Paper
Questioning the Authority of Myth in The Histories
History can be defined as the systematic study of and writing about the past (Cartledge, Paul, The Greeks: A Portrait of Self and Others, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993). Does this mean anything that happened, or that was believed to have happened, in the past can be recorded as history? Or, does one need proof? In Herodotus The Histories, the narrative is arranged in a dramatic form. Modern historians also arrange their narrative in dramatic form, but he or she uses footnotes, endnotes and citations to show proof; the raw data, of his or her work is validated. These notes allow the historian to share sources of details and present tangible information. Herodotus, however, was not able to use such conventions as footnotes or endnotes. In The Histories, Herodotus includes as much primary material as he can, but obviously does not fully trust his sources. He takes special care to let his readers know when he is saying what has been told to him by other people, and often includes accounts that he believes to be false. Cartledge states that historians all create their own distinctive, selective pasts (Cartledge, 19). In including all accounts, and stating which he believes to be true, Herodtus in fact creates his own past.
But, was Herodotus telling the truth? He uses many techniques in his writing to make the reader believe that what he is saying is fact. Herodotus uses story and myth in such a way that it lends credibility to his writing. Why did he include stories and myths? Cartledge makes the claim that, Myths were virtually all that Herodotus could possibly have used to recount and account for the origins, development, and outcome of his chosen subject (Cartledge, 21). First of all, Herodotus used the stories to tell the history of the time because he often only had stories
Haas, p.2
to tell, as no concrete facts were available to him. Secondly, the people of his day were used to literature filled with myth and symbolism. It may have been that Herodotus wrote his books using many stories because he felt it was the only way to properly tell the history of the people of Persia and Greece.
I am not going to come down in favor in this or that account of events…I will cover major and minor human settlements equally, because most of those which were important in the past have diminished in significance by now, and those which were great in my own time were small in times past. I will mention both equally (Waterfield, Robin, Herodotus The Histories, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998, Book 1, Chapter 15).
In order to understand how Herodotus arrives at conclusions about the events he discusses it helps to examine specific instances where his methods of narration and analysis are illustrated. By looking carefully at these examples, we are able to draw conclusions that help define what constitutes proof for Herodotus. A good example of his method of historical analysis can be found in the story of Helen (2.113-120). Her familiar story is reconstructed to show the reader a different outlook on the causes and historical facts which make up the event. Herodotus begins by telling the above story as related to him by the priests. However, he does not take myth as truth. Herodotus questions the validity of the myth by using tools of logic and reason. He examines the situation surrounding the myth and evaluates it rationally. Herodotus uses two major tools to prove his outlook. He begins by using the fact that the statue of Aphrodite, now standing at the former site of Proteus’ court, is referred to as “the stranger.” As this is the only statue of Aphrodite referred to in this way, he concludes that there must be a reason why. He believes that it is because of the story of Helen. Here, Herodotus takes anthropological details into account and through his own observations, he manages to
Haas, p. 3
supplement the myth. Herodotus then uses a form of literary analysis in order to validate the story of the priests further, and in doing so he lays out the difference between Homer’s use of myth and his own practice of rational analysis. In looking at three passages from the Iliad and the Odyssey, he pulls out details that point to Homer acknowledging Helen s being at Proteus’ court (2.116). And, though this does not outrightly prove Herodotus’ account, it is certainly an effective critical tool in analyzing the event and adding much validity to his analysis.
The mere fact of Herodotus questioning the authority of the myth is, remarkable, at least reference to earlier writers. In fact, he seems in complete rebellion of myth when he writes, “Now, I think that Homer had heard this story as well, because although he omitted it on the grounds that it was not suitable for an epic poem as the other one (the one he used), he still showed that he knew this alternative story too (2.115).” He is attacking Homer for his subjectivity by implying that he gives a false account of the story for the sake of poetry. There is a direct contradiction between Homer’s account of Helen s story and of Herodtus objective telling of the tale.
In the story of Cyrus youth, Herodotus transforms the mythological facts underlying the tale into a realistic narrative. He does this by removing an element that had not ever been removed in earlier works–the gods. They are very noticeably absent. In many places throughout the text where one might expect there to be implications of religion, it simply does not happen, although the reader is assuming that the gods have something to do with the dreams of Astyages, it is never explicitly stated. The best example of this is the justification Harpagus gives as to why he will not kill the baby Cyrus–normally, the reader would most assume there to be a judgment passed on the unjustness of the act or at least an appeal to the gods: instead, several human concerns appear:
There are plenty of reasons why I won t kill the child, not least of which he s a relative of
Haas, p. 4
mine. Also, Astyages is old now, but has no male offspring. Suppose, when he dies, that the tyranny devolves on to Mandane, whose son he is now using me to kill. The only possible outcome for me will be that my life will be in danger. Still, for the sake of my own safety, the child has to die, but it must be one of Astyages men who commits the murder and not one of mine (1.109).
This avoidance of the mention of appealing to gods lends credibility and validity to the story.
In the process of making Cyrus story into history , Herodotus makes use of narrative and storytelling devices which make his work seem truly “historical” to the modern reader. A method repeated in the text is shown by the great detail in which the descriptions of people, places, and things are given. The names of people, places and things are are specifically stated, as are the stories behind their origins. That is not to mention the a great amount of time that is devoted to lengthy digressions that reveal customs and traits of the group under discussion to the reader. The liberty which Herodotus has to discuss any subject he deems important lends a greater factuality and credibility to the The Histories by means of the inclusion of all relevant (and irrelevant) historical details.
The story of Cyrus is portrayed by Herodotus as a narrated history, although it contains non-narrative elements and mythology. The mythology is ignored by Herodotus, and, therefore makes the work far more believable by means of objectivity.
There are instances in The Histories where Herodotus is even scientific in his reasoning. In Book Two, he makes educated guesses as to why the Nile floods. He outlines the theories held by three scientific beliefs, and continues by refuting them with his own theory. He argues each one systematically to disprove it. When he explores the argument that the flooding of the Nile is caused by winds he writes:
Haas, p.5
Two of these views would not be worth mentioning, in my opinion,except I do want to give some idea of what they are. The first claims that the Etesian winds prevent the Nile from flowing out into the sea, and so cause it to flood. However,the fact is that the Nile carries on as usual even when the Etesian winds are not blowing…and the same thing would happen to any other rivers that run counter to these winds…the second theory is even more ignorant than the one I have just mentioned…the idea that it rises in snowy regions makes no sense at all (2.20-21).
Instead of merely dismissing the theory as myth, Herodotus logically and scientifically refutes the claim of the winds being the cause of the flood.
In this paragraph, we see yet another explicit mention of the myth versus reason. Herodotus attacks those who accept facts without questioning when he writes, As anyone capable of rational though could realize (2.21). He continues attacking myth when he writes about the author of a certain theory, contending that, It is impossible to argue against…because the tale is based on something which is obscure and dubious (2.23). It is language such as “obscure and dubious” that shows Herodotus’ distaste for claims that are not based on logic.
The only way for Herodotus to report on the past was to tell the stories from oral tradition that existed, and to then rationalize on whether he believed them or not. He told all sides of the story so that the reader could make up their own mind about which was true, and told which answer he personally found the most truth in. Herodotus also realized that it was important to tell all of the stories if he wanted to properly represent history, whether true or not. He wrote his Histories filled with stories and myths, but it was not, in the end, so different from any other historian throughout history–even without raw facts and footnotes. Anyhow, we must remember what Cartledge said: Whether it is true or not in terms of actual historical fact is beside the point (Cartledge, 26).
Bibliography
1. Cartledge, Paul, The Greeks: A Portrait of Self and Others, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993.
2. Waterfield, Robin, Herodotus The Histories, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
Другие работы по теме:
Political Anarchy
There are several arguments against philosophical anarchism. Most of the arguments are in line with either the theory that consent is not required or of the theory we have already consented. For the sake of being brief, this essay will attempt to refute only the latter of the two. Along with the idea of individual consent is the longstanding, traditional theory of the authority of God.
Donald Davidson Essay Research Paper In Shakespeares
Donald Davidson Essay, Research Paper In Shakespeare?s Hamlet, there is a murder, and it doesn?t say straight out who the murder is. There are no detectives on the case. No one within in the state is really questioning the murder of the King except for his son. It may not have all the customary qualities of detective story, but it does come across as a detective story in which Hamlet seeks to solve the mysterious death and to revenge for his father.
A Critique Of Socrates
’ Guilt In The Apology Essay, Research Paper A Brief Comment on the Query: “Is Socrates Guilty As Charged?” History of Political Thought 47.230 B Mini-Essay for Discussion Group #3
Miranda Vs Arizona Essay Research Paper In
Miranda Vs Arizona Essay, Research Paper In 1966 the Supreme Court made a ruling that every American would always know and remember. The case was Miranda versus The State of Arizona.
Bessy Essay Research Paper Farmer Joe decided
Bessy Essay, Research Paper Farmer Joe decided his injuries from the accident were serious enough to take the trucking company (responsible for the accident) to court. In court the trucking company’s fancy lawyer was questioning farmer Joe. “Didn’t you say, at the scene of the accident, ‘I’m fine’?” said the lawyer.
Terrorism Essay Research Paper Terrorism is defined
Terrorism Essay, Research Paper Terrorism is defined as “the use of violent means against non-military targets”. Acts of terrorism are typically designed to destroy the authority and legitimacy of a country. While the US is a legitmate world power, we do not experience a substantial amount of terrorism.
Power Essay Research Paper Does the world
Power Essay, Research Paper Does the world belong to the strong? As they are used in this sentence, belong and strong are two multifaceted words. They can each indicate different definitions, changing the meaning of the question.
The Lee Valley Regional Park Essay Research
Paper The Lee Valley Regional Park Authority was set up in 1967 by an act of parliament to develop the areas along the Lee, many of them by then dis-used and derelict,? for recreation and nature
Rebellion Essay Research Paper Long before the
Rebellion Essay, Research Paper Long before the actual act of rebellion, the thoughts and the sentiment of rebellion linger in the soul. These thoughts and feelings continue to fester before they reach the fruition of deed. Throughout the course of an extended period of time the uprising stems its roots in the heart; the actual revolt takes place within one s self, long before one mounts a rebellious action.
Electric Belief System Essay Research Paper The
Electric Belief System Essay, Research Paper The use of eclectic belief systems is the ultimate realization of personal destiny. It is a set of beliefs and practices that have been tailored to the needs of the individual, not of the populus, or the governing geographical authority. It represents an active, positive role of the individual in the direction of his or her life.
Disrespect Essay Research Paper DisrespectWhen television first
Disrespect Essay, Research Paper Disrespect When television first emerged, sitcoms like Leave It To Beaver portrayed loving children who would have never dreamed of disobeying someone with authority. But as we flip through the channels today, we see pictures of children screaming at their parents, students hitting teachers, and juveniles running from the law.
Reflection Rap Essay Research Paper On my
Reflection Rap Essay, Research Paper On my neck, I still got marks from the day I was born. As a shorty, I always had to get scorned. I couldn?t have been more of a prick as a thorn. A bad report card-before it reached home it got torn. I didn?t know if I should be soft or hardcore, like porn. I stomped on authority, like a mat for a door.
Henry Foyal Essay Research Paper Henry Fayol
Henry Foyal Essay, Research Paper Henry Fayol’s Principal of management Fayol was a key figure in the turn-of-the-century Classical School of management theory. He saw a manager’s job as:
Perils Of Obedience Essay Research Paper The
Perils Of Obedience Essay, Research Paper The Perils of Obedience This experiment is a test to see if people are naturally aggressive. Milgram does not believe that people are naturally aggressive. Although some people think people are naturally aggressive. Ordinary people can be part of a bad course of actions without having any anger toward then victim.
Spring Offensive Essay Research Paper SPRING OFFENSIVEWilfred
Spring Offensive Essay, Research Paper SPRING OFFENSIVE (Wilfred Owen) Wilfred Owens poem Spring Offensive explores the unnatural offensive of war against spring or nature. Opening with Halted against the shade of the last hill Owen suggests both the calmness of the shade and the deadly implication of last.
Tyger And Lamb Essay Research Paper The
Tyger And Lamb Essay, Research Paper The Tyger and the Lamb In order to look at William Blake’s poem “Tyger! Tyger!” one must also look at “The Lamb.” The lamb and the tyger show the two contrary states of the human soul with respect to creation while asking what kind of god could make both. Blake’s questioning of God reflects the influence of the Enlightenment period.
The Milgram Experiment Essay Research Paper The
The Milgram Experiment Essay, Research Paper The Milgram Experiment The Milgram experiment is one of Psychology?s most controversial experiments. The study examines to what extend individuals obey an authority figure, and how far they will go, even if they believe their actions are harming another individual.
The True Authority
– The Crucible Essay, Research Paper Picture what it would be like to go back in the days of the Puritans. The people you’d expect to see would be kind, honest, religious and in every way ethical because that’s how a Puritan should be. Although there were many good Puritans, you’d turn around to see that some were deceiving, vindictive, dishonest, and disloyal.
Authority Central Essay Research Paper Authority CentralIn
Authority Central Essay, Research Paper Authority Central In the brink of colonization, wealth was in the eyes of many monarchs. England, searching for the best way to amass in wealth, saw mercantilism. Mercantilism was a theory in which a country was to export more and import less, therefore making the gold and silver flow into the country s treasury.
Louis X1V Outline Essay Research Paper I
Louis X1V Outline Essay, Research Paper I. Introduction II. Political Crisis A. Religious Disputes 1.Development of science (the new philosphy) a. Undermining of church authority and Kings in Rule
Maturity Essay Research Paper There is a
Maturity Essay, Research Paper There is a time and place for everything, and this is why people must learn to present themselves in the correct manner. Dealing with certain types of authority requires a certain amount of maturity towards the personperson’s you may come into contact with. I, for instance, have to present myself accommodatingly for the proper authority.
Hawthorne And Symbolism Essay Research Paper Hawthorne
Hawthorne And Symbolism Essay, Research Paper Hawthorne and Symbolism Symbolism is a key in all or most writings. Symbolism is what the reader needs in order to use his imagination. In “Young Goodman Brown” by Nathaniel Hawthorne, through different symbolism, Hawthorne writes about a man who in his coming of age.
Native Son By Bigger Essay Research Paper
Native Son Essay In Native Son Bigger struggles against authority. The authority is the white people. Bigger wants to have the same power as blacks. In the movie? The Heat? Stephen
Personal Essay The Yemin Order Project Essay
, Research Paper Personal Essay: The Yemin Order Project I am extremely happy at school which has helped and encouraged me to develop all my skills both educational and social. I was also part of the Yemin Orde project
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay Research Paper is
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay, Research Paper is Cohens vs. Virginia, in which the question arose as to the right of the Supreme Court to exercise its appellate jurisdiction over the judgment of a state court involving the validity of state legislation. The contention of the counsel for the state struck at the very root of the judicial system of the Union, with its authority to review state decisions which involved the binding effect of the Federal Constitution and laws: and so to the discussion of this fundamental question Marshall brought his heaviest artillery.
Arrest Analysis Essay Research Paper Arrest
Arrest Analysis Essay, Research Paper Arrest: – An arrest is the act of depriving an individual of his liberty by legal authority. This is to inform you the two procedures of arrest. The procedures of arrest are warrant and non-warrant.
The Process Of An Essay Essay Research
Paper Do you know how to write an essay? Writing an essay could be easy or hard. Some students cannot do it well and that is why they hate it. You can find the writing as something interesting and important for your own future. If you do not know how to write an essay, there are several steps that you can follow. There are three basic steps to write an essay; discovering a topic, supporting the thesis, and editing the essay.
The Crucible And The Use Of Authority
Essay, Research Paper Today s society is composed of a country built on the Constitution, which is governed by laws, justice in these laws and authority. Authority holds precedence in any situation; the policeman upholding the law, the judge administering justice, the common citizen being law abiding.
Big Bang Essay Research Paper Before The
Big Bang Essay, Research Paper Before The Big Bang Every since scientists came up with an idea of how the universe started and was created, through the Big Bang, there has always been discussion and questioning on what the universe was, before it was created. Was there nothing because there was no time and no God, or was there something we haven t discovered yet.
The Living Symbol Of The Scarlet Letter
Essay, Research Paper The Living Symbol of the Scarlet LetterThe Scarlet Letter A, worn by Hester Prynne, was a punishment for the immoral sin of adultery she had committed. Hester was forced to wear the letter upon her bosom for the rest of her life. Following Hester’s act of adultery, she became pregnant with a baby girl whom she named Pearl. “Pearl was a born outcast of the infantile world.