Moral Questions in Hamlet
Conscience and Responsibility
Hamlet the play and Hamlet the character have always attracted the attention of critics with a strongly moral bent. This is inevitable. The play deals with crime and its punishment, with complex questions of right and wrong, moral decisions, moral responsibility for actions, questions of conscience. Critics and readers must respond accordingly.
Most of the moral issues raised in Hamlet arise from the role imposed on its central character: the role of revenger. To appreciate the full implications of these issues, we have to remember that the play confronts us with two starkly conflicting moralities, two radically opposed views of the task which defines Hamlet’s role in the play: to be the avenger of his father’s death. On the one hand, Shakespeare presents his characters against an obviously Christian background, a background much more distinctively Christian than that of any of the other tragedies. The outlook of the characters has been conditioned by Christian teaching, and the play itself is based on an acceptance of the Catholic teaching on the after-life: the Ghost returns from Purgatory, for example. Marcellus celebrates miracles at Christmas, and the burial of Ophelia is in accordance with prescribed Christian ritual in relation to a woman in her circumstances. Claudius at prayer clearly believes in traditional Christian teaching on sin and repentance: without atoning for his crimes, he knows that he cannot earn forgiveness. Hamlet, like his father, accepts the Christian teaching on adultery, and the Christian prohibition of suicide. The world of Hamlet, then, is a Christian one, and the characters view themselves and the significance of their actions and beliefs against Christian teachings and practices. On the other hand, the totally antiChristian ethic of revenge is proposed as an imperative for Hamlet by the ghost of his father, a saved soul returned from Purgatory. This makes the moral effect of the play extremely confusing and ambiguous. Hamlet embodies two incompatible moral systems, one Christian, the other pagan. If Hamlet accepts the Ghost’s command, takes the law into his own hands and commits regicide, not just murder, by slaying Claudius as an act of vengeance, he is defying one of the great fundamental Christian teachings: that vengeance is an evil thing. His Christian alternative is to refrain from acting against Claudius and to live in patience, leaving vengeance to God. To pursue Claudius will involve the spilling of blood, some of it more or less innocent, and Hamlet’s incorporation in the evil he officially opposes. This process begins when he rashly slays Polonius in mistake for Claudius; this is the turning-point in his moral career.
The extraordinary moral confusion at the heart of the play, the grave moral compromise into which his revenger’s role plunges Hamlet,is dramatically highlighted in the `Prayer Scene’ (3, 3, 36-98). Here Claudius is desperately struggling to settle his account with heaven and repent of his crimes, knowing as a Christian believer, that no forgiveness is possible until he has given up the gains for which he committed the murder: his crown, his ambition and his queen. Hamlet, finding Claudius praying, has a perfect opportunity to kill him. The reason he gives for not doing this has shocked four centuries of commentators. Believing that the King’s prayerful posture means that he is in the state of grace and so ready for heaven, Hamlet refuses to send him there, instead preferring to kill him at some future time when he is engrossed in sinful pursuits, so that `his soul may be as damned as black/as hell whereto it goes’ (3, 3, 94-5). Had Hamlet been a pagan avenger, he could not have advanced this reason for sparing Claudius, but would have been satisfied with bringing the bodily life of Claudius to an end. Hamlet, however, is behaving as he does precisely because he is a Christian, believing that the soul’s state at the point of death will determine its immortal destiny, although his project to send Claudius to eternity when he is sure he will be damned is decidedly un-christian, however it accords with Hamlet’s notions of poetic justice. Hamlet’s savage sentiments here are among the strongest indications in the play that his moral sense is debased by the evil that pervades the play. His callous, dismissive attitude to the dead Polonius is another.
Does Hamlet take the Ghost’s command to revenge as a moral duty, and if he does, is he right to do so? If he does, does the play as a whole insist that we approve of his attitude? In other words, is Shakespeare content to allow his hero to make his own of an anti-Christian ethic of revenge, without testing this against the Christian ethic which should govern the world in which he and the other characters live? As one might expect, there has been a wide range of answers to these questions. Many critics accept without hesitation that the revenge-ethic is the one that governs the moral dimension of the play, that Hamlet accepts it as morally valid for his situation, that given all the circumstances he has a duty to do as the Ghost commands, that he is an agent of justice as well as an avenger. There is a minority view that a ghost from Purgatory who calls for revenge must be a morally ambivalent spirit, that Hamlet, in accepting the command, is yielding to temptation. It is possible to explain these difficulties and the moral confusion surrounding the revenge theme by reminding ourselves that Shakespeare’s contemporaries seemed able to accommodate both Christian and pagan ideas of revenge side by side and find justification for each. It is also possible to argue that the acute moral problems posed by the Ghost’s command have their origin in Shakespeare’s decision to place an essentially pagan story of revenge in a thoroughly Christian setting.
On the whole, one must take it that Shakespeare, for the purposes of the play, accepts the revenge ethic as an appropriate basis for Hamlet’s actions. Hamlet himself is in no doubt about this question, whatever doubts he may entertain about the Ghost’s `honesty’. There is no suggestion in the play that Hamlet entertains doubts about the morality of the act of vengeance: his delay in fulfilling the Ghost’s command, whatever its motivation, is certainly not prompted by moral scruples on this score. He spontaneously accepts as a sacred duty the task of avenging his father, promising to make this his only occupation (`And thy commandment all alone shall live/Within the book and volume of my brain’, 1, 5, 102-3). Even after he has been tardy in fulfilling the command of the Ghost, he continues to see vengeance as a moral duty, reminding himself that he as `cause, and will, and strength and means’ to kill Claudius (4, 4, 45). It is true that his tardiness up to the Play scene can be interpreted in terms of moral uncertainty, but the cause of this uncertainty, if we are to take his own word for it, is his fear that the Ghost may be a devil who has assumed a virtuous shape in order to deceive him. Furthermore, the overall tone of the play persuades us to admire Hamlet and to identify with his concerns, and, by implication, with his acceptance as a duty of the task of vengeance. To argue otherwise would be to see a massive irony in the ending and in Horatio’s parting tribute (`Flights of angels sing thee to thy rest’) something few readers or spectators would find acceptable.
Some of Hamlet’s moral choices have provoked hostile responses. L.C. Knights, for example, writes about `the murder of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern’. The two are bearing a packet containing sealed orders for Hamlet’s execution in England ( `No leisure bated … my head should be struck off’, 5, 2, 23-5). He alters the commission: the English King is to put Rosencratz and Guildenstern to death, giving them no time to confess their sins or make their peace with God (5, 2, 46-7). In defence of Hamlet’s action here, it might be argued that it is a question of his survival or theirs. But there is another consideration. There is a sense in which Hamlet is at war: his kind of revenge would have been regarded by Shakespeare’s contemporaries as being covered by the rules of warfare. Shakespeare pointedly conveys this idea by the use of military imagery in relation to the practices of Rosencrantz and Guidenstern:
For ’tis the sport to have the engineer Hoist with his own petar (3, 4, 207-8).
and
Their defeat Does by their own insinuation grow: ‘Tis dangerous when the baser nature comes Between the pass and fell incensed points Of mighty opposites (5, 2, 60-2).
Shakespeare goes to considerable lengths to underline Hamlet’s tendency to consider the issues confronting him in moral terms, and to apply strict standards of moral judgment to himself and to everybody around him. In his soliloquies, he pronounces the sternest moral verdicts on himself for his failure to meet the demands of his chosen role (`Yes I/A dull and muddy-mettled rascal, peak/Like John-a-dreams,unpregnant of my cause’, 2, 2, 554-6). In his most famous soliloquy, he deals with the most fundamental of all questions. Before he can decide whether the better moral choice for a rational, noble creature is to suffer the blows of fate in patience or to struggle against them and perhaps die in the struggle, he must decide whether death is preferable to life (`To be, or not to be’ . . . 3, 1, 56).
Другие работы по теме:
Donald Davidson Essay Research Paper In Shakespeares
Donald Davidson Essay, Research Paper In Shakespeare?s Hamlet, there is a murder, and it doesn?t say straight out who the murder is. There are no detectives on the case. No one within in the state is really questioning the murder of the King except for his son. It may not have all the customary qualities of detective story, but it does come across as a detective story in which Hamlet seeks to solve the mysterious death and to revenge for his father.
The Killing Of Rosencrantz And Guildenstern Essay
, Research Paper The Killing of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Hamlet’s own Philosophic view. In terms of Hamlet’s own philosophic view, the killing of Rosencrantz and Guildenstern is very out-of-character. Hamlet is an intellectual, and therefore believes that killing is not a necessary solution (this could also relate to why he hesitates so long at killing Claudius).
Telmah Essay Research Paper
<< In the play Hamlet by William Shakesphere, the main character, Hamlet, has a high level of intelligence. In Denmark, Hamlet is the son of the king who had recently passed away, and the queen who betrayed her husband to marry Hamlet’s uncle soon after his death. Hamlet is hurt and uproared by his mother’s betrayal and his uncle’s rise to become king.
Hamlet Essay Research Paper Certainly one of
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Certainly one of the reasons tha twe read Hamlet’s speeches with ineterst is because we relate it to our own ” Spiritual region”. It is common for most of us to search on a surface without trying to understand the depth of a character. Hamlet is a very complex character and that is one of the reasons why he is a very interesting subject fo rpsychological analysis.Reading Hamlet through the play of our imagination we become aware of something very personal and sometimes hidden in unconsciousness.
Bla Essay Research Paper IIIi5690Hamlet condemns himself
Bla Essay, Research Paper III.i.56-90 Hamlet condemns himself to life in this soliloquy. He realizes that by escaping his earthly body through death he will still remain in the prison of painful thoughts. Hamlet, the thinker, cannot escape his conscious self and in that realization decides, “to be.” The foundation of his choice is solipsistic in nature.
Hamlet Character Essay Research Paper In the
Hamlet Character Essay, Research Paper In the pay "Hamlet", the main character is a man who wants revenge. He wants it so bad that he becomes obsessed with the idea until it ultimately kills
Hamlet Essay Research Paper Act IV Scene
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Act IV, Scene vii: Claudius convinces Laertes that he is innocent in Laertes’ father’s death and that Hamlet is to blame. A messenger enters with Hamlet’s letter and Claudius is amazed to find that
Hamlets Sanity Essay Research Paper Hamlet s
Hamlets Sanity Essay, Research Paper Hamlet s Sanity In the second act of Hamlet , it is evedent that Hamlet is not the norm . It comes down to the question of either Hamlet is faking his insanity or he has truly lost his mind. Polonius made the ussumption that Hamlet has gone mad with love, a theory inwich holds it s own from a outside point of view.Through further investigation in which Claudius and Polonius spy on Hamlet by using Ophelia as bate .
Hamlet Essay Research Paper ally funny man
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper ally funny man. Hamlet: why are you throwing up another skull. It could be a skull of a lawyer. So who grave is this man. Clown: It?s all mine.
Love In Hamlet Essay Research Paper Hamlet
Love In Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Hamlet is, without any doubt, one of William Shakespeare’s most puzzling plays. Often times, the reader becomes engulfed in the mystery, trickery and deceit in this tragedy. People become perplexed while reading Hamlet when they ask themselves the question, “Does Hamlet truly love Ophelia?”.
Drama Essay Research Paper Happy endings according
Drama Essay, Research Paper Happy endings, according to Fay Weldon do not necessarily mean a marriage or rescue from death. Instead, a happy ending can come in the form of a spiritual reassessment or moral reconciliation. In Hamlet, what would normally be considered a tragic ending, resulting in the death of nearly all the characters, can instead, as Weldon implies, be seen as both a spiritual reassessment and moral reconciliation.
Hamlet Essay Research Paper The true nature
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper The true nature of Hamlet”s madness has been an issue of debate for scholars over the centuries. One theory is that Hamlet”s madness was for his own protection. In the time period in which Hamlet would have lived, governments functioned through the usage of intricate spying networks.
Hamlet And His Maddness Essay Research Paper
Hamlet and his Madness Since the play Hamlet was first written and performed, critics have analyzed the question “Was Hamlet really mad?” I personally do not believe that he was, but all of the characters in this play have a different opinion.
Hamlet Essay Research Paper The major question
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper The major question in ‘To be or not to be’ cannot be suicide. If it were, as many have noted, it would be dramatically irrelevant. Hamlet is no longer sunk in the depths of melancholy, as he was in his first soliloquy. He has been roused to action and has just discovered how to test the Ghost’s words.
Hamlet Essay Research Paper Justifying Hamlets Insanity
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Justifying Hamlet?s Insanity Hamlet?s insanity is caused by the internal conflict within himself. His obligation as a son is to avenge his father?s death but at the same time also ensure stability in the kingdom. To fulfill his duty Hamlet must kill a king in order to avenge his father?s death.
Hamlet Kings Essay Research Paper There are
Hamlet Kings Essay, Research Paper There are many differences between the Kings Hamlet and Claudius with very few similarities. Perhaps the similarities stop at being the product of the same
Hamlet Foreshadowing Essay Research Paper An example
Hamlet Foreshadowing Essay, Research Paper An example of foreshadowing is when Hamlet’s father came to him as a ghost to inform him of his murder, this caused a rage within Hamlet that foreshadows his revenge. This revenge led to the death of his uncle, mother, and himself. It also created Hamlet’s wild behavior, and caused him possibly to become insane..
Hamlet And Ophelia Essay Research Paper An
Hamlet And Ophelia Essay, Research Paper An example of foreshadowing is when Hamlet?s father came to him as a ghost to inform him of his murder, this caused a rage within Hamlet that foreshadows his
Hamlet Vs Laertes Essay Research Paper Hamlet
Hamlet Vs Laertes Essay, Research Paper Hamlet vs Laertes Both Laertes and Hamlet both have similar and unique personality traits. These two characters are essential parts to the structure and theme of this play. Laertes tends to be possibly, in my opinion, an earlier version of Hamlet. Laertes has a positive outlook on life and seems to make the best of his life.
Compare And Contrast Macbeth
’s And Hamlet’s Madness Essay, Research Paper Madness can be described as an internal flaw that both characters, Hamlet and Macbeth, possess. Although their madness is different in some aspects, it can be said that
Hamlet Essay Research Paper Hamlet Hamlet is
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Hamlet Hamlet is the inner person of all mankind” as stated by actor Alan Bates. What did Mr. Bates mean by this? Could he be referring to the love, the corruption, the revenge, or the insanity displayed by Hamlet; or was he
Hamlet 3 Essay Research Paper HamletThe work
Hamlet 3 Essay, Research Paper Hamlet The work that I wish to discuss is Tom Stoppard’s play “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead” as a scholarly work in regards to William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, which is included in Sven Birket’s Literature: The Evolving Canon.
Crazy Hamlet Essay Research Paper Crazy Hamlet
Crazy Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Crazy Hamlet Shakespeare The real question is Hamlet crazy or is he just acting it. In my opinion there are many things throughout the play that make me tend to believe that he is crazy. When Hamlet enters Opheliu”s room and she has the question if he is truly mad or if he is just acting.
Hamlet Essay Research Paper There are many
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper There are many reasons why one would think that Queen Gertrude is clueless about the murder of King Hamlet, yet others think she was involved in the murder. People have their own opinions on this but I believe that Queen Gertrude had an idea about the murder. There are many reasons and facts contributing to my opinion on this.
Hamlet Movie Essay Research Paper The movie
Hamlet Movie Essay, Research Paper The movie of Hamlet was an excellent, as far as book-movies go. I believe it was produced with focus, reason, and logic. The characters were also portrayed with
Hamlet Essay Essay Research Paper Hamlet by
Hamlet Essay Essay, Research Paper Hamlet by Shakespeare Hamlet’s Sanity Hamlet appears to be insane, after Polonius’s death, in act IV scene II. There are indications, though, that
Hamlet Act I Essay Research Paper In
Hamlet Act I Essay, Research Paper In Act I of Hamlet, the ghost of the king hamlet comes to the battlement, outside a castle in Denmark. Marcellus and Horatio ask the ghost to speak, but
Claudius In Hamlet Essay Research Paper ClaudiusA
Claudius In Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Claudius A Man Masked in Betrayal and Murder What could be worse than killing your brother? Marrying his wife right after! Claudius is the shadiest character in Act I of Hamlet. Claudius had poured the juice of a hebenon (henbane; a very poisonous plant) into his brother?s, Hamlet Sr.?s ear.
Structure Of Hamlet Essay Research Paper Structure
Structure Of Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Structure of hamletThe structure of Shakespeare s “Hamlet”, lays on the little information received by Hamlet from the mysterious ghost. Among all the characters, Marcellus seems to have the deepest understanding of the personality of this ghost. He is the one who fears a relation with this ghost.
The Tragedy In Hamlet Essay Research Paper
The Tragedy In Hamlet The tragedy in Hamlet lies in the fact that Hamlet, the hero was human and was violently wronged and was justified in seeking revenge. Hamlet the play
Hamlet The Movie Vs Hamlet Th Essay
, Research Paper Hamlet the Movie Hamlet the Play After reading Shakespeare s play Hamlet and viewing the video, Hamlet , many differences and similarities can be found. The video had many good qualities to it. Unfortunately it had many negative aspects also. The same applies for the book. Something s about it were great while other things could have been better.
Hamlet 12 Essay Research Paper Hamlet
Hamlet 12 Essay, Research Paper Hamlet’s “Tragic Flaw” Hamlet’s famous soliloquy (Hamlet, act III, scene 1) shows his depth and ability in thinking, and shows Shakespeare’s ability to manipulate language. Throughout the play, Hamlet stops to think before acting on anything. The more he thinks, the less he does.