Descartes Vs. Hume Essay, Research Paper
Rationalism and Empiricism are most likely the two most famous and intriguing schools of philosophy. The two schools deal specifically with epistemology, or, the origin of knowledge. Although not completely opposite, they are often considered so, and are seen as the “Jordan vs. Bird” of the philosophy world. The origins of rationalism and empiricism can be traced back to the 17th century, when many important advancements were made in scientific fields such as astronomy and mechanics. These advancements were most likely the basis for a sudden philosophical argument: What do we truly know? People wondered whether science was really giving us knowledge of reality. The quest for the answer to this question led to the development of these two schools of philosophy. Two of the most famous philosophers of epistemology are Rene Descartes and David Hume, the former being a rationalist, and the latter an empiricist. In this paper I will attempt to give an understanding of both rationalism and empiricism, show the ideas and contributions each of the men made to their respective schools, and hopefully give my personal reasoning why one is more true than the other.
Rationalism was developed by several important philosophers all around the 17th century. Descartes, Spinoza, and Leibnitz are all given credit for developing rationalism. Rationalism is the idea that reason and logic are the basis of knowledge. It says that knowledge is innate, and that it cannot come from sources such as the senses. Rationalists believe that we are all born with a means of obtaining truth and knowledge. Empiricism also came about in the 17th Century, mostly through the ideas of the philosophers Locke and Bacon. Although Hume wrote several decades after these two, he probably wrote the strongest arguments for empiricism, covering some questions not answered by Locke and Bacon. Empiricism says that all real knowledge is based on experience. It claims that people are born with no innate knowledge, and that everything that happens in the mind is a result of our perceptions.
Descartes begins his theory of knowledge by assuming that nothing exists. He trusts nothing, not what he has seen or heard, not anything that he has thought. After careful deliberation, he comes to the foundation of his proof: I think, therefore, I am. What he means by this is that he knows that he exists because he thinks. This of course cannot be disproved, because to do so, would require thinking. Descartes believed that in order to obtain knowledge, there must be some rational method for obtaining it, and that the use of senses, or any personal experience was not a reliable source. In his third meditation he says, “I know that even bodies are not…perceived by the senses, or by the faculty of imagination, but by the intellect alone” (Descartes 69). He believed that this was the same for every human, that we all have innate ideas in our soul. This definitely follows the definition of a rationalist. In order to discover these ideas in our soul, we must go about a method of reasoning, which he referred to as methodological doubt. This method resembles the axiomatic geometric system, which probably so because of his expertise and interest in mathematics. Axioms are self-evident principals that are so clear that they are accepted as true, and part of everyone’s knowledge. He believed that knowledge of external things was a result of only the mind, and not the senses. Descartes also said that the universe was mathematically logical, and that anything can be arrived at by reasoning. In fact, he goes on in his writings and uses this method to prove God, the human senses, and the world, all through his reason. Descartes believed that no question was too difficult to discover by his means.
Hume later contradicted the theory of Descartes by ignoring his method of thinking, and claiming that people learn through “perceptions”. These perceptions can by from one of two categories: impressions or ideas. He said that impressions are what gave us the ability to have ideas. Hume also believed that since everyone has different impressions, no one is alike. This is also contrary to what Descartes claimed. Hume said that there are three different ways perceptions can be classified: resemblance, contiguity, and cause and effect. Resemblance is like when a picture makes you think of the original scene. Contiguity is when a dog is mentioned, it makes you think of other dogs, and cause and effect is when you think of a wound, and you associate it with the pain and bleeding that follows. Hume also believed that causation was the method that humans used to reason, to go beyond just impressions and memories. Since causation is developed through experience, it is evident that Hume fits the mold of the empiricist. Hume said that this reason developed from experience could be separated into two areas. One is “relations of ideas”, or things such as mathematics and logic, which can be considered certain because it just relates ideas to one another. Hume says, “Propositions of this kind are discoverable by the mere operation of thought” (Hume 71). The other one is “matters of fact”, or reasoning gained from perceptions. It is based on the idea of cause and effect; if we see something happen after something enough times, we call it the effect and the former the cause. However, Hume is quick to point out that the conclusions we draw from our perceptions are not necessarily true. He says, “The contrary of every matter of fact is still possible” (Hume 71). He makes the example that we cannot be sure that the sun will rise tomorrow, even though it has every other day of our life. Because of this claim, he believed that obtaining real knowledge was impossible.
Both Descartes and Hume made excellent arguments for their beliefs, and both schools of philosophy became quite popular, and have been ever since. Of course determining which one is truer is not an easy task, and as with any philosophical question, there is no right or wrong answer. I think before I can make my decision, I have to look at what the world of science today says about the two different theories, over 300 years after they were developed. The science of evolutionary psychology tells ups that no sharp line can be drawn between information that originates from environment, and information that is acquired through genes. However, in studying of the genetic model, it has been shown that genes cannot express themselves in bodily structures (i.e. the brain), unless they are in a very specific, suitable environment. Although no figures are strictly quantifiable, 99% of the information for building an organism may be thought of as located in the environment, and only 1% in the genes themselves (Steen). This is demonstrated by instances in which environmental information that comes through the senses activates certain genes, such as: cats are unable to perceive vertical lines if they are not exposed to them before a certain age, and children who have not heard a language before the age of ten will no longer retain the capacity to acquire one. When it comes to modern scientific views, it seems that Hume has the edge over Descartes. This seems a bit ironic considering that Descartes believed that knowledge is gained from a logical and scientific method. The very method that Descartes used to prove his ideas on human understanding has been used to disprove his ideas about innate truth.
After reading passages from both writers, as well as interpretations on them, I have to say that I am not convinced that rationalism or empiricism is right. I believe that both had very convincing proofs of their ideas, that is, I could not find any holes in their reasonings. Empiricism is definitely favored by the genetic theory. However, I think that rationalism and Descartes follow more closely my religious beliefs. Descartes relates his ideas partially through a theological point of view. He proves that there is a God, and that God fits into his ideas on epistemology. So on this side I have to give rationalism the edge. I would have liked to been able to choose one of the schools to believe in, but at least it seems that I am in the majority when I say that I am somewhere in between. In fact, Francis Steen, from the University of California, says, “the distinction between empiricism and rationalism has become largely meaningless, like two aspects of the same coin that have fused into a sphere.”
Descartes, Rene. Discourse on Method and Meditations on First
Philosophy. Trans. Donald A. Cress. Hacket Publishing
Company, Inc. 1998.
Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Antony
Flew, ed. Chicago. Open Court Publishing Company. 1988.
Steen, Francais F. Empiricism Vs. Rationalism. Department of English,
University of California, Santa Barbara. Mar 20, 2001
Другие работы по теме:
Innate Ideas Rene Descartes And John Locke
Essay, Research Paper Throughout the passage of time, philosophers have written and discussed many topics in philosophy. Sometimes, these philosophers agree on ideas or sometimes they make their own assumptions. There are two philosophers who had different ideas concerning where innate ideas come from and how we get these types of ideas.
Rationalism And Religion Essay Research Paper We
Rationalism And Religion Essay, Research Paper We are the Perfection of Imperfectness The question of the co-existence between rationalism and religion has been argued by many philosophers, such as Descartes. The compatibility between rationalism and religion has brought up many different ideas and thoughts.
Empiricism Rationalism And Pragmatism Essay Research Paper
Empiricism, Rationalism, and Pragmatism, as theories of knowledge, attempt to prove the nature of reality and what can be considered true or real. All three of these philosophies, however, encounter problems when attempting to prove the nature of reality. How these different philosophies overcome obstacles in their attempt to prove the nature of reality is a factor in discriminating between the three.
Descarted Meditations Essay Research Paper Clear and
Descarted Meditations Essay, Research Paper Clear and Distinct Perception: An Analysis Of Rene Descartes Rene Descartes? Meditations in the First Philosophy is a skeptic?s speculation on certain inalienable truths. Descartes meditations are based on the epistemological theory of rationalism: that is if someone truly knows something then they could not possibly be mistaken.
Descartes And Searle Essay Research Paper As
Descartes And Searle Essay, Research Paper As a psychology major, one of topics that I find most interesting in philosophy is the mind/body problem. This can be defined as the relationship between the immaterial mind and the material body.
Can We Ever Reach Certainty Essay Research
Paper First, I would like to quote Descartes: “Cogito, ergo sum” – I think, therefor I am. He said this, because he didn’t know weather he knew if he existed or not. Descartes thought like this: I know that I’m dreaming, but I don’t know if it’s reality or dream, I doubt. But because I doubt, I think, and if I am thinking, I am a human, thinking, being, and therefor – I exist – “Cogito, ergo sum”.
Rene Descartes The Search Of Knowledge Essay
, Research Paper As I sit and ponder how I am going to write this paper, it accurse to me that I may not be writing this paper at all. How, I ask myself, can this be possible? I can feel the keys under my fingers, hear their distinct clicks as I press them, and I can see my writing on the screen. Yet all of these things are sensory based, and I wonder if my senses can be trusted as certainty.
Two Philosophies And Their Belief Essay Research
Paper Two Philosophers and Their Theories of Belief When reading Rene Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy and David Hume s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, one notices that both philosophers focus a large part of their writings on the subject of human belief. Both authors have different theories on what makes a person form those beliefs that are important in life.
Decartes Meditations Essay Research Paper In Descartes
Decartes Meditations Essay, Research Paper In Descartes Meditations he talks about many different things. Two things he talks about are his arguments on Dreams and what he calls the “Evil Demon”. Both of them have to do with deceiving the mind into believing in things that may be untrue.
Descartes And Berkeley On Skepticism About The
Senses Essay, Research Paper Descartes and Berkeley on Skepticism About the Senses The philosophers Geroge Berkeley and Renee Descartes both had strong opinions on skepticism about the senses. In this paper, I
Rene Descrates Essay Research Paper While the
Rene Descrates Essay, Research Paper While the great philosophical distinction between mind and body in western thought can be traced to the Greeks, it is to the seminal work of Ren? Descartes (1596-1650) [see figure 1], French mathematician, philosopher, and physiologist, that we owe the first systematic account of the mind/body relationship.
Descartes And Hume Essay Research Paper There
Descartes And Hume Essay, Research Paper There are three ways in which one is able to find truth: through reason (A is A), by utilizing the senses (paper burns) or by faith (God is all loving). As the period of the Renaissance came to a close, the popular paradigm for philosophers shifted from faith to reason and finally settling on the senses.
Ideas Of Descartes Plato And Hume Essay
, Research Paper The immediate starting-point of Plato’s philosophical speculation was the Socratic teaching. In his attempt to define the conditions of knowledge so as to refute sophistic skepticism, Socrates had taught that the only true knowledge is a knowledge by means of
Descartes And Hume Essay Research Paper Skepticism
Descartes And Hume Essay, Research Paper Skepticism is the philosophical belief that doubts whether or not any of our knowledge is true. Hume as well as Descartes have a complex relationship with skepticism. In several of their works, the philosophers respond to skepticism through the use of skepticism.
Hume Truths Essay Research Paper Hume separates
Hume Truths Essay, Research Paper Hume separates his distinction of truths of into two categories. They are Relation of Ideas (ROF) and Matter of Fact (MOF). Hume states Relation of Ideas
Hume Hobbes And Descartes Essay Research Paper
Hume, Hobbes, and Descartes Rene Descartes, Thomas Hobbes and David Hume are well known philosophers of the time. These three men were after the truth. The truth about life. The truth about how one exists. The truth about the world around them. They questioned, thought, and reasoned. This is what they did.
Descartes Meditations Essay Research Paper Analyze in
Descartes Meditations Essay, Research Paper Analyze in detail Descartes First Meditation and the beginning of the Second Meditation. Do you believe Montaigne could not reply to Descartes and therefore that Descartes has succeeded in defeating skepticism? Descartes First Meditation sought out to offer reasons to doubt everything in order to, after taking doubt into consideration, discover what we of what we believe is true.
Descartes First Meditation Essay Research Paper Descartes
Descartes First Meditation Essay, Research Paper Descartes first meditation, his main objective is to present three skeptical arguments to bring doubt upon what he considers his basic beliefs. Descartes believes this to be an intricate part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes skeptical arguments are not intended to be a denial of his basic beliefs.
David Hume Essay Research Paper In reading
David Hume Essay, Research Paper In reading the ideas of David Hume, I have came to believe that he was telling us the miracles don?t exist. They are sort of a ?Mission impossible.? We
Metaphysis Essay Research Paper Hello I
Metaphysis Essay, Research Paper : Hello: : I need help, I have somes question would help me. 1. do the criticisms that hume makes of Design Arguments all apply to Thomas’ Teleological Argument?
Descartes Essay Research Paper Descartes
Descartes Essay, Research Paper Descartes’ “Wax Argument” In this essay I will refer to the “wax argument” presented by Rene Descartes and explain that it is a valid argument, but not so sound. In Descartes argument, he observes a piece of wax, from a hive, and using his judgment and senses, analyzes the structure and properties of the wax.
Hume And Descartes On The Theory Of
Ideas Essay, Research Paper Hume and Descartes on The Theory of Ideas David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers with opposing views about the origination of ideas. Descartes believed there were three types of ideas
David Hume Essay Research Paper I would
David Hume Essay, Research Paper I would like to start by stating that the arguments I will present about David Hume?s ?An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding? are not going to be
Philosiphy Of David Hume Essay Research Paper
David Hum s literary works were varied both in subject and in popular reception. Hume s life was one marked by a seemingly overwhelming love of literature and philosophy. In his autobiography Hume refers to this love absent; …seized very early with a passion for literature which has been the ruling passion of my life… Hume spent most of his life directed by a need to have his works published.
Human Understanding Essay Research Paper In the
Human Understanding Essay, Research Paper In the history of human understanding, I couldn’t think of any person to study for a singular perspective of gaining knowledge through philosophy. I am glad that the class has been given two philosophers to compare and contrast their ideas. The subject of human understanding is a wide range of ideas to discuss, which can be quite complex, a feat I would never return to do.
Argument From Design Essay Research Paper Hume
Argument From Design Essay, Research Paper Hume s criticism in regard to the Design Argument, although complex, can be summarized quite simply. It is first important to understand the main elements of the Design Argument. Hume s theory in opposition to that of the Design Argument contests the suggestion that the simple things in the universe must be compared with the greater to appreciate their complexity as a component of the system of the universe.
On Descartes Meditations I
& Ii Essay, Research Paper On Descartes Meditations I & II Descartes uses his Meditations on First Philosophy to consider one of philosophy s greatest questions: what is truth? He dedicates this writing to outlining a rational, logical process of determining the answer, as well as his own conclusions in the matter.
Kant Essay Research Paper How does one
Kant Essay, Research Paper How does one label Kant as a philosopher? Is he a rationalist or an empiricist? Kant makes a distinction between appearances and things in themselves. He also says that things in themselves exist, and that we have no knowledge of things in themselves. This could be labeled “CLOSE TO NONSENSE”, but we know Kant better than that.
Hume Essay Research Paper Humes
Hume Essay, Research Paper Hume?s “affirmation” David Hume makes a strong affirmation in section IV of an Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Hume states, “I shall venture to affirm as a general proposition, which admits of no exception, that the knowledge of this relation is not, in any instance attained by reasonings a priori; but entirely from experience.” In this statement, when discussing “knowledge of this relation,” Hume is referring to the relation between cause and effect.
The Soul Essay Research Paper Out of
The Soul Essay, Research Paper Out of all the philosophers we have examined in this unit, Ren? Descartes (On Thinking and the Soul) presents the best argument about what a soul and body are. In contrast, I believe that Locke?s interpretation of the body, mind, soul and self was my least favorite interpretation.
Descartes Essay Research Paper Descartes Ren
Descartes Essay, Research Paper Descartes, Ren Ren Descartes was born on March 31, 1596 and died on February 11, 1650. Ren Descartes was a man of many things. He was a French mathematician, philosopher and scientist. He made contributions to the theory of equations and his rule of signs, but the most distinguished contribution that Descartes made to the world of mathematics was analytic geometry.