’s The American Political Tradition Essay, Research Paper
Richard Hofstadter’s The American Political Tradition, like all
his other
writings, was greatly influenced by the ideology of the time period in which
he
wrote. The book was written at a time when progressive ideas were the most
prevalent school of thought. Hofstadter was part of a growing number of
writers
who challenged these self-glorifying ideas. In the mid-thirties America had
lost
practically all critical content in favor of a “resurgence of American
cultural
chauvinism, a tiresome celebration of the American past.” This mentality
was
partially fueled by the New Deal , where the government helped pull the
country
out of The Depression. The emergence of Communism also played a big role.
There was a strong reaction to those who believed that communism should
become the new Americanism. Suddenly anti-American thought and critical
writing gave way to a “literature of hero worship” and “national self-
congratulation.” This reaction to communism caused many Americans to rally
behind democracy, becoming more patriotic and less critical of American
history,
its heroes and their flaws. Going against the fashion, Hofstadter wrote true
to his
own philosophy that “American political heroes are not saints in plaster but
live
and vulnerable figures of controversy.”
Much of Hofstadter’s early writing was influenced by Marxism as an
intellectual alternative to capitalism. Although not a supporter of Stalin,
he did
agree with the Marxist economic interpretation of history. He did not,
however,
buy into the whole cultural transformation. It is these early roots in
Marxist
ideology that also contribute to Hofstadter’s critical eye on American
history.
These Marxist ideas inspired a desire to find flaws in the American political
system and its key figures. “The Partisan Review” was one such magazine
which expressed this ideology. Although Marxist in intellectual approach,
“The
Partisan Review” was anti-Stalinist in its politics. This magazine most
efficiently
criticized the new “American Renaissance,” as they called it. Both The
American
Political Tradition and the “Partisan review” focus on American traditions,
but
instead of praising them, they criticized their inadequacies.
Hofstadter’s critical approach to writing affected practically
everything he
wrote. Hofstadter is almost always writing to criticize the progressive
Historians
as much as or more than the subject matter he is writing about. In The
American
Political Tradition, every chapter is filled with his criticism. In the case
of Wendell
Phillips the criticism is not so much directed at Phillips, but actually
aimed
towards the progressive historian’s negative opinion of him. Hofstadter’s
anti-
progressive ideology and cynical approach is evident in his writings on
Abraham
Lincoln, Wendell Phillips, and the spoilsmen.
Abraham Lincoln, despite the fact that he is considered to have
been
one of the greatest, if not the greatest president of The United State, was
not free
of Hofstadter’s critique. This is evident right in the beginning of the
chapter,
when looking at the chapter title, ” Abraham Lincoln and the Self- Made
Myth.” A
myth implies something false. For America, the legends of Abe Lincoln’s
humble
beginnings and rail splitting are all part of his hero status. Hofstadter’s
tone in his
writing as well as his words reveal Lincoln the politician, using his past
for
political gain. Hofstadter also points out, how brief these humble beginnings
were, and how rapidly Lincoln actually rose. Hofstadter by no means believed
that Lincoln was a bad president, he just felt that Lincoln’s sparkling clean
hero
image was a little extreme. Because of the fact that to many Americans
Lincoln
personified the American dream, progressive historians overlooked Lincoln’s
flaws and exaggerated his good qualities. Hofstadter sensed this and
therefore
he made sure he included every minor shortcoming that was ignored by others
in
an effort to polish Lincoln’s heroic status. Throughout the chapter one can
find
Lincoln’s character flaws such as his physical laziness and his political
obsession. Hofstadter is quick to display insults, quoting William Herndon
when
he states, “How are you going to make a great lawyer out of Lincoln? His
soul
was afire with its own ambition and that was not law.” By being so critical
Hofstadter was not trying to be cruel but rather he was attempting to show
America the reality that even the distinguished figures in American history
are
human and therefore imperfect.
The chapter on Wendell Phillips is another chapter that
demonstrates
Hofstadter’s critical writing approach. The difference is that in this
chapter,
Hofstadter is praising the subject and criticizing Phillip’s critics. This
chapter,
entitled “Wendell Phillips: The Patrician as an Agitator,” is unique in that
it is the
only chapter which is written about a non-politician. Phillips was an
agitator but
never ran for any office. This raises two important questions: Why then does
Hofstadter included Wendell Phillips in his book on American politics? Also,
why
does Hofstadter praise Phillips instead of criticize? The answer lies in the
fact
that Phillips was a key subject of negative criticism by progressives.
Hofstadter,
in regard to progressive Historians’ opinion of Phillips, states, “Finding
him useful
chiefly as a foil to Abraham Lincoln, historians have stereotyped him as the
wrongheaded radical of the Civil War crisis.”2 Hofstadter disagreed
completely
with their opinion of Phillips. Hofstadter states that these historians ”
who have
been indulgent with men who exaggerated because they wanted to be elected
have been extremely severe with men who exaggerated because they wanted to
free slaves.”2 The general historical opinion of Phillips angered Hofstadter
enough to include a chapter in a book on politics on a non-politician. In
order to
defend Phillips and insult his critics Hofstadter aggressively states,
“Phillips was
in some ways more sophisticated than those who condemn him. Certainly he
had attained a higher level of intellectual self-awareness.”2 This chapter
on
Wendell Phillips, while not critical to his study of American politics, is
very
important in that it demonstrates that Hofstadter’s purpose in writing The
American Political Tradition was more to denounce the progressive ideology
and
less to criticize the actual figures and systems in American political
history.
Hofstadter’s cynical and anti-progressive approach is also
evident when
he writes his chapter entitled, “The Spoilsmen: An Age of Cynicism.” When
most
historians of Hofstadter’s times were praising the wealthy entrepreneurs for
demonstrating how great the American economic system was, Hofstadter went
the other direction. He pointed out the corruption which filled the Nation
when
economical powerhouses take control of politics. Hofstadter believed that
this is
truly what had happened and was very critical of a time period which some
historians see as a great time in American past. Hofstadter emphasizes the
corruption when he states, “In business and in politics the captains of
industry did
their work boldly, blandly , and cynically. Exploiting workers and milking
farmers,
bribing Congressmen, buying legislatures, spying upon competitors, hiring
armed
guards .they made a mockery of the simple gentry who imagined that the
nation’s development could place dignity and restraint under the regime of
laissez-faire.”2 Hofstadter writes this way in order to show the dark side of
the
American industrial revolution. He made sure it was known that this time
period
politically and economically was certainly not as glamorous as many
historians
made it out to be.
Throughout his book, The American Political tradition, Richard
Hofstadter
is constantly being cynical and critical. Critical, that is, not necessarily
of the
subject matter he is writing about, but of the progressive ideology.
Hofstadter
was in disagreement with the what most historians at the time were writing
about.
Hofstadter would criticize when other historians would praise and vice versa.
Hofstadter would realistically write about history even if it meant
tarnishing the
reputation of American historical heroes. His basis for this thinking was
greatly
influenced by Marxism and other factors. Hofstadter’s anti-progressive
approach
was clearly demonstrated in his chapter’s on Abraham Lincoln, where he
pointed
out that the American hero was not without flaws, Wendell Phillips, where he
criticized Phillip’s critics, and The Spoilsmen, in which he revealed the
harsh
reality of industrialization and its effect on politics and the economy.
Hofstadter
was part of a cynical undertow in a wave of progressive writing. The American
Political Tradition is a very satisfying contradiction to all the hero
praising,
progressive historical writings of its time.
372
Другие работы по теме:
Analysis Of Richard Iii Essay Research Paper
Analysis of Richard III In Richard III, Shakespeare invites us on moral holiday. The early part of the play draws its readers to identify with Richard and thereby to participate in a
Richard The Iii Essay Research Paper Richard
Richard The Iii Essay, Research Paper Richard the III In the play, Richard the III, by William Shakespeare, the character Richard (Duke of Gloucester) is a very manipulative and deceiving person. Richard acts like this in order to fulfill his dream to become King. And since he is at the bottom of a long, long list to be King, he has a lot of people to deceive.
Theodore Roosevelt And Woodrow Wilson Essay Research
Paper Woodrow Wilson and Theodore Roosevelt s brand of conservatism were very similar. Wilson and Roosevelt were of socially secure background, even though, Wilson did go through a time of poverty and frustration. Theodore Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson both favored a laissez-faire style of government, although Wilson disliked the idea of a laissez-faire government at the beginning of his political career.
Richard II Essay Research Paper The problem
Richard II Essay, Research Paper The problem with Richard is that he is not really a man of action; he confronts and deals with difficulties by internalising and talking about them.
Richard Iii Essay Research Paper Richard IIIIn
Richard Iii Essay, Research Paper Richard III In Richard III, Shakespeare invites us on moral holiday. The early part of the play draws its readres to identify with Richard and thereby to participate in a
Richard Iii Essay Research Paper Richard was
Richard Iii Essay, Research Paper Richard was a bad guy. This was one of his speeches: Was ever woman in this humor wooed? Was ever woman in this humor won? I?ll have her, but I will not keep her long.
Was Richard The Third Evil Essay
, Research Paper Was Richard the Third Evil Richard the Third was thought to be an evil mastermind here are three main reasons as to why. The primary reason he was thought to be evil, is on his accession to the throne, a few of is relatives were died and he was later accused of murdering them. The Princes in the Tower were killed but no evidence was ever found to pin Richard to their deaths.
Richard Cory Essay Research Paper The poem
Richard Cory Essay, Research Paper The poem “Richard Cory” by Edwin Arlington Robinson, is a poem that shows that people cannot determine another person s happiness by their appearance. The author
Richard Cory Essay Research Paper In the
Richard Cory Essay, Research Paper In the poem ?Richard Cory? by Edwin Arlington, the theme of the poem is just because a person is rich does not make that person happy. When Richard Cory goes down town every person on the pavement looks at him. Somehow Richard seems to be a gentleman all the time and Richard is always clean and slim.
Does Richard III Deserve His Reputation Essay
, Research Paper Richard III, a wicked tyrant, an unscrupulous murderer, a deformed hunchback. Just some of the reputations and images that have been associated with this notorious king ever since his death on the fields of
Black Boy Essay Research Paper Most young
Black Boy Essay, Research Paper Most young people have a dream of what they want to become. Maybe it doesn’t have to be a dream, but some kind of goal that they reach for. In the book, Black Boy, Richard, the main character, also had a dream, even though he lived in the South with strong white discrimination, pressure and a bad relationship with his relatives.
Richard WrightS Black Boy Essay Research Paper
More than Just Physical Hunger Hunger is a physical aspect of life. Generally, when you think of hunger you think of food. Hunger is a different thing in Richard Wright’s Black Boy. In this autobiography, Richard tells of his life from a young boy in the prejudice south to an adult in the north.. In Black Boy, Richard’s expression of hunger goes beyond the physical sense.
Black Boy Essay Research Paper Richard has
Black Boy Essay, Research Paper Richard has many different ideas on how to deal with racism. Throughout the entire first part of the book he makes many references as to what he believes could help the problem. Although the most frequent method he practiced to deal with racism was acceptance, Richard does not believe this is the best way to handle it.
Richard Wright Essay Research Paper In his
Richard Wright Essay, Research Paper In his development of this theme, Richard Wright alludes to several stories from classical Greek mythology, most notably the stories of Oedipus of Thebes. Like Sophocles’ stories of Oedipus, Native Son intertwines the idea of hubris (”excessive pride”) with the idea of blindness.
Maya Angelou 3 Essay Research Paper The
Maya Angelou 3 Essay, Research Paper The readings from “Graduation Day” by: Maya Angelou and “On Becoming A Chicano” by: Richard Rodriguez were different but they the same point across. They were of different cultures, race, and time era, and they both overcame adversity to excel in their schooling.
Richard Cory Essay Research Paper EssayIn the
Richard Cory Essay, Research Paper Essay In the poem, ?Richard Cory?, Robinson describes the character, Richard Cory, as being wealthy, generous, handsome, and courteous. Regardless of his social status,
King Richard The Lion Hearted Essay Research
Paper King Richard 1st was called Coeur de Lion, which means Lion Hearted. He was born in Oxford, England1157. He was the third son of Henry 2nd and Eleanor of Aquitaine. While Richard was still a baby he was betrothed to daughter of the French king Louis VII, and in 1172 he was given the duchy of Aquitaine in France, his mother’s inheritance.
Richard The Lionheart Essay Research Paper Richard
Richard The Lionheart Essay, Research Paper Richard Plantagenet (Richard the Lionheart) was a king of England.He was born on September 8,1157,at Oxford.Richard was the third son of Henry II and Eleanor of Aquitaine.He had an older brother named Henry and two younger brothers named John and Geoffrey.When Richard was born,King Henry gave Richard the Duchy of Aquitaine which belonged to his mother Eleanor.So Richard’s full name became Richard Plantagenet,Duke of Aquitaine.
Richard III Essay Research Paper The
Richard III Essay, Research Paper The Cold, Fearful Soliloquy of a Condemned King The night before battle at Bosworth field, Richard’s sleep is disturbed by the ghosts of those he murdered in his scheme to acquire and retain the kingship. The ghosts haunt Richard with prophesies of the justice due him. Startled from sleep, Richard’s shaken soliloquy is delivered fearfully and honestly, testifying his gradation of sins and foreshadowing his inevitable demise.
Richard Cory Essay Research Paper In
Richard Cory Essay, Research Paper In “Richard Cory”, Edwin Arlington Robinson explores the deception of appearances. Richard Cory was a wealthy man, admired and envied by those who
Richard Corey Essay Research Paper Money can
Richard Corey Essay, Research Paper Money can t buy happiness and “You can’t judge a book by its cover” are two old adages that echo through time; however, they seem to echo so softly that they are quite often disregarded. For men, in their search for contentment and fulfillment, only see money as the main vehicle.
Contrast Of Richard
’s Homes Essay, Research Paper This diorama is a contrast between Richard?s original home, at his grandma?s house, and where he moves to later, with Mr. and Mrs. Moss and their daughter Bess.
King Richard Ii Essay Research Paper Richard
King Richard Ii Essay, Research Paper Richard II Richard II was one of Shakespeare’s political works depicting the rise and fall of King Richard II. Richard became king of England as a boy at 10 years of age, although his advisors made most of the political decisions of the kingdom until he matured. During this maturation period, Richard was more interested in learning about aesthetic things in life rather than things more responsible to the monarch.
Legitimacy In Richard Ii Essay Research Paper
Legitimacy Richard became king at the age of ten, taking over for his father, Edward the Black Prince, Edward III?s oldest son, who predeceased his father. This elevation gave the boy authority over all nobles, including his uncles. Once crowned, Richard?s right to rule and to have his commands obeyed was supported by the order of God, since it was believed that the king?s power was issued directly from God.
Analyze The Poem
– Richard Cory Essay, Research Paper Description: Analyze the poem “Richard Cory” and prove themes and ideas with MLA style writing. Why does everyone want to be like someone else? It is human nature to want to be admired and honored. This is not right, though. Each and everyone person should be happy with who they are because just imagine if everyone were perfect and the same.
The Beach By Alex Garland Essay Research
Paper Jason Black The Beach by Alex Garland “As for me… I’m fine. I have bad dreams, but I never saw Mister Duck again. I play video games. I smoke a little dope. I got my thousand yard stare. I carry a lot of scars. I like the way that sounds. I carry a lot of scars”
Black Boy Paper Essay Research Paper Black
Black Boy Paper Essay, Research Paper Black Boy Paper When put into a foreign environment animal s adept, so do humans when they need to learn they ways of life. Richard Wright, due to his surroundings, had to adapt and become independent early in his life. In the book, Black Boy, Richard shows how he progressively became independent in his writings.
Black Boy And Th Struggle For Finding
A Figure Of Manhood To Emulate Essay, Research Paper Black Boy is an autobiography about Richard Wright’s life, and his struggle for freedom. Throughout this book, Richard strives to find a model of manhood to emulate, but ultimately fails.
Black Boy Analysis Essay Research Paper Black
Black Boy Analysis Essay, Research Paper Black Boy From the early days of Richard s childhood, Richard was always alienated from his environment. Even though he tried to distance himself from the prejudice all around him, the white people still tried to turn him into the stereotypical southern black person.
The American Political Tradition Essay Research Paper
The American Political Tradition, written by Richard Hofstadter, is an extremely influential book highlighting America s political past. Hofstadter wrote the book at the age of 27 and did not hesitate to include his rather strong ideals and beliefs. He rejected the progressive historians like Charles A.
We Speak No Treason Essay Research Paper
Gloucester: You may partake of any thing we say; We speak no treason, man; we say the King Is wise and virtuous….. Shakespear: Richard III: Act I, Sc I. He was the youngest brother of the King of England. He was the Duke of Gloucester and the Lord of the
Roosevelt Essay Research Paper Chapter nine of
Roosevelt Essay, Research Paper Chapter nine of Richard Hofstadter s, American Political Traditions, is titled, Theodore Roosevelt: Conservative as Progressive. By this title Hofstadter is referring to how Roosevelt’s methods in government were very conservative when looking at the goals the Progressive Party was trying to achieve.