Society Essay, Research Paper
Aristotle: A Comprehensive View on Nature and Society
In order to fully understand Aristotle’s views on a natural system, it
is necessary to first explain some general principles of his philosophy. It is
in his work the Categories that Aristotle presents the concept of substance, a
concept which will serve as the foundation for much of his philosophical system.
Substance, for Aristotle, is not a universal, but rather, it is the particular;
substance is not a ?such,? but a ?this.? Thus, substance is neither in nor is
it said of a subject (as are qualities). Rather it is that which makes the
subject numerically one; it is that which makes the subject the individual.
Substance is “an individual man and [or] an individual horse.” Aristotle still
classifies universals as substances, for they define what constitutes the
substance, and without these universals, a substance would not be what is.
There are four characteristics of substances: a substance is a ?this?, not a
qualification or a ’such’ (which stresses individuality); a substance has no
contraries to it (there are no opposites of a substance); a substance does not
admit more or less (there are not degrees of a substance); and a substance can
admit contraries while remaining numerically one.
In the Physics, Aristotle addresses that which constitutes Natural
Objects as substances. He states that all Natural Substances consist of both
form and matter. Matter is that out of which the substance arises and form is
that into which the matter develops. In building a table, the wood, nails, etc.,
are the matter, and the idea of a table, what the end result will be, is the
form, according to Aristotle. Matter and form are inseparable from each other;
there is no ‘form’ apart from concrete things. Aristotle explains that all
substances contain within themselves the origin of their change and movement.
He continues by stating that the change which can occur is due to four possible
natural causes: formal cause, material cause, efficient cause, and final cause.
Formal and material cause are self explanatory, in that it is the form or the
matter of the substance which is responsible for the change within the substance.
Efficient and final cause, however, will become more clear once we investigate
Aristotle’s ideas of actuality and potentiality.
We should begin the explanation of actuality and potentially by saying
that form can be seen as the actuality of the substance while matter is the
potential for that form to exist. The best way to illustrate this is through
the analogy of the building of a house. The materials, bricks and wood, should
be seen as the matter, the potentially to become a house. The end-result, the
house, is the form, it is the potential made actual. The building of the house
itself, the movement, is analogous to the four types of causes Aristotle says
exist in substances. In the case of this analogy the builder would be the
efficient cause in that it is he/she who initiates the change. One could also
say that there is a final or teleological cause taking place as well, that the
motive is to build a house which serves the purpose of ?house-ness?, namely that
the house is one in which people can live. Through this analogy one can begin
to see the nature of each of the causes which can exist within a given substance.
Once we see how Aristotle’s ideas of actuality and potentially relate to his
ideas of form and matter (matter is potentiality, form is it’s actuality), which
necessarily relate to substance, we can almost begin the analysis of his
philosophy on an ethical system. First, however, an introduction to the idea of
the ?Unmoved Mover? is necessary.
In accordance with Aristotle’s teleological view of the natural world,
the ?Unmoved Mover? is a purely actual thing which motivates all things toward
the ?good.? All things try to achieve completeness, full actuality, or
perfection; this implies that there must exist an object or state towards which
this striving or desire is directed. This object or state is the ?Unmoved
Mover.? This state of perfection must be one of pure actuality since it can
have no potential, being perfect; it must be non-natural since all natural
things have potential. Thus, it is not moving, yet moves other things to
attempt to achieve perfection; this thing is the final cause of the universe.
Knowing, now, that which moves all natural things towards the goods, we can
begin the analysis on Aristotle’s ethical system.
In investigating Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, it is important to
remember that just like the Physics, it is a teleological view, not on the
natural world, but on human nature, the end (telos) of which is the ?good.?
Everything that humans do is aimed at some end; this end is can either have
intrinsic or extrinsic worth. This is to say that the acts of humans can either
be done for themselves (intrinsic) or can be done as a means to something else
(extrinsic). The underlying goal of all our action, Aristotle calls the ?good?,
but along with the ?good,? comes happiness. For Aristotle, then, all human are
just trying to be happy.
The good life, then, is a life of happiness; Aristotle says such a life
can be achieved by excellence (arete) in two areas of virtue: intellectual and
moral. First, we will have to analyze moral virtue in order to understand fully
the notion of intellectual virtue. More or less, for Aristotle, the life of
moral virtue, not being an exact science, is a life of moderation. This is a
common theme with most all the ancient philosophers and authors (especially the
playwrights). It is practical wisdom which is not ?a priori,? but rather it is
a learned trade which varies from situation to situation; it can not be taught,
it must be learned from experience. What, then, exactly is moral virtue? It is
acting in accordance with our nature and our striving towards the ?good,? by
means of moderate actions is everyday life. Knowing this practical type of
reason, we can now examine the theoretical type of reason, intellectual virtue.
Happiness is an activity, it is not a passive state for Aristotle. It
is our potential which allows us to be motivated by the concept of the ?Unmoved
Mover,? towards a state of perfection or perfect happiness. In order to achieve
this state, a human, according to Aristotle, must partake in an activity which
is both sought for intrinsic purposes and is in itself perfect. Intellectual
virtue is this activity. It is a theoretical principle which each person knows ?
a priori;? it is the act of doing what is most natural for all humans to do, to
reason. It is our nature according to Aristotle, to reason, and it follows that
if we achieve the perfectness or excellence (arete) in our nature, we achieve
perfect happiness. Specifically, for Aristotle, the best way to come close to
achieving the perfect ?good? is to act as a seeker of truth. The philosopher is
the way to go according to Aristotle; ?Philosophical thoght is the way to
consummate perfect happiness, but it doesn’t pay well.?
370
Другие работы по теме:
Analysis Of Veiwpoints On Tragedy Essay Research
Paper The question of what defines tragedy has been an issue addressed by several different literary minds since the day of Aristotle, the first person to define tragedy. When Aristotle first defined tragedy he believed tragedy was something reserved for a person of noble stature. He said this person was eventually brought down by a tragic flaw, hence the term tragedy.
Oedipus The King Essay Research Paper 3
Oedipus The King Essay, Research Paper 3. How Sophocles? Oedipus the King fits the description of tragedy provided by Aristotle? Why does Aristotle believe tragedy is superior to epic poetry?
Aristotle Essay Research Paper In Aristotle
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper In Aristotle’s Metaphysics, he discusses what he believes to be the theory of origin. One must differentiate Aristotle’s theory with that of creation. The word “creation” implies a biblical idea. Aristotle was not familiar with the biblical text and therefore did not understand the concept of “creation” in the biblical sense.
Aristotle Essay Research Paper One would like
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper One would like to believe that there are many factors that distinguish humans from animals. On the contrary, many philosophers believe that there is just one difference between man and animal: reason.
Aristotle 2 Essay Research Paper Aristotle s
Aristotle 2 Essay, Research Paper Aristotle s Life Aristotle (384-322 BC) was a Greek philosopher, educator, and scientist, and was also one of the most influential thinkers in Western culture (World Book 663). Through his writings, Aristotle considered, summarized, criticized, and helped to further develop many of these traditions from which he had learned from Plato, his teacher.
Aristotle Essay Research Paper AristotleAristotle was a
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Aristotle Aristotle was a Greek philosopher, educator, and scientist. He was one of the greatest and most influential thinkers in Western culture. He familiarized himself with the entire development of Greek thought preceding him. In his own writings, Aristotle considered, summarized, criticized, and further developed all the intellectual tradition that he had inherited from his teacher, Plato.
Relationship Between Art And Society Mimesis Essay
, Research Paper The relationship between art and society: Mimesis as discussed in the works of Aristotle, Plato, Horace and Longinus The relationship between art and society in the works of Plato are based upon his idea of the world of eternal Forms. He believed that there is a world of eternal, absolute and immutable Forms (the world of the Ideal) and this is proven by the fact when man is faced with the appearance of anything in the material world, his mind is moved to a remembrance of the Idea or an absolute and immutable version of the thing he sees.
Aristotle 3 Essay Research Paper PhilosophyMoral Virtue
Aristotle 3 Essay, Research Paper Philosophy Moral Virtue and the Mean In this reading Aristotle describes virtue concerning actions and passions, and the choice of how we become our actions and passions is either of excess, defect, or intermediate. Excess and deficiency both forms of failure and the intermediate (mean) a form of success.
Aristotle Essay Research Paper Aristotle The Most
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Aristotle: The Most Influential Greek Thinker Aristotle was one of the most influential thinkers in western culture, and a Greek philosopher, teacher, and scientist. He was probably the most scholarly and learned of the ancient Greek Philosophers. Aristotle mastered the entire development of Greek though before him and employed this knowledge in his writings.
3Y63yheh Essay Research Paper According to Aristotle
3Y63yheh Essay, Research Paper According to Aristotle the definition of political success means the general happiness of the citizenry. Aristotle belief that molding excellent character within the citizenry is the first and most important step towards solidifying the happiness of the state as a whole.In developing political theory Aristotle begins by addressing issues of personal character on a microscopic level believing that in turn this will assist the state on a macroscopic level.
Aristotle 384 322 BC Essay Research Paper
Aristotle (384 -322 BC) ARISTOTLE’S LIFE Aristotle, Greek philosopher and scientist, is one of the most famous of ancient philosophers. He was born in Stagira, Greece to a physician to the royal court.
Critical Analysis Of The Ethics Of St
. Thomas Essay, Research Paper Critical Analysis on the Metaphysics of St. Thomas Aquinas Metaphysics is the philosophical study whose object is to determine the real nature of things to determine the meaning, structure, and principles of whatever is insofar as it is. Although this study is popularly conceived as referring to anything excessively subtle and highly theoretical and although it has been subjected to many criticisms, it is presented by metaphysicians as the most fundamental and most comprehensive of inquiries, inasmuch as it is concerned with reality as a whole.
Poetics Essay Research Paper The subject of
Poetics Essay, Research Paper The subject of the Poetics is poetry, including epic poetry, tragedy and comedy. Unlike Plato, Aristotle regards poetry as a techne. The practice of poetry is governed by rules; these rules can be formulated and taught. Poetry is rationally comprehensible.
Aristotle On Virtue Essay Research Paper Aristotle
Aristotle On Virtue Essay, Research Paper Aristotle’s Views on Virtue Aristotle explains virtue by first explaining what things are found in the soul. He says that the soul has three things-passions, faculties, and states of character, and virtue must be one of these. Passions are things such as anger, fear, longing, and joy.
Aristotle Essay Research Paper Aristotle was perhaps
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Aristotle was perhaps the first and greatest of all polymaths, being credited with the founding of logic. He is said to have transformed every field of logic that he touched (apart from mathematics where Plato and Platonic thought remained supreme). He divided human knowledge into separate categories, which enabled our understanding of the world to develop in systematics fashion.
Aristotle Defination Of Friendship Essay Research Paper
Friendship is undoubtedly one of the most important elements in the books of Aristotle s ethical principles. Aristotle takes the idea of friendship to a serious degree. He categorizes them into three groups or types of friendships. This report will attempt to define each type of friendship as well as identify the role of friendship in a society.
Plato Vs Aristotle Essay Research Paper How
Plato Vs. Aristotle Essay, Research Paper How do we explain the world around us? How can we get to the truth? Plato and Aristotle began the quest to find the answers thousands of years ago. Amazingly, all of philosophy since that time can be described as only a rehashing of the original argument between Plato and Aristotle.
Plato And Aristotle Essay Research Paper Nearly
Plato And Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Nearly all humans have the goal to live a virtuous and happy life. Two of the world most acknowledged philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, had their own views on this central issue. Plato supported the understanding view; he believed understanding is the key to living a virtuous life.
Greek Philosophers Socrates Plato And Aristotle Essay
, Research Paper Greek Philosophers Greek Philosophers Socrates, Plato and Aristotle had virtually the same beliefs about man’s relation to the State, although Plato’s political theory of the State was more rational
Plato Essay Research Paper There are many
Plato Essay, Research Paper There are many ways in which the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle have reached that of that of Saint Thomas Aquinas, due to the fact that Aristotle thought the world that we live in today is the ultimate reality. While Plato thought the world that we see every day is real but is not the ultimate reality.
Aristotle Essay Research Paper Aristotle b 384
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Aristotle (b. 384 – d. 322 BC), was a Greek philosopher, logician, and scientist. Along with his teacher Plato, Aristotle is generally regarded as one of the most
Aristotle On Politics Essay Research Paper The
Aristotle On Politics Essay, Research Paper The central concern of theorists is to establish a form of constitution that a society will likely succeed. Political success according to Aristotle is determined by the happiness of the citizens of the society. Aristotle’s vision of a perfect government all begins with the character of the citizenry leading to the happiness of a whole state.
Book Ii Of The Politics By Aristotle
Essay, Research Paper Bill Stewart October 14, 2000 Intro to Political Philosophy Paper Assignment #1, Essay 5 In Book II of The Politics Aristotle uses the examples of a number of political regimes in order to show the reader the nature of political life. In relating what is and what is not included in these regimes, discussing the problems associated with each of these, and by examining how well all of these regimes agree with Aristotle’s own theory, Aristotle provides the reader with a comprehensive view of political life with regard to the nature of regimes.
Aristotle Essay Research Paper Aristotle analyzes the
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Aristotle analyzes the goods and the virtues that lead to human beings toward happiness in book one of Nicomachean Ethics. According to Aristotle, every activity has an end (or goal); another way of saying this is that the aim of every activity is some kind of good. Concerning this, human existence itself must have some ultimate good.
Aristotle 3 Essay Research Paper Aristotle s
Aristotle 3 Essay, Research Paper Aristotle s Successful Attack on Socrates Proposal: Should Women and Children Be Held in Common? In Aristotle s Politics, Aristotle successfully criticizes Socrates proposal of having wives and children in common (Plato 449d) by pointing out a number of flaws in Socrates proposal.
Aristotle Essay Research Paper Aristotle 384 BC
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Aristotle (384 BC -322 BC) was a Greek philosopher, logician, and scientist. Along with his teacher Plato (author of The Republic), Aristotle is generally regarded as one of the most influential ancient thinkers in a number of philosophical fields, including political theory.
Physics By Aristotle Essay Research Paper Aristotle
Physics (By Aristotle) Essay, Research Paper Aristotle begins by describing the meaning of the words ?nature? and ?natural.? He identifies the meaning of each, and also explains some common phrases which include each of the words.
Aristotle Essay Research Paper An ethical issue
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper An ethical issue that is debated in our society is the concern of driving while intoxicated. Although this was naturally not the case during Aristotle?s time, many of his ethical beliefs can be applied to refute this dilemma. I will prove the standing issue to be unethical through Aristotle?s discussion of virtue and his concept of voluntary/involuntary actions in the Nicomachean Ethics.
Philosophies Of Socrates Plato And Aristotle Essay
, Research Paper Philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle The philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle had different points of-view but they were also similar in some ways. For example, all three