Hamlet Explication Essay, Research Paper
The purpose of this paper is to explicate a soliloquy spoken by Hamlet in Act IV, scene IV, lines 32-66 of Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. This soliloquy illustrates a significant change in Hamlet’s personality. Up until this point, Hamlet maintains his act of madness and insults everyone he meets. He is very indecisive and submissive. For example, in Act II, Hamlet resolves that “the play’s the thing wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the king” (II. ii. 58-59). However, following the play-within-the-play and Claudius’s obvious admission to guilt, Hamlet is still very ambivalent and cannot decide what action to take against Claudius. When Hamlet stumbles onto Claudius praying, he does not kill Claudius because he “scans,” or analyzes, his plot for revenge and then decides to postpone it until a more opportune time (III. iii. 74-97). Hamlet further demonstrates submissiveness and inaction when, after killing Polonius (III. iv. 32-27), he obeys the kings instructions to go to England (IV. iv. 38-44).
On the way to England, Hamlet encounters Fortinbras’s captain, who informs Hamlet that he and his soldiers are on their way to Poland to conquer an insignificant plot of land (IV. iv. 18-22). Upon hearing this, Hamlet realizes that while Fortinbras’s army is going to war over a trivial matter, Hamlet, who has much better reasons to “go to war,” is sitting back and doing nothing. Hamlet realizes that he has been very passive and hesitant due to excessive analysis of his thoughts. He resolves to give up reflection, feeling that, thus far, it has only led to cowardice. Hamlet vows to become more aggressive and to think only “bloody” thoughts from this moment on (IV. iv. 32-36). In this soliloquy, Hamlet ponders the difference between men and beasts, the reasons for which he has delayed his revenge, and the way in which Fortinbras, despite being detestable in terms of his ambition, provides Hamlet with an example to follow.
Hamlet begins his soliloquy by exclaiming, “How all occasions do inform against me, and spur my dull revenge!” (IV. iv. 32-33) Hamlet has been very listless and hesitant in carrying out his plans for revenge on Claudius, and he believes that everything is working against him to propel him to rise and to take action. Hamlet asks, “What is a man, if his chief good and market of his time be but to sleep and feed? A beast, no more” (IV. iv. 33-35). In saying this, Hamlet deducts that a person who does nothing with his life except to sleep and eat is like a dull-witted animal, and nothing else. Hamlet believes that certainly God, who when creating man gave him “such large discourse” (IV. iv. 36), or reasoning power, and the capability of planning the future and remembering the past, didn’t give man these capabilities to “fust” and to remain “unused” (IV. iv. 39). Hamlet realizes that he has not been utilizing these capabilities. He says:
Now, whether it be bestial oblivion, or some craven scruple of thinking too precisely on the event, — a thought which, quartered, hath but one part wisdom and ever three parts coward, — I do not know why yet I live to say ‘this thing’s to do,’ sith I have cause, and will, and strength, and means, to do’t. (IV. iv. 40-46)
Since Hamlet has a motive, the will, the strength, and the means to carry out his plans for revenge, he doesn’t know what is causing him to be so hesitant, whether it be demented carelessness or the cowardly scruple of thinking too much about the situation. Hamlet believes that if his former reasons for hesitancy were broken down into four parts, there would be only be one part wisdom and three parts cowardice. He realizes that by over-analyzing his thoughts and intentions, he has been acting like more of a coward than wasting his God-given gift of reasoning, along with his time.
Hamlet tells the audience:
Examples gross as earth exhort me: witness this army, of such mass and charge, led by a delicate and tender prince, whose spirit with divine ambition puffed makes mouths at the invisible event, exposing what is mortal and unsure to all that fortune, death, and danger dare, even for a egg-shell. (IV. iv. 46-53)
Hamlet compares his inaction to date with Fortinbras’ action. Although Hamlet does not admire Fortinbras’s god-like ambition, he cannot help but to envy his fearlessness. While Hamlet fears the future, Fortinbras has a cavalier attitude towards the unseen outcome that his army faces. He pays little heed to the act of exposing his men, who are mortal and apprehensive, to luck, death, and dangerous heroics.
Hamlet comes to the conclusion that “Rightly to be great is not to stir without great argument, but greatly to find quarrel in a straw when honor’s at the stake” (IV. iv. 53-56). In other words, To be truly noble, one must not take action without a great cause, but he or she should nobly recognize an argument, no matter how small, when honor is at stake. In comparing himself to this ideal, Hamlet relates:
How stand I then, that have a father killed, a mother stained, excitements beyond my reason and my blood, and let all sleep, while to my shame I see the imminent death of twenty thousand men that for a fantasy and trick of fame go to their graves like beds, fight for plot whereon the numbers cannot try the cause, which is not tomb enough and continent to hide the slain? (IV. iv. 56-65)
Hamlet is ashamed of his hesitancy and passiveness. He realizes that he has plenty of cause to take action. His father has been murdered and his mother has been “corrupted” by an adulterous relationship. These occurrences are causing Hamlet both mental and physical anguish, yet he allows everyone to go without punishment. Hamlet also becomes ashamed when he compares himself to Fortinbras’s army. Hamlet foresees the impending death of these twenty thousand men who, for illusion and frivolous moment of fame, go to their graves as easily as they go to bed at night.
Hamlet says that the men will be fighting for plots in such numbers that there will not be enough space on the battlefield to hide their slaughtered bodies.
Hamlet makes a vow that, “from this time forth, my thoughts be bloody, or be nothing worth!” (IV. iv. 65-66) Hamlet decides to cast aside his hesitant and reflective nature, and to finally take action. He swears that from this point on, his thoughts will be murderous or be worth nothing.
Following this soliloquy, Hamlet becomes much more rebellious and aggressive. For example, in Hamlet’s letters to Horatio and Claudius, Hamlet appears to be much more decisive and rash. He writes to Horatio to tell him that he has single-handedly boarded a pirate ship, has been captured, and has made a deal with them to take him back to home to Denmark. These actions are eminently unlike the character of Hamlet that was witnessed in the previous scenes. Hamlet also writes a letter to Claudius, which is very sarcastic and taunting. In it, Hamlet uses expressions such as “high and mighty” and “your kingly eyes” (IV. vii. 43-44), which seem to be mocking the king.
The final example of how Hamlet’s character drastically changed at the conclusion of the novel is when he enters into the duel with Laertes. Horatio warns Hamlet that he “will lose this wager” (V. ii. 184), however Hamlet replies:
We defy augury: there is special providence in the fall of a sparrow. If it be now, ’tis not to come; if it be not to come, it will be now; if it be not now, yet it will come: the readiness is all; since no man has aught of what he leaves, what is’t to leave betimes? Let be (V. ii. 193-197).
Hamlet realizes that he probably will not survive the duel with Laertes, yet he decides to fight Laertes anyway, saying, “let it be.” Hamlet resolves that he can no longer fear the uncertainty of the future, and he decides to finally take action and to avenge his father’s murder.
32c
Другие работы по теме:
Horatio From Hamlet Essay Research Paper Horatios
Horatio From Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Horatio?s role in the play Hamlet, which was written by William Shakespeare, is extremely important. In the first place, Horatio was the person who told Hamlet about the ghost. He also had the job of watching Claudius while the play was going on in order to see if he showed his guilt.
Bla Essay Research Paper IIIi5690Hamlet condemns himself
Bla Essay, Research Paper III.i.56-90 Hamlet condemns himself to life in this soliloquy. He realizes that by escaping his earthly body through death he will still remain in the prison of painful thoughts. Hamlet, the thinker, cannot escape his conscious self and in that realization decides, “to be.” The foundation of his choice is solipsistic in nature.
Hamlet Character Essay Research Paper In the
Hamlet Character Essay, Research Paper In the pay "Hamlet", the main character is a man who wants revenge. He wants it so bad that he becomes obsessed with the idea until it ultimately kills
Hamlet Essay Research Paper Act IV Scene
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Act IV, Scene vii: Claudius convinces Laertes that he is innocent in Laertes’ father’s death and that Hamlet is to blame. A messenger enters with Hamlet’s letter and Claudius is amazed to find that
Hamlets Sanity Essay Research Paper Hamlet s
Hamlets Sanity Essay, Research Paper Hamlet s Sanity In the second act of Hamlet , it is evedent that Hamlet is not the norm . It comes down to the question of either Hamlet is faking his insanity or he has truly lost his mind. Polonius made the ussumption that Hamlet has gone mad with love, a theory inwich holds it s own from a outside point of view.Through further investigation in which Claudius and Polonius spy on Hamlet by using Ophelia as bate .
Hamlet Essay Research Paper ally funny man
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper ally funny man. Hamlet: why are you throwing up another skull. It could be a skull of a lawyer. So who grave is this man. Clown: It?s all mine.
Love In Hamlet Essay Research Paper Hamlet
Love In Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Hamlet is, without any doubt, one of William Shakespeare’s most puzzling plays. Often times, the reader becomes engulfed in the mystery, trickery and deceit in this tragedy. People become perplexed while reading Hamlet when they ask themselves the question, “Does Hamlet truly love Ophelia?”.
Hamlet And His Revenge Essay Research Paper
Hamlet was bound by honor and a code or righteousness. He could not merely kill Claudius as Claudius had killed his father, Hamlet was obligated by personal, honorable, Biblical, and righteous standards to hesitate until the right time. When Polonius said to Hamlet, “Readiness is all”, it sparked the fact the Hamlet must wait until the perfect time to take his revenge.
Hamlet Essay Research Paper The true nature
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper The true nature of Hamlet”s madness has been an issue of debate for scholars over the centuries. One theory is that Hamlet”s madness was for his own protection. In the time period in which Hamlet would have lived, governments functioned through the usage of intricate spying networks.
Hamlet And His Maddness Essay Research Paper
Hamlet and his Madness Since the play Hamlet was first written and performed, critics have analyzed the question “Was Hamlet really mad?” I personally do not believe that he was, but all of the characters in this play have a different opinion.
Hamlet Act 2 Scene 2
– Compare Hamlet’s Reaction To Arrival Of Rosencrantz And Guildenstern And To The Players Essay, Research Paper Hamlet: Act 2 Scene 2 – Compare Hamlet’s Reaction to Arrival of Rosencrantz and
Explication From Hamlet Essay Research Paper Assignment
Explication From Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Assignment 1: Explication from Hamlet (1.3.111-137) (?My lord, he hath importuned me with love? ? [end of scene].Ophelia and Polonius have a father-daughter discussion toward the end of Act 1 where Polonius, concerned father that he is, warns his daughter Ophelia of becoming too involved with Hamlet.
Hamlet Explication Essay Research Paper Hamlet Explication
Hamlet Explication Essay, Research Paper Hamlet Explication In Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, Rosencrantz speaks Act 3 Scene 3 lines 11-23. The lines that he speaks are in response to the Kings request that Rosencrantz and Guildenstern take Hamlet to England immediately. The king feels that Hamlet’s madness is a threat to him and tries to convince the men that it is a threat to the kingdom and that it would be in Hamlet’s best interest to go to England.
Hamlet Essay Research Paper Justifying Hamlets Insanity
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Justifying Hamlet?s Insanity Hamlet?s insanity is caused by the internal conflict within himself. His obligation as a son is to avenge his father?s death but at the same time also ensure stability in the kingdom. To fulfill his duty Hamlet must kill a king in order to avenge his father?s death.
Hamlet Kings Essay Research Paper There are
Hamlet Kings Essay, Research Paper There are many differences between the Kings Hamlet and Claudius with very few similarities. Perhaps the similarities stop at being the product of the same
Hamlet Criticism Essay Research Paper In
Hamlet Criticism Essay, Research Paper In Hamlet ; Literary Remains, Samuel Taylor Coleridge describes Hamlet as an intricate planner who s thought process is slow and methodical. He describes Hamlet as someone having Supercilious activities of the mind, which, unseated from its healthy relation, is constantly occupied with the world within, and abstracted from the world without throwing a mist over all common-place actualities.
Hamlet Foreshadowing Essay Research Paper An example
Hamlet Foreshadowing Essay, Research Paper An example of foreshadowing is when Hamlet’s father came to him as a ghost to inform him of his murder, this caused a rage within Hamlet that foreshadows his revenge. This revenge led to the death of his uncle, mother, and himself. It also created Hamlet’s wild behavior, and caused him possibly to become insane..
Hamlet And Ophelia Essay Research Paper An
Hamlet And Ophelia Essay, Research Paper An example of foreshadowing is when Hamlet?s father came to him as a ghost to inform him of his murder, this caused a rage within Hamlet that foreshadows his
Hamlet Vs Laertes Essay Research Paper Hamlet
Hamlet Vs Laertes Essay, Research Paper Hamlet vs Laertes Both Laertes and Hamlet both have similar and unique personality traits. These two characters are essential parts to the structure and theme of this play. Laertes tends to be possibly, in my opinion, an earlier version of Hamlet. Laertes has a positive outlook on life and seems to make the best of his life.
Critical Analysis Of Hamlet Essay Research Paper
Hamlet What is mans’ purpose in life? Is there a purpose? If there isn’t, then is it wise to end it, despite the fact that there might be nothing better? In Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, Hamlet
Compare And Contrast Macbeth
’s And Hamlet’s Madness Essay, Research Paper Madness can be described as an internal flaw that both characters, Hamlet and Macbeth, possess. Although their madness is different in some aspects, it can be said that
Hamlet Essay Research Paper Hamlet Hamlet is
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Hamlet Hamlet is the inner person of all mankind” as stated by actor Alan Bates. What did Mr. Bates mean by this? Could he be referring to the love, the corruption, the revenge, or the insanity displayed by Hamlet; or was he
Hamlet Essay Research Paper HamletIn the play
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Hamlet In the play Hamlet, William Shakespeare proposed two kinds of men. Horatio is the character who represents a man of thought. The other kind of man is represented by
Hamlet 3 Essay Research Paper HamletThe work
Hamlet 3 Essay, Research Paper Hamlet The work that I wish to discuss is Tom Stoppard’s play “Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead” as a scholarly work in regards to William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, which is included in Sven Birket’s Literature: The Evolving Canon.
Crazy Hamlet Essay Research Paper Crazy Hamlet
Crazy Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Crazy Hamlet Shakespeare The real question is Hamlet crazy or is he just acting it. In my opinion there are many things throughout the play that make me tend to believe that he is crazy. When Hamlet enters Opheliu”s room and she has the question if he is truly mad or if he is just acting.
Hamlet Essay Research Paper There are many
Hamlet Essay, Research Paper There are many reasons why one would think that Queen Gertrude is clueless about the murder of King Hamlet, yet others think she was involved in the murder. People have their own opinions on this but I believe that Queen Gertrude had an idea about the murder. There are many reasons and facts contributing to my opinion on this.
Hamlet Movie Essay Research Paper The movie
Hamlet Movie Essay, Research Paper The movie of Hamlet was an excellent, as far as book-movies go. I believe it was produced with focus, reason, and logic. The characters were also portrayed with
Hamlet Essay Essay Research Paper Hamlet by
Hamlet Essay Essay, Research Paper Hamlet by Shakespeare Hamlet’s Sanity Hamlet appears to be insane, after Polonius’s death, in act IV scene II. There are indications, though, that
Hamlet Act I Essay Research Paper In
Hamlet Act I Essay, Research Paper In Act I of Hamlet, the ghost of the king hamlet comes to the battlement, outside a castle in Denmark. Marcellus and Horatio ask the ghost to speak, but
Structure Of Hamlet Essay Research Paper Structure
Structure Of Hamlet Essay, Research Paper Structure of hamletThe structure of Shakespeare s “Hamlet”, lays on the little information received by Hamlet from the mysterious ghost. Among all the characters, Marcellus seems to have the deepest understanding of the personality of this ghost. He is the one who fears a relation with this ghost.
Hamlet The Movie Vs Hamlet Th Essay
, Research Paper Hamlet the Movie Hamlet the Play After reading Shakespeare s play Hamlet and viewing the video, Hamlet , many differences and similarities can be found. The video had many good qualities to it. Unfortunately it had many negative aspects also. The same applies for the book. Something s about it were great while other things could have been better.
Hamlet 12 Essay Research Paper Hamlet
Hamlet 12 Essay, Research Paper Hamlet’s “Tragic Flaw” Hamlet’s famous soliloquy (Hamlet, act III, scene 1) shows his depth and ability in thinking, and shows Shakespeare’s ability to manipulate language. Throughout the play, Hamlet stops to think before acting on anything. The more he thinks, the less he does.