Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper
Euthanasia continues to be an extremely controversial issue in society, and there are many opposing viewpoints concerning this specific subject. The case of Sue Rodriguez versus the province of British Columbia, is one that demonstrates the high degree of debate over such a sensitive topic, as euthanasia. The following is an analytical examination of the case at hand, and a critical comparison of it, to the theories of Patrick Nowell-Smith. When relating the theories of Patrick Nowell -Smith to the case of Sue Rodriguez, it is evident that he would not agree with the judge?s final decision.
Firstly, it is necessary to discuss some of the relevant and significant points of the case. Sue Rodriguez is a mother in her forties, suffering from Lou Gehrig?s disease. Her life expectancy is several months, however her condition is deteriorating quickly. Soon, she will no longer be able to swallow, speak, walk or move, and she will require a respirator in order to breath. She will be bedridden. Sue Rodriguez is aware of her situation and knows that death is inevitable, however, she wishes to control her circumstances, and her time and manner of death. By the time Sue is no longer able to enjoy life, she will be physically unable to terminate her life with out assistance. Sue is not requesting that her death be caused by active euthanasia, which would be by means of a doctor physically ending her life with some form of injection. She is asking that a qualified medical physician set up a certain technological system that would allow her, if she chose to, end her life with her own hand. This is passive euthanasia, as it allows the victim herself to control the time and manner of her own death. The Criminal Code includes a section regarding the idea of suicide that the judge lays before her in an attempt to defy her wishes. Section 241 states that ?Every one who counsels a person to commit suicide or aids or abets someone to commit suicide, whether suicide ensues or not is guilty of an indictable offense and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years.? (Koggel, 5). Sue rebuts this argument be stating that the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms entails that ?everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principals of fundamental justice.? (Koggel, 5). Therefore if everyone has the right to life, than one must also be able to control his own life. Sue also says that by prohibiting her to end her own life, she is being deprived of both her liberty and her security.
There are several parallels of Sue Rodriguez?s arguments and the views of Patrick Nowell-Smith. When exploring these similarities, it is clear and manifest that they hold similar views about euthanasia, despite the fact that it might be for different reasons. Due to the fact that they agree that euthanasia should be allowed in certain cases, it is apparent that Nowell-Smith would disagree with the judge?s decision to deny Sue of her plea. Nowell- Smith states that we, as society, have the right to do anything we like providing that there are no good reasons for prohibiting what we do. Sue states that because the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that everyone deserves equal rights to life, liberty and security, that she should be able to make her own decisions regarding her life, providing that it is not threatening or having a detrimental effect on anyone else except herself. The type of euthanasia that Sue is requesting is both passive and voluntary, meaning that she has requested and consented to the decision for her to end her life. She is not asking that someone kill her, she is requesting that she would have the option to kill herself, and that nobody would prevent that. On the same scale, Nowell-Smith labels the right to life, a negative right, in that one?s right to life does impose on someone else the duty to not kill with out consent, but it also imposes no duty to keep one person alive. He states, similarly, that the right to die, means that one has the right to assert that neither the person who asks for assistance in death, nor the person who gives the help is committing a moral wrong. Sue does not necessarily want to face death, yet she wants to escape the pain and suffering that she faces in life. She is asking that, because of her painful situation, she be given the option to end her life, by means of discontinuing life saving procedures. It is clear that the opinions of Sue Rodriguez and Nowell-Smith are similar, and contrast with the decision of the court.
There are several reasons why Nowell-Smith would not agree with the judgement in the case. First and foremost, it is clear that Nowell-Smith agrees with euthanasia in most legitimate cases, and it is evident that the judge disagrees. Judge Sopinka focuses on the basic law principals of euthanasia and the fact that they must be followed. He believes that the preservation of human life is a basic value of society. His views are also influenced by the ?slippery slope? concept. This concept entails that if assisted suicide was legalized there is a risk that others will manipulate those persons with life threatening disabilities. Also that the decriminalization of this procedure might be altered from its original purpose and abused, in that it would be used to eliminate many who are a burden to others and society. Judge Sopinka holds strong on the protection of life idea; that life must be preserved at all costs. Nowell- Smith, opposes these views, as he argues in support of the legalization of euthanasia, and he states the significance of avoidance of suffering and moral autonomy principles. Nowell-Smith believes that what is often morally right is legally incorrect. He proves his statement when he refers it to the case of Mrs. Hough, who?s friend requested that she assist her in her suicide. She did so, and was consequently faced with nine months in prison, on a charge of second degree murder. Although the judge had sympathy for Mrs. Hough, he had to up hold the law. The judge obviously holds similar views to that of Judge Sopinka. Nowell-Smith brings into focus the fundamental principal of medical ethic. This has always been that the doctor should act in the best interest of his patients. Therefore, it is logical to say that if one is in proper mental condition to make a decision regarding their life, and the decision is to voluntarily and passively die, than that should be what the doctor acts on. He also argues that letting someone die, might fundamentally be worse than killing someone, because physically ending someone?s life might give him a quicker, less painful release. Nowell-Smith stresses the idea that a more liberal law is needed to alleviate the skepticism and inhumanity of our current laws. Sopinka, on the other hand, stresses the importance of laying down the laws that already exist. Nowell-Smith believes in the great importance of life, and the necessity to enjoy it to it?s full extent, yet he also supports the concept that when life has no more good to offer, death should be an option.
I certainly agree with the ideologies of Patrick Nowell-Smith. His arguments are justified, fair and legitimate. A person who is terminally ill and is suffering greatly should be able to make the decision if they should die. Life is meant to be enjoyed, and when someone is suffering from so much pain and helplessness, it is almost impossible to enjoy life. It would be much easier to see someone at rest, then to see someone have to endure and tolerate such strong discomfort. Many people have been so close to death, however the law prohibits them from putting an end to their life, and therefore ceasing the pain they are feeling. I also agree on his notion that active euthanasia might in fact be equal on a moral scale to passive euthanasia, pending certain cases. Stopping all forms of medication to an ill patient, so that they eventually die, might actually cause them to experience more pain than they would if they we killed by injection. I feel euthanasia laws should be modified and a person who is in a state that is only going to get worse should be allowed to request that he end his life. I can see the importance that it must be voluntary, however passive or active should remain his decision, depending on his situation. The Canadian Charter states that everyone should have equal rights in life, it therefore makes sense that they should be able to control their life too.
When examining the Sue Rodriguez case and comparing it with the theories of Patrick Nowell ?Smith it is apparent that Nowell-Smith argues for the legalization of euthanasia, thus Sue Rodriguez would agree with his views. It is also obvious that Nowell-Smith would disagree with the decisions of Judge Sopinka. Although Judge Sopinka showed empathy for Sue?s condition he strictly emphasized abiding the laws of euthanasia. In contrast, Nowell-Smith stressed the need for a vast change in both the laws and the moral understanding of euthanasia.
Другие работы по теме:
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia which comes
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia which comes from the Greek meaning of easy death is one of our societies highly debatable issues and the main reason for this argument is against active euthanasia, which is when a terminally ill patient is administered with a lethal drug or using other means to cause there death.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Is euthanasia the
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Is euthanasia the mercy killing of someone who is in extreme pain in order to end suffering, an immoral or amoral act? Simply put, it is an immoral act even though it is intended to help another person. It is assisting in killing another human being, and ending their existence.
Euthanasia Should Be Abolished Essay Research Paper
Euthanasia is the painless, intentional death of a person who is suffering. Euthanasia is wrong because it alters our natural way of survival, and upsets religous beliefs. By using euthanasia, ?miraculous? recoveries have been prevented. People think that the easy way out of their problems is by conducting euthanasia.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Assisted SuicideA great
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Assisted Suicide A great deal of debate surrounds the practice of assisted suicide. Lately, laws against voluntary euthanasia have been eased, although serious moral and legal questions still exist. Most opposition of assisted suicide comes from religious groups, including Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.
Argument Essay Research Paper Quantity vs QualityMany
Argument Essay, Research Paper Quantity vs. Quality Many people see death is a bad thing. People don t like it and they don t want to hear about it. For many seriously ill and vegetative patients, death is a good thing for them. Death will end their suffering from pains and they can also die with dignity. Euthanasia traditionally means a good death.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Jason Adams
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Jason Adams Adams1 October 15, 1998 Mrs. Faulk English Per.4Euthanasia Euthanasia should be legal, because if it is their life, therefore, they have the right to be able to end their suffering. Euthanasia was formerly called Mercy killing . Euthanasia means intentionally making someone decease rather then allowing that person to die naturally.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper In today
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper In today’s society, if you ask five people who Jack Kevorkian is then three or more would know who he is. The issue of euthanasia has been on the media’s forefront for several years. There are several pros and cons to this issue. Some of these pros are as follows: it would help to end pain and suffering, it allows a person to die with dignity, and it also helps the grieving process because the person knows when they are gonna die.
Euthanasia And Assisted Suicide Essay Research Paper
EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE In today’s society, euthanasia and assisted suicide is a major discussion. People, who are terminally ill or are depressed, are sometimes looking for a way out. They feel that their only hope is to kill themselves. Other people in the world feel that euthanasia and assisted suicide are morally wrong.
Euthanasia In Australia Essay Research Paper What
Euthanasia In Australia Essay, Research Paper What is it and how is it performed?Euthanasia is the practice of ending a life so as to release an individual from an incurable disease or intolerable suffering. The term is sometimes used generally to refer to an easy or painless death. Voluntary euthanasia involves a request by the dying patient or that person’s legal representative.
Legalizing Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Legalizing euthanasia
Legalizing Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Legalizing euthanasia in the United States gives rights to the people. Rights to those who endure the irrefutable agony of pain and suffering, rights to those who want to be cured of their pain, and rights to those that struggle to end their suffering. Euthanasia is the answer to end their suffering.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaEuthanasia is just
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Euthanasia is just another word for ?mercy killing? as some people put it but it also means good death. I look at it as more of a good death if it is performed with the right procedures and if a person has a legitimate reason to be put to death but many people would not agree with me that it should be legal.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia killing life
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia- killing life painlessly to end suffering, mercy killing. This pratice was traced back as far as the Greek and Roman times. As time passed religion increased and life was viewed as sacred. All forms of Euthanasia was/is now considered wrong. In the year of 1935 a group of doctors formed the first Voluntary Euthanasia Society in London.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Retired professor and
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Retired professor and psychoanalyst Ernest Van den Haag, by defending the right to commit suicide, made an appeal to J.S. Mill?s principle. Van den Haag said that people should have the right to choose as they please, as long as no one else is hurt (Hallock 13). According to the constitution, people have the right to decide death, not the government (Dority 8).
Euthenasia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia
Euthenasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Euthanasia has become an issue of increasing attention. Euthanasia should be legalized so, if we ever have a loved one that is suffering and death is certain, that we have the choice to ease their pain if they want. Those who are against euthanasia argue that the doctors must always be on the side of preserving life.
Euthansia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia has been
Euthansia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia has been a popular topic nowadays, but not many peo0le may know about this subject in depth. In my opinion, Dr. Philip?s idea is good as it can help the elderly people to get more information about different methods of euthanasia. As euthanasia is a new issue that came up recently, most elderly people may not know much about it.
Euthanasia People Should Have The Right To
Choose Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia: People Should Have the Right to Choose There are many sides to the dilemma of whether or not euthanasia should be carried out. There is the question of morality, the question of active
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaEuthanasia has brought
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Euthanasia has brought great attention to the public eye since Dr. Jack Kevorkian was discovered for contributing to these horrible inhumane acts. At the present time, the state of Oregon has the world’s only law specifically permitting a doctor to prescribe lethal drugs for the purpose of ending a patient’s life (iaetf/faq.htm).
The Controversy Over Euthanasia Essay Research Paper
The controversy over euthanasia is based on the same ethical and social platform from which the debates for abortion and capitol punishment stem. These social dilemmas all revolve around the sanctity of life and how far government can go in making choices involving individual rights. Although the debate over euthanasia is just heating up in the American judicial system, the practice of assisted suicide has been around for centuries, Modern advances in medicine and technology have helped doctors in prolonging life.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaEuthanasia may be
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Euthanasia may be defined as taking your own/someone’s life because it is inevitable that he/she/you will die because of some painful terminal illness. Some may see it as murder/suicide and others may see it as a way out, the best thing to do. Like abortion, it is very hard for me to take an “it is right/wrong” philosophical position, because situations vary from person to person.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EUTHANASIA When most
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper EUTHANASIA When most people think of euthanasia, they think merely of death. Death usually has a negative connotation to it although often times it may be beneficial. This understanding is fundamental to euthanasia. The roots words for euthanasia, eu and thantos, mean good and death respectively (Humphrey Dying With Dignity 80).
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaVoluntary euthanasia is
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Voluntary euthanasia is a very contentious issue in today?s society. This is where a terminally ill patient?s life is ended at their request. The law allows doctors to withdraw treatment or administer high doses of pain-relieving drugs even though they expect this will result in death.
Eutahnasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaEuthanasia is an
Eutahnasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Euthanasia is an issue that has been debated on many occasions. Both ethical and political questions have been raised. It is the one issue that can touch anyone, even politicians. Euthanasia is an issue that is controversial from all sides and is such a deeply felt issue across society.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia may be
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia may be defined as the action of killing an individual for reasons consideredmerciful. Euthanasia can be asserted many different ways. A family member, a friend, or aphysician could do the killing. The individual may die from the result of omitting life-savingdevices, such as respirators, from omitting life-saving medicines, or from being prescribed drugsthat would induce their death.
Euthenasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaImmoral or Human
Euthenasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Immoral or Human Right? Recent debates over active euthanasia, “killing” a terminally ill patient, in Holland, has risen the question whether euthanasia is immoral or a simple human right. Doctors seem to have no doubt. They made an oath.
Euthansia Article Analysis And Opinion Essay Research
Paper Euthanasia is the help with a death and is also known as ?mercy killing?. There are two types of Euthanasia: Active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. There is also active voluntary euthanasia and active involuntary euthanasia. Euthanasia is illegal in all states but Oregon, who passed a bill making it legal in 1994 under certain circumstances.
Euthanasia Today Essay Research Paper Euthanasia has
Euthanasia Today Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia has been, and always will be, a controversial moral and ethical subject. While the majority of both Americans and Canadians seem to support euthanasia as indicated by the latest polls, it is still illegal in both countries. I think it is important to first distinguish between passive euthanasia and active euthanasia.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia should not
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia should not be made legally acceptable in the present society because there are important aspects that need to be considered and handled concerning who?s to decide, extent to which a physician can practice medicine, and religious opposition to this practice.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EUTHANASIAEuthanasiaRenaldo La FoucadeEducation
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper EUTHANASIA Euthanasia Renaldo La Foucade Education of America University Euthanasia Euthanasia Euthanasia is a topic that provokes as much controversy as capital punishment, primarily because it is irreversible. The question of euthanasia being right or wrong is one that most would prefer left alone.
Euthanasia Pro Con Catholic View Essay Research Paper Some
Euthanasia Pro+Con+Catholic View Essay, Research Paper Some have suggested that we legalize physician-assisted suicide in California. They argue that we should find death before it finds us, and that the right to die is the right-to-choose. They are supporting such an initiative because they fear that they will have to endure horrible pain and live out a life encompassed by absolute suffering.
Brief Look At Euthanasia Essay Research Paper 2
Brief Look At Euthanasia- Essay, Research Paper Brief Look at Euthanasia- Euthanasia is one of the most acute and uncomfortable contemporary problems in medical ethics. Is Euthanasia Ethical? The