Hobbes ?The Fool? Essay, Research Paper
A covenant is a contracted agreement in which it is trusted that both persons will carry out their responsibility in time. This can be referred to as the keeping of a promise. ?The mutual transferring of right, is that which men call CONTRACT.? This means that when you exchange something in return for something else you are binding yourself to the agreement of the exchange. ?One of the contractors, may deliver the thing contracted for on his part, and leave the other to perform his part at some determinate time after, and in the mean time be trusted; and then the contract on his part, is called PACT or COVENANT.? When a person agrees to do something at a time in the future for someone or to someone they are being trusted to follow through, therefore giving their trusted word, making a promise. ?To promise that which is known to be impossible, is no covenant.? Therefore, a person cannot be bound to a promise that requires an impossible thing to be accomplished. According to Hobbes, there are two ways in which a person can be freed from a covenant, ?by performing; or by being forgiven.? ?What I lawfully covenant, I cannot lawfully break.? Hobbes explains that no matter what the circumstances, even ?covenants entered into by fear, in the condition of mere nature, are obligatory.?5 Who breaks a covenant? Does a covenant become void if it seems to have a beneficial outcome on a party involved?
Hobbes states that only one person reasons that the breaking of a covenant can be beneficial to ones life and that the reasoning that this person uses is false. Hobbes calls this unreasonable character ?the fool.? To understand why Hobbes believes that the person who believes breaking a covenant could be to one?s benefit is a fool, we must understand his definition of justice. ?Justice is the constant will of giving to every man his own.? Meaning that justice is the established idea that you get what you deserve. When there is no own, there is no unjustice. Justice can be idealized as the ?keeping of covenant, a rule of reason, by which we are forbidden to do any thing destructive to our life; and consequently a law of nature.? Who is the fool? How does he reason that it is sometimes beneficial to break a promise? ?The fool hath said in his heart, there is no such thing as justice; and sometimes with his tongue; seriously alleging, that every man?s conservation, and contentment, being committed to his own care, there could be no reason, why every man might not do what he thought conduce thereunto: and therefore also to make, or not make; keep, or not keep covenants, was not against reason, when it conduced to one?s benefit.? The fool believes that as long as it is beneficial to you in some way it is okay to break a promise.
Hobbes finds that the fool?s reasoning is false for two reasons with two consequences. The first reason he suggests is that nothing that seems to be accidentally beneficial still ?tends to? one?s destruction, even if done reasonably. ?Seeing all the voluntary actions of men tend to the benefit of themselves; and those actions are most reasonable, that conduce most to their ends. This specious reasoning is nevertheless false.? Hobbes feels that although there is a slight possibility that the breaking of a covenant could be beneficial to one?s self, the chances are not in that person?s favor, therefore making it a risk not worth taking. Secondly Hobbes explains that in a state of nature, a known deceiver is not welcome amongst a confederation or nor accepted due to the lack of trust established. ?Wherein every man to every man, for want of a common power to keep them all in awe, is an enemy, there is no man who can hope by his own strength, or wit, to defend himself from destruction, without the help of confederates; where every one expects the same defense by the confederation, that any one else does: and therefore he which declares he thinks it reason to deceive those that help him can expect no other means of safety, than what can be had from his own single power.? By this explanation Hobbes states that it is actually self destructive to reason that the deceit of one?s covenant is beneficial because he is now without the very safety which allows him to live, therefore the reasoning is void and unjust. The very penalties that bind a person to their promise are not worth the risk of the possible lucky benefit one may receive by breaking their word. The two major penalties listed by Hobbes include being cast out of society, which in turn will lead to one?s destruction, and being cast out of heaven. ?If he be left or cast out of society, he perisheth.? ?Gaining the secure and perpetual felicity of heaven, by any way; it is frivolous: there being but one way imaginable; and that is not breaking, but keeping of covenant.?
I believe that Hobbes definitely makes a point in why he feels that a person is obligated to carry out one?s covenant, even in circumstances where the covenant is made out of fear or to bargain for one?s life. Perhaps his strongest point can be made through his beliefs in justice. ?Justice therefore, that is to say, keeping of covenant, is a rule of reason, by which we are forbidden to do any thing destructive to our life; and consequently a law of nature.? In his stating this belief that ultimately we have an obligation to ourselves to stay alive and that is our main goal, I would have to agree that in the circumstances he has listed you would definitely be a fool. Taking a risk that tends to the destruction of your own life is illogical, ignorant and done with false reasoning. I do feel that there may be a possible situation in which these laws may apply but in a different sense. This would be in the case of the Martyr, for I wonder if it is unjust to sacrifice your life for a cause greater than your own, or to promise your life in exchange for another person?s life, and then break the promise because it is self destruction.
Bibliography
Note: All quotes taken from excerpt of Thomas Hobbes, ?Leviathan?
Другие работы по теме:
Thomas Hobbes Essay Research Paper In 1651
Thomas Hobbes Essay, Research Paper In 1651, Thomas Hobbes published Leviathan, his famous work that detailed his physicalist outlook and his concept of the value of a social contract for a peaceful society and the nature of man. His major belief was that man is a beast that defines his identity through the need to be controlled under some kind of external, oppressive power.
Thomas Hobbes Paper Essay Research Paper Thomas
Thomas Hobbes Paper Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes Paper – What is the difference betweenobligations in foro interno and in foro externo, and when do wehave such obligations? According to Thomas Hobbes, there are certain laws of nature whichexist in the absence of an organized government. These laws are extremelycut throat, and place people in extremely dangerous situations where theirlives are in danger.
King Lea The Role Of The Fool
Essay, Research Paper In the play King Lear, by William Shakespeare, there are many intriguing characters. Perhaps the most intriguing of them all is the fool. The fool seems to exist outside the play appearing and disappearing without warning. The fool is, however, a necessary character to the evolution of Lear’s character, since he is the personification of truth and reason.
The Great Gatsby 10 Essay Research Paper
The Great Gatsby In the novel, The Great Gatsby, the eyes of Dr. T.J. Eckleburg represents god, the all seeing and all knowing god, which society, cannot fool.
Iron Pyrite Essay Research Paper Iron Pyrite
Iron Pyrite Essay, Research Paper Iron Pyrite Pyrite, also known as Fools Gold is the most common of the sulfide minerals. Pyrite is called Fool’s Gold because of it’s pale brass yellow color and
Support Of Hobbes Version Of The Social
Contract ( Essay, Research Paper The purpose of this paper is to interpret and support Hobbes’ version of the social contract. I will support Hobbes’ version of the social contract based upon the opinion that it seems logical in that men are, by nature, egocentric. Humans spend their lives looking for what makes them happiest, this includes charity works.
Jon Locke Essay Research Paper 4 John
Jon Locke Essay, Research Paper 4. John Locke was opposed to an absolute monarchy; Hobbes thought they were a good system. John Locke believed that the individual should be responsible for his own justice; Hobbes thought that a society needed an absolute ruler. The differences that appear lye in regard to their thoughts on mankind in general.
Leviathan By Hobbes Essay Research Paper Thomas
Leviathan By Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes in his book Leviathan, during the course of his argument about the social contract we make to surrender our rights of nature a sovereign in
Thomas Hobbes Essay Research Paper Thomas Hobbes
Thomas Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher who was lived from 1588-1679. He attended Oxford University where he studied classics. His occupation was a tutor, but he also traveled around Europe to meet with scientists and to study different forms of government. He became interested in why people allowed themselves to be ruled, and what would be the best form of government for England.
Hume Hobbes And Descartes Essay Research Paper
Hume, Hobbes, and Descartes Rene Descartes, Thomas Hobbes and David Hume are well known philosophers of the time. These three men were after the truth. The truth about life. The truth about how one exists. The truth about the world around them. They questioned, thought, and reasoned. This is what they did.
Hobbes Vs Descartes Essay Research Paper The
Hobbes Vs Descartes Essay, Research Paper The question I chose to answer was number 3. Contrast Descartes thoughts of the mind against Hobbes thoughts. The paper will consist of the strengths and weaknesses of Cartesian Dualism. Cartesian Dualism claims the independent existence of a non-physical realm and a physical realm.
King Lear The Role Of The Fool
Essay, Research Paper King Lear: The Role of the Fool In Shakespeare?s, King Lear, the Fool plays three major roles. One of these roles is of an ?inner-conscience? of Lear. The Fool provides basic wisdom and reasoning for the King at much needed times. The Fool also works as amusement for Lear in times of sadness and is also one of the only people besides the Duke of Kent and Cordelia who are willing to stand up to the King.
Gimpel The Fool Essay Research Paper Gimpel
Gimpel The Fool Essay, Research Paper Gimpel the Fool, as he is called by the people of the Jewish town of Frampol, is constantly ridiculed and poked practical jokes at. Gimpel himself does not believe himself to be a fool,
Gimple The Fool Essay Research Paper Is
Gimple The Fool Essay, Research Paper Is Gimpel a Fool? In Gimpel the Fool, the main character, Gimpel, developed into a very strong person mainly because of the way people treated him. He begins as a strong person, but grows stronger and stronger as his life continues. Everybody in Gimpel s town thinks he is a gullible fool, but they re the fools.
Locke And Hobbes Essay Research Paper Hobbes
Locke And Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Hobbes point of view on human nature and how a government should be run is a more realistic way of looking at things than John Locke?s theory. Both Hobbes and Locke see human nature differently, Hobbes sees people as being run by selfishness whereas Locke says that people are naturally kind.
Locke VsHobbes Essay Research Paper Locke versus
Locke Vs.Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Locke versus Hobbes Locke and Hobbes were both social contract theorists, and both natural law theorists, but there the resemblance ends. All other natural law theorists assumed that man was by nature a social animal. Hobbes assumed otherwise, thus his conclusions are strikingly different from those of other natural law theorists.
Thomas 2
Thomas & Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, a mathematician, and John Locke, a philosopher both had great ideas on human society. Hobbes had a more pessamistic outlook on on human nature. Locke saw men living in a state of nature which was basically reasonable an cooperative. In my opinion hobbes ideas on human nature as being competitive prove more true.
Gimpel The Fool Essay Research Paper Singer
Gimpel The Fool Essay, Research Paper Singer s Gimpel the Fool is written in first person point of view, and the narrator, Gimpel, is the main character in the story. In the opening paragraph in the story Singer shows how reliable of a narrator that Gimpel is. Gimpel shares many of the nicknames he has had given to him in school, including imbecile, donkey, flax-head, dope, glump, ninny, and fool.
Dont Judge A Book By It
’s Cover:A Twelfth Night Comparrison Of Feste And Sir Andrew Essay, Research Paper Don?t Judge A Book By It?s Cover Looks can be deceiving, and in the case of Sir Andrew and Feste the fool, the
The Fool In King Lear Essay Research
Paper The Fool is a tremendously substantial character in William Shakespeare’s tragedy, King Lear. Traditionally, fools were the equivalent of court jesters and were thought to be insane. They were customarily physically and sometimes even mentally impaired. Persons became fools as the result of an aristocratic individual’s compassion or boredom.
Social Contract Theory Essay Research Paper Hobbes
Social Contract Theory Essay, Research Paper Hobbes Social Contract Theory Thomas Hobbes starts his argument by discussing the nature of mankind. One man can be better in something than another man, but in the end their
The Easy Road To The Final Four
Essay, Research Paper The Easy Road To the Final Four… So, you’re from Indianapolis but all the tickets to the Final Four games are sold out. You still want in. You go to the game looking for scalpers but they charge over $200 a ticket. You pay him. FOOL!!!! Don’t pay him! Here’s what ya do,
Fool For Love By Sam Shepard Essay
, Research Paper Play overviewsPlay: Fool for Love by Sam ShepardSuper Objective:Eddie wants May to understand just how much he s gone through to come and seeher. He wants her realize his love for her even though he has done somethings that wouldcause her to doubt him. Eddie needs to be with May, she is a security for him and nomatter what he will keep coming back to her.
King Lear And The Fool Essay Research
Paper Sebastian Crichton King Lear and the Fool There is much to be said of Lear and The Fool. I believe that The Fool in King Lear serves as an unbiased advisor, providing Lear with many lessons that a more powerful being would not have attempted, due to fear of the king’s wrath. The Fool had the ability to be totally honest with Lear, fore he had no rank or status to be stripped of.
King Lear The Roles Of The Fool
Essay, Research Paper The Roles of the Fool in King Lear Fools in traditional royal households were seen as imbecils and jesters, nothing more. The older role of a royal fool, which Shakespeare adopted from the pagan setting of King Lear, was to correct minor faults and incongruencies in their masters. By detatching the Fool from a conventional fool’s role, Shakespeare allows for the crowd’s suspention of disbelief in the Fool’s ability to get away with the comments he makes to the King.
Thomas Hobbes John Locke And Montesquieu Essay
, Research Paper Many men and women had significant impacts on the historical period known as the Enlightenment. Three men that had such an impact on the Enlightenment were Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Montesquieu. Each of these men had different theories and ideas about what type of government there should be.
John Locke And Thomas Hobbes Two Views
Of The Social Contract Essay, Research Paper John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were two English thinkers who contributed their ideas to the Enlightenment. There are a few similarities between these two. They were both English thinkers, and they both lived in the 1600s. Locke and Hobbes both lived through the upheavals in England early in the 17th century.
The Philosophies Of John Locke And Thomas
Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were two philosophers with completely different ideas. One tended to be more conservative and prejudice, whilst the other was free of spirit and
Laws
– Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Laws. We all must obey them, but why? For fear of going to jail, or being fined? Those are the individual effects of civil disobedience, but what happens what is the purpose of law in society? Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all attempted to interpret the need for laws in society, in order to maintain the good of the whole and the individual.
King Lear Essay Research Paper Many of
King Lear Essay, Research Paper Many of the passages of King Lear, particularly those between the characters of Lear, Kent, the Fool, and Cordelia, all share a common theme. The imagery of nothing, as well as that of blindness, echoes throughout the play. King Lear is in many ways about nothing. However, Kent, the Fool, and Cordelia make him more than nothing does by serving faithfully, speaking bluntly, and loving unconditionally.
King Lear Essay Research Paper King LearKing
King Lear Essay, Research Paper King Lear King Lear is the tale of a vain, prideful, and foolish old man who is blinded by his rage and too stubborn to mend his ways. The “self”
Hobbes Locke Rousseau Essay Research Paper Thomas
Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, all became three of the most influential political theorists in the world.