Epistemology Essay, Research Paper
Plato’s View in Human Knowledge
Plato presents three different views about knowledge in Meno, Republic, and Theaetetus. In Meno’s case, Plato believes knowledge as something innate in us when we are born; in his later view, in Republic, Plato believes we perceive things and gain knowledge; and from the last view, in Theaetus, Plato believes knowledge is the combination of a true opinion and a rational opinion. Strangely enough, Plato’s views in Meno, Republic, and Theaetetus are similar, regarding the characteristics of knowledge. Despite that, Plato’s views in Meno, Republic, and Theaetetus have different degrees of weakness in developing his argument about knowledge.
The concrete characteristics of knowledge of Plato’s views in Meno, Republic, and Theaetetus are similar. According to Ron’s Palace,
there are two essential characteristics of the soul. First, knowledge must be certain and infallible. Second, knowledge must have as its object that which is genuinely real as contrasted with that which is an appearance only. Because that which is fully real must, for Plato, be fixed, permanent, and unchanging, he identified the real with the ideal realm of being as opposed to the physical world of becoming (Internet).
Before we are born, our souls stay in the in invisible world and saw all the “Forms” of all things. The “Form”, according to Plato, is eternal, unchanging, and universal. In the dialogue between Socrates and Meno (slave boy), according to Moser’s book, Socrates mentions that
his soul must remain always possessed of this knowledge…. And if the truth of all things always exists in the soul, then the soul is immortal….and try to discover by recollection what you do not now know, or rather what you do not remember (Plato 42).
The knowledge alreadily has existed in us when we are born. By absorbing the information from the visible world into our minds, we then remember what we have forgotten in our previous existence. Since the knowledge in us is from the eternal and unchanging “Form”, the knowledge in us is unchanging and eternal. In similar to Plato’s view in Meno, Plato’s view in Republic has two categories of knowledge. He says “there are two ruling powers, and that one of them is set over the intellectual world, the other over the visible” (Plato 47). On that account, the knowledge we have is from both our perception and our intellectual world. What we perceive is not true and that is not knowledge. When we perceive something that comes in a pattern and has a principle, our reason will process into hypothesis by opinion and our soul will recognize that by reason (Plato 48). Mathematical formulas can be good examples in this argument because mathematical formulas are eternal and unchanging. For instance, before we recognize that “a?+b?=c?” as a hypothesis, we must have had experience of measuring a physical right triangle in order to make sure that hypothesis becomes true at all time. When the hypothesis is true, it then becomes knowledge. That is the procedure of the intellectual world. The intellectual world that is our knowledge is eternal and unchanging. In a similar way, the view in Theaetetus’s case, Plato believes that some true opinions or beliefs can be knowledge. In Theaetetus, Plato thinks knowledge is “right opinion with rational definition or explanation” (Plato 60). For instance, when we hold a true opinion about a right triangle formula, we need to justify that true opinion by our rationality; we know that it becomes knowledge if that formula works with all cases. As a result, that knowledge is unchanging and eternal and knowledge timelessly exists.
The difference of knowledge in Meno, Republic, and Theaetetus is the degree of weaknesses in developing the argument of finding out what knowledge is. In Meno case, Plato proves his recollection argument by constantly asking questions and explaining geometrical space of a square to a slave, Meno, who has no mathematical background whatsoever. In a mean while Plato thinks, “There is no teaching, but only recollection” (Plato 39). With a series of simple geometrical diagrams and questions from Socrates, Plato asks Meno is able to make basic conclusion of each question. The method proves that Meno “must have had and learned” the notions “at some other times” (Plato 42). In other words, Meno knowledge can be recollected and learned by “putting questions to him” (Plato 42) and Plato states that our soul “must remain possessed …knowledge” (Plato 42). The idea of what we know about knowledge is too general which is hard to define knowledge; thus, that is the weakness of Plato’s view in Meno’s case. In distinction to Meno’s case, in the Republic Plato develops a narrower conception of knowledge. Plato believes that the knowledge and perception are the same because “the soul perceives and understands” (Plato 46). When we perceive things by our senses we achieve knowledge; so each of our senses uniquely functions in its own nature. For instance, the object, such as color, belongs to the faculty of sight by the light (Plato 46). According to Jowett, “general ideas are perceived by the mind alone without the help of the senses” (246); “The senses perceive objects of sense, but the mind alone can compare them” and “sensations are given at birth, but truth and being, which are essential to knowledge, are acquired by reflection later on” (247). That is the weakness of this argument in Plato’s view in; we do not gain knowledge unless we think and rationalize. However, in Theaetetus’s case, Plato proposes a different aspect of knowledge as a true opinion or belief and a rational explanation (Plato 60). This view is more abstract than the other two earlier views of Plato on knowledge; as a matter of fact, it attacks two earlier views of Plato in Meno and Republic as the development of the theory of knowledge persists. As this argument continues, Plato believes that “knowledge is true opinion” (Plato 50) on the first move. A true opinion or belief cannot be equivalent to a true belief in a persuasive case in court. For instance, in a jury trial, the juror believes that the defendant is guilty from the attorney’s argument rather than seeing the concrete evidence (Plato 60). In this case, true opinion is not always knowledge; that is why this argument is weak. Furthermore, when there is a true opinion, there is also a false opinion that is not knowledge. In the case of “5+7=11”, “5+7” is the object of opinion and “=11” is not a false opinion which “is impossible… in the sphere of knowledge” (Jowett 249) but it is erring by “a confusion of thought and sense” (Plato 56). A true opinion must be what is the case and the object of the opinion must exist. Moreover, “the differences in the kinds and degrees of knowledge depend on the extent and the qualities of the wax” (Jowett 258). Therefore, it is agreeable that some true opinions can be knowledge. As Plato approaches to his final move on his argument, he explains
in the first place, the meaning may be, manifesting one’s thought by the voice with verbs and nouns, imaging an opinion in the stream which flows from the lips, as in a mirror or water. Does not this appear to you to be one kind of explanation (Plato 61).
Plato thinks that explanation is “the reflection of thought in speech.-But this is not peculiar to those who know” and “the enumeration of the parts of a thing” (Jowett 275). The weakness is that it is possible for “enumerations of parts without knowledge” (Jowett 276). Nonetheless, this weakness in Theaetetus’s case is not that bad comparing to other two cases (Meno and Republic) in terms of different degrees of weakness in the development of knowledge theory.
Plato’s late view in Theaetus is superior to all of his early views in Meno and Republic. In Meno, Plato’s view falls short on his argument of recollection because this visible world has nothing to do with the invisible world. If there were another world beside our world, it would have nothing to do with our knowledge. In a sense, if we need measure how much knowledge we, we can hardly tell our knowledge at certain degree when situations may arise to us case by case because every case is not the same. For almost the same thing in Meno’s case, in Republic, Plato’s view is insufficient; our senses cannot give us knowledge when we hear people speaking different languages that we have never learned and when we see magicians performing illusions. In these cases, we do not understand what people are talking about in foreign languages and the illusions deceive our eyes; as a result, our senses and perceptions do not give us knowledge. On the other hand, Plato’s view in Theaetetus is stronger as we see in our world today. A true opinion can be understood as a hypotheses; a rational explanation is the experiment of the hypothesis. When a hypothesis matches with a rational explanation, a large possibility that it can become theory. When we know the theory and we can explain it, then we have knowledge. This argument in Theaetetus has less weakness than other arguments in his earlier views (Meno and Republic). Likewise, we can be sure how much we know at least in a certain degree. For instance, if we take a math test, we can measure how many principles, theories, and formulas we have learned. For that reason, Theaetetus is more concrete than other two earlier views although Socrates is not satisfied at all with Plato’s views in Meno, Republic and Theatetus about the definition of knowledge.
After comparing and contrast Plato’s views in Meno, Republic, and Theaetetus, I find that the similarity is the uniqueness of knowledge in Plato’s argument. I also find that the differences are the degree of weaknesses of each of his view. I think Plato presents a strong argument on we define knowledge. In Theaetetus’s case, realistically we can tell that we have some degrees of knowledge by having tests; I think this argument is the best. This definition of knowledge, I think, can apply to our world today. Most importantly, knowledge is involved not only in what we learn, but also in what interpret and process from what we learn in our mind.
4d0
Jowett, B. The Dialogues of Plato Translated into English with Analyses and
Introductions. New York: MacMillan and Co, 1892.
Plato. “Meno.” “Republic.” and “Theatetus.” Eds. Paul K. Moser and Arnold vander
Nat. Human Knowledge Classical and Contemporary Approaches. New York:
Oxford University Press 1995.
“Ron’s Palace.” Feb 13 2000.
Другие работы по теме:
The Allegory Of The Cave By Plato
Essay, Research Paper Plato was born 427 B.C. and died 347 B.C. He was a pupil under Socrates. During his studies, Plato wrote the Dialogues, which are a collection of Socrates’ teachings. One of the parables included in the Dialogues is “The Allegory of the Cave”. “The Allegory…” symbolizes man’s struggle to reach understanding and enlightenment.
Plato Essay Research Paper PlatoLIFEPlato was born
Plato Essay, Research Paper Plato LIFE Plato was born to an aristocratic family in athens, greece. When he was a child his father, Ariston, who was believed to be descended from the early kings of Athens died, and his mother, Perictione married Pyrilampes. As a young man Plato was always interested in political leadership and eventully became a disciple of Socrates.
PlatoS Biography Essay Research Paper Plato
Plato`S Biography Essay, Research Paper Plato’s LifeThere is an ancient story (very likely a true one) that Plato was originally named Aristocles, but acquired the nickname Plato (”broad” or “wide” in Greek) on account of his broad shoulders. Both of Plato’s parents were from distinguished aristocratic families.
Plato Essay Research Paper PLATOPlato was one
Plato Essay, Research Paper PLATO Plato was one of the greatest Philosophers in history. He came up with a process of dialectical thinking. This is a Process of thinking by dialogue, discussion, debate, or argument. In ancient Greece, the term was used literally.
Thomas Vs Moore Essay Research Paper Plato
Thomas Vs. Moore Essay, Research Paper Plato’s Republic and Thomas More’s Utopia have a relationship in that they both share an idea. These books both have the concept of an ideal society, although they do this for distinct reasons and they attain contrasted types of perfection. More describes Utopia as “the most civilized nation in the world”.
Aristotle 2 Essay Research Paper Aristotle s
Aristotle 2 Essay, Research Paper Aristotle s Life Aristotle (384-322 BC) was a Greek philosopher, educator, and scientist, and was also one of the most influential thinkers in Western culture (World Book 663). Through his writings, Aristotle considered, summarized, criticized, and helped to further develop many of these traditions from which he had learned from Plato, his teacher.
Plato Essay Research Paper Plato
Plato Essay, Research Paper Plato’s theory of knowledge is found in the Republic, particularly in his discussion of the image about the myth of the cave. Plato distinguishes between two levels of awareness:
Plato The Philosopher Essay Research Paper
“Plato the Philosopher” Plato was born in 427 BC and died in 347 BC. In his early life Plato was exposed to war service and political ambitions. However, he was never really sorrowful towards t
The Idea Of Form Essay Research Paper
Chapter three The Idea of Form Introduction Plato-when philosophy came of age: we can also encounter the first philosophical system. Philosophical system- fundamental idea or theory that is worked out for all aspects of experience. Plato’s Philosophy- reality, knowledge, ethics, art, religion, cosmetology etc.
Epistemology Essay Research Paper Epistemology is the
Epistemology Essay, Research Paper Epistemology is the nature of knowledge. Knowledge is important when considering what is reality and what is deception. The movie “The Matrix” displays a social deception in which Neo, the main character, is caught between what he thought was once reality and a whole new world that controls everything he thought was real.
Epistemology
– Plato Vs Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Epistemology Plato vs. Aristotle In Republic, Plato defines the ideal government to be one that is set up and run by a philosopher king. This person, having a completely just soul, would be able to organize and run a government that was also completely just. Aristotle also believes that this monarchy run by the perfect ruler that Plato describes would be ideal, if it were possible.
The Apology Essay Research Paper The ApologyIn
The Apology Essay, Research Paper The Apology In The Apology by Plato, Socrates was giving his testimony before he was forced to commit suicide. He was trying to prove that death is better than living without one?s beliefs. He believed that he was innocent, going to a better place, and he was going to die anyway.
Transmigration Of The Soul Plato
’s Theory Of Human Knowledge Essay, Research Paper Plato contended that all true knowledge is recollection. He stated that we all have innate knowledge that tells us about the things we experience in our world. This knowledge, Plato believed, was gained when the soul resided in the invisible realm, the realm of The Forms and The Good.
The Tempest Essay Research Paper Prospero
The Tempest Essay, Research Paper Prospero’s philosopher lacking Shakespeake’s Tempest is a window into his idea of a utopia. The island serves as a place much like that of Plato’s Republic and Moore’s Utopia. But, Prospero, the leader of Shakespeare’s Tempest is not the same philosopher king that both Moore and Plato wished to rule their respective societies.
Rebel Essay Research Paper For Judy lipstick
Rebel Essay, Research Paper For Judy, lipstick has both pleasurable and painful connotations. Her conflict with her father stems from her wearing it and his rejection of it. “He looks at me like I m the ugliest thing in the world,” she tells an officer. Her desire to get her father s attention with lipstick is characteristic of the Electra complex she has for him.
St Augustine Confessions Essay Research Paper Saint
St. Augustine Confessions Essay, Research Paper Saint Augustine s Confessions Saint Augustine was believed to be the Christian Plato. He describes Plato with the adulation of an admirer and follower. He achieved most of his knowledge through the interpretations of the immensely popular neo-Platonists.
The Allegory Of The
Cave Essay, Research Paper The Allegory of the Cave Plato gives rise to an interesting thought in The Allegory of the Cave . He suggest that people are to trusting in an unreliable society. Though he wrote this many years ago, it still applies today. It is ironic that people are willing to believe what the are told to be true, rather than search for the actual truth.
Metaphysis Essay Research Paper Hello I
Metaphysis Essay, Research Paper : Hello: : I need help, I have somes question would help me. 1. do the criticisms that hume makes of Design Arguments all apply to Thomas’ Teleological Argument?
Poetics Essay Research Paper The subject of
Poetics Essay, Research Paper The subject of the Poetics is poetry, including epic poetry, tragedy and comedy. Unlike Plato, Aristotle regards poetry as a techne. The practice of poetry is governed by rules; these rules can be formulated and taught. Poetry is rationally comprehensible.
Plato Vs Aristotle Essay Research Paper How
Plato Vs. Aristotle Essay, Research Paper How do we explain the world around us? How can we get to the truth? Plato and Aristotle began the quest to find the answers thousands of years ago. Amazingly, all of philosophy since that time can be described as only a rehashing of the original argument between Plato and Aristotle.
Theory Of Recollection Essay Research Paper Plato
Theory Of Recollection Essay, Research Paper Plato has had a Theory of Recollection to explain our access of knowledge, that knowledge is from within, and not obtained through experience. The Theory of Recollection refers to the idea that recollection is like the soul, where it is maintained and never dying, therefore it constitutes the spiritual aspect of remembering.
Plato And Aristotle Essay Research Paper Nearly
Plato And Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Nearly all humans have the goal to live a virtuous and happy life. Two of the world most acknowledged philosophers, Plato and Aristotle, had their own views on this central issue. Plato supported the understanding view; he believed understanding is the key to living a virtuous life.
Plato The Stoics And The Epicureans Views
On Pleasure And Pain. Essay, Research Paper Plato?s believes that the body is nothing but constant distraction to the soul. The five senses, along with pleasure and pain are among the most distracting feature of the body because
The Republic By Plato 427
– 347 B.C.) Essay, Research Paper The Republic is one of the foundational writings of Western philosophy and civilization. We see Platonic thought and Socratic methodology still vitally evolving in today’s world. Dialectic
Atlantis Essay Research Paper Atlantis was known
Atlantis Essay, Research Paper Atlantis was known as the lost continent. It was said to be the size of Europe. Many people said that Atlantis existed during the time of the Stone Age, which was about nine thousand years ago. Plato, a popular Greek philosopher wrote a lot about Atlantis, it s inhabitants, it s geography, and it s theories on its destruction.
Plato Vs Nietzche- The Nature Of
Good Essay, Research Paper Plato Vs. Nietzsche: The Nature of Good Plato and Nietzsche have opposing views on the nature of good. Plato, as demonstrated in the “The Cave” and “Apology,” believes that Good is absolute. This means that he is of the opinion that there is one perfect version of Good for all people, whether they are rich or poor, powerful or weak.
Plato Essay Research Paper There are many
Plato Essay, Research Paper There are many ways in which the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle have reached that of that of Saint Thomas Aquinas, due to the fact that Aristotle thought the world that we live in today is the ultimate reality. While Plato thought the world that we see every day is real but is not the ultimate reality.
Socrates And Sophist Essay Research Paper Socrates
Socrates And Sophist Essay, Research Paper Socrates and Sophist Plato s Sophist is one of the only dialogues in which Socrates isn t the main character. This makes for an interesting question: why? Why would Plato stray from the norm of making his teacher the main focus of this dialogue? As I ve thought about this I ve come up with three possible explanations that may explain Plato s decision.
Nietzche Vs Socrates And Plato Essay Research
Paper Nietzsche s thoughts on finite differed dramatically from Socrates and Plato. Nietzsche believes that everyone should embrace the finite because you will enhance this life and make it more beautiful. He rejects the theory that eternity is of more importance than the present life. To Nietzsche, pursuing what you love to do is the only way to excellence.
Philosophies Of Socrates Plato And Aristotle Essay
, Research Paper Philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle The philosophies of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle had different points of-view but they were also similar in some ways. For example, all three
Socrates Vs Plato Essay Research Paper One
Socrates Vs. Plato Essay, Research Paper One of the areas of greatest disagreement between Plato and Socrates was on the issue of incontinence and how the idea manifests itself in people s lives. This was one of the first areas in which Plato made a point of disagreeing with his teacher. As a consequence he develops a very different theory of motivation as compared to Socrates.
Plato Vs Socrates Essay Research Paper Plato
Plato Vs Socrates Essay, Research Paper Plato vs SocratesPlato was one of the most influential and significant philosophers throughout the antient and modern world. Through his rich blood line and his years of studying under Socrates, Plato was able to develop various theories, such as the Theory of Knowledge and The Forms.
LAW Ceciro Plato Socrates St Thomas Essay
, Research Paper REVIEWING KEY CONCEPTS 1) Define natural and positive law. Identify the fundamental differences between the theories of natural and positive law. Give an example to illustrate each of these theories.