’s “Politics And The English Language” Essay, Research Paper
My focus is upon a piece by Niccolo Machiavelli, an Italian prince from the renaissance period who writes “The Morals of a Prince”, and in an opposite vein, an essay by George Orwell, an English author and enemy of totalitarianism whose essay is “Politics and the English Language”. Within these essays I have found a similarity in which Orwell illustrates that ‘political writing becomes the defense of the indefensible, most political writing is bad, where it is not the author is usually a rebel who expresses his private opinions’. While this could be true of Machiavelli’s piece, he himself contends that ‘men who embrace the ideal, while rejecting the real, will only accomplish their ruin’
Machiavelli wishes to convince other statesmen of the necessary vices that a prince must possess to rule a kingdom. A bold stance is taken for the sake of reality “?Better to go after the real truth of the matter than ?.what people have imagined”. He offers rationalizations for why a prince cannot be good, and at the same time, reign effectively. Vice is a condition of humanity, a prince must therefore be cunning, miserly, feared, and dishonest to prevent himself, and his post, from being victimized. Manipulation is key lest friend or foe best him. Generosity cannot be practiced, otherwise he must recoup his loses in taxation, resulting in his subjects hatred of him. Though a prince should be feared, for fear of punishment prevents men from committing crimes against him. The latter is especially true in regard to soldiers during times of war; respect for their leader intensifies performance. ‘A prince must also be sly like a fox and wary of traps for he cannot defend himself against wolves. Therefore, he must not be honest because doing so would go against his best interest.’ Machiavelli argues “To preserve the state, he often has to do things against his word, against charity, against humanity, against religion”.
Consequently Orwell draws a connection between the misuse of the English language and politics, suggesting that it’s used as a tool to reword, alter, and deform its purest meaning, while confusing others into accepting defensive reaction and BAD politics. He contends that ‘political writing is done in modern English prose and through the misuse of archaic metaphors, showing incompetence and vagueness, further revealing the author’s lack of interest in what he is expressing. Political writing continues to prefer passive voice rather than active, as it substitutes simple verbs for general-purpose verbs while turning them into phrases by attaching a noun or adjective. Adjectives might be used to dignify international politics, glorify war, or to add an air of elegance. Misuse of Greek and Latin root words while adding “ize-formation” takes the place of the author’s inability to find appropriate words to convey meaning. Orwell claims most demonstrate laziness by employing parody, which “?consists of gumming together long strips of words which have already been set in order by someone else, and making the results presentable by sheer humbug”. Political authors often rely upon “Ready made phrases” ‘which construct sentences and imitate real thought processes. Horrific events become sugar coated by replacing and eliminating unreliable elements’. Pleas upon us are made ‘to never develop the habit of seeking replacement phrases or jargon in place of simple, clear, and expressive English. He points out that insincerity corrupts clear language, arguing that ‘if thought can ruin language, language can in turn ruin thought’.
Orwell takes a maxim rhetorical approach as he begins his essay by defining principles in a pragmatic way. Starting with what we must do in order to reshape our deteriorating language while blaming amoral political lifestyles. By reforming our bad habits, clear language will follow then we can move toward political regeneration. On the opposite coin, Machiavelli uses truism for his narration. Even as he writes of the vices that princes’ must possess, he wishes to convince us that his essay is quite frank and therefore moral because of it. He too defines principles as he begins his piece by explaining to his readers that he offers useful information with refreshing truths in place of previously imagined scenarios. A man, or prince, cannot possibly be good when most of civilization is not, how could he compete otherwise. Orwell could have been referring to Machiavelli’s piece when he adds, “In our time it is broadly true that political writing is bad writing. Where it is not true, it will generally be found that the writer is some kind of rebel”. He is a bit of a rebel for he is not afraid to voice his opinions even though they may not be favorably received. Putting aside the ostentatious reasoning he uses to bait his readers “The Morals of the Prince” is clearly written with only a few of Orwell’s “bad writing” techniques employed. Machiavelli writes, ” The man who neglects the real to study the ideal will learn how to accomplish his ruin, not his salvation”. With this he could have been speaking of “Politics and the English Language”, as Orwell ideologically adds, “?Decline of a language must ultimately have political and economic causes?. an effect can become a cause”.
With each of the two pieces written in a different era, Machiavelli’s from the renaissance period and Orwell’s from the mid 1900s, the similarities described by each could invariably have been referring to the other. To be fair, since Machiavelli’s piece was translated from Italian to English, we have to wonder how much of his meaning was lost, or gained, in translation. Seeing that it reads most clearly, I have to believe that what small percentage appears as “bad writing” may have been done on the part of the translator As Machiavelli craftily defends his vices through abstract reasoning. I could deduce that Orwell was closely correct in assuming, ‘political speech and writing can indeed be used, as the defense of the indefensible’, for Machiavelli certainly uses ornate writing to add credence to his theories. While Orwell ideologically stands his ground indicating that bad writing is interconnected politically, Machiavelli suggests that clinging to the ideal rather than the real, could cause a man to live a false reality and lead to his inevitable downfall. I feel both are a bit extreme, though our language may have changed substantially, it is unjust to say its cause should lie mainly with politics. I must add that I do not agree with “Morals” because corruption is necessary to rule.
Most of speech, or writing, is colored to some extent to aide politicians in the support of current issues. Language and politics seem to go hand in hand, for what would one be without the other. This of course is why reformists who seek to expose corruption and preserve justice, draw a connection between the two. Many clues lie within our language revealing the true intention behind the fa?ades. Still with all of this considered, I find that what was true of politics then is ironically true of politics now. Some aspects of the human condition appear to be ageless.
Bibliography
The Morals of a Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli
Politics and the English language by George Orwell
38a
Другие работы по теме:
Orwell Shooting An Elephant Essay Research Paper
In George Orwells ?Shooting an Elephant?, Orwell is faced with a terrible decision. By taking the life of the elephant which so wrongly took the life of the Indian, the killing was then justified in Orwells mind. He was taking a
A Hanging Audience Essay Research Paper I
A Hanging Audience Essay, Research Paper I had never realised what it means to destroy a healthy, conscious man. After reading and understanding George Orwell s feelings through his experiences in his essay A Hanging. We come to realize that George Orwell, a visitor from the European establishment, gets the opportunity to participate in the execution of a Hindu man.
George Orwell
’s 1984 Essay, Research Paper George Orwell’s 1984 was a book on how the government, Big Brother, had total control over the people of Oceania. There are many reasons to believe that our own world is slowly becoming the nightmare. Since the publication in 1949, Orwell?s novel has consistently trigured heated debates about whether or not our society has become like Oceania, how accurate Orwell?s predictions were, and which political parties? philosophies most resemble Ingsoc.
George Orwell`S
“1984″ Essay, Research Paper DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER, the omnipresent leader of Ingsoc, or English socialism, and the force that has society in a vice of fear and ignorance. It is in
Aldous HuxleyS
“Brave New World” And George Orwell?S “1984″ Essay, Research Paper Neil Postman once stated; ?Huxley?s vision is more relevant today than is Orwell?s,? Neil was of course refering to Aldous Huxley?s Brave New World and George Orwell?s 1984, both chilling prophecies of the future of humanity gone terribly wrong.
George Orwells
“Shooting An Elephant” Essay, Research Paper In George Orwell’s essay “Shooting An Elephant,” he writes about racial prejudice. Orwell is a British officer in Burma. The author is, “for the Burmese and all against their oppressors, the British”(842). Orwell feels caught in the middle of this cultural struggle.
Geore Orwell Essay Research Paper The True
Geore Orwell Essay, Research Paper The True meaning behind the Killing of the Elephant An elephant has been shot and killed. Wt a mere act of violence or does it go beyond that? In this situation, the killing of the elephant goes far behind self-defense and security. It s taken to a personal level, which leads to difficult complications.
Book Review Essay Research Paper Animal Farmby
Book Review Essay, Research Paper Animal Farm by: George Orwell Book Review by George Lacy Mrs. Spain Fall 96 Character Analysis of Napoleon “Napoleon was a large rather fierce looking Berkshire boar,” that was spoiled and always got his way. He was the only pig of the kind on the farm. Napoleon was a great rival to Snowball.
The Very Dfferent Same Essays
– I Have A Dream And Shooting An Elephant Essay, Research Paper The Very Different Same Essays Both Martin Luther King s I have a Dream and George Orwell s Shooting an Elephant are essays about denouncing racism through effective language manipulations, for example, figurative language and precise diction.
George Orwell Essay Research Paper As a
George Orwell Essay, Research Paper As a journalist and writer of autobiographical narratives, George Orwell was outstanding. But he will be remembered primarily for two works of fiction that have become 20th-century classics: ‘Animal Farm’, published in 1944, and ‘Nineteen Eighty-four’ (1949).
Shooting An Elefant By George Orwell Essay
, Research Paper In the essay ?Shooting an Elephant,? George Orwell describes an internal conflict between his personal morals and his duty to his country?moreover, his duty to the white man?s reputation. Orwell?s decision to kill the elephant is a direct result of oppression. Oppression perhaps goes deeper than the average man would imagine, noticeably hindering even the lives of the oppressors.
Orwell And The Elephant Essay Research Paper
In his essay Shooting an Elephant, George Orwell explains how the controlling authorities in a hostile country are not controlling the country’s population but are in fact a mere tool of the populous. Orwell’s experience with the elephant provided the insight for his essay, and gives a clear example of the control the natives have over the authorities.
Animal Farm Book Review Essay Research Paper
Many people have many different reactions after reading George Orwell s Animal Farm. Some think it fascinating, some educational, and some long and tedious. Most everyone agrees that it is a political satire on the Revolution, however, and equates each character with a historical figure. For instance, Donlee Brussell speaks of Napoleon as the most corrupt character in the book with a brutal system of ruling Manor Farm that magnetizes an idiosyncratic correspondence to Joseph Stalin (A Soviet politician).
1984 Essay Research Paper The lesson to
1984 Essay, Research Paper The lesson to be learned from George Orwell’s 1984 is that an “ideal” of having a Utopian society will never really work. George Orwell may have written 1984, in order
The Animal Farm Essay Research Paper George
The Animal Farm Essay, Research Paper George Orwell s, The Animal Farm, depicts how power can corrupt society. If one person receives too much power, one will most likely lead up to dictatorship. To exemplify this idea, Orwell uses a farm to represent a society and the animals inside to portray the people. Orwell s use of the pigs and animals are also an analogy that people sometimes act as mindless pigs .
Animal Farm Analysis Essay Research Paper Animal
Animal Farm Analysis Essay, Research Paper Animal Farm, written by George Orwell, is a masterpiece mocking communism. Animalism, which represents communism, was a revolution that didn t work. Animalism was supposed to make life better for the animals but instead their lives got worse. By the end of the story, everything had changed.
1984 6 Essay Research Paper The book
1984 6 Essay, Research Paper The book 1984 by George Orwell is merely a warning of what could happen to a society in the future after many years of decline. In the nineteen fifties it was thought of as a prophecy. Many people actually thought that George Orwell was a madman for predicting all of these events in this book to happen in the year 1984.
Animal Farm As A Satire Essay Research
Paper ANIMAL FARM Animal Farm is a fable of our time full of meanings and messages relating to the importance of freedom in any society. The story light-heartily uses a farm and the rebellion of its mistreated animals to symbolize a much more serious issue. George Orwell expresses his own political opinions in a clever and interesting way, that allows reader s of all ages have an understanding of what really is a complex situation.
George Orwell Essay Research Paper Biography Report
George Orwell Essay, Research Paper Biography Report In any writer’s life, there are many important people who can affect the writer’s work. In George Orwell the Political Pen, By Keith Ferrell, the headmaster of St. Cyprian and his wife, Mr. and Mrs. Vaughan Wilkes influenced Orwell’s works. The British author George Orwell, pen name for Eric Blair, was born in 1903 in the Indian Village Motihari.
Critical Review Of 1984 By George Orwell
Essay, Research Paper 1984 by George Orwell is a story of a man’s strugle against a totalitarianstic government that controlls the ideas and thoughts of its citizens. They use advanced mind reading techniques to discover the thoughts of the people and punish those who show signs of rebellion against the government.
George Orwell 1984 Essay Research Paper George
George Orwell 1984 Essay, Research Paper George Orwell, author of Nineteen Eighty Four , in 1921 joined the Indian Imperial Police but seven years later resigned having come to hate imperialism. This was
Report On Animal Farm Essay Research Paper
Animal Farm By: George Orwell a report by: Eric Drewes Animal Farm by George Orwell is the story about the farm of Farmer Jones, and how the animals rebelled and took control. For years, the animals took Jones’ tyranny. This created a resentment for him in the animals for him, and this built up until the animals, led by the pigs, formed an army and drove the farmer from his home.
Style Elements In Animal Farm Essay Research
Paper Animal Farm Animal Farm by George Orwell is a story about a group of animals that rebel to get their freedom. It is a story about a society with excellent ideas for progress, that starts with good management, but eventually becomes corrupt.
1984 Essay Research Paper 1984 1984 is
1984 Essay, Research Paper 1984 1984 is a political parable. George Orwell wrote the novel to show society what it could become if things kept getting worse. The first
Analysis Of A Newspaper Articl Essay Research
Paper 131-81 Analysis of The Union Racket There is an article in the April 24,2000 issue of The Detroit News called The Union Racket . This article explains how the International Brotherhood of Teamsters currently stands with its lawsuit against its former president. Though the essay dose communicate many useful points, is dose a poor job of not meeting the seven failure requirements for any writing as established by Orwell.
George Orwell Essay Research Paper George Orwell
George Orwell Essay, Research Paper George Orwell also known as Eric Arthur Blair lived from 1903 – 1950. He was a British writer who wrote documentaries, essays, and articles. He was born in Motihari, India. Orwell was educated at Eton College in England. From an early age Orwell said, ” Perhaps the age five or six, I knew that when I grew up I should be a writer.” After Orwell did not win a university scholarship at Eton College he joined the Indian Imperial Police.
An Analysis Of Orwell
’s “Shooting An Elephant” Essay, Research Paper An Analysis of Orwell’s “Shooting an Elephant” Erika Moreno-Dalton In ?Shooting an Elephant,? George Orwell finds himself in a difficult situation
Ironies In The Novel 1984 George Orwell
Essay, Research Paper ironies in the novel 1984 george Orwell THE IRONIES OF 1984 The novel 1984, by George Orwell, has many examples of ironythroughout it. The two major types of irony: verbal irony and situationirony, are demonstrated again and again in this novel. In the followingessay I will discuss these types of ironies and give examples of each fromthe book.
In George Orwell S Politics A
Essay, Research Paper In George Orwell s Politics and the English Language , the author argues that written language has suffered a serious decline as a result of political causes. Orwell shows there is a correlation between mistakes found in political language and modern language. He describes common misuses of the modern writing and provides examples of each one.