Animal Rights Essay, Research Paper
Non-human animals are given rights only because of their interactions with human beings. Without involvement with humans, animals do not deserve rights. It is through this interaction with humans that animals are even given moral consideration. We do not give rights to a rock simply because it is a creation of Mother Nature, similarly non-human animals do not have rights unless it is in regards to humans. As pointed out by Jan Narveson “morality is a sort of agreement among rational, independent, self-interested persons who have something to gain from entering into such an agreement” (192). In order to have the ability to obtain rights one must be consciously able to enter into an agreement, non-human animals are unable to do so. Entering into an agreement is done so because both parties have something to gain from this understanding. Narveson’s view of morality can be understood in two parts: 1.) entering into an agreement is done so for one’s self-interest and 2.) they are willing and able to enter into an agreement and maintain it. This separates humans from them in that animals are unable to willingly enter into any sort of agreement or stay true to it.
Morality is a human concept, completely original and separate from the animal kingdom. Animals, as I understand, do not consider whether what they are doing is morally permissible or objectionable, they simply act without regard to the consequences of their actions. Furthermore, humans have no reason to give animals rights based on the fact that humans have little to gain from doing so. An animal is not able to enter into an agreement and thus does not deserve to gain such rights simply for existing. Only through their interaction with human beings are animals even considered to have rights. Without humans the concept of rights doesn’t exist amongst animals.
Contrary to Narveson, I do not believe that animals should be denied of moral consideration because of their limited ability to harm humans. First of all, this statement is false animals clearly have the ability to attack if so desired not by the human, but by the decision of the animal. In our sculpted urban environments animals are exiled and in relatively minimal human contact. Such predacious animals, that have historically attacked humans, have been kept out of our society by enormous architectural fences. These animals that attack usually need vast open spaces to hunt game, these environments hardly exist any more, and these animals are rarely in contact with humans. These urban areas do not attract animals with the capacity to attack humans but that is not to say that these animals do not have the ability to harm us, we have just manipulated our environment so that they are on the outside. One thousand years ago, humans would have been more likely to have been attacked by an animal. Our modern buildings and infrastructure isolate us from these creatures and has also reduced their population making it less dangerous for a human to worry about being struck by a beast on their way to work.
Also, Narveson states that “Humans have excellent reason to be fearful about each other” (193). She goes on to state that humans not only have the capacity to harm one another but are often “interested in doing so”(194). In the case of an animal attacking a human Narveson argues that it sporadically occurs and in the event of an animal attacking a human we can simply cage or shoot them. Is this any different from how we treat human on human violence? The penalty for harming another human is often imprisonment or death, just like the penalty an animal would suffer at the hand of a human.
The concept of suffering has often been applied to understand whether an animal deserves rights. Like Vicki Hearne, I too argue that suffering should not be an antidote to decipher whether an animal deserves rights or not. An animal’s ability to feel the sensation of pain is not reason enough to grant it rights. In the case of an infant, we are willing to grant the child rights not based on the fact that she or he can feel pain, but because that child’s parents would be upset. The child is a part of a larger whole, a member of society and a family that care for them. In defense of her own training of animals Hearne states that we are willing to grant her Airedale rights “for his capacity to scream when subjected to a blowtorch but not for his wit and courage, not for his natural good manners that are a gentle rebuke to ours” (61). Another point brought up by Hearne is that children, just like dogs, “have almost no unconscious minds, so they can learn only by thinking” (63). She goes on to say that it isn’t until these children are educated for many years that they are able to understand their ability.
Animals do not deserve rights simply for inhabiting the earth with us. Non-human animals have no concept of morality thus they should not be guaranteed rights. According to John Chipman Gray animals do not deserve rights because they are “incapable of being moral subjects,”
Animals cannot be “reasoned with” or instructed in their responsibilities; they are inflexible and unadaptable to future contingencies; they are subject to fits of instinctive passion which they are incapable of repressing or controlling, postponing or sublimating. (182)
Joel Feinberg agrees that “animals are incapable of claiming rights on their own” (182). Since morality is a human concept and animals are unable to engage in conversation, animals lack the ability to coherently express a desire for their own personal rights. Though this may be a barrier that is a result of human’s inability to understand the needs of animals, it is because of this lack of communication of needs that animals do not simply require rights. Animals are unable to engage in agreements or act in a moral way that distinguishes right from wrong. Non-human animals do not have the ability to recognize when or if their rights are being violated. Simply by reacting to pain an animal does not necessarily mean that the animal is aware that something morally wrong is being done to it.
Since animals are unable to understand when their rights have been violated or if they have been violated at all they cannot bring about any action to change such activity. Non-human animals are unable to even conceive a sense of what is right and there is nothing that they themselves can do to prevent their rights from being violated. Only through humans speaking on behalf of an animal does an animal gain rights. But, should an animal deserve rights because a human being can speak on behalf of it? I hardly think so. Unlike animals, even an intellectually challenged human has the ability to enter or leave an agreement. Since animals are unable to assert their needs and defend their own rights they need a human to act as a tool to see to it that the rights of the animal is protected. Feinberg goes on to say that those that are deserving of rights are those that can or have the ability to have interests (184). Feinberg continues with two qualifications of a being deserving of rights: 1.) they must be able to be represented further, it is impossible to represent a being that has no interests, and 2.) “because a right holder must be capable of being a beneficiary in his own person, and a being without interests is a being that is incapable of being harmed?”(184).
The argument may be made that shouldn’t animals be considered to have a right to moral consideration based on the fact that they have intrinsic value in themselves? No, animals do not have intrinsic value in themselves. They are only given importance through human’s interaction with them and thus have instrumental value for humans. As Feinberg argues, “?we do have duties to protect threatened species; not duties to the species themselves as such, but rather duties to future human beings, duties derived from our housekeeping role as temporary inhabitants of this planet?”(185). As such, animals only have value because human beings have given them worth and are not deserving of moral consideration.
Humans do not have any moral obligation to animals themselves, but rather, have a moral duty through animals to other human beings. Non-human animals are not deserving of rights because they have no ability to understand the concept of morality, or even distinguish between right and wrong. Because animals lack the ability to engage in agreements, or recognize when their rights have been violated, and possess no sense of morality they are not deserving of moral consideration from human beings.
Другие работы по теме:
Animal Rights Essay Research Paper Chris Morra
Animal Rights Essay, Research Paper Chris Morra En-105-03 Animal Rights In Brigid Brophy s essay, The Rights of Animals, there are some statements that I agree with and some that I don t. Unlike Brigid Brophy, I am not a vegetarian, nor would I ever become one, but I do believe that animals have certain rights.
Animal Rights Essay Research Paper When someone
Animal Rights Essay, Research Paper When someone mentions animal rights what comes to mind? My mind flashes back to a print ad a couple of years ago with half-a-dozen naked models holding up a sign saying We d rather be naked then wear fur! I was very happy to support their cause to stop people from wearing fur as a fashion statement.
Animals Rights Essay Research Paper Human beings
Animals Rights Essay, Research Paper Human beings and wild animal encounters often result in the death of either the human or animal. Controversy amongst people has been established over this issue and support for animals rights has been developed. The people who sustain animal rights are called animal activists, and they disagree with cruelty and death of animals regardless of the circumstances.
Animal Farm Essay Research Paper Animal FarmBy
Animal Farm Essay, Research Paper Animal Farm By George Orwell In this story, the major problem being faced is the dictatorship of Mr. Jones, a farmer. Most of the animals on his farm didn?t have a problem with his
Analysis Of Animal Rights Essay Research Paper
Animals have been used in medical research for centuries. Most of the animals used for research are rodents such as rats, mice, hamsters and gerbils. Some dogs, cats and a variety of goats, ferrets, pigeons, monkeys and rabbits are also used .The struggle against this tyranny is a struggle as important as any of the moral and social issues that have been fought over in recent years.
Utopian Society Essay Research Paper Animal Farm
Utopian Society Essay, Research Paper Animal Farm, like Brave New World, shows the idea of a Utopia . The animals yearned for their perfect farm where they could run themselves and their work would be rewarded rather than be given more work. It was their idea of a flawless society, where everyone was happy and cooperated.
Summary Of Orwells
’ Animal Farm Essay, Research Paper Summary of Orwells’ Animal Farm In the beginning of Orewell’s novel the animals rebel against the “Manor Farm” they take it over, and drive the humans off of the farm. In doing this
Animal Cruelty Essay Research Paper Animal CrueltyHow
Animal Cruelty? Essay, Research Paper Animal Cruelty? How would you like it if you were used in an experiment to see if the mascara your girlfreind used was safe? And then when they were done with you, they disposed of you and killed you off as if you didn?t matter. Well that?s what is being done to animals. They are being tested on.
What Do Aniamls Mean To Us Essay
, Research Paper Anthony Jones WHAT DO ANIMALS MEAN TO US? When it comes to dealing with animals humans tend to think that they can do whatever they want. Animals should have rights just as humans have rights. However, animal rights are disregarded as we continue to eat and use them in experiments. We view animals not as living creatures, but as objects to do with as we please.
My View On Animal Rights Essay Research
Paper Wild animals never kill for sport. Man is the only one to whom the torture and death of his fellow creatures is amusing in itself. –Froude (1818-1894) When
Manipulation In Animal Farm Essay Research Paper
The easy manipulation of human nature is illustrated in “Animal Farm”The Pigs of Animal Farm repetidly abused the animals. Because of their lack of intelligence and strength the animals became victims of the pigs. The easy manipulationof human nature is illustrated in “Animal Farm” A. The animals weren’t strong enough to compete with the stronger pigs.1.
Animals Chemist Essay Research Paper This page
Animals Chemist Essay, Research Paper This page is dedicated to animal rights issues. For centuries people across the world have loved animals. Whether it’s ribs on the grill or Spot in the
Animal Farm 10 Essay Research Paper Animal
Animal Farm 10 Essay, Research Paper Animal Farm Animal Farm, by George Orwell, is a science fiction story based on the Russian Revolution, where instead of humans, the animals are the main characters. The story is predominantly about how power can overcome people who don t know how to use it correctly and from that, in almost any situation comes a revolution or as it was stated in Animal Farm a rebellion.
Bioethics Essay Research Paper One of the
Bioethics Essay, Research Paper One of the many issues of today’s conversations is still confusing on my understanding it. Is it ethical for people to engage in animal research for human excellence? And if so, just how far can animal research be taken to meet these achievements for human kind? When thinking about this, I would conclude that animals over human beings do not have any rights what so ever, but I would be the biggest hypocrite in the world by saying this due to believing my doggy (Frankey) has rights in our household.
Benefits Of Animal Experimentation Essay Research Paper
Abstract Are we to let concern for the ?rights? of pests cost human lives? The answer is a simple one?no. Animal research, although often the subject of debate is a positive thing. Without it, where would the world be? Tests certainly cannot be done on humans, for what human will risk his or her life if there is a more convenient and sensible option.
Ethics In Research Essay Research Paper The
Ethics In Research Essay, Research Paper The study of psychology often requires the use of experimental methods to gather important information for the betterment of the human race. Experiments often involve the use of humans and animals. What can be done to a human or animal in the name of science and research is a question of ethics.
Animal Rights Essay Research Paper Justin KubisiakProposal
Animal Rights Essay, Research Paper Justin Kubisiak Proposal Paper Eng. Comp. Fri. Nov. 13, 1998 Animal Rights Where do you stand on the mistreatment of animals? Are you completely against hurting animals, so much so that you would not wear a fur coat nor eat meat?
Animal Rights Essay Research Paper Animal Rights
Animal Rights Essay, Research Paper Animal Rights The 20th century has had more medical breakthroughs than any other hundred years in history. But there is a price. No significant discovery in this time has occurred without the use of animals in biological research experiments. Heart surgery, polio, osteoporosis, diabetes, AIDS, and cancer have all had significant breakthroughs thanks to these experiments(McCarty 15).
Animal Experimentation 2 Essay Research Paper Lab
Animal Experimentation 2 Essay, Research Paper Lab experimentation involving animals is inhumane. Animal testing is cruel because an animal s life is just as important as a human s life, people are exploiting animals, and animal testing doesn t show whether or not a product is safe for humans.
Animal Experimentation Essay Research Paper Abstract
Animal Experimentation Essay, Research Paper Abstract Animal experimentation has been going on for a while now and people have been protesting against it since it has begun. It seems now days there are more cons for animal experiments because of how it has become a popular topic to this day. The pros seem to think that animal experiments are necessary for living a healthy life.
Animal Experimentation Essay Research Paper Animal ExperimentationANIMAL
Animal Experimentation Essay, Research Paper Animal Experimentation ANIMAL RIGHTS– The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals was founded in England in 1824 to promote humane treatment of work animals, such as cattle and horses, and of household pets. Within a few decades similar organizations existed throughout Europe.
Animal Testing Essay Research Paper The American
Animal Testing Essay, Research Paper The American Medical Association has stated that it believes that research-involving animals is essential to maintaining and improving the health of human beings. They point out that all advances in medical science in the 20th century, from antibiotics to organ transplants, has been achieved either directly or indirectly through the use of animals in laboratory experiments.
Should Animals Be Used For Research Testing
? Essay, Research Paper Animal rights activists continually oppose the medical research that involves animals as test subjects. Too many people have come to the conclusion that medical researchers are cruel and inhumane. In many cases the good of the research is overlooked and the bad is used. Even though many people may believe that animal research is morally wrong, animal research should continue because it is critical to helping heal human lives.
Animal Rights Essay Research Paper The rights
Animal Rights Essay, Research Paper The rights of animals is a topic that is very important to me. I simply think that everyone should have the decency to treat animals with kindness and respect, and not make them suffer in any way. I believe that animals deserve to live according to their own natures, without harm, abuse or exploitation.
Animal Rights Essay Research Paper Animal RightsNo
Animal Rights Essay, Research Paper Animal Rights No animal should be killed unless it is for food. None of the animals of this planet deserve to die. The only animal that can do bad is humans. Just because we think we rule the world this does not mean we are allowed to kill the creatures of the world we live in. Humans believe that they are the best of all animals, this is an extremely arrogant point of view.
Animal Rights 2 Essay Research Paper Animal
Animal Rights 2 Essay, Research Paper Animal Rights As Doctor Zola-Morgan stated in a speech to animal right activists, “I ve seen the impact of the animal rights movement. I believe this is an attack on science of the worst kind. If we allow it to prevail it will take us back to the dark ages.” Too much of the public has come to think of medical researchers as “tormenters rather than healers.” The good is overlooked and the bad is exploited.
An Argument For Animal Research Essay Research
Paper An Argument For Animal Research English 103 Paper #1 Animal Rights Medicine has come a very long way since the days when men used to puncture holes into the skull to release tension or evil spirits. In the last one
Mdeical Benifits Of Animal Testing Essay Research
Paper Argument Essay Where would we be Without Animal Testing? Is the use of animals in research justified? Should animal experimentation be permitted? Should these animals be liberated? A logical person would say the benefits justify the research. Without animal testing, products would be based on theory.