People Essay, Research Paper
Jason
I. Explain the distinction between substance and process and the importance of the distinction for the issues discussed in this course.
?Over the past few years?the court?holding that henceforth, before it can be determined that you Are entitled to ?due process? at all, and thus necessarily before it can be decided what process is ? due,? you must show that what you have been deprived of amounts to a ?liberty interest? or perhaps a ?property interest.? (Ely, p.19)
Just as a skilled magician will deliberately show his empty top hat to the audience right before he pulls a rabbit out by its ears, so was judicial review pulled out of thin air. Judicial review has opened the floodgates of substantive procedures in the courts, which refer to content based decisions made by judges, as a tool employed in matters of judicial review and has become the dominant means of legislating in areas which would not otherwise be open to legal re-interpretation. In essence substance refers to the ability and right of judges to employ their own values in rendering decisions concerning a case at hand or in the past, reflecting a non-interpretivist approach to legislating. Such decisions are grounded in the Substantive Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (a doctrine created by Justice Taney in the Dred Scott case itself derived from the Fifth amendment), which ostensibly provides citizens protection from the state governments. Substance also refers to morality and decisions based on natural law as opposed to positivism. Process is at the heart of democracy because it reflects the legitimate method by which a community can enact laws in a system of representative democracy; to that end, the principal virtue of a process oriented political system is its independence of concurrent political, moral, or societal pressures. These issues are obviously paramount in studying social reform and the role of the courts (judges) as legislators or guardians of correct legislative practice.
#2 Explain Ely?s account of prejudice and the role it plays in his theory of judicial review.
?So stereotypes, at least in the ordinary sense of that term, are the inevitable stuff of legislation.?(Ely, p.156)
Ely describes prejudice as a ?lens distorting reality,? that ?blinds us to overlapping interests which in fact exist.? In reference to the treatment of minorities and blacks in particular, prejudice in the legislative levels of government is the basis of laws which put a minority group without adequate, if any representation or voice at a disadvantage without reference to some worthy social goal and at the judicial level implies a consensus of ?solicitude? among the judiciary toward such ?discrete? and ?insular? groups within society. The other type of prejudice involves ?suspicious classifications,? or stereotypes that may disadvantage groups but still is within the boundaries of democracy; this type of classification is considered harmful by Ely when we consider the presence of undue stereotypes that are discovered in previous acts of legislation. Ely asserts a more interperetivist approach although he concedes the practical implausibility of such an approach because of the inability of the constitution to forsee all possible situations. In the final analysis, Ely thinks in a representative democracy laws should agree with those values which are fundamental in the constitution (and surrounding historical documents) and which obligates, without undue discrimination obligates all to obey, despite a plurality of perspectives. Finally, Ely offers up that because matters of racial, sexual, moral and other prejudices are essentially primae facia in terms of what constitutes discrimination, a process-based model for the Supreme Court would be optimal, the only difficult being hard cases.
#3 Explain Dworkin?s critique of Ely?s theory.
?In qny case, judicial review of the political processes only polices democracy; it does not seek to override it as judicial review of substance does?My point in this essay is that both ways end in failure, and in the same sort of failure.? (Dworkin, p.34)
Dworkin called Ely?s Democracy and Distrust ?interesting? and he obviously saw some merit in Ely?s claims; however, Dworkin analyzed Ely?s four main assertions and accepted only the first (that judicial review should be concerned with process legislation rather than the substantive decisions made by judges). Dworkin disagreed with Ely on his second point, that processes should conform to a specific model of democracy because, he argues, there is no universally accepted conception (in the sense Rawls uses the word in A Theory of Justice, 1971). Thirdly, Dworkin finds Ely?s contention untenable that process-based-review agrees with democracy and is thus the judiciary?s proper function, namely because it contradicts his arguments against the discovery of objective fundamental values?necessary to a consistent code of process. Entailed in this is the distinction Dworkin draws between input and outcome cases which aide in rendering the best conception of democracyt. Lastly, Dworkin attacks Ely by pointing to his claim that the courts err in making ?putatively? substantive judgements (i.e. Lochner, Roe v. Wade) yet, simply, for Ely?s theory to work substance-based decisions are necessary in bringing about the equality Ely regards so highly. con, and substantive judicial review is a necessity in the battle of the liberal to equalize the opposing forces in society (insofar as opportunity is concerned) Dworkin?s analysis of Ely rests on their differing conceptions of equality and the rule of law as the bases of democracy.
#4 Explain Rosenberg?s view of the relative validity of the dynamic and constrained court models.
??an examination of the direct effects of courts in producing significant social reform, in the case of civil rights, shows that the theoretical framework of the constraints and conditions successfully explains the varying patterns of judicial efficacy. In contrast, neither view of the Court alone, nor the existing paradigm of Brown as the symbol of judicial efficacy, works very well?Courts can matter, but only sometimes, and only under limited conditions.? (Rosenberg, p. 106)
The dynamic court view espouses a vigorous, active, and decisive role of judges and does not scorn decisions that run contrary to mainstream belief and practice and it opposes the constrained view which posits that the court?s role should be minor, passive, and weak. Although black and white, the views nonetheless are not mutually exclusive and according to Rosenberg actually depend on one another for their validity. The contradiction here is that if both models are present in a given situation, which was apparently true in Brown v. Board of Education, the distinction becomes meaningless. The point Rosenberg makes is that the courts are more or less always acting under the constrained model except when it makes a controversial decision which has certain and major social implications. However, Rosenberg also makes clear that only when the court has the active support of other areas of government can the dynamic role be realized. Finally, the interplay between the two views of the Court has the effect of sharply limiting the functionality of either in gauging or constructing a coherent conception of the Court?s role.
363
Другие работы по теме:
Limiting Rights Essay Research Paper Government is
Limiting Rights Essay, Research Paper Government is justifiable in limiting the rights of the people it governs for the welfare of the group, and even themselves (the people). If people has use of their absolute rights, meaning they were allowed to do anything because they have the right to do anything they choose, rights of other people would be infringed on.
Mcculloch V Maryland Essay Research Paper The
Mcculloch V. Maryland Essay, Research Paper The Supreme Court case of McCulloch v. Maryland set forth important principles in American government. The case itself dealt with whether or not the Congress had power from the Constitution to establish a national bank; also, it dealt with whether or not a state could tax or interfere with the national bank.
Case Study Amoco Oil Co V Borden
, Inc Essay, Research Paper Amoco Oil Co. v. Borden, Inc. 889 F.2d 664 (5th Cir. 1989) Plantiff and Defendants: The Plantiff is Amoco Oil Company. The defendant is Borden, Inc.
Amendment 1 Essay Research Paper The first
Amendment 1 Essay, Research Paper The first amendment in the Bill of Rights guarantees freedom of religion, speech, press assembly, and the right to petition the government. The establishment clause supports the first amendment by directing the national government not to involve itself in religion. And the Free Exercise Clause guarantees the citizens that the national government will not interfere with their practice of religion.
Greg Sirico Essay Research Paper Adv American
Greg Sirico Essay, Research Paper Adv American Gov. November 14th ?98 McCulloch v Maryland Can congress incorporate a bank? Can a state tax the national government? These were some of the key issues that brought up in the Supreme Court case of McCullloch v Maryland. James Madison, the judge in this case, rules in favor of the National Government.
Law Essay Research Paper 1 The trial
Law Essay, Research Paper 1. The trial court is bound by the Supreme Court s decision under Stare Decisis. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the judicial system. All other courts are most likely to follow a higher courts decision. The only time a precedent would change is if it is out of date, the situation is different, or if the ruling is found invalid.
Civil Rights Essay Research Paper The Constitution
Civil Rights Essay, Research Paper The Constitution Protects the Civil Rights of Americans but again the Constitution does protect the civil rights of Americans. Even though some laws are passed that violate the civil rights of people in the United States, the Supreme Court corrects these errors. The cases reviewed here ask if it is okay to compose and mandate prayer in schools, whether the death penalty is Constitutional, and how much privacy is given to the American people.
Gideon V Wainwright Essay Research Paper Gideon
Gideon V. Wainwright Essay, Research Paper Gideon v. Wainwright What most people don’t know is that in the past those arrested for a crime did not really have “the right to an attorney” unless they had money. This became a right because Clarence Gideon, a prison inmate who did not have the money for a lawyer, took a pencil in his hand and wrote his own petition to the United States Supreme Court.
Gideon V Wainwright Essay Research Paper Clarence
Gideon V. Wainwright Essay, Research Paper Clarence Earl Gideon was charged in a Florida state court with having broken and entered a poolroom with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Appearing in court without funds and without a lawyer, Gideon asked the Florida state court to appoint counsel for him, whereupon the following troubles took place.
Supreme Court Gideon Vs Wainwright Verdict Essay
, Research Paper Supreme Court Gideon vs. Wainwright- Verdict In the Supreme Court case of Gideon v. Wainwright, the ruling is obviously in favor of Mr. Gideon. His rights of the accused were evidently violated. His rights to a fair trial as well as the right to counsel were severely abridged, and his liberties guaranteed by the Constitution were defied in the name of the state of Florida and its refusing to pay for proper counsel.
Marbury V Madison Trial Essay Research Paper
Marbury v. Madison The issue before the Supreme Court was the question of the court?s own constitutional authority, and to decide whether or not to issue the writ and if this would
Madison Vs Marbury Essay Research Paper Between
Madison Vs. Marbury Essay, Research Paper Between 1800 and 1835, the Supreme Court dealt with many cases of great importance to the United States of America. John Marshall served as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during this time. The case of Marbury v. Madison, in 1803, was one of the most crucial court cases and decisions made in this time period.
New York Times Co Vs United States
Essay, Research Paper New York Times Co. v. United States U.S. Supreme Court, 1971 The New York Times printed allegedly classified documents that leaked from the Pentagon
Econ Essay Research Paper The federal progressive
Econ Essay, Research Paper The federal progressive income tax has been an issue that has been argued on the floors of Congress, in front of the United States Supreme Court, in front of television cameras, and around the dinner table. The tax served its purpose in supplementing revenue during the Civil War and World War I, but continued taking from Americans’ income in peacetime, allowing fewer dollars to be spent on goods and services.
Freedom And The Constitution Essay Research Paper
The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to freedom of religion and freedom of expression from government interference. Freedom of expression is made up of the explicit rights of freedom of speech, press, assembly and to petition the government for a redress of grievances, and the implied right of association and belief contained in the First Amendment.
John Marshall
’s Court Rulings Essay, Research Paper Hamilton was a federalist and served as the secretary of the treasury in the 1890s. He was a strong supporter of a centralized federal government. He also advocated loose interpretation of the u.s. constitution and the use of the elastic clause. Which was an ambiguous power of the federal government stating that ?congress can do what it is proper and necessary? john Marshall?s epitomizing of these Hamiltonian principals and philosophies can be seen in several of his court rulings.
Canada Essay Research Paper This ISP is
Canada Essay, Research Paper This ISP is is about my views on the Canadian Constitution and what I think needs to be changed in it. Some topics I have chose to discus,
Examination Of The Federal Judiciary Essay Research
Paper The federal judiciary of the United States is split into, essentially, one court system for the national government and one for each of the states. The federal courts are then split up further. The first level of federal courts are the district courts, including the U.S. Tax Court, followed by the U.S. courts of appeal, which includes the U.S.
Al Gore Essay Research Paper Democratic presidential
Al Gore Essay, Research Paper Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore went to the Florida Supreme Court today to call for an immediate count of some 14,000 disputed Florida ballots. Meanwhile, the Bush team pressed ahead with transition plans, and Florida legislators considered a special session to name electors.
Judicial Review Essay Research Paper Judicial ReviewThe
Judicial Review Essay, Research Paper Judicial Review The Supreme Court is the only court designated in the constitution. Within it is the Chief Justice of the United States, and eight associates. Being the highest court it is the last resort for all federal court questions. The Supreme Court has the power to determine whether something is constitutional or not, which makes them the final authority.
John Marshall Essay Research Paper John MarshallIn
John Marshall Essay, Research Paper John Marshall In early American history, the powers of the executive and legislative branches of the government were already well defined. However, the judicial branch needed to establish its position as an equal of the other two branches. John Marshall was crucial in making this happen.
The Supreme Court What Do They Have
To Hide Essay, Research Paper Matthew J. Vowell Ms. Lanctot English 122 Dec. 5, 2000 The Supreme Court: What Do They Have To Hide? The tone of this article is pretty much summed up in the first sentence. The author writes, “ I wonder what the pompous justices on our Supreme Court have to hide by not letting their actions be viewed live on national television?” (Aldrich 6B) He is obviously angry that we have been somewhat shut out from the Supreme Court decision on the Florida recount.
The Supreme Court New Essay Research Paper
Today the Supreme Court agrees to hear about 7,000 cases each year. In the early days of the Supreme Court (1790-1801) the court heard only 87 cases. This number slowly increased up until recently where they have shown a dramatic increase. The court has original jurisdiction over all cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a Sate shall be a party.
John Marshall Influence On The Supreme Court
Essay, Research Paper In the beginning years of the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court was a struggling institution due to the lack of effectiveness of the Chief Justices and was not highly regarded by the executive and legislative branches of the government. The third Chief Justice in only twelve years, John Marshall put an end to the Supreme Court’s lack of influence after his appointment by President John Adams in 1801.
Supreme Court Essay Research Paper Supreme Court
Supreme Court Essay, Research Paper Supreme Court Research The Supreme Court is the highest in the United States. It is the “final court of appeal and the expositor of the U.S. Constitution”. The United States Supreme Court is now located in Washington D.C. There are presently nine justices that sit upon the court.
Federalism Essay Research Paper Federalism the balanced
Federalism Essay, Research Paper Federalism, the balanced division of state and federal powers, is an essential principle of the United States Government. On occasion this balance is contested or violated and court cases ensue. These court cases over time have shaped and defined federalism and the powers, rights, and position of state and national governments.
Supreme Court Row V Wade Essay Research
Paper Supreme Court Row v Wade Roe v. Wade I believe that it is outrages that the states could turn a matter of personal liberties and privacy into a tool used to promote itself as a non-federal government dominated body. By refusing a woman to have the right to terminate a pregnancy, the state abridges that woman’s right to privacy, which is supported by the constitution in more then one Amendment such as the first, the fourth, the fifth, the ninth, and of course the famous fourteenth.
JUDICIAL REVIEW Essay Research Paper uncategorized
JUDICIAL REVIEW Essay, Research Paper : uncategorized : Pros and Cons of Judicial Review Pros and Cons of Judicial Review Judicial Review is the power given to Supreme court justices in which a judge has the power to reason whether a law is unconstitutional or not. Chief Justice John Ma
Judicial Activism Vs Judicial Restraint Essay Research
Paper Judicial activism and judicial restraint are two opposing philosophies when it comes to the Supreme Court justices’ interpretations of the United States Constitution; justices appointed by the President to the Supreme Court serve for life,and thus whose decisions shape the lives of “We the people” for a long time to come.
Federalism Essay Research Paper David FederalismThe current
Federalism Essay, Research Paper David Federalism The current state of federalism in the United States is of one of peril, plagued with recent Supreme Court rulings, current debates over the devolution of Federal powers, and variance in State governing. The United States has always been troubled with the role of the Federal government V.
Constitutional Law
– Marbury V. Madison Essay, Research Paper Constitutional Law Marbury v. Madison Marbury v. Madison, one of the first Supreme Court cases asserting the
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay Research Paper is
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay, Research Paper is Cohens vs. Virginia, in which the question arose as to the right of the Supreme Court to exercise its appellate jurisdiction over the judgment of a state court involving the validity of state legislation. The contention of the counsel for the state struck at the very root of the judicial system of the Union, with its authority to review state decisions which involved the binding effect of the Federal Constitution and laws: and so to the discussion of this fundamental question Marshall brought his heaviest artillery.
The Incorporation Doctrine Essay Research Paper The
The Incorporation Doctrine Essay, Research Paper The Incorporation Doctrine The Incorporation Doctrine was devised by the Supreme Court to apply the state rights that are enumerated in the Bill of Rights. This is to ensure that the individual states are not by-passing the Bill of Rights in their decision making process.
ROe V Wade Essay Research Paper Daniel
ROe V Wade Essay, Research Paper Daniel DellaCroce Law and the Legal System Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113 The case of Roe v. Wade started back in the state of Texas. This was where a single pregnant woman brought a class action challenging the constitutionality of the Texas abortion laws. This is where in Texas it is a criminal offense to have an abortion.
THE POLITICAL SYSTEM OF UKRAINE
The Constitution outlines the structure of the national government and specifies its powers and duties. Under the Constitution the powers of the government are divided into three branches - the legislative which consists of the Verhovna Rada, the executive, headed by the President, and the judicial, which is led by the Supreme Court.