Euthanasia: An Overview Essay, Research Paper
Euthanasia: An Overview
There has been much debate in recent American society over the legality
and morality of a patients right-to-die. Current legal statue prohibits any
form of euthanasia, however, there are many moral and ethical dilemmas
concerning the controversy. For the purposes of this essay, I will define
euthanasia as the implementation of a decision that a person’s life will come to
an end before it need stop. In other words, it is a life ending when it would
otherwise be prolonged. There is an important distinction between voluntary
euthanasia where the decision to terminate life coincides with the individuals
wishes and involuntary euthanasia where the individual concerned does not know
about the decision and has not approved it in advance. I will be dealing
specifically with the concept of voluntary euthanasia, for it seems intuitive
that involuntary euthanasia is not only illegal but also profoundly immoral.
Opponents arguments against euthanasia which fail to substantiate their claims,
many proponents arguments highlighted by the right to autonomy, and empirical
examples of legalized euthanasia all prove the moral legitimacy of physician-
assisted-suicide.
Opponents of euthanasia generally point to three main arguments which I
will mention only for the purposes of refuting them. First, many cite the
Hippocratic oath which reads, “I will give no deadly medicine to anyone if asked,
nor suggest any such counsel” as a reason to oppose euthanasia. Clearly, the
Hippocratic oath does condemn the practice, however, I do not find this as
reason enough to reject the moral permissibility of euthanasia. If the premise
of the oath is flawed (i.e., if it is morally permissible for a physician to
assist in suicide), then a physician should not be prohibited from assisting in
suicide simply because of an oath. Indeed, if it is proven (as will be done
later in this essay) that euthanasia is a moral way to end needless suffering,
then doctors should be obliged to fulfill their patients requests for early
death. The second argument that opponents of euthanasia cite is based on the
Judeo-Christian ethic of human life being the ultimate value of existence. This
argument is vague at best. At the most well-explained level, it says that human
life is intrinsically valuable and should be preserved in every instance
(because human bodily life is the life of a person) thus euthanasia is wrong
because it is killing before life would naturally end. This argument is proven
unsound in two ways. First, I believe that human life is distinct from
personhood. Many patients requesting euthanasia have ceased to be persons
because they are terminally ill and incapable of enjoying the gift of existence.
Thus many of these individuals ( and certainly those in a vegetative state with
a living will that requests euthanasia) are living lives that are not
intrinsically valuable. Second, I disagree with the notion that life is
intrinsically valuable and should be preserved in every instance. I believe
that life is valuable only inasmuch as it is the basis for rational decision-
making. (This argument will be elaborated upon later in the essay). Therefore,
we respect the value of life by respecting a persons autonomy and allowing them
to willingly end their life. The final argument given by opponents of
euthanasia is the notion of a slippery slope in which legalized voluntary
euthanasia will snowball and begin to result in widespread involuntary
euthanasia. The basis for this reasoning is that under a system of voluntary
euthanasia, doctors must make the final determination of whether a person can be
euthanized or not therefore allowing them to decide if a patients life is
“worth” living. Many feel that if doctors can do this to competent people, it
could snowball to incompetent patients and doctors may make decisions to
euthanize without the will of patients. However, I argue that the moral
permissibility of euthanasia depends on a patients voluntary consent. If a
patient does not expressly wish to die, then a doctor who kills a patient
without the consent of that patient would be acting immorally. From a legal
standpoint, the request for euthanasia would have to come first from the patient,
which diminishes the likelihood of involuntary euthanasia occurring. Given
these two scenarios, the idea of a slippery slope is dispelled on both a
theoretical and a pragmatic level. Furthermore, empirical evidence that will
be discussed later disproves the notion of a slippery slope.
In addition to the responses to opponents claims, there are many reasons
why euthanasia is morally acceptable. The justifications for voluntary active
euthanasia rest in four main areas. First, society has a moral obligation to
respect individual autonomy when we can do so without harm to others and when
doing so does not violate some other moral obligation. This is because life is
intrinsically valuable only as a result of its necessity for decision-making and
free will. Life without autonomy ceases to be of the utmost value, rather, a
persons right to choose his or her life (and death) course should be the highest
priority. This principle guarantees a persons right to have his or her own
decisions respected in determining medical treatment, including euthanasia. The
second argument for the moral acceptance of euthanasia rests on the premise of
mercy and compassion, two ideals which are essential to human dignity. In most
cases when a person requests euthanasia they are suffering unrelenting and
continual pain, and there is no reasonable possibility of substantial recovery.
It is morally repugnant to watch another person suffer through humiliating
helplessness and constant pain when one could prevent it. It is widely
considered humane to put animals that are permanently physically impaired to
death, yet humans cannot currently receive the same mercy under the law, even
when they request it. When we are confronted with suffering which is wholly
destructive in its consequences and, as far as we can tell, could have no
beneficial result, there is a moral obligation to end it. The third affirmation
of the moral legitimacy of euthanasia is that of justice. Euthanasia allows for
fairer distribution of medical resources in a society which lacks sufficient
resources to treat all of its people. Because we have an obligation to relieve
suffering, people have a right to whatever medical resources might be effective
in the treatment of their condition. However, the scarcity of resources ensures
that not all medical claims can be met, therefore a fair way to distribute
medical resources must be found. If treatment must be denied to some people
with the result that they will die, then it is better to deny it to those people
who are medically unsalvageable and will die soon with or without treatment.
The final justification for euthanasia is that the burden of proof for rejecting
the morality of the practice should rest with its opponents. It is up to any
person or institution wanting to prevent an individual from doing something he
or she wants to do to provide sound reasoning which justifies interference.
Since it has already been proven that opponents arguments against euthanasia
fail to substantiate their claim that it should not occur, then the practice
should be considered moral.
The Netherlands successful experiment with legalized voluntary
euthanasia is further proof that physician-assisted-suicide is a moral action.
The Dutch legalized euthanasia partly because they realize that the practice
occurs frequently in the status quo and is now entirely at the discretion of
physicians. 85% of deaths in the United States occur in hospitals or nursing
homes; of those 70% involve withholding life-sustaining treatment. This is
certainly a form of euthanasia, yet it is uncontrolled and oftentimes performed
without the patient’s knowledge. On the contrary, the Dutch system brings the
question of euthanasia into the open and allows for regulations which lessen the
likelihood of a slippery slope. The requirements for euthanasia under Dutch law
are that patients must ask to be euthanized, they must be fully informed of
their medical condition, suffering must be intolerable, and the process of
carrying out the patients death wish must be performed by a doctor. These
stringent guidelines have created an environment where 2,300 individuals have
found relief in the form of euthanasia, an number which represents just 1.8 % of
all deaths in the Netherlands. Only 1/3 of all requests for euthanasia are
honored by physicians, which is proof against the slippery slope argument. A
study published by the Dutch government in 1992 further dispels the slippery
slope theory. It reported that since euthanasia had been legalized, only 2
cases have been documented where a patient was euthanized without request. In
both cases the patient was suffering severe pain, and was terminally ill. Given
the large numbers of deaths from euthanasia, this statistic seems to be very
small in comparison. Also, in no instance has a patient been put to death
against his or her expressed or implied wish. This empirical evidence
concretely disproves the notion that voluntary euthanasia will somehow snowball
to involuntary euthanasia. It is also powerful proof that voluntary euthanasia
can be carried out legally and with no great harms to society or individuals.
The unsubstantiated claims of euthanasia opponents, many affirmative
arguments supporting the moral permissibility of euthanasia, and the successful
Dutch experiment with legalization all prove that euthanasia is a legitimate
moral practice. If we do not allow for individual autonomy in determining the
scope and extent of medical treatment, then we are sentencing many terminally
ill patients to a final stage of life filled with misery and wracked with
unrelenting pain. Instead, the moral and ethical course of action is to grant
patients who request euthanasia the mercy and relief of a death with dignity.
Другие работы по теме:
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia which comes
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia which comes from the Greek meaning of easy death is one of our societies highly debatable issues and the main reason for this argument is against active euthanasia, which is when a terminally ill patient is administered with a lethal drug or using other means to cause there death.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Is euthanasia the
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Is euthanasia the mercy killing of someone who is in extreme pain in order to end suffering, an immoral or amoral act? Simply put, it is an immoral act even though it is intended to help another person. It is assisting in killing another human being, and ending their existence.
Euthanasia Should Be Abolished Essay Research Paper
Euthanasia is the painless, intentional death of a person who is suffering. Euthanasia is wrong because it alters our natural way of survival, and upsets religous beliefs. By using euthanasia, ?miraculous? recoveries have been prevented. People think that the easy way out of their problems is by conducting euthanasia.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Assisted SuicideA great
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Assisted Suicide A great deal of debate surrounds the practice of assisted suicide. Lately, laws against voluntary euthanasia have been eased, although serious moral and legal questions still exist. Most opposition of assisted suicide comes from religious groups, including Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.
Argument Essay Research Paper Quantity vs QualityMany
Argument Essay, Research Paper Quantity vs. Quality Many people see death is a bad thing. People don t like it and they don t want to hear about it. For many seriously ill and vegetative patients, death is a good thing for them. Death will end their suffering from pains and they can also die with dignity. Euthanasia traditionally means a good death.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Jason Adams
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Jason Adams Adams1 October 15, 1998 Mrs. Faulk English Per.4Euthanasia Euthanasia should be legal, because if it is their life, therefore, they have the right to be able to end their suffering. Euthanasia was formerly called Mercy killing . Euthanasia means intentionally making someone decease rather then allowing that person to die naturally.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper In today
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper In today’s society, if you ask five people who Jack Kevorkian is then three or more would know who he is. The issue of euthanasia has been on the media’s forefront for several years. There are several pros and cons to this issue. Some of these pros are as follows: it would help to end pain and suffering, it allows a person to die with dignity, and it also helps the grieving process because the person knows when they are gonna die.
Euthanasia And Assisted Suicide Essay Research Paper
EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE In today’s society, euthanasia and assisted suicide is a major discussion. People, who are terminally ill or are depressed, are sometimes looking for a way out. They feel that their only hope is to kill themselves. Other people in the world feel that euthanasia and assisted suicide are morally wrong.
Euthanasia In Australia Essay Research Paper What
Euthanasia In Australia Essay, Research Paper What is it and how is it performed?Euthanasia is the practice of ending a life so as to release an individual from an incurable disease or intolerable suffering. The term is sometimes used generally to refer to an easy or painless death. Voluntary euthanasia involves a request by the dying patient or that person’s legal representative.
Legalizing Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Legalizing euthanasia
Legalizing Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Legalizing euthanasia in the United States gives rights to the people. Rights to those who endure the irrefutable agony of pain and suffering, rights to those who want to be cured of their pain, and rights to those that struggle to end their suffering. Euthanasia is the answer to end their suffering.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaEuthanasia is just
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Euthanasia is just another word for ?mercy killing? as some people put it but it also means good death. I look at it as more of a good death if it is performed with the right procedures and if a person has a legitimate reason to be put to death but many people would not agree with me that it should be legal.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia killing life
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia- killing life painlessly to end suffering, mercy killing. This pratice was traced back as far as the Greek and Roman times. As time passed religion increased and life was viewed as sacred. All forms of Euthanasia was/is now considered wrong. In the year of 1935 a group of doctors formed the first Voluntary Euthanasia Society in London.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Retired professor and
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Retired professor and psychoanalyst Ernest Van den Haag, by defending the right to commit suicide, made an appeal to J.S. Mill?s principle. Van den Haag said that people should have the right to choose as they please, as long as no one else is hurt (Hallock 13). According to the constitution, people have the right to decide death, not the government (Dority 8).
Euthenasia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia
Euthenasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Euthanasia has become an issue of increasing attention. Euthanasia should be legalized so, if we ever have a loved one that is suffering and death is certain, that we have the choice to ease their pain if they want. Those who are against euthanasia argue that the doctors must always be on the side of preserving life.
Euthansia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia has been
Euthansia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia has been a popular topic nowadays, but not many peo0le may know about this subject in depth. In my opinion, Dr. Philip?s idea is good as it can help the elderly people to get more information about different methods of euthanasia. As euthanasia is a new issue that came up recently, most elderly people may not know much about it.
Euthanasia People Should Have The Right To
Choose Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia: People Should Have the Right to Choose There are many sides to the dilemma of whether or not euthanasia should be carried out. There is the question of morality, the question of active
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaEuthanasia has brought
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Euthanasia has brought great attention to the public eye since Dr. Jack Kevorkian was discovered for contributing to these horrible inhumane acts. At the present time, the state of Oregon has the world’s only law specifically permitting a doctor to prescribe lethal drugs for the purpose of ending a patient’s life (iaetf/faq.htm).
The Controversy Over Euthanasia Essay Research Paper
The controversy over euthanasia is based on the same ethical and social platform from which the debates for abortion and capitol punishment stem. These social dilemmas all revolve around the sanctity of life and how far government can go in making choices involving individual rights. Although the debate over euthanasia is just heating up in the American judicial system, the practice of assisted suicide has been around for centuries, Modern advances in medicine and technology have helped doctors in prolonging life.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaEuthanasia may be
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Euthanasia may be defined as taking your own/someone’s life because it is inevitable that he/she/you will die because of some painful terminal illness. Some may see it as murder/suicide and others may see it as a way out, the best thing to do. Like abortion, it is very hard for me to take an “it is right/wrong” philosophical position, because situations vary from person to person.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaVoluntary euthanasia is
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Voluntary euthanasia is a very contentious issue in today?s society. This is where a terminally ill patient?s life is ended at their request. The law allows doctors to withdraw treatment or administer high doses of pain-relieving drugs even though they expect this will result in death.
Eutahnasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaEuthanasia is an
Eutahnasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Euthanasia is an issue that has been debated on many occasions. Both ethical and political questions have been raised. It is the one issue that can touch anyone, even politicians. Euthanasia is an issue that is controversial from all sides and is such a deeply felt issue across society.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia may be
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia may be defined as the action of killing an individual for reasons consideredmerciful. Euthanasia can be asserted many different ways. A family member, a friend, or aphysician could do the killing. The individual may die from the result of omitting life-savingdevices, such as respirators, from omitting life-saving medicines, or from being prescribed drugsthat would induce their death.
Euthanasia Overview Essay Research Paper Euthanasia OverviewThe
Euthanasia Overview Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Overview The term Euthanasia has become well known throughout the country. The word is derived from ancient Greek eu thantos, meaning easy death. Today, euthanasia is referred to as mercy killing. There is much controversy over whether or not the practice is just.
Euthenasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaImmoral or Human
Euthenasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Immoral or Human Right? Recent debates over active euthanasia, “killing” a terminally ill patient, in Holland, has risen the question whether euthanasia is immoral or a simple human right. Doctors seem to have no doubt. They made an oath.
Euthansia Article Analysis And Opinion Essay Research
Paper Euthanasia is the help with a death and is also known as ?mercy killing?. There are two types of Euthanasia: Active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. There is also active voluntary euthanasia and active involuntary euthanasia. Euthanasia is illegal in all states but Oregon, who passed a bill making it legal in 1994 under certain circumstances.
Euthanasia Today Essay Research Paper Euthanasia has
Euthanasia Today Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia has been, and always will be, a controversial moral and ethical subject. While the majority of both Americans and Canadians seem to support euthanasia as indicated by the latest polls, it is still illegal in both countries. I think it is important to first distinguish between passive euthanasia and active euthanasia.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia should not
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia should not be made legally acceptable in the present society because there are important aspects that need to be considered and handled concerning who?s to decide, extent to which a physician can practice medicine, and religious opposition to this practice.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EUTHANASIAEuthanasiaRenaldo La FoucadeEducation
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper EUTHANASIA Euthanasia Renaldo La Foucade Education of America University Euthanasia Euthanasia Euthanasia is a topic that provokes as much controversy as capital punishment, primarily because it is irreversible. The question of euthanasia being right or wrong is one that most would prefer left alone.
Euthanasia Pro Con Catholic View Essay Research Paper Some
Euthanasia Pro+Con+Catholic View Essay, Research Paper Some have suggested that we legalize physician-assisted suicide in California. They argue that we should find death before it finds us, and that the right to die is the right-to-choose. They are supporting such an initiative because they fear that they will have to endure horrible pain and live out a life encompassed by absolute suffering.
Brief Look At Euthanasia Essay Research Paper 2
Brief Look At Euthanasia- Essay, Research Paper Brief Look at Euthanasia- Euthanasia is one of the most acute and uncomfortable contemporary problems in medical ethics. Is Euthanasia Ethical? The