Judicial Precedent Essay, Research Paper
ESSAY: a) Explain and illustrate the operation of the doctrine of judicial precedent.
b) How far is it true to say judges are bound by decisions in earlier cases?
A)
Judicial precedent is where the past decisions of the judges create law for future judges to follow. English precedent is based on the Latin, stare decisis, meaning stand by what has been said in the past. This allows the rules system to be consistent: like cases treated alike, and it is just, as people can decide on a course of conduct knowing what the legal consequences will be.
Judicial Precedent can only operate if the legal reasons for past decisions are known, therefore, at the end of the case there will be a judgement. This will contain the precise words of the judge and follow a Law Report, which consists of full accounts of cases that are considered important. It will give an account of the facts of the case and a summary of the decision. The principles of law that the judge used to make his decision are the important part of the judgement, and are known as ratio decidendi, or ‘the reason for deciding’. This is what creates a precedent for judges to follow in future cases. This is identified not by the judge that makes the decision, but by lawyers looking at it afterwards, they may therefore have different views on it. The remainder of the judgement is called obiter dicta and in future cases, judges do not have to follow it. These are other things the judge said, such as the reasoning and explanation of why he made the decision. It may also contain a hypothetical situation, what his decision would have been if the facts of the case had been different, and the legal reasoning may be considered in future cases. If a new event that hasn’t been decided before comes to the court (original precedent), it is likely that the judge will look at cases which are close in principle and decide to use similar rules. This idea of creating new law by analogy can be seen in Hunter v Canary Wharf (1995). The interference with the reception on Hunter’s television because of Canary Wharf Tower having been built, was likened to the case of Bland v Molselely (1661), in respect to the loss of a view. The two things were said to be a matter of “delight” and not “necessity” so could not come before the courts.
In England and Wales, the courts have a very rigid doctrine of judicial precedent, which has the effect that every court is bound to follow any decision made by a higher court and that appellate courts are bound by their own decisions. Decisions made in the European Court of Justice bind all other courts since 1973 and can overrule its own decisions. Decisions made in the House of Lords bind all lower courts, especially Court of Appeal, and, since 1966 when it issued a practise statement, can overrule past decisions. This is clearly seen in DPP. NI v Lynch when the House of Lords said that duress could be a defence to a charge of murder, and in R v Howe they said it could not. The Court of Appeal has two divisions, which are both bound by the higher courts but not each other. Each single division is bound by its own previous decisions. Both have the Young v Bristol Aeroplane Exceptions however. Divisional Courts are bound by higher courts and bind lower courts. They are generally binding on themselves, but with the Young v Bristol Aeroplane Exceptions. The High Court is bound by higher courts, but not themselves, and all courts bind Inferior Courts.
B)
If one line of authority is clearly binding on the court, then the judges have no choice but to follow it, even if they do not agree with the legal principle. A binding precedent is only created when the facts of the second case are sufficiently similar to the original case and the decision was made by a court senior to the court hearing the later case. Persuasive precedent however is not binding, but the judge may consider it and decide that it is a correct precedent. Persuasive precedent can come from courts lower in the hierarchy, as seen in R v R (1991), where the House of Lords agreed and followed the same reasoning as the Court of Appeal. Decisions of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, and statements made obiter dicta. Where a case has been decided by a majority of judges, there may be some that don’t agree on what the law is, this is known as a dissenting judgement. In Candler v Crane, Christmas and Co., Lord Denning gave a dissenting judgement on the case, but the other judges didn’t agree with him. In 1964 however, The House of Lords decided he had been right, in the case of Hedley Byrne v Heller and Partners. The dissenting judgement persuaded them to follow it. Decisions from foreign courts may also have persuasive precedents.
There are also other methods used by judges to prevent them from following precedents: Distinguishing is when a judge finds the material facts of the case he is deciding are sufficiently different for him to draw a distinction between the present case and previous precedent. Two cases demonstrating this process are Balfour v Balfour (1919) and Merritt v Merritt (1971). The first case was successful but the second was not, as although both involved a wife making a claim against her husband for breach of contract, there was enough different facts to distinguish them. Overruling is where a court in a later case states that the legal rule decided in an earlier case is wrong. It is used to prevent an injustice if the judges feel the first decision was wrong. This is illustrated in Pepper v Hart (1993) when the House of Lords ruled that Hansard could be consulted in statutory interpretation. This overrules the earlier decision in Davis v Johnson (1979). The last method is Reversing, and is when a higher court overturns the decision in a lower Court of Appeal, in the same case. This is again illustrated in Davis v Johnson (1979).
Because of distinguishing, overruling, reversing and persuasive precedents, it is true to say that although judges are bound rigidly to follow decisions made in earlier cases, they do have ways of avoiding it if certain facts comply.
Другие работы по теме:
A Successful Administration Essay Research Paper A
A Successful Administration Essay, Research Paper A Successful Administration Each president elected desires a smoothly operating administration run by competent officials in order to accomplish his goals and prerogatives and shared political ideologies between head administration members are vital to a successful government.
Romeo An Juliet Essay Research Paper hi
Romeo An Juliet Essay, Research Paper hi i need an essay about a character in romeo and juliet that demonsrtated maturity. in a well developed multi pagraph essay and say why you think the character’s maturity was greater than the other characters in the play.
Law Essay Research Paper 1 The trial
Law Essay, Research Paper 1. The trial court is bound by the Supreme Court s decision under Stare Decisis. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the judicial system. All other courts are most likely to follow a higher courts decision. The only time a precedent would change is if it is out of date, the situation is different, or if the ruling is found invalid.
Jerry Seinfeld Essay Research Paper Sometimes a
Jerry Seinfeld Essay, Research Paper Sometimes a persons achievements can have an impact on an entire segment of an industry. In the book Jerry Seinfeld by Josh Levine this theory stands true. Jerry Seinfeld?s brilliant comedy has had a tremendous impact on this segment of the entertainment industry. His clean comedy and detailed tactics have set a precedent for comedians to come.
Oh Really Essay Research Paper Oh Reallyyou
Oh Really? Essay, Research Paper Oh Really, you think i am a lark, the dogs they run and bark, but when i say to them, shut up shut up shut up, you say to be nice to them,
ROTC Entrence Essay Essay Research Paper entrance
ROTC Entrence Essay Essay, Research Paper entrance essay For almost as long as I cn remember, I have been interested in th military. Influenced by such movies as “Patton”, and by my dad’s interest in military history, my
Marbury Vs Madison Essay Research Paper Marbury
Marbury Vs. Madison Essay, Research Paper Marbury V. Madison As the government was newly establishing its stronghold on the nation, forging its way to a powerful republic and instituting precedents for the future, a struggle to preserve the foundations of American Society instituted by Washington and John Adams existed as Thomas Jefferson took office.
Shane Essay Research Paper Sometimes I need
Shane Essay, Research Paper Sometimes, I need you more than I need air And sometimes I miss you more than I will forever, never forget the times that we have shaared. The are priceless
Social Democracy Essay Research Paper Austria is
Social Democracy Essay, Research Paper Austria is a democratic, federal republic. The constitution of Austria provides for a distinct division of power among the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government. Basic human rights and liberties are granted by the constitution and so are the rights of minorities granted as well.
Judicial Review And J Marshal Essay Research
Paper As the fourth Supreme Court Chief Justice of the United States of America, John Marshall created a legacy that has endured nearly two hundred years. While writing the majority opinion for the Supreme Court case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, he single-handedly changed the course of our judicial system.
Judicial Review Essay Research Paper Towering over
Judicial Review Essay, Research Paper Towering over us all When looking at the three branches of government one sees all the power that the people have given them. One is looking at all the great accomplishments in the history of the U.S.A. In the beginning, the United States government was formed in the intent of having the power fall in the order of executive, legislative, and then judicial.
Judicial Review Essay Research Paper Judicial ReviewThe
Judicial Review Essay, Research Paper Judicial Review The Supreme Court is the only court designated in the constitution. Within it is the Chief Justice of the United States, and eight associates. Being the highest court it is the last resort for all federal court questions. The Supreme Court has the power to determine whether something is constitutional or not, which makes them the final authority.
Poem She Sat Essay Research Paper She
Poem: She Sat Essay, Research Paper She sat… helpless in her room praying to whatever god there may be to let her call to him. could god ignore such a painful cry?
John Marshall Essay Research Paper John MarshallIn
John Marshall Essay, Research Paper John Marshall In early American history, the powers of the executive and legislative branches of the government were already well defined. However, the judicial branch needed to establish its position as an equal of the other two branches. John Marshall was crucial in making this happen.
French Government Essay Research Paper The modern
French Government Essay, Research Paper The modern French government is run very much like the government of the United States. France is a democratic republic that is divided into three branches,
Presidential Power Essay Research Paper Powers of
Presidential Power Essay, Research Paper Powers of the Presidency The President of the United States is probably the most powerful and influential person in the whole world. Alone, he has full control over the Executive Branch and has a lot of roles that he is the leader of. With this in mind, I think that the power given to the President is still balance along with the Legislative and Judicial Branch.
Death Penalty Essay Research Paper Chad HeldtSociologyPeriod
Death Penalty Essay, Research Paper Chad Heldt Sociology Period 1 4/28/98 The Death Penalty Should It Be Allowed Or Not? In my paper I plan to give my opinion and my position on the death penalty. I believe the death penalty should be for hardened criminals like the Charlie Mansons of the world and people like that.
Framers Ideals And Legislation Essay Research Paper
Framers Ideals and Legislation Branches on the Tree of Liberty Why, if one were concerned with protecting human liberty, would one want to make the legislative branch of government dominant rather than the executive or judicial? Are these good reasons for someone concerned with liberty to distrust a strong executive or a powerful judicial?
Clinton Essay Research Paper Whether or not
Clinton Essay, Research Paper Whether or not to have the trial be held in public or private, symbolizes the trial. A simple question that is answered by common sense, made to just prolong a trial that serves no purpose, but to explain the bungling of two parities walking in the dark. At this stage in the proceeding there is nothing left to deliberate, no posturing left to do.
Trial By Ordeal Essay Research Paper Trial
Trial By Ordeal Essay, Research Paper Trial by Ordeal I personally feel that trial by ordeal was a rather, how should I put this, “unjustified” way of determining guilt. Trial by ordeal was a type of “trial” that was used
The Judicial System Essay Research Paper This
The Judicial System Essay, Research Paper This is very long, I just didn’t wrap the words The Judicial System The justice system in our country today, is one of the best in the world, but it is not without problems. The 12-person Jury system has good intent but has definite faults and should be rethought and possibly revamped.
Judicial Activism Vs Judicial Restraint Essay Research
Paper Judicial activism and judicial restraint are two opposing philosophies when it comes to the Supreme Court justices’ interpretations of the United States Constitution; justices appointed by the President to the Supreme Court serve for life,and thus whose decisions shape the lives of “We the people” for a long time to come.
Law Of Precedent Essay Research Paper Law
Law Of Precedent Essay, Research Paper Law of Precedent One of the major considerations on how someone is tried in a court of law depends upon the previous convictions of similar cases. This law of
Judicial Precedent Essay Plan Essay Research Paper
Judicial Precedent Essay planIntro Say what precedent is: ?Stare decesis et non quieta movere? = Stand by what has been decided and do not unsettle the established. Which means a decision made in one case is binding on all
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay Research Paper is
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay, Research Paper is Cohens vs. Virginia, in which the question arose as to the right of the Supreme Court to exercise its appellate jurisdiction over the judgment of a state court involving the validity of state legislation. The contention of the counsel for the state struck at the very root of the judicial system of the Union, with its authority to review state decisions which involved the binding effect of the Federal Constitution and laws: and so to the discussion of this fundamental question Marshall brought his heaviest artillery.
Provencher Brief Essay Research Paper Facts Motorist
Provencher Brief Essay, Research Paper Facts: Motorist located a roadside rest area. The user of the roadside rest area fell on the stairs. The fall caused an injury, which consisted of a fractured right ankle.
California Law Essay Research Paper Caleb FairleyJudicial
California Law Essay, Research Paper Caleb Fairley Judicial Proc. 9/03/00 1. California law restricts the use of guns by seeing to it that the guns are safer, and by being safer they are registered by the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice tests the guns to make sure that they meet all safety needs and that the guns are not faulty.
Dare Essay Essay Research Paper What DARE
Dare Essay Essay, Research Paper What D.A.R.E Means To Me Dare has prepared me to say no to drugs in eight different ways. If anyone asks me to do drugs I will know what to do, such as- just ignoring the person or just
A Tale Of Two Cities Faults Of
Social Structure Essay, Research Paper A Tale of Two Cities: Faults of Social Structure Charles Dickens has been acclaimed as one of the foremost satirists of the
How To Writing A Research Essay Essay
, Research Paper How To Writing A Research Essay The toughest part of the essay, for me, was taking all the information I had gained and reduce it to a mere few pages essay. After all, quality is better