooms should be smaller and more teachers should be hired.
Debates 2000 Essay Research Paper The Third
Debates 2000 Essay, Research Paper The Third Debate The third Presidential Debate was between Vice President Al Gore and Gov. George W. Bush. The debate was in the format of a Town Hall debate. Both Vice President Al Gore and Gov. Bush performed well. An audience member asked the candidates a question and given two minutes to answer the question set forth.
Health Care Essay Research Paper Health care
Health Care Essay, Research Paper Health care is an issue that everyone has to face no matter where they live. In great Britian thecosts for medical treatment is payed for by the government. In the United States there has beenmuch debate over a national health-care system. As it is today, health-care is paid for by thegovernment, but the money comes from the people s taxes.
Ebonics Essay Research Paper One of the
Ebonics Essay, Research Paper One of the conflicting issues among African Americans and Caucasians is the issue of ebonics. It s not just an issue facing one race or the other it effects both races
Ebonics A Bridge To Help Black Students
Master In Standard English. Essay, Research Paper I feel that the discussion on Ebonics has gone beyond the original objectives of the program. Ebonics is a bridge to make Afro-American children understand more the English language. Mexican Americans use the code-switching technique to learn the language.
Ebonics Essay Research Paper EBONICSEbonics also known
Ebonics Essay, Research Paper EBONICS Ebonics, also known as Black English, is a nonstandard dialect spoken in many homes in the inner cities of America. This nonstandard language is often looked upon as low-class or lazy talk. This is not the case, however. Due to consistencies found in the dialect, there seems to be an order.
Ebonics Essay Research Paper EbonicsWhat is Ebonics
Ebonics Essay, Research Paper Ebonics What is Ebonics? Is it a language or not? Should it be used as a tool to teach Ebonic speaking students “standard” English or not? These issues recently came under fire when an Oakland, California school board unanimously voted that Ebonics, which is also referred to as black English, is a language with clearly evident African American roots.
Ebonics 2 Essay Research Paper EbonicsThe other
Ebonics 2 Essay, Research Paper Ebonics The other day I was talking on the subject of Ebonics. I feel Ebonics should be a language. I mean black adolescents that are seen as stupid and non-educated mostly use it. The talk compelled me to do some extensive studying on the subject.
Segregation Essay Research Paper Though 1963 was
Segregation Essay, Research Paper Though 1963 was not the year of integration, it was still a continued debate throughout the southern states. Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary defines segregation as the separation or isolation of race, class, or ethnic group by enforced or voluntary residence in a restricted area, by barriers to social intercourse, by separate educational facilities, or by other discrimitory means.
Argument About The Exist Of God Essay
, Research Paper Argument About The Exist of God The following paper will provide a sound argument in favor of the existence of God. By demonstrating that an Atheist world cannot account for the
Can We Debate Art Essay Research Paper
subject = philosophy title = can we debate art? papers = Can we debate art? When I first began thinking about this topic, it seemed as if it was a fairly simple subject. Of course we could debate art, critics and the average
Ebonics Essay Research Paper Ebonics Ebonics which
Ebonics Essay, Research Paper Ebonics Ebonics, which stands for Ebony + Phonics is a new term that Linguistics use to describe Black Dialect or Black English or many of the other names that it has been given for more that 350 years.. has been in the news recently but it is definitely not a new topic.
EBONICS Essay Research Paper FOR AGES AFRICAN
EBONICS Essay, Research Paper FOR AGES AFRICAN AMERICANS HAVE BEE MANIPULATING THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE, WHICH APPEARS TO BE ACCEPTED BOTH THROUGH LITERATURE AND VERBAL SPEAKING. IN THE 21ST CENTURY THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM IS FACED WITH A TASK OF REFORMING A LANGUAGE SUPPOSIDLY CALL “BLACK ENGLISH” OR “EBONY PHONICS,” DEPICTING WHAT IS WIDELY KNOWN AS EBONICS.
Ebonics Essay Research Paper Ebonics is the
Ebonics Essay, Research Paper Ebonics is the name given to what linguists refer to as Black English or African American Vernacular English1. Black English has been around since the time of slavery and the slave trade in the United States. It is a mixture of West African languages and English which has been passed down from generation to generation of African Americans.
Perspective Of Black English Essay Research Paper
Black English Conclusions To the majority of the people we gave this survey to, a lot of them said it sounded like jibberish, but that at certain points it was understandable. They explained that the speaker talks fast, but for the most part are able to catch on to what they are saying. They didn t think that Ebonics should be accepted in today s society to the point that our leaders would be using it when making a speech to the nation.
Abortion Essay Research Paper My view on
Abortion Essay, Research Paper My view on the abortion is pro-choice so I will debate the issue from the pro-life point of view. Abortion is in a word: murder. There is no way around it , people that have abortions are committing a crime. If one was killing a person who could defend themselves they would go to jail but the people who have abortions just get continue on with their sinful lives.