Paper
As the fourth Supreme Court Chief Justice of the United States of America, John Marshall created a legacy that has endured nearly two hundred years. While writing the majority opinion for the Supreme Court case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, he single-handedly changed the course of our judicial system. He did this by granting the judicial branch the power to determine a law unconstitutional, otherwise known as judicial review. The question at hand, then, is to explore how this one ruling on a seemingly insignificant case became a worthy landmark on the timeline of United States history. Just as any decision, at any specific point in time, Marshall did not intentionally choose to eradicate the norm and clear a new path for the future. He was neither attempting to establish judicial supremacy nor rewrite the law. Nevertheless, this seemingly ingenious decision was clearly groundbreaking in that it was the first instance on which the Supreme Court officially established its power over legislation, and has since been viewed as the basis for judicial authority (Gunnarson 2). However, John Marshall s ruling in the case of Marbury v. Madison was undoubtedly the only logical choice, and was based on three important factors: previous models of judicial review, political interests, and the Constitution.
According to Gunnarson (1), the assumption of judicial review was present before the Marbury decision, and Marshall based his opinion on theories that already existed. The first significant idea of judicial review came in May of 1787 during the Constitutional Convention. The eighth resolution of the Virginia plan recommended the formation of a council that would have the power to review and revise all acts of Congress (9). This marked the beginning of the basic ideas of judicial review. Several months later, the debate changed from whether or not to create this Council of Revision, to who should belong on it. The central argument between the delegates was whether or not judges should be allowed to be participants on the coucil. On the one hand, some argued that judges should be on the council to prevent Congress from exceeding its granted power (11-12). On the other hand, several delegates believed that it was not necessary for them to be on this council because as federal judges, they were already granted the right of judicial review. This proves that some delegates already believed the powers of judicial review were assumed well before John Marshall was Chief Justice. One delegate compared a judicial system without the power of checks on legislation to the absolute rule of Parliament in Great Britain (Goldstein 65). Both Federalists and anti-Federalists reached an understanding that judicial review was necessary. Eventually, it seemed as though virtually every member of the Constitutional Convention acknowledged the practice of judicial review, yet did not deem it necessary to clearly grant these powers to the Supreme Court (Gunnarson 15). Fifteen years later, when the opinion for Marbury v. Madison had to be written, Marshall voluntarily took advantage of the opportunity to establish a precedent. By basing his opinion on previous models of judicial review, Marshall used the powerful tool of precedent to help further his political party. If Marshall had not established the power of judicial review through this case, he would have missed a crucial opportunity to help empower the Federalists.
At the time preceding the Marbury v. Madison case, the United States was undergoing a critical transformation. For the first time in its history, the political power was switching hands from the Federalists to the Republicans. The Federalists had lost the presidential election, and the Republicans took over many strategic political positions. The federal courts were under a continued attack by newly appointed President Jefferson and the Republican Party who wished to bring the courts under the command of the executive branch. In spite of this, the lone area of power in Washington D.C. for the Federalists remained in the Supreme Court, where the justices served life-long terms. William Marbury, a Federalist, was fighting for his Justice of the Peace appointment made by lame-duck president John Adams (Clinton 285). One of Marshall s options was to rule in favor of Marbury, thus helping the cause of the Federalists in the short run. However, this would have angered the Republicans. Marshall realized that the Republicans would be in control for some time, and did not want to be the victim of their fury for years to come (Clinton 285). To solve this dilemma, Marshall viewed the situation in terms of the long run, and seized an opportunity to regain some of the power taken by the Republicans. Marshall wrote in his opinion that the Constitution did not allow for the Supreme Court to rule on such a case, therefore granting it the power of judicial review. By deciding as he did, Marshall not only outshined President Jefferson, but also greatly increased the power of the Federalist dominated Supreme Court. As a lifetime member of the Supreme Court, and of the Federalist Party, it was logical for Marshall to act on personal political concerns. In turn, the doctrine of judicial review soon became the crux on which the Federalist Party relied.
As a staunch Federalist, Marshall viewed the Constitution as the fundamental law of the land. He believed a strong, central government, and popular sovereignty were two crucial elements in the success of a nation. The establishment of judicial review combined these two principle beliefs into a very convincing argument. The judicial branch had neither the power of force, which belonged to the executive branch, nor the will of the people, which belonged to the legislative branch. It did, however, have the ability to judge the laws passed by legislation and to ensure their constitutional validity. The people, not the government, are sovereign, and the Constitution reflects their ultimate will. Therefore, by judging on the basis of our fundamental law (the Constitution), the judicial branch granted the superiority over the other two branches to the rule of the people (Wolfe 295). Thus meaning, that following the opinion written by Marshall, the Supreme Court could uphold the people s highest ideals. By exercising judicial review, the Court was simply enforcing the will of the people as expressed in the Constitution.
One way to explain a specific moment in time is to relate it to other events in history. Many theories and concepts that arise are the product of the blending and molding of previous beliefs and ideals. The establishment of judicial review is a prime example. John Marshall did not invent judicial review, yet crafted a clever way to declare its credibility. The evidence introduced in this essay supports the fact that equivalent theories of judicial review previously existed and that Marshall had no other options but to rule against Marbury as he did (Gunnarson 27). John Marshall created an outcome that best benefited his own personal and political party s interests, by establishing a check on the legislative branch and by enforcing popular sovereignty as laid out in the Constitution.
Другие работы по теме:
История Ирландии /english/
Главный парадокс в истории Ирландии - в самой Ирландии живет меньшее количество ирландцев, чем в Америке, Канаде, Австралии, Великобритании и др.
Job Letter Essay Research Paper To Whom
Job Letter Essay, Research Paper To Whom It May Concern: I am enclosing a copy of my resume for your files and review. I am an individual who responds to challenges and works both independently or as a part of a team,
Field Marshal Haig Essay Research Paper Douglas
Field Marshal Haig Essay, Research Paper Douglas Haig was born on June 19 1861, the son of a wealthy whiskey distiller, he was educated at Oxford and Sandhurst. Haig participated in the Omdurman campaign (1897 – 1898) and the Boer War (1899 – 1902). His rank remained inspector of general cavalry in India from 1903 until 1906, when he became director of military training at the war office.
Marbury Vs Madison Essay Research Paper Marbury
Marbury Vs. Madison Essay, Research Paper Marbury V. Madison As the government was newly establishing its stronghold on the nation, forging its way to a powerful republic and instituting precedents for the future, a struggle to preserve the foundations of American Society instituted by Washington and John Adams existed as Thomas Jefferson took office.
Marbury V Madison Trial Essay Research Paper
Marbury v. Madison The issue before the Supreme Court was the question of the court?s own constitutional authority, and to decide whether or not to issue the writ and if this would
Madison Vs Marbury Essay Research Paper Between
Madison Vs. Marbury Essay, Research Paper Between 1800 and 1835, the Supreme Court dealt with many cases of great importance to the United States of America. John Marshall served as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during this time. The case of Marbury v. Madison, in 1803, was one of the most crucial court cases and decisions made in this time period.
John Marshal Essay Research Paper The Influence
John Marshal Essay, Research Paper The Influence of Marshall s Court The Supreme Court, under John Marshall, had a great influence on the development of the powers of our present day government. John Marshall s court was responsible for greatly increasing the powers of the Supreme Court and the Federal Government.
The Supreme Court And Government By The
People Essay, Research Paper Jason I. Explain the distinction between substance and process and the importance of the distinction for the issues discussed in this course.
Amistad Movie Review Essay Research Paper The
Amistad Movie Review Essay, Research Paper The movie Amistad is a 4 star film because I believe it is historically accurate, very effective in showing the way slaves were treated, and the way slavery and the American judicial system worked during the Antebellum period. The movie was also a good watch, and was entertaining and educational at the same time.
Appraising My Test Taking Skills Essay Research
Paper The advantages of my test taking skills are effectiveness,organization, and good review tools. Thus, the disadvantages are manageable review time and strategy planning. I find myself mostly “stuck” on planning a strategy.
The Conflict Between Love And Duty In
The Bride Comes To Yellow Sky Essay, Research Paper The conflict between love and duty in The Bride Comes to Yellow Sky In this essay I will discuss the conflict between love and duty in Stephan Crane s The Bride Comes to Yellow Sky . In the story there is a constant reflection by the town s marshal, Jack Potter on his recent marriage and his duties and responsibilities to his town.
Americas Political Legacy Essay Research Paper Websters
Americas Political Legacy Essay, Research Paper Webster?s Dictionary defines legacy as ?anything handed down from an ancestor, predecessor, or earlier era.? Legacy is something that has been passed on, something that teaches, something that is embraces a person or society and aids them through life with knowledge and a proven system.
Social Democracy Essay Research Paper Austria is
Social Democracy Essay, Research Paper Austria is a democratic, federal republic. The constitution of Austria provides for a distinct division of power among the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government. Basic human rights and liberties are granted by the constitution and so are the rights of minorities granted as well.
Judicial Review Essay Research Paper Towering over
Judicial Review Essay, Research Paper Towering over us all When looking at the three branches of government one sees all the power that the people have given them. One is looking at all the great accomplishments in the history of the U.S.A. In the beginning, the United States government was formed in the intent of having the power fall in the order of executive, legislative, and then judicial.
Judicial Review Essay Research Paper Judicial ReviewThe
Judicial Review Essay, Research Paper Judicial Review The Supreme Court is the only court designated in the constitution. Within it is the Chief Justice of the United States, and eight associates. Being the highest court it is the last resort for all federal court questions. The Supreme Court has the power to determine whether something is constitutional or not, which makes them the final authority.
French Government Essay Research Paper The modern
French Government Essay, Research Paper The modern French government is run very much like the government of the United States. France is a democratic republic that is divided into three branches,
Review Of Ceremony Essay Research Paper Review
Review Of Ceremony Essay, Research Paper Review of Ceremony Ceremony, written by Leslie Marmon Silko, traces the alienation and destruction of a young Native American who must first come to terms with his past before he can overcome his post-traumatic stress. Throughout this novel, there are many symbols and examples of how not only the main character, but his culture as a whole was ignored, rejected, and destroyed.
Seperation Of Powers Essay Research Paper Separation
Seperation Of Powers Essay, Research Paper Separation of Powers Separation of powers is the act of separating of responsibilities of the three branches of the government. The idea of this separation is not a new one either. John Locke originally talked about it. He stated that the legislative power should be divided between the King and Parliament in England.
3 Branches Of Government Essay Research Paper
There are three branches of the federal government, the executive, the judicial, and the legislative. The executive branch consists of such people as the president, the cabinet, and the executive offices of the president. The executive branch is known for enforcing laws created by the legislative branch.
Framers Ideals And Legislation Essay Research Paper
Framers Ideals and Legislation Branches on the Tree of Liberty Why, if one were concerned with protecting human liberty, would one want to make the legislative branch of government dominant rather than the executive or judicial? Are these good reasons for someone concerned with liberty to distrust a strong executive or a powerful judicial?
Review Of Reviews Essay Research Paper I
Review Of Reviews Essay, Research Paper I chose to review John Updike?s Review ?It Was Sad? from the October 14th issue of ?The New Yorker?. In the review, Updike examines
Barbados Essay Research Paper BarbadosThe Barbados is
Barbados Essay, Research Paper Barbados The Barbados is a small country located in the Caribbean, island between the Caribbean Sea and the North Atlantic Ocean, northeast of Venezuela. It?s about 2.5 times the size of Washington, DC. The population of the country is 256,395, with a growth rate of .25%. 80% of their population is African American and the most common language is English.
The Judicial System Essay Research Paper This
The Judicial System Essay, Research Paper This is very long, I just didn’t wrap the words The Judicial System The justice system in our country today, is one of the best in the world, but it is not without problems. The 12-person Jury system has good intent but has definite faults and should be rethought and possibly revamped.
JUDICIAL REVIEW Essay Research Paper uncategorized
JUDICIAL REVIEW Essay, Research Paper : uncategorized : Pros and Cons of Judicial Review Pros and Cons of Judicial Review Judicial Review is the power given to Supreme court justices in which a judge has the power to reason whether a law is unconstitutional or not. Chief Justice John Ma
Judicial Activism Vs Judicial Restraint Essay Research
Paper Judicial activism and judicial restraint are two opposing philosophies when it comes to the Supreme Court justices’ interpretations of the United States Constitution; justices appointed by the President to the Supreme Court serve for life,and thus whose decisions shape the lives of “We the people” for a long time to come.
High Noon Essay Research Paper High NoonThe
High Noon Essay, Research Paper High Noon The movie High Noon is a western style movie about loyalty and betrayal. Throughout the whole movie, you can see how Kane is loyal to the town and how the town betrays Kane.
Seperation Of Powers Essay Research Paper The
Seperation Of Powers Essay, Research Paper The Judicial Branch in Regard to Separation of Powers The Doctrine of Separation of powers is that political power should be divided among several bodies as a precaution against tyranny. The ideal is opposed the absolute sovereignty of the Crown, Parliament, or any other body.
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay Research Paper is
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay, Research Paper is Cohens vs. Virginia, in which the question arose as to the right of the Supreme Court to exercise its appellate jurisdiction over the judgment of a state court involving the validity of state legislation. The contention of the counsel for the state struck at the very root of the judicial system of the Union, with its authority to review state decisions which involved the binding effect of the Federal Constitution and laws: and so to the discussion of this fundamental question Marshall brought his heaviest artillery.
Letter Of Application Essay Research Paper Please
Letter Of Application Essay, Research Paper Please accept this letter in application for the Admission Counselor position currently available within your school. My resume is enclosed for your review and I believe you will find that my qualifications meet your expectations.
Book Review Essay Research Paper Book ReviewFor
Book Review Essay, Research Paper Book Review For Whom The Bell Tolls Ernest Hemingway Pages Read: 74 (really busy) For Whom The Bell Tolls begins with a pyrotechnic for the Russian army reviewing the land where he must blow a bridge to stop enemy movement. He is a little overwhelmed by the task he is assigned to complete yet he is mentally sound in his manner and seems to know exactly how to handle himself in the situation.
Book Review Essay Research Paper Book Review
Book Review Essay, Research Paper Book Review Eric T. LibeerPark Hill South High School Thursday, May 27, 1999 Book Review By Eric Libeer Homeland, John Jakes’s formidable noel about the final explosive events of the nineteenth century, is the first in a series that will focus attention on a new “Jakes” family, the Crowns.
A Tale Of Two Cities Faults Of
Social Structure Essay, Research Paper A Tale of Two Cities: Faults of Social Structure Charles Dickens has been acclaimed as one of the foremost satirists of the