’s Theory Of Ideas Essay, Research Paper
ARISTOTLE’S REFUTATION OF PLATO’S THEORY OF IDEAS
ARGUMENTS FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
Aristotle refutes Plato’s Theory of Ideas on three basic grounds: that the
existence of Ideas contradicts itself by denying the possibility of
negations; that his illustrations of Ideas are merely empty metaphors; and
that they theory uses impermanent abstractions to create examples of
perception. Though the theory is meant to establish concrete standards for
the knowledge of reality, Aristotle considers it fraught with
inconsistencies and believes that the concept of reality depends upon all
forms’ correlations to other elements.
Ideas, Plato believes, are permanent, self-contained absolutes, which
answered to each item of exact knowledge attained through human thought.
Also, Ideas are in Plato’s view concrete standards by which all human
endeavor can be judged, for the hierarchy of all ideas leads to the highest
absolute – that of Good. In addition, the theory claims that states of
being are contingent upon the mingling of various Forms of existence, that
knowledge is objective and thus clearly more real, and that only the
processes of nature were valid entities.
However, Aristotle attacks this theory on the grounds that Plato’s
arguments are inconclusive either his assertions are not al all cogent.
Aristotle says, or his arguments lead to contradictory conclusions. For
example, Aristotle claims that Plato’s arguments lead one to conclude that
entities (such as anything man-made) and negations of concrete ideas could
exist – such as “non-good” in opposition to good. This contradicts Plato’s
own belief that only natural objects could serve as standards of knowledge.
Also, Aristotle refutes Plato’s belief that Ideas are perfect entities unto
themselves, independent of subjective human experience. Ideas, Aristotle
claims, are not abstractions on a proverbial pedestal but mere duplicates of
things witnessed in ordinary daily life. The Ideas of things, he says, are
not inherent to the objects in particular but created separately and placed
apart from the objects themselves. Thus, Aristotle says, Plato’s idea that
Ideas are perfect entities, intangible to subjective human experience, is
meaningless, for all standards are based somewhere in ordinary human
activity and perception.
Thirdly, Aristotle assails Plato’s efforts to find something common to
several similar objects at once, a perfect exemplar of the quality those
things share. Beauty is a perfect example; Plato considered Beauty both a
notion and an ideal, isolated by abstractions and fixed permanently while
its representatives fade away. Aristotle claims that abstractions like
Beauty cannot be cast as absolutes, independent of temporal human
experience; the Idea of Beauty changes with time and individual perceptions
and cannot (as Plato felt) exist forever as a concrete standard.
Plato and Aristotle reach some agreement, though, on the topic of reality.
Plato believes that all reality was derived from his Ideas (which themselves
dealt with concrete hierarchy of rational ideas.
St. Anselm, though, makes the most dogmatic and logically tortuous case for
God’s existence, relying not upon explanations of goodness, truth, or
rational order of ideas but upon an absurd argument. He claims that
everyone has some sense of God, and he claims that for one to deny God’s
existence is an invalid and contradictory assertion; therefore, God exists.
Also, Anselm believes that those capable of understanding God cannot believe
that he does not exist – as if the enormity of the idea was so clear than
only a fool could not perceive it.
His arguments seem the weakest of the four viewpoints here, for they are
riddled with dogma and assume that God is a constant – using faith alone.
Anselm considers faith paramount to logic or other forms of thought and asks
no questions as to what powers the universe or what goodness is – he
basically follows the Christian “party line” too closely to be valid.
In general, St. Augustine combines Plato’s idea of a moral hierarchy with
his own rational observations of truth and goodness being embodied in their
highest form by God. While Plato wavers on God’s superiority, Aristotle
views man as god’s pawn, and Anselm uses tortuous dogmatic logic,
Augustine’s arguments seem to make the most sense from not only a Christian
point of view but from a moral and rational one as well.
The philosophies of Plato, Aristotle, St. Augustine, and St. Anselm on the
existence of God all vary on the issue of God’s nature; though each thinker
takes a different approach to why there is a God, that of St. Augustine
seems the most valid because he takes a rational stance and does not
dogmatically assume God’s existence.
Plato’s philosophy assumes that God exists as a supremely good being whose
goodness is analogous to Plato’s concrete concept or the ultimate good.
However, God and goodness are not one and the same; Plato does not directly
state that goodness is good, but that God is good, since he exemplifies the
idea at the top of Plato’s hierarchy. In short, God does not equal
goodness, but God encompasses it better than any other being.
This implies not that God is perfect, but that God’s intentions and actions
have good aims – goodness may emerge from other sources besides God. The
main problem with Plato’s philosophy is his inconsistency; he owes the
existence of his Ideas to both God and goodness, but he claims the two are
not identical. God becomes subordinate to the “universals” in Plato’s
ordered cosmos, and his defense of God appears rather weak.
While Plato assumes God exists as the ultimately good (but not omnipotent)
being, Aristotle questions God’s active role in the universe and claims that
nature depends upon an immaterial Supreme Being. For example, he cites
natural genesis and the perpetuity of movement as evidence of God’s
immaterial existence, and he implies that God is a self-sufficient,
compelling force for both nature and man.
Aristotle’s concept of God seems valid as a pre-scientific explanation of
the universe; however, he seems to ignore God’s embodiment of moral goodness
and man’s ability to think and act freely and still be good. He believes
that all goodness comes from within God and that the goodness in man is
drawn toward God and nothing else. Aristotle’s ideas on God seem, from a
modern point of view, effective only as explanations of the supernatural and
even of the miracle of life.
St. Augustine links God with rational thought and states that human
knowledge of truth depends upon man’s relationship to God. His argument
moves him from existence of the self to the objectivity of truth and finally
to God’s reality. Augustine assumes that God is a rational being and that
the rational and the good are identical. Only God could be superior to
truth, he says, and therefore must be the ultimate good; therefore, truth,
goodness, and God are one and the same.
His argument seems fairly clear-eyed and rational, for he does not approach
God’s goodness dogmatically or automatically assume God’s existence.
Instead, he works toward that end by evaluation the rationality of truth and
goodness, and he casts God in that role as the ultimate embodiment of both.
In general, Augustine implies, God represents goodness and occupies the
pinnacle of the concept like unity and twoness). He considers unity and
goodness the combined center of his system of Ideas and stated that the
Ideas had to be more real and concrete than any objects of ordinary
experience. Aristotle, meanwhile, agreed with Plato’s notion that the
immaterial (form) and the material (matter) were distinctly separate
entities; however, he did not share Plato’s belief that all forms were
permanent, freestanding truths; he felt that form correlated to matter.
Ideas, he stated, correlated to something material and were thus changeable
and often dependent upon the observer.
In general, Aristotle refutes Plato on the grounds that his Theory of Ideas
tries too hard to establish concrete, universal definitions for things that
depend too much on the material. Though both thinkers agree on the
separation of the material and immaterial (which gave both a somewhat
similar view of God), they still differ sharply over the permanence of
standards by which human nature and endeavor can be judged.
Другие работы по теме:
The Allegory Of The Cave By Plato
Essay, Research Paper Plato was born 427 B.C. and died 347 B.C. He was a pupil under Socrates. During his studies, Plato wrote the Dialogues, which are a collection of Socrates’ teachings. One of the parables included in the Dialogues is “The Allegory of the Cave”. “The Allegory…” symbolizes man’s struggle to reach understanding and enlightenment.
Plato Essay Research Paper PlatoLIFEPlato was born
Plato Essay, Research Paper Plato LIFE Plato was born to an aristocratic family in athens, greece. When he was a child his father, Ariston, who was believed to be descended from the early kings of Athens died, and his mother, Perictione married Pyrilampes. As a young man Plato was always interested in political leadership and eventully became a disciple of Socrates.
PlatoS Biography Essay Research Paper Plato
Plato`S Biography Essay, Research Paper Plato’s LifeThere is an ancient story (very likely a true one) that Plato was originally named Aristocles, but acquired the nickname Plato (”broad” or “wide” in Greek) on account of his broad shoulders. Both of Plato’s parents were from distinguished aristocratic families.
Plato Essay Research Paper PLATOPlato was one
Plato Essay, Research Paper PLATO Plato was one of the greatest Philosophers in history. He came up with a process of dialectical thinking. This is a Process of thinking by dialogue, discussion, debate, or argument. In ancient Greece, the term was used literally.
PlatoS Five Dialogues And Descartes Six Meditations
Essay, Research Paper One of the odd yet interesting ideas that philosopher’s demand be debated is that of the true nature of the human being. Even though probably each philosopher has his own unique perception of the true nature of the human being, philosophers tend to share some of the same basic attributes in their definition.
Thomas Vs Moore Essay Research Paper Plato
Thomas Vs. Moore Essay, Research Paper Plato’s Republic and Thomas More’s Utopia have a relationship in that they both share an idea. These books both have the concept of an ideal society, although they do this for distinct reasons and they attain contrasted types of perfection. More describes Utopia as “the most civilized nation in the world”.
Plato Essay Research Paper Plato
Plato Essay, Research Paper Plato’s theory of knowledge is found in the Republic, particularly in his discussion of the image about the myth of the cave. Plato distinguishes between two levels of awareness:
Plato The Philosopher Essay Research Paper
“Plato the Philosopher” Plato was born in 427 BC and died in 347 BC. In his early life Plato was exposed to war service and political ambitions. However, he was never really sorrowful towards t
Plato And The Cave Essay Research Paper
Plato and the cave After reading Plato?s cave several times, I learned that every time I read it I gained a completely different interpretation. You can relate all of the different symbols to any aspect of life, and still have a clear understanding of what Plato is talking about. My first interpretation of the cave was, the world as the cave.
The Idea Of Form Essay Research Paper
Chapter three The Idea of Form Introduction Plato-when philosophy came of age: we can also encounter the first philosophical system. Philosophical system- fundamental idea or theory that is worked out for all aspects of experience. Plato’s Philosophy- reality, knowledge, ethics, art, religion, cosmetology etc.
Refutation Essay Research Paper Bridget King Basic
Refutation Essay, Research Paper Bridget King Basic Comp. Refutation Essay January 11, 2000 Sending Out an S.O.S On January 2nd, while I was perusing the Providence Journal I stumbled upon the editorial page. On the page was an article titled ? Imposing a Rescue Fee? which was written by an anonymous author.
The Apology Of Socrates Essay Research Paper
The Apology of Socrates,by Plato,is an important work of literature. Although written some two-thousand years ago,it shows us how our society is much like the one of Socrates.It shows how the equities and inequities of his time are like the one’s today.In reading the Apology of Socrates,one can learn how consistency can lead to equitableness.
Transmigration Of The Soul Plato
’s Theory Of Human Knowledge Essay, Research Paper Plato contended that all true knowledge is recollection. He stated that we all have innate knowledge that tells us about the things we experience in our world. This knowledge, Plato believed, was gained when the soul resided in the invisible realm, the realm of The Forms and The Good.
The Tempest Essay Research Paper Prospero
The Tempest Essay, Research Paper Prospero’s philosopher lacking Shakespeake’s Tempest is a window into his idea of a utopia. The island serves as a place much like that of Plato’s Republic and Moore’s Utopia. But, Prospero, the leader of Shakespeare’s Tempest is not the same philosopher king that both Moore and Plato wished to rule their respective societies.
Rebel Essay Research Paper For Judy lipstick
Rebel Essay, Research Paper For Judy, lipstick has both pleasurable and painful connotations. Her conflict with her father stems from her wearing it and his rejection of it. “He looks at me like I m the ugliest thing in the world,” she tells an officer. Her desire to get her father s attention with lipstick is characteristic of the Electra complex she has for him.
Poetics Essay Research Paper The subject of
Poetics Essay, Research Paper The subject of the Poetics is poetry, including epic poetry, tragedy and comedy. Unlike Plato, Aristotle regards poetry as a techne. The practice of poetry is governed by rules; these rules can be formulated and taught. Poetry is rationally comprehensible.
Plato Vs Aristotle Essay Research Paper How
Plato Vs. Aristotle Essay, Research Paper How do we explain the world around us? How can we get to the truth? Plato and Aristotle began the quest to find the answers thousands of years ago. Amazingly, all of philosophy since that time can be described as only a rehashing of the original argument between Plato and Aristotle.
Theory Of Recollection Essay Research Paper Plato
Theory Of Recollection Essay, Research Paper Plato has had a Theory of Recollection to explain our access of knowledge, that knowledge is from within, and not obtained through experience. The Theory of Recollection refers to the idea that recollection is like the soul, where it is maintained and never dying, therefore it constitutes the spiritual aspect of remembering.
Plato And Aristotle Essay Research Paper Nearly
Plato And Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Nearly all humans have the goal to live a virtuous and happy life. Two of the world most acknowledged philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, had their own views on this central issue. Plato supported the understanding view; he believed understanding is the key to living a virtuous life.
Plato The Stoics And The Epicureans Views
On Pleasure And Pain. Essay, Research Paper Plato?s believes that the body is nothing but constant distraction to the soul. The five senses, along with pleasure and pain are among the most distracting feature of the body because
The Republic By Plato Essay Research Paper
The Republic by Plato Throughout history, Plato has been conceived as one of the greatest philosophers of all time. His many theories have made us delve deep into our minds for new knowledge and understanding. He is looked up to by many all over the world in present day as well as in history. However, not even Plato is perfect.
Objections To Plato
’s Essay, Research Paper Objections to Plato s Three Parts of the Soul Plato s The Republic is perhaps the first and greatest works written about politics ever. This book, which was written more than 24 centuries ago, is very modern in the sense that it still makes people think the way it did in the 4th century B.C., and although the reader may not always agree with what Plato has to say, he does make some points like no philosopher after him ever will again.
Plato Vs Nietzche- The Nature Of
Good Essay, Research Paper Plato Vs. Nietzsche: The Nature of Good Plato and Nietzsche have opposing views on the nature of good. Plato, as demonstrated in the “The Cave” and “Apology,” believes that Good is absolute. This means that he is of the opinion that there is one perfect version of Good for all people, whether they are rich or poor, powerful or weak.
Greek Philosophers Socrates Plato And Aristotle Essay
, Research Paper Greek Philosophers Greek Philosophers Socrates, Plato and Aristotle had virtually the same beliefs about man’s relation to the State, although Plato’s political theory of the State was more rational
Plato Essay Research Paper There are many
Plato Essay, Research Paper There are many ways in which the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle have reached that of that of Saint Thomas Aquinas, due to the fact that Aristotle thought the world that we live in today is the ultimate reality. While Plato thought the world that we see every day is real but is not the ultimate reality.
Plato The Soul And The Theory Of
Forms Essay, Research Paper The Relationship Between Plato?s Theory of Forms and the Immortality of the Soul Preface In the Phaedo, Plato set out to show many things, including that the Soul is Immortal. Through the aid of the Theory of Forms Plato proved that the soul is immortal.
Socrates And Sophist Essay Research Paper Socrates
Socrates And Sophist Essay, Research Paper Socrates and Sophist Plato s Sophist is one of the only dialogues in which Socrates isn t the main character. This makes for an interesting question: why? Why would Plato stray from the norm of making his teacher the main focus of this dialogue? As I ve thought about this I ve come up with three possible explanations that may explain Plato s decision.
Nietzche Vs Socrates And Plato Essay Research
Paper Nietzsche s thoughts on finite differed dramatically from Socrates and Plato. Nietzsche believes that everyone should embrace the finite because you will enhance this life and make it more beautiful. He rejects the theory that eternity is of more importance than the present life. To Nietzsche, pursuing what you love to do is the only way to excellence.
Philosophies Of Socrates Plato And Aristotle Essay
, Research Paper Philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle The philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle had different points of-view but they were also similar in some ways. For example, all three
Socrates Vs Plato Essay Research Paper One
Socrates Vs. Plato Essay, Research Paper One of the areas of greatest disagreement between Plato and Socrates was on the issue of incontinence and how the idea manifests itself in people s lives. This was one of the first areas in which Plato made a point of disagreeing with his teacher. As a consequence he develops a very different theory of motivation as compared to Socrates.
Plato Vs Socrates Essay Research Paper Plato
Plato Vs Socrates Essay, Research Paper Plato vs SocratesPlato was one of the most influential and significant philosophers throughout the antient and modern world. Through his rich blood line and his years of studying under Socrates, Plato was able to develop various theories, such as the Theory of Knowledge and The Forms.
The Unjust Life Is More Profitable Than
The Just Life Essay, Research Paper “The Unjust Life Is The Most Profitable Life” Plato argues in his book the “Republic” that the just life is better that the unjust life. Although, Glaucon has legitimate arguments, Plato refutes them effectively by showing that the just life is better.
LAW Ceciro Plato Socrates St Thomas Essay
, Research Paper REVIEWING KEY CONCEPTS 1) Define natural and positive law. Identify the fundamental differences between the theories of natural and positive law. Give an example to illustrate each of these theories.