Pateman On Locke Essay, Research Paper
For years social contract theorists had monopolized the explanation of modern
society. John Locke was among those who advocated this theory of a collectively
chosen set of circumstances. Carole Pateman, on the other hand rejects many of the
pillars of the social contract and specifically attacks certain aspects of Locke’s argument
regarding paternalism and patriarchy. Pateman defends her idea that the individual about
which Locke writes is masculine, instead of the gender-encompassing form of the word
"man." Pateman also argues that Locke denies the individuality of women. Instead of
scrapping his entire work, however, she grants him a couple of concessions, even
acknowledging Locke as anti-patriarchal. If John Locke were around to defend his
theories, he would probably have an opinion about the treatment of his work.
To accurately discuss Pateman’s view of Locke’s paternal/patriarchal theory, a
working knowledge of the theory itself is necessary. According to Locke "all men by
nature are equal"(Second Treatise: 43) with the exception of children who have not
reached the full state of equality, but must obey their parents. Domestic and political
power is vested in the Father, according to Locke. As he puts it, "the natural fathers of
families, by an insensible change, became the politic monarchs of them too."(Second
Treatise: 42) Locke does not reserve domestic power regarding children solely to the
Father, however. Instead he claims that the mother "hath an equal title."(Second
Treatise: 30) He even defends the rights of children. Locke argues that children have the
same moral rights as any other person, though the child’s inadequate mental faculties
make it permissible for his parents to rule over him to a limited degree. "Thus we are
born Free, as we are born Rational; not that we have actually the Exercise of either:
Age that brings one, brings with it the other too." (Second Treatise: 30) Locke does
specify that children are free because of their "father’s title," in addition to being
governed by the law of their father. It is less clear in this situation whether Locke is using
the term "father" to include both parents as the "term" man can be interpreted to mean
both sexes. It is likely, based on the tradition of male heredity prevalent during his time,
that Locke literally meant only a Father’s legacy affects the children.
With at least a basic background of Locke’s views on paternal power, it is
possible to examine a feminist, namely Carole Pateman’s, view of the same theories.
Much like the other social contract theorists, Pateman believes that Locke leaves women
out of the picture. In Pateman’s eyes Locke excludes women from "participation in the
act that creates civil society."(Sexual Contract: 21) Others have generously argued that
Locke omitted women from the original contract in order to keep from alienating his
(male) audience or, even though they are not mentioned directly, women still "could
have been party to the social contract."(Sexual Contract:21) Pateman believes his
omission was the direct result of Locke’s idea of an individual being masculine. When
Locke speaks of man and man’s role in the social contract, Pateman takes "man" literally
to mean the male gender instead of as a universal term.
Pateman also concerns herself with Locke’s status as a believer in paternal or
parental power. Although Locke stresses the Bible’s fifth commandment (Honor thy
father and mother) he does not extend women’s equality to other arena’s. Instead,
according to Pateman, "the husband still exercises power over his wife, but the power is
less than absolute."(Sexual Contract: 22) It is in this manner that Pateman attributes
male dominated government and politics to a traditional patriarchal system. To quote
Pateman directly:
The genesis of the (patriarchal) family is frequently seen as synonymous with
the origin of social life itself, and the origin of patriarchy and the origin of
society are treated as the same process.(Sexual Contract: 25)
Despite the image depicted here Pateman does grant that Locke appears to be
anti-patriarchal in many of his views.
Locke separates the family from politics. It is through this separation that
Pateman benevolently attributes his anti-patriarchalism. To begin, Locke states that a
man has no more power over his offspring because he conceived them than he earns
through the care for these children. From this it can be drawn that fathers have only the
power of benevolence with which to control the home. Paternal power in the home
must be earned and is forfeited through misuse. Pateman claims that "the separation of
the family from political life had everything to do with Locke’s view of
women."(Sexual Contract: 21) Locke also brings into the picture a different kind of
domestic power, that of conjugal power. Unlike many other critics, Pateman realizes
the difference Locke presents between conjugal power and paternal power. A man
exercising control of his wife conjugally is using "the power that men exercise as men,
not as fathers."(Sexual Contract: 22) The status Pateman grants Locke as
Anti-patriarchal does not mean Locke accepts women as equals in the political arena,
but simply that the kind of control men express at home is different from their political
control.
A discussion of the critique of Locke’s work would not be fair if the subject of
criticism were not given a forum to retaliate. Locke would most likely have a response
to much of Pateman’s description of his theories. Based on his emphasis of the fifth
biblical commandment and the equality of respect parents deserve from their children,
Locke could argue that Pateman unfairly describes the role of fathers. Locke questions
the dominance of a father in the family by stating:
But what reason can hence advance this care of the parents due to
their off-spring into an absolute arbitrary dominion of the father,
whose power reaches no farther, than by such a discipline, as he finds
most effectual, to give such strength and health to their bodies, such
vigour and rectitude to their minds, as may best fit his children to be
most useful to themselves and others.(Second Treatise: 35)
It is obvious from this that Locke does not mean for a father’s power to extend into all
facets of the family. Therefore, he could contest that he allotted only the same small
measure of control to men in the political world. Although it seems logical for Locke to
argue that the same checks apply to a father’s political power as his domestic, Pateman
could easily counter this defense by drawing attention to the passage where Locke
pronounces fathers as "political monarchs." Another far-reaching defense Locke could
pose for his theories is a simple clarification of terms. Pateman relies heavily on the fact
that Locke’s definition of "man" is man, not humanity. If the late philosopher were
present today he could clarify precisely what he meant by this term, and dispel or
support Pateman’s accusation.
John Locke’s view of the the social contract comes under attack by the
criticism of Carole Pateman. She not only refutes his use of terms, but also accuses
Locke of ignoring women. Pateman claims that Locke purposefully left women out of
the original contract in the same fashion that he denies their individuality. Like most
people, Locke would likely defend himself and his theories to the best of his abilities if
he were able. Either way, Pateman’s critique provides the opportunity for
reexamination of a widely accepted theory and theorist.
Locke, John. Second Treatise of Government. Indianapolis: Hackett
Publishing Co, 1980.
Pateman, Carole. The Sexual Contract. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1988.
Comments: This is an evaluation of modern-feminist philosopher Carole Pateman’s description of John Locke’s theories.
Другие работы по теме:
Locke And Newton Essay Research Paper Locke
Locke And Newton Essay, Research Paper Locke and Newton The scientific revolution was used to describe a change in intellectual thought during the 16th and 17th centuries. This change formed the dividing line between the medieval world and the early modern world. Science basically became invented during this revolution.
Enlightnement Thinkers Essay Research Paper Enlightenment philosophers
Enlightnement Thinkers Essay, Research Paper Enlightenment philosophers have had a profound impact on the progress of society, they quite simply have provided the structure for government today. European thinkers such as John Locke, Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are some of the European political thinkers who have changed the course of history.
Innate Ideas Rene Descartes And John Locke
Essay, Research Paper Throughout the passage of time, philosophers have written and discussed many topics in philosophy. Sometimes, these philosophers agree on ideas or sometimes they make their own assumptions. There are two philosophers who had different ideas concerning where innate ideas come from and how we get these types of ideas.
Locke 2 Essay Research Paper Michael WestonPhilosophy
Locke 2 Essay, Research Paper Michael Weston Philosophy 2329 May 1, 2000 Locke on Abortion Clinic Bombings Abortion is one of the most controversial issues in the world today. Many mothers are becoming pregnant unexpectantly, and they are not ready for all the responsibilities of being a mother. Because these mothers cannot take care of these children, they elect to have an abortion to solve the problem.
Locke And Equality Essay Research Paper First
Locke And Equality Essay, Research Paper First of all,the basis for understanding Locke is that he sees all people as having natural God given rights. As God’s creations, this denotes a certain equality.
Age Of Reason Essay Research Paper The
Age Of Reason Essay, Research Paper The age of reason was a time of Empiricism and of Materialism, which brought out philosophers like John Locke and George Berkeley as well as authors like Swift and Pope. These philosophers and authors belong to the Age of Reason because of their use of anti-emotional thought and the idea of Occam’s razor.
Enlightenment The Light Bulb Of The 1700
’s Essay, Research Paper Enlightenment: The Light Bulb of the 1700’s Throughout history many people have changed society with their ideas and actions. Two philosophers whose ideas and actions changed society are Voltaire
Locke Essay Research Paper In the Second
Locke Essay, Research Paper In the Second Treatise of Government, Locke explains different ways in which human beings can live together. He suggests there are two ways and he describes them as “the state of nature” and “civil (or political) society.” “Civil Society” can exist in many forms although there is only one “state of nature.” The determination of the best form of government is dependent on the recognition of these two types of societies.
Lawgrtt Essay Research Paper The Constitution of
Lawgrtt Essay, Research Paper The Constitution of the United States and Madison’s Federalist Paper 51 draw upon the philosophy of John Locke, as expressed in his Second Treatise of Government. Madison and the framers of the Constitution looked to Locke’s ideas for justification and guidance. The Preamble of the Constitution reflects the intentions of its authors and shows the influence of Locke’s ideas.
Locke And Decartes Essay Research Paper In
Locke And Decartes Essay, Research Paper In comparing the argument for the existence of God there are two views, Decartes and Locke. Decartes believes there is innate knowledge that everybody already has a perfect being acquired knowledge. Locke believes that all ideas come from experience. I believe truth lies between both of these theories.
John Locke Summary Essay Research Paper John
John Locke: Summary Essay, Research Paper John Locke: The Empiricist Theory of Knowledge: Summary Understanding and knowledge is what makes man superior to all other beings according to John Locke. However, the bounds of this understanding and knowledge are questionable. Is some knowledge innate? How certain can we be about beliefs and the knowledge we have? John Locke attempts to give some insight as to the answers of these questions in his work, The Empiricist Theory of Knowledge.
Locke Is This True Justice Essay Research
Paper Locke: Is This True Justice? Justice is responsible for making sure the country is taken care of and that all dangers or problems be taken care of as well. It is essential that the
Jon Locke Essay Research Paper 4 John
Jon Locke Essay, Research Paper 4. John Locke was opposed to an absolute monarchy; Hobbes thought they were a good system. John Locke believed that the individual should be responsible for his own justice; Hobbes thought that a society needed an absolute ruler. The differences that appear lye in regard to their thoughts on mankind in general.
John Locke Essay Research Paper John LockeJohn
John Locke Essay, Research Paper John Locke John Locke was an English philosopher and political theorist during the 1600s. He was also the founder of British empiricism. He is known for his great contribution to
John Locke On The Extent Of The
Legislative Power Essay, Research Paper Locke on Politics, Religion, and Education- chap. 1 JOHN LOCKE ON THE EXTENT OF THE LEGISLATIVE POWER It is easy to see where the philosophy behind our country’s system of government was derived from when you read any of Locke’s essays on civil government. In fact if you have read our own Declaration of Independence it is possible to recognize the similarity between it and Lock’s writings.
Natural Laws Essay Research Paper Natural LawsJohn
Natural Laws Essay, Research Paper Natural Laws John Locke?s piece called Second Treatise Government, was written to express his beliefs on how a government should be established. John Locke was born in 1632 and died in 1704. He was a statesman as well as a philosopher, a political theorist and a main contributor to the Enlightenment period.
Locke And Hobbes Essay Research Paper Hobbes
Locke And Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Hobbes point of view on human nature and how a government should be run is a more realistic way of looking at things than John Locke?s theory. Both Hobbes and Locke see human nature differently, Hobbes sees people as being run by selfishness whereas Locke says that people are naturally kind.
John Locke 2
John Locke’s Views On Property Essay, Research Paper I feel that after reading John Locke’s views on property and also the views of Ward Churchill, that the distribution of property in America as we know it is not legitimate.
Locke VsHobbes Essay Research Paper Locke versus
Locke Vs.Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Locke versus Hobbes Locke and Hobbes were both social contract theorists, and both natural law theorists, but there the resemblance ends. All other natural law theorists assumed that man was by nature a social animal. Hobbes assumed otherwise, thus his conclusions are strikingly different from those of other natural law theorists.
Thomas 2
Thomas & Hobbes Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, a mathematician, and John Locke, a philosopher both had great ideas on human society. Hobbes had a more pessamistic outlook on on human nature. Locke saw men living in a state of nature which was basically reasonable an cooperative. In my opinion hobbes ideas on human nature as being competitive prove more true.
Enlightenment Essay Research Paper PhilosophersIdeas of enlightenment
Enlightenment Essay, Research Paper Philosophers Ideas of enlightenment have been seen across the world for centuries now, but the first real movements started around 1669. With the majority of its great thinkers in Europe, particularly England and France, enlightenment became a great philosophic movement marked by a rejection of traditional social, religious, and political ideas.
Locke And Freud Essay Research Paper Many
Locke And Freud Essay, Research Paper Many different people have their own beliefs of the understanding of human nature. After reading Dr. Sigmund Freud’s letter to Professor Einstein, Why War?, the
Politics 2
Politics – Influences By The Enlightenment Essay, Research Paper Shaping Politics an enlightenment essay We may see politics as something that was simply there for us to use, but we, the United States of America, had to concoct our very own form of government – a government that reflected what we wanted. But what did we want? What influences were had on our political system and our declaration of independence? Prepare yourself, because we are going to delve into a world of intrigue and splendor, a world where the fun just doesn t seem to stop.
Locke Essay Research Paper There were many
Locke Essay, Research Paper There were many philosophers throughout the Enlightenment period. Some of these great thinkers shared similar views on related ideas, others differed completely. I
John Locke 4 Essay Research Paper John
John Locke 4 Essay, Research Paper John Locke embraced many ideas Hobbes presented in his theories on the state of nature and the rise of government and society. They differed however, in that Locke believed that God was the prime factor in politics. He believed that individuals were born with certain natural rights given not by government or society, but by God.
John Locke 2 Essay Research Paper John
John Locke 2 Essay, Research Paper John Locke (1632-1704) John Locke was born at Wrington, a village in Somerset, on August 29, 1632. He entered Westminster school in 1646, and passed to Christ Church, Oxford, as a junior student, in 1652. The official studies of the university were uncongenial to him; he would have preferred to learn philosophy from Descartes instead of from Aristotle.
Locke Essay Research Paper John Locke
Locke Essay, Research Paper John Locke John Locke was an English philosopher. He was born at Wrington, Somerset, on August 29, 1932. He had attended the University of Oxford. Locke had spent his boyhood in Beluton, near the village of Pensford. But the house no longer stands there. Locke s parents, John Locke and Agnes Keene, were married in 1630 and John was said to be a pious woman and Locke speaks of her with affection.
Second Treatise Of Government By John Locke
Essay, Research Paper n the Second Treatise of Government by John Locke, he writes about the right to private property. In the chapter which is titled ?Of Property? he tells how the right to private property originated, the role it plays in the state of nature, the limitations that are set on the rights of private property, the role the invention of money played in property rights and the role property rights play after the establishment of government..
John Locke Philosophy Essay Research Paper The
John Locke Philosophy Essay, Research Paper The basic elements in John Locke’s political theory are natural rights, social contract, and government by consent, and right of revolution. Locke was very concerned with the “property right” and derived property right from higher law. He also declared that natural law remained valuable in civil society as the fundamental measure of men’s rights.
John Locke And Thomas Hobbes Two Views
Of The Social Contract Essay, Research Paper John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were two English thinkers who contributed their ideas to the Enlightenment. There are a few similarities between these two. They were both English thinkers, and they both lived in the 1600s. Locke and Hobbes both lived through the upheavals in England early in the 17th century.
Laws
– Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Laws. We all must obey them, but why? For fear of going to jail, or being fined? Those are the individual effects of civil disobedience, but what happens what is the purpose of law in society? Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all attempted to interpret the need for laws in society, in order to maintain the good of the whole and the individual.
Locke And The American Political System Essay
, Research Paper John Locke and his ideas about philosophy was a major influence on the American political system, not to mention many other political systems, too. His ideas were very
The Soul Essay Research Paper Out of
The Soul Essay, Research Paper Out of all the philosophers we have examined in this unit, Ren? Descartes (On Thinking and the Soul) presents the best argument about what a soul and body are. In contrast, I believe that Locke?s interpretation of the body, mind, soul and self was my least favorite interpretation.