Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper
Utilitarianism
The concept of sustainable development is an attempt to balance two
moral demands placed on the environment. The first demand is for development,
including economic development or growth. It arises mainly from the interests
of people who live in developing countries. Their present poverty gives them a
low quality of life and calls urgently for steps to improve their quality of
life. The second demand is for sustainability, for ensuring that we do not risk
the future in the sake of gains in the present. This arises from the interests
of people in the future who will need access to a reasonable quality of life,
non-renewable resources, unspoiled wilderness, and a healthy biosphere. These
two moral demands do conflict. In fact, economic growth is the prime source of
threats to the natural environment.
We have a rough sense of what a good quality of life for humans consists
of. Also, we can make some rough judgments about when a person’s quality of
life has increased or decreased. Utilitarianism about future generations says
that people should weigh these increases impartially with respect to times. And,
in particular, should not prefer a smaller increase in the present well-being to
larger increases in the future. We should try to maximize the sum of increases
in well-being across times counting future lives equally against those in the
present. Our moral goal should always be to produce the greatest total of such
gains, no matter by whom they are enjoyed.
Utilitarianism has been extensively discussed by philosophers, and many
objections have been raised against it. Two objections are especially relevant
here. First, utilitarianism is an extremely, even excessively demanding moral
view for most humans. If we have a duty always to bring about the best outcome,
than any time we can increase the well-being of others (which is just about at
any time), we have a moral duty to do so. There is no moral time off, no moral
relaxation, nor is there a moral holiday. Humans are always duty bound to
sacrificing something for the benefit of others at a given time. Second,
utilitarianism can favor unequal distributions of well-being. In particular, it
can impose severe deprivations on the few for the sake of gains for the many.
Given its interpretations of impartiality, utilitarianism will count the
deprivations of the few as a moral cost. But, if they produce benefits for
enough people, this cost will be outweighed. Even a severe inequality can be
balanced out and approved of by a utilitarian.
Some philosophers, feeling the force of these objections, have proposed
replacing utilitarianism about future generations with an egalitarian view.
This view cares not just about the sum of benefits across generations, but also
about their equitable distribution. We do not sacrifice the worst-off
generation for better-off generations, but aim at equality of conditions among
them. This egalitarian view can take many forms, but a good version has been
proposed by Brian Barry. He says that each generation has a duty to pass on to
its successors a total range of resources and opportunities that is at least as
good as its own.[1] Those generations that enjoy favorable conditions of life
must pass on similar circumstances of life to their future. However,
generations that are less fortunate have no such stringent obligations. What is
required of each generation is that it just pass on a total package of
opportunities that is comparable to its own; whatever the exact composition of
that package may be. Barry’s approach to the egalitarian view can easily be
interpreted as an ethic of outcomes. Assuming this interpretation, is the
egalitarian view the best of our duty concerning future generations? There
seems to be one major objection against Berry’s view.
Brian Barry’s egalitarian view does not place excessive demands on early
generations to make sacrifices for the sake of later generations. That is
because it places no such demands-early generations need do nothing at all for
later generations. Surely early generations have some duty to enable their
successors to live better than themselves. An ideal of sustainability, or of a
constant level of well-being through time, may be attractive to think of when
starting from a high level of well-being. But, it is not so attractive when
starting from a low level of well-being. There is nothing inspiring about a
consistently maintained level of misery. Yet Barry’s view allows consistent
misery to persist. It finds nothing objectionable in a sequence where the first
generation passes on a very limited range of opportunities and resources to the
next generation, and so on. Surely this sequence of events is objectionable.
There may not be as stringent a duty to improve conditions for future
generations as utilitarianism claims, but there must be some such duty that
exists.
Personally, there has to be a middle between utilitarianism for future
generations and Brian Barry’s egalitarian view. I feel that our so-called duty
is only to make the conditions of future generations reasonably good. If people
follow utilitarianism, then we will say that we have a duty to give future
generations a reasonable quality of life through demanding sacrifices of
ourselves. And if people followed Barry’s egalitarian view, then future
generations may be stuck in the same rut as past generations. That is why a
middle-road must be used. By taking these two ideas, then we can see that each
generation should pass on to its successors a range of opportunities that allows
for a reasonable quality of life. However, it should not be seen as a duty. If
it is seen as a duty, then most humans may be turned off by the prospect of
taking care of their environment for future generations. If it is seen by
humans that our environment is a precious jewel, then we will more than likely
want to share it with our future generations.
Works Cited
[1] Brian Berry, “Intergenerational Justice in Energy Policy.” In D. MacLean
and P. G. Brown, eds., Energy and the Future Totowa, NJ: Rowan and Littlefield,
1983 pp.274.
Resources
1. Barry, Brian. “Intergenerational Justice in Energy Policy,” in D. MacLean
and P. G. Brown, eds., Energy and the Future Totowa, NJ: Rowan and Littlefield,
1983.
2. Danielson, Peter. “Personal Responsibility,” in H. Coward and T. Hurka,
eds., Ethics and Climate Change: The Greenhouse Effect Waterloo: Wilfred
Laurier UP, 1993.
3. Sidgwick, Henry. The Methods of Ethics, 7th ed. London: Macmillan, 1907.
4. World Commission on Environment and Development. Our Common Future Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1987.
323
Другие работы по теме:
Right Theory Essay Research Paper Right Theory1
Right Theory Essay, Research Paper Right Theory: 1. Rights create obligations, type of moral discourse & involve agents, being who act & are acted upon. People are given obligations to respect your rights. There is no right to obligate other people rights. (Conventional rights: Created by group of people as law or regulation in our society.
Mcluhan Essay Research Paper While many McLuhanites
Mcluhan Essay, Research Paper While many McLuhanites consider the concept of the Global Village to be prescient, especially in terms of “predicting” the Internet, it is ludicrous to thus “Nostradamus-ize” McLuhan, leaving us to interpret each phrase in terms of some event or invention, nodding sagely at his brilliance each time we make a connection.
Historical Fiction Essay Research Paper Textbooks can
Historical Fiction Essay, Research Paper Textbooks can often prove to offer only a limited amount of information. Space and time constraints place the author(s) of these textbooks in a sticky situation. They must get the general concept through without taking up to much space. However, this can sometimes push out relevant material that van help to support the general concept.
MILLS UTILITARIANISM Essay Research Paper In discussing
MILL?S UTILITARIANISM Essay, Research Paper In discussing matters of right and wrong, it is essential to first lay down the foundation of these concepts. These terms are indeed concepts because they hold no certain truth to the general society. True, righteousness may be a measurement of happiness, lack of pain, or a circumstantial mode of contentment, however, if you consider one persons? happiness to be another persons? pain, then what is the true measurement of right? We see that there are actually two distinct aspects to this question, a practical concern and a moral dilemma.
Masturbation Essay Research Paper They
Masturbation Essay, Research Paper They’re not blind. They don’t have hair on their palms. Even so, they still masturbate. Of all the topics that continually find themselves under attack, none seems to be restricted solely to quiet, taboo conversations as often as masturbation. For countless generations, this subject has been put down, looked down on, and kept behind closed doors, and no one is really sure why. “It’s immoral”, or “its dirty” are the best anyone has come up with.
Utiliatariasm And Its Authors Essay Research Paper
Utilitarianism is the principle idea for the greatest happiness for the greatest numbers. In other words, maximize the pleasure while minimizing the pain. One such philosopher and believer of Utilitarianism is Jeremy Bentham, who lived from 1748 until 1832. He believed that there should be a moral system, and that it should do two things.
The Myth Of Time Sumosaki Vs Enigma
) Essay, Research Paper Give me some time to think. You pressure me with your hourglass. Your concept, I am not supposed to believe in. But I am not given choices.
Lawgrtt Essay Research Paper The Constitution of
Lawgrtt Essay, Research Paper The Constitution of the United States and Madison’s Federalist Paper 51 draw upon the philosophy of John Locke, as expressed in his Second Treatise of Government. Madison and the framers of the Constitution looked to Locke’s ideas for justification and guidance. The Preamble of the Constitution reflects the intentions of its authors and shows the influence of Locke’s ideas.
Js Mill Essay Research Paper The principle
Js Mill Essay, Research Paper The principle of utility is that pleasure and happiness are valuable, pain and suffering are disvaluable, and anything else only causes the happiness or adds to the suffering. A utilitarian is someone who believes the principle of utility to be correct, and is therefore concerned with maximizing the utility of the universe.
Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper UtilitarianismThe main idea
Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper Utilitarianism The main idea of utilitarianism, according to Adam Morton s book Philosophy in Practice is to follow the action that brings about the greatest amount of pleasure or the least amount of pain. This idea at first seems simple but when applied to some examples the edges blur.
Glass Ceiling Summary Essay Research Paper Utilitarianism
Glass Ceiling Summary Essay, Research Paper Utilitarianism favors unequal treatment in the work place.CONTROLLING IDEA: Big corporations should be forced into applying affirmative action to equal out the male/female ratio in management positions.
Societal Marketing Concept Essay Research Paper The
Societal Marketing Concept Essay, Research Paper The societal marketing concept holds that the organisation should concentrate on the needs and wants of their customers, and then deliver the desired satisfactions more effectively and efficiently than competitors, in a way that maintains or improves the consumer’s and the society’s well-being.
Utility An Impartial And Equitable Standpoint Essay
, Research Paper Utility: An Impartial and Equitable Standpoint Mackey- Philosophy 318 Section Wednesday 12:00- 1:00 Tu Phan Phliosophy 318- Mackey The foundation of Utility is based on John Stuart Mill’s notion that one must strive to act in such a way to produce the greatest good of the greatest number.
Utilitarianism The Survival Lottery Essay Research Paper
It is better to give than to receive . I believe I was about nine years old when I heard that statement for the first time . It was in church. It was one of those things that I randomly chose to hear while sitting in church every Sunday. Normally anything that was said in that building never made sense to me and I never had any use for retaining it.
Marriage Essay Research Paper In the United
Marriage Essay, Research Paper In the United States most Americans have trouble understanding the concept of an arranged marriage. Arranged marriages not only affect individuals, but also society. I believe that arranged marriages are better then personal choice marriages. I came to this conclusion on the basis of other cultures other then the culture of the United States.
Style Essay Research Paper I am choosing
Style Essay, Research Paper I am choosing to write about paragraph two, page 95 of the Hebidge article. I agree that taste does distinguish those who make the distinctions.
Ethics 4 Essay Research Paper Connie Science
Ethics 4 Essay, Research Paper Connie Science s moral dilemma of whether or not to break government ethics laws regarding the acceptance of lobbyist s gifts has come to its climax where she must choose if she will jump on the bandwagon or not. Ms. Science could use a number of methods to come to a logical and morally sound conclusion.
Kant And Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper First
Kant And Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper First of all I want to state the Kantian and the Utilitarian views butt heads on this issue. The Kantian view is nonconsequential, that is as a matter of
Utilitarianism 2 Essay Research Paper When first
Utilitarianism 2 Essay, Research Paper When first introduced to Utilitarianism one would think that it is pretty straightforward and easy to swallow. Utilitarianism relates to the greatest happiness of the greatest number. Although there are some problems with this theory. In the paragraphs to follow I will illustrate what Utilitarianism is, discuss why it is important to society, and discuss some of the problems related to Utilitarianism.
Mill
’s Utilitarianism Essay, Research Paper “Utilitarianism” is the ethical doctrine, which essentially states that which is good is that which brings about the most happiness to the most people. John Stuart Mill believed that the decisions we make should always benefit the most people as much as possible regardless of the consequences to the minority or even yourself.
Classical Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper
“Classical Utilitarianism,” by John Rawls This short piece by Rawls makes the point that “utilitarianism does not take seriously the distinction between persons.” This is an intriguing statement and warrants discussion. Rawls view of utilitarianism is that the goal for society is the fulfillment of the maximum satisfaction of all its members.
Fairness Of Jurors Essay Research Paper MUST
Fairness Of Jurors Essay, Research Paper MUST A JUROR’S MIND BE EMPTY TO BE OPEN?This article is about a concept of choosing the 12 jurors. In any case, jurors always play important roles in the court since they are the people who will come up with a verdict. Because of this, people believe that when the jurors are chosen for a certain trial, they must be aware of that case and know what is going on in that case.
John Stuart Mills Essay Research Paper Is
John Stuart Mills Essay, Research Paper Is ignorance bliss? Would human beings, without higher thought processes, lead a happier existence? Or, is it better to be a human dissatisfied, than a pig satisfied ?(Mill, 335). These are questions that plagued the mind of John Stuart Mill. These are questions that help us look into ourselves and form our own opinions of pleasure, happiness, and utility.
Mobile Alerts Essay Research Paper Mobile Alerts
Mobile Alerts Essay, Research Paper Mobile Alerts – Concept Paper. What is Mobile Alert? Mobile Alert is the text message (SMS) sent to a mobile phone as a result of occurrence of an event for which the mobile user has registered the request for getting the notification.
Starbucks Coffee Company Essay Research Paper CONCEPT
Starbucks Coffee Company Essay, Research Paper CONCEPT PAPER COMPANY: Starbucks Coffee Company The purpose of the video program is to orient and inform employees about the goals and objectives of the company. In addition to this, the rules and benefits of employees will be featured. The video will employ a factual style in conveying its purpose.
Mills Theory Of Utilitarianism Essay Research Paper
MILLS THEORY OF UTILITARIANISM AND HOW IT EFFECTS LIVING A DECENT OR JUST LIFE When faced with a moral dilemma, utilitarianism identifies the appropriate considerations, but offers no realistic way to gather the necessary information to make the required calculations. This lack of information is a problem both in evaluating the welfare issues and in evaluating the consequentialist issues which utilitarianism requires
LAW Ceciro Plato Socrates St Thomas Essay
, Research Paper REVIEWING KEY CONCEPTS 1) Define natural and positive law. Identify the fundamental differences between the theories of natural and positive law. Give an example to illustrate each of these theories.