Morality And God Essay, Research Paper
The belief that morality requires God remains a widely held moral maxim. In particular, it serves as the basic assumption of the Christian fundamentalist’s social theory. Fundamentalists claim that all of society’s troubles – everything from AIDS to out-of-wedlock pregnancies – are the result of a breakdown in morality and that this breakdown is due to a decline in the belief of God. This paper will look at different examples of how a god could be a bad thing and show that humans can create rules and morals all on their own. It will also touch upon the fact that doing good for the wrong reasons can also be a bad thing for the person.
The belief that morality requires God is not limited to theists, however. Many atheists subscribe to it as well. An existentialist once wrote, “If God is dead, everything is permitted.” In other words, if there is no supreme being to lay down the moral law, each individual is free to do as he or she pleases. Without a divine lawgiver, there can be no universal moral law.
The view that God creates the moral law is often called the “Divine Command Theory of Ethics.” According to this view, what makes an action right is that God wills it to be done. That an atheist should find this theory suspect is obvious, for, if one doesn’t believe in God or if one is unsure which God is the true God, being told that one must do as God commands will not help one solve any moral dilemmas. According to Divine Command Theory, nothing is right or wrong unless God makes it so. Whatever God says goes. So if God had decreed that adultery was permissible, then adultery would be permissible.
Let’s take this line of reasoning to its logical conclusion. If the Divine Command Theory were true, then the Ten Commandments could have gone something like this: “Thou shalt kill everyone you dislike. Thou shalt rape every woman you desire. Thou shalt steal everything you desire. Thou shalt torture innocent children in your spare time. …” The reason that this is possible is that killing, raping, stealing, and torturing were not wrong before God made them so. Since God is free to establish whatever set of moral principles he chooses, he could just as well have chosen this set as any other.
However it is absurd to think that such needless killing, raping, stealing, and torturing could be morally permissible. Moreover, to believe that God could have commanded these things is to destroy whatever grounds one might have for praising or worshiping him. And if in accord with the definition of tyrants, justice consists in that which is pleasing to the most powerful? Besides it seems that every act of willing supposes some reason for the willing and this reason, of course, must precede the act.
Leibniz’s position is that, if things are neither right nor wrong independently of God’s will, then God cannot choose one thing over another because it is right. Thus, if he does choose one over another, his choice must be arbitrary. But a being whose decisions are arbitrary is not a being worthy of worship.
The fact that Leibniz rejects the Divine Command Theory is significant, for he is one of the most committed theists in the Western intellectual tradition. He argues at great length that there must be an all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-good God and consequently that this must be the best of all possible worlds, for such a God could create nothing less. What Leibniz demonstrates is that, far from being disrespectful or heretical, the view that morality is independent of God is an eminently sensible and loyal one for a theist to hold.
To avoid the charge of absurdity, a Divine Command theorist might try to deny that the situation described above is possible. He might argue, for example, that God would never condone such killing, raping, stealing, and torturing, for God is all good. But to make such a claim is to render the theory vacuous. The Divine Command Theory is a theory of the nature of morality. It tells us what makes something good by offering a definition of morality. But if goodness is a defining attribute of God, then God cannot be used to define goodness. If being all-good is an essential property of God, then all the Divine Command Theory tells us is that good actions would be willed by a supremely good being. While this is certainly true, it is unenlightening. For it does not tell us what makes something good and hence does not increase our understanding of the nature of morality.
A Divine Command theorist might try to avoid this circularity by denying that goodness is a defining attribute of God. But this would take him from the frying pan into the fire, for if goodness is not an essential property of God, then there is no guarantee that what he wills will be good. Even if God is all-powerful and all-knowing, it does not follow that he is all-good, for, as the story of Satan is supposed to teach us, one can be powerful and intelligent without being good. Thus the Divine Command Theory faces a dilemma: if goodness is a defining attribute of God, the theory is circular, but if it is not a defining attribute, the theory is false. In either case, the Divine Command Theory cannot be considered a viable theory of morality.
The foregoing considerations indicate that it is unreasonable to believe that an action is right because God wills it to be done. One can probably believe that God wills an action to be done because it is right, but to believe this is to believe that the rightness of an action is independent of God. In any event, the view that the moral law requires a divine lawgiver is invalid.
There are those who maintain, however, that even if God is not required as the author of the moral law, he is nevertheless required as the enforcer of it, for without the threat of divine punishment, people will not act morally. But this position is no more plausible than the Divine Command Theory itself.
In the first place, as an empirical hypothesis about the psychology of human beings, it is questionable. There is no explicit evidence that theists are more moral than nontheists. Not only have psychological studies failed to find a significant correlation between frequency of religious worship and moral conduct, but also convicted criminals are much more likely to be theists than atheists.
Second, the threat of divine punishment cannot impose a moral obligation, for might does not make right. Threats force; they do not create a moral duty. If our only reason for obeying God is the fear of punishment if we do not, then, from a moral point of view, God has no more claim to our allegiance than Hitler or Stalin.
Moreover, since self-interest is not an adequate basis for morality, there is reason to believe that heaven and hell cannot perform the regulative function often recognized to them. Heaven is the reward that good people get for being good, and hell is the punishment that bad people get for being bad. But consider this. Good people do good because they want to do good – not because they will personally benefit from it or because someone has forced them to do it. People who do good solely for personal gain or to avoid personal harm are not good people. Someone who saves a drowning child, for example, only because he was offered a reward or was physically threatened does not deserve our praise. If your only reason for performing good actions is your desire to go to heaven or your fear of going to hell – if all your other-regarding actions are motivated purely by self-interest – then you should go to hell because you are not a good person. An obsessive concern with either heaven or hell should actually lessen one’s chances for salvation rather than increase them.
A study was done on infants and their sense of morality. Infants have had not much time to be exposed to moral systems or religion for that matter. The creator of this experiment was Jean Piaget. He looked for a sense of morality when the children were allowed to play with marbles. He found several stages of development among the children, the first being standard behaviors of tasting them, burying them, piling them up, etc. Next, some of these behaviors became ritualized and repeated, as if associated with particular thoughts of the infants performing them. Within two years, small children old enough to speak were making some effort to imitate the rules of the game as practiced by their elders. They did not have the mental equipment yet to remember or understand all these rules. Paradoxically, they considered the rules sacred, yet each child played only against him even when with others, and there was no true competitive play under collective rules. Later, children mastered the rules of marbles in competition with one another. A keen sense of fairness arose that influenced the creation and use of the rules. Finally, though fairness remained paramount, older children came to regard the rules as their collective creation, a contract they form to be able to play with one another.
Thus, the rules evolved to define the conditions for cooperation and the penalties for defection, and may be replaced by other formulations serving the same purpose. To my mind, this research proves conclusively that humans are rules-creating animals and that God is not required as the explanation either of marbles or of morality.
The thought of that terrifies most theists, but it shouldn’t. God wasn’t much help to us in discovering how to cure or prevent smallpox, diphtheria, typhoid, whooping cough, polio, measles, and dozens of other diseases. We had to do it on our own. God wasn’t much help to us in making the scientific discoveries that led to the technology that now makes life so comfortable for us. We had to do it on our own. So if we did all these things without God, surely we can make the moral discoveries that are necessary for society to function in an orderly, beneficial way.
Fundamentalists correctly perceive that universal moral standards are required for the proper functioning of society. But they mistakenly believe that God is the only possible source of such standards. Philosophers as diverse as Plato, Immanuel Kant, and John Rawls have demonstrated that it is possible to have a universal morality without God. Contrary to what the fundamentalists would have us believe, then, what our society really needs is not more religion but a richer notion of the nature of morality.
Bibliography
Louis P. Pojman, Ethical Theory (Belmont,CA: Wadsworth, 1998), 635-637.
Pojman, 646
Robin Le Poidevin, “Are God and Ethics Inseparable or Incompatible”,
*hem.passagen.se/nicb/god_ethics.htm* (10 Oct. 1996).
Poidevin, article
Mark I. Vuletic, “Against Moral Argument”,
* infidels/library/modern/mark_vuletic/moral.html* ( 1997).
Mark I. Vuletic, “The Night I Saw the Light”, *secularhumanism/library/fi/allen_wayback.html* ( 11/10/2000).
Другие работы по теме:
Vietnam Essay Research Paper Harold
Vietnam Essay, Research Paper Harold “Light Bulb” Bryant’s portrayals of life in the Vietnam War offend the human race. Not so much the actions Bryant displayed, but the demeanor of the U.S. armed forces. Through Bryant’s stories one comes to the conclusion that war made these people completely mad, and lost every bit of morality.
Grendel Essay Research Paper From the poem
Grendel Essay, Research Paper From the poem Beowulf i cant tell if the character Grendel is truly evil. I know that he is not good because he kills people yet this does not let me know that his soul is evil.
The Passage For Nietzsche On Religion Rhetorical
Devices Essay, Research Paper Following is an excerpt from Twilight of the Idols by Nietzsche. The most general formula at the basis of every religion and morality is: ‘Do this and this, refrain from this and this – and you will be happy! Otherwise….’ Every morality, every religion is this imperative – I call it the great original sin of reason, immortal unreason.
Justice Essay Research Paper The concept of
Justice Essay, Research Paper The concept of justness is a subjective reality. Justice is not present in any one person, justice appears to be present only in consensus. There is no just,
Everyman Vs The Pardoner
’s Tale Essay, Research Paper Morality is strongly lacking in present society, as it was lacking in society in medieval times. The play, Everyman, and the short story, The Pardoner?s Tale, are both literary works which try to educate the reader in the proper ways of life. Everyman?s theme seems to aim toward educating the reader on the reasons why death comes to all people.
Child Morality Essay Research Paper The Child
Child Morality Essay, Research Paper The Child as a Moral Philosopher In this Article ? The Child as a Moral Philosopher,? psychologist Lawrence Kolberg gives a clear description of his theory of moral development. Kolberg uses the studies of seventy-five American boys of varying ages. He also uses boys from other cultures for instance Great Britain, Canada, Taiwan, Mexico and Turkey.
Catholic Morality Essay Research Paper Morality can
Catholic Morality Essay, Research Paper Morality can be defined as being able to be good in character or conduct; virtuous according to civilized standards of right or wrong; each person has their own ?moral standards? which they consider to be right. The Catholic Church also has a version of what being moral entails.
Five Ripe Pears And On Morality Essay
, Research Paper Morality is, in essence, subjugated by he who defines it. This being the case, morality (defined as right or wrong, good or evil) is malleable as long as it does not impede upon any ipso facto virtue (Didion). In the essay On Morality , by Joan Didion, this aspect on morality is composed. This will be utilized to verify that William Saroyan s (author of Five Ripe Pears) guilt of an immoral action is conflicting given specified conditions.
Morality Does Need Religion Essay Research Paper
Morality Does Need Religion In his essay, C. Stephen Layman clashes two views of morality: that of the secular point of view and the religious point of view. Layman starts out by defining the two different stances. The secular point of view states that there is no after life and that morality was an emergent phenomenon.
Film And Morals Essay Research Paper In
Film And Morals Essay, Research Paper In the two films Primary Colors and Godfather, there is a difficult distinction of where the line can be drawn between what is business and what is morally wrong. Morals are important to have, but sometimes we have to make exceptions.
Myth And Symbol Essay Research Paper It
Myth And Symbol Essay, Research Paper It would be short-sighted to presume The Ecstasy of Rita Joe a somewhat dogmatic condemnation of English Canada’s – indeed, all of Canada’s – neglect of Native culture. What George Ryga likely intended was more a universal pronouncement of guilt on the government’s part with regard to all issues of morality, whether unrecognised or, if you will forgive my coyness, unintended.
Positivism Essay Research Paper PositivismPositivism is the
Positivism Essay, Research Paper Positivism Positivism is the belief that “scientific naturalism” is the foundation of knowledge and truth. Leszek Kolakowski wrote “Positivism is a normative attitude, regulating how we are to use such terms as knowledge , science , cognition , and information . Positivism rejects the theories of theology and metaphysics because they don t have proof that they are true.
Divine Command Theory Essay Research Paper The
Divine Command Theory Essay, Research Paper The Divine Command Theory Religion and ethics are seen to be somehow inseparable in our culture. Religious leaders are usually appealed to in some capacity when
Gilgamesh Essay Research Paper Reading Response Epic
Gilgamesh Essay, Research Paper Reading Response: Epic of Gilgamesh There are questions of what tomorrow may bring. How will we handle the things life has to offer us? We don’t always know how we will react. These questions can be triggered by physical aging or a change in the lifestyle. With age come the questions of morality.
SelfDescription Essay Research Paper I come from
Self-Description Essay, Research Paper I come from a very traditional Vietnamese family, where culture is greatly stressed in the household. Growing up, I was taught to follow this culture, I followed it because it was the first thing I learned. Respect, morality, and maintaining a good reputation for the family are some of the most important practices of my culture.
Divine Command Theory Essay Research Paper Divine
Divine Command Theory Essay, Research Paper Divine Command Theory The divine command theory is the view that moral actions are those which conform to God’s will. Charity, for example, is morally proper because God endorses it, and murder is wrong because God condemns it. One way to test to see whether any action is right or wrong is first to determine if it conforms to God’s will, it is morally permissible, if it does not, then it is impermissible.
What Does It Mean To Be Moral
Essay, Research Paper What does it mean to be moral? Our morality is used every day in every situation and decision we make. Morality is very much a part of who you are. To be a person who is moral you know what is right and wrong on your own.
Morality Theory Essay Research Paper MoralityThrough out
Morality Theory Essay, Research Paper Morality Through out the evolutionary process of rules and regulations that we abide by, we come to a discrete conclusion that religion and its “morality” have complete power over our beings. Morality is the quality of being in accord with standards of right or good conduct.
Nietzsche Essay Research Paper My name is
Nietzsche Essay, Research Paper My name is Friedrich Nietzsche and I would like to explain the concepts of my work, On the Genealogy of Morality, to you. “Good” initially designated only the right of those individuals with social and political power to live their lives by sheer force of will. But a social class, motivated by their resentment of their natural superiors, generated a corrupt alternative that would appeal to those who were less capable, which turned values inside out.
Social Contract Theory Essay Research Paper Hobbes
Social Contract Theory Essay, Research Paper Hobbes Social Contract Theory Thomas Hobbes starts his argument by discussing the nature of mankind. One man can be better in something than another man, but in the end their
Freidrich Nietzsche Essay Research Paper Friedrich Nietzsche
Freidrich Nietzsche Essay, Research Paper Friedrich Nietzsche, a unique philosopher had some very interesting ideas about people?s human values and personality types. In this essay I will explain what I like and dislike about his ?Master Morality? & his antithesis to this, ?Slave Morality?.
Socrates 2
Socrates – The Republic Essay, Research Paper The theme of The Republic is very complicated in some ways; it is a manual of sorts, which demonstrates how society can achieve virtue. In the beginning of the Republic, we are introduced to the fundamental question of the rest of the text, whether it is more beneficial to live justly (moral) or unjustly (immoral).
Government And Morality In 20Th Century America
Essay, Research Paper Government and Morality in 20th Century America On July 4, 1776, a general congress of the English colonies of the Americas assembled in Philadelphia and combined their experience, education, and frustration to compose the Declaration of Independence. This document, which even today tells the story of how our country was started, speaks of the religious and moral persecution that our forefathers were forced to bear for years upon years.
Plato Vs Nietzche- The Nature Of
Good Essay, Research Paper Plato Vs. Nietzsche: The Nature of Good Plato and Nietzsche have opposing views on the nature of good. Plato, as demonstrated in the “The Cave” and “Apology,” believes that Good is absolute. This means that he is of the opinion that there is one perfect version of Good for all people, whether they are rich or poor, powerful or weak.
Morality Essay Research Paper Morality is the
Morality Essay, Research Paper Morality is the cooperation of the part to the whole in order to instill conformity in everyone. How does society place morality on people? One of the major methods is through religion. Using the Devil as a catharsis, the single-shared belief in some type of God brings people together in conformity, ethically.
Nick Vs Tom Essay Research Paper NICK
Nick Vs. Tom Essay, Research Paper NICK vs. TOM There are numerous types of people in this world. Apart from physical features, it is the characteristics of a person that makes him/her unique. Nick Carraway the narrator of The Great Gatsby has characteristics, which are the total opposite of those of Tom Buchanan, his cousin-in-law.
Spanking Essay Research Paper In western society
Spanking Essay, Research Paper In western society, spanking is often not seen as a suitable way to discipline youth. In fact, spanking is a good way to discipline by helping to build self-awareness and morality, it is beneficial to
Individual Morality Vs Flawed Social Morality In
“Huck Finn” Essay, Research Paper Individual Morality Vs. Flawed Social Morality In “Huck Finn” Throughout the tale of Huckleberry Finn, morality plays a very prominent role. Specifically; it is social morality that plays such an important role, social morality being the prevailing social morality of the general population.
The Great Gatsby Morality And Gatsby Essay
, Research Paper The Great Gatsby: Morality and Gatsby Morality is a very controversial issue. That is one of the reasons what people are interested in reading about it. Morality can lead to many questions
Inherit The Wind Essay Research Paper MahaThe
Inherit The Wind Essay, Research Paper Maha The Theme of Inherit the Wind The theme of Inherit the Wind by Jerome Lawrence and Robert Lee is the right to think. One example that supports the theme is that Drummond tries to prove Bert Cates is on trial because he uses his right to think. Drummond asks Howard?s opinion on morality, so he can establish that ?anyone in this courtroom . . . has the right to think? (64).