Descartes Meditations Essay, Research Paper
In Descartes? Meditations on First Philosophy, he offers two main arguments from which he concludes the existence of God. In the Third Meditation, Descartes proposes his metaphysical argument, which states that God must exist, because his real existence is the only cause, which could have produced Descartes? own idea of God. In the Fifth Meditation, Descartes contends that existence is contained in God?s essence, so a non-existent God is by definition, a contradiction. This paper will analyze the strengths and weaknesses of both arguments, and will contend that the metaphysical argument, while flawed, is more credible than Descartes? ontological argument. I will show that the metaphysical argument is the more successful of the two because of its own virtues and because of serious deficiencies in the ontological argument.
Descartes posits his metaphysical argument in Meditation Three, where he begins his reflection by considering the source of all of his ideas. He notes that all his ideas are equally real in the sense that they are all ” simply modes of thought.” However, not all of his ideas are endowed with an equal magnitude of objective reality, meaning that all of his ideas may not represent something which really exists. He then concludes “that it is manifest by the natural light that” if the object of an idea of something involves some level of reality, the idea must be caused by that which has a greater or equal level of reality. Descartes uses this foundation to reason that since his idea of an all-perfect God, who is an infinite substance, contains more reality than he thinks he possesses, he cannot be the source of that idea. The idea must be caused by something which has as much perfection and reality as the object of its idea. By Descartes? definition of that which is “supreme?infinite, omniscient, omnipotent, and the creator of all things,” this cause of his idea must be God.
One of the virtues of this argument is its validity. Descartes clearly enumerates his premises:
? he has an idea of an infinite and perfect God
? ideas have causes which have objective reality, which is equal to that of the object of the idea
? he could not have produced his own idea of the infinite
? God must have produced his idea of the infinite
? God exists.
If these premises are true, his argument is a successful and sound one. Like the ontological argument, the premises of this work draw a lot of objections. Yet Descartes maintains the strength of this an inductive argument by addressing some of the most potentially damaging objections to his metaphysical argument.
Descartes? whole metaphysical argument presupposes that he has an idea of an all-perfect, infinite God. Yet the thesis that Descartes? finite mind can perceive the infinite lends itself to powerful controversy. One could explicitly challenge Descartes in the following manner: It is inconsistent to maintain that one has a clear idea of an infinite and perfect God. Because the individual?s mind is by Descartes? own admission, finite, infinity is inconceivable to the individual.
Descartes? argument can withstand such criticism if we are precarious in our interpretation of what may constitute the idea of an infinite being. Descartes explains that “it does not matter that I do not grasp the infinite?it is enough that I understand the infinite.” This divide between grasping and understanding may seem vague, but it is crucial to the legitimacy of the metaphysical argument. Descartes? understanding of the infinite is an acceptable starting point from which he can proceed to search for the cause of his idea of the infinite. Yet his simultaneous inability to grasp the infinite conciliates the relation of a finite intellect to the incomprehensible nature of the infinite.
Descartes? advances his argument by illustrating the theory that his idea of the infinite must have been caused by that which has infinite reality and perfection, namely, God. Descartes? belief welcomes the contention that an idea of infinity need not be caused by the infinite, so long as one can contemplate the infinite as that which is not finite. Since the individual is finite, one need not look outside of one?s self to find a cause for an idea which lacks the property of being finite.
In the case of false ideas, we may indeed have the idea of a positive quality which is really just formed from the lack of some positive real quality. Descartes explains, “if it is true that cold is nothing but the absence of heat, the idea which represents it to me as something real and positive deserves to be called false.” Descartes then qualifies the infinite as a true idea, which cannot be produced by experiencing a privation of its contradiction. He offers a strong logical explanation to support his position. He says that the idea of the infinite must necessarily exist prior to the idea of the finite because otherwise, the individual would have no standard by which to say that he or she lacks or desires anything. All Descartes really needs to maintain is that an objective, finite cause is insufficient in accounting for the infinite and finite ideas we have. It does not damage Descartes? position if it is shown that our understanding of the infinite and of the finite might rely on each other simultaneously. While these two keen counter-objections solidify the basis for Descartes argument, not all of his counter-objections are as acceptable. To Descartes, it is obvious that “for a given idea to contain such and such objective reality, it must surely derive it from some cause which contains at least as much formal reality.”
Descartes? readers have a right to doubt his clear and distinct perception, including his observation that God?s essence must involve existence. Descartes explicitly recognizes that “the way [he is] made makes him prone to frequent error.” The fact that Descartes is ever prone to error is necessarily a concession that there is some deficiency in his intellect which causes that error. Descartes may not legitimately lay claim to a perfectly clear and distinct perception after he recognizes that that same perception is the product of a fallible intellect. Descartes defends himself in this respect by maintaining that that none of his fallible perceptions ever struck him as clear and distinct in the first place. But the sole fact that Descartes? clear and distinct perceptions have not yet proven themselves false does not necessitate that they are true. Essentially, the only credibility with which Descartes can back up his perceptions, is the fact that he clearly and distinctly perceives that whatever he clearly and distinctly perceives must be true. This begs the question and leaves any reader who does not share his clarity of perception at a loss.
Besides Descartes? reliance on his clear and distinct perception, there are other viable objections to the ontological argument which he is unable to conquer.
Descartes claims there is no inconsistency in his derivation of God?s real existence from what must originate as a conceptual property of a conceptual nature. Descartes argues that any attribute which can be predicated is an acceptable property of something?s nature. On one hand, Descartes is right; real existence meets the fundamental criteria for being a property in the sense that it describes. But as existence still functions grammatically, this argument won?t have the appearance of a logical predicate. Hence, Descartes may use semantics to draw existential conclusions from conceptual premises, but he has no basis to claim his conclusion is logically accurate.
In the metaphysical argument, I have shown that Descartes is able to logically address serious criticisms, and his resort to clear and distinct perception is detrimental, yet secondary. In the ontological argument, however, Descartes relies on his clear and distinct perception to substantiate his most fundamental statements and the fact that something appears to be clear and distinct is not enough to substantiate one?s claims. If one grants Descartes the truth-value of his clear and distinct perceptions, his ontological argument still gives the reader adequate opportunity to can challenge the logical cogency of the argument. These flaws discredit the legitimacy of the ontological argument and support the metaphysical argument?s qualifications as the more successful of the two.
Другие работы по теме:
Ren Descartes Essay Research Paper Prove
Ren Descartes Essay, Research Paper Prove It I dare YOUProve It, I Dare YouFor many years philosophers have disputed argued, dissected and used countless of other devices in order to prove God’s existence. Is there someone or something that has been there since time started? All my life I was raised to believe that God exists.
Descartes Essay Research Paper The way Descartes
Descartes Essay, Research Paper The way Descartes chose to write this piece literature captivated me. Descartes was a very intelligent man who wanted to make sense of the world he lived in. The format he used was unusual. It seems to me that he may have used this format, which is a replication of the book of Genesis in the Bible, to have a deeper and more profound impact on the reader.
Innate Ideas Rene Descartes And John Locke
Essay, Research Paper Throughout the passage of time, philosophers have written and discussed many topics in philosophy. Sometimes, these philosophers agree on ideas or sometimes they make their own assumptions. There are two philosophers who had different ideas concerning where innate ideas come from and how we get these types of ideas.
Only The Mind Percives Essay Research Paper
Descartes’ overall objective in Meditations on First Philosophy is to question knowledge. To explore such issues as the existence of God and the separation of mind and body, it was important for him to distinguish what we can know as truth. He believed that reason as opposed to experience was the source for discovering what is of absolute certainty.
Descartes Extreme Philosophy Essay Research Paper
The philosopher/scientist/mathematician Rene Descartes lived in a time of sweeping changes across all realms of knowledge. Descartes himself was responsible for many of these changes, one of which was a strong advancement in philosophy. Descartes? Meditations on First Philosophy tackle, among many things, two difficult philosophical issues.
Descartes And The Material World Essay Research
Paper Can you doubt that the material world exists? If you can’t, does it follow that Descartes’ method of doubt is useless?It is very difficult to know for certain if the material world exists or not because we are dealing with metaphysical philosophy. Metaphysical philosophy is the branch of philosophy concerned with the basic nature of reality.
PlatoS Five Dialogues And Descartes Six Meditations
Essay, Research Paper One of the odd yet interesting ideas that philosopher’s demand be debated is that of the true nature of the human being. Even though probably each philosopher has his own unique perception of the true nature of the human being, philosophers tend to share some of the same basic attributes in their definition.
What Is Descartes Trying To Achieve In
The Meditations And What Is The Relationship Between T Essay, Research Paper What Descartes is trying to achieve in the Meditations can be simply described as trying to find the truth. Although in the printed dedication at
Descarted Meditations Essay Research Paper Clear and
Descarted Meditations Essay, Research Paper Clear and Distinct Perception: An Analysis Of Rene Descartes Rene Descartes? Meditations in the First Philosophy is a skeptic?s speculation on certain inalienable truths. Descartes meditations are based on the epistemological theory of rationalism: that is if someone truly knows something then they could not possibly be mistaken.
Descartes And Searle Essay Research Paper As
Descartes And Searle Essay, Research Paper As a psychology major, one of topics that I find most interesting in philosophy is the mind/body problem. This can be defined as the relationship between the immaterial mind and the material body.
Can We Ever Reach Certainty Essay Research
Paper First, I would like to quote Descartes: “Cogito, ergo sum” – I think, therefor I am. He said this, because he didn’t know weather he knew if he existed or not. Descartes thought like this: I know that I’m dreaming, but I don’t know if it’s reality or dream, I doubt. But because I doubt, I think, and if I am thinking, I am a human, thinking, being, and therefor – I exist – “Cogito, ergo sum”.
Rene Descartes The Search Of Knowledge Essay
, Research Paper As I sit and ponder how I am going to write this paper, it accurse to me that I may not be writing this paper at all. How, I ask myself, can this be possible? I can feel the keys under my fingers, hear their distinct clicks as I press them, and I can see my writing on the screen. Yet all of these things are sensory based, and I wonder if my senses can be trusted as certainty.
Two Philosophies And Their Belief Essay Research
Paper Two Philosophers and Their Theories of Belief When reading Rene Descartes Meditations on First Philosophy and David Hume s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, one notices that both philosophers focus a large part of their writings on the subject of human belief. Both authors have different theories on what makes a person form those beliefs that are important in life.
La Croix On Descartes Essay Research Paper
La Croix in his essay disputes the position set forth by Harry Frankfurt in his article “Descartes on the Creation of the Eternal Truths” (The Philosophical Review, 1977), charging that Frankfurt misrepresents Descartes? view of God?s nature and power. According to La Croix, Frankfurt holds that, in claiming that God created the eternal truths and could have done the opposite with respect to establishing the law of contradiction, Descartes conceived of God?s power as extending beyond the laws of logic.
Decartes Meditations Essay Research Paper In Descartes
Decartes Meditations Essay, Research Paper In Descartes Meditations he talks about many different things. Two things he talks about are his arguments on Dreams and what he calls the “Evil Demon”. Both of them have to do with deceiving the mind into believing in things that may be untrue.
Descartes And Berkeley On Skepticism About The
Senses Essay, Research Paper Descartes and Berkeley on Skepticism About the Senses The philosophers Geroge Berkeley and Renee Descartes both had strong opinions on skepticism about the senses. In this paper, I
Rene Descrates Essay Research Paper While the
Rene Descrates Essay, Research Paper While the great philosophical distinction between mind and body in western thought can be traced to the Greeks, it is to the seminal work of Ren? Descartes (1596-1650) [see figure 1], French mathematician, philosopher, and physiologist, that we owe the first systematic account of the mind/body relationship.
Descartes And Hume Essay Research Paper Skepticism
Descartes And Hume Essay, Research Paper Skepticism is the philosophical belief that doubts whether or not any of our knowledge is true. Hume as well as Descartes have a complex relationship with skepticism. In several of their works, the philosophers respond to skepticism through the use of skepticism.
Descartes Epistemology Essay Research Paper Descartes epistemology
Descartes Epistemology Essay, Research Paper Descartes epistemology is known as foundationalism. In his Meditations, Descartes tries to discover certain, indubitable foundations for knowledge. He is searching for absolute certainty, and does this by subjecting everything to doubt. Through this he reaches the one thing he believes to be certain, his existence.
Hume Hobbes And Descartes Essay Research Paper
Hume, Hobbes, and Descartes Rene Descartes, Thomas Hobbes and David Hume are well known philosophers of the time. These three men were after the truth. The truth about life. The truth about how one exists. The truth about the world around them. They questioned, thought, and reasoned. This is what they did.
Rene Descartes Essay Research Paper I Think
Rene Descartes Essay, Research Paper I Think Therefore I Write The philosopher I chose was Rene Descartes, he was more than just a philosopher. He was also a scientist and a mathematician, this man was truly the first of his kind. He was born on March 31, 1596 in La Haye which is near Tours. After his child hood he attended the Jesit College of La Fleche between 1606 and 1614.
Descartes Meditations Essay Research Paper Analyze in
Descartes Meditations Essay, Research Paper Analyze in detail Descartes First Meditation and the beginning of the Second Meditation. Do you believe Montaigne could not reply to Descartes and therefore that Descartes has succeeded in defeating skepticism? Descartes First Meditation sought out to offer reasons to doubt everything in order to, after taking doubt into consideration, discover what we of what we believe is true.
Descartes First Meditation Essay Research Paper Descartes
Descartes First Meditation Essay, Research Paper Descartes first meditation, his main objective is to present three skeptical arguments to bring doubt upon what he considers his basic beliefs. Descartes believes this to be an intricate part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes skeptical arguments are not intended to be a denial of his basic beliefs.
Descartes Essay Research Paper Descartes
Descartes Essay, Research Paper Descartes’ “Wax Argument” In this essay I will refer to the “wax argument” presented by Rene Descartes and explain that it is a valid argument, but not so sound. In Descartes argument, he observes a piece of wax, from a hive, and using his judgment and senses, analyzes the structure and properties of the wax.
Explication Of The Cogito Essay Research Paper
In his Meditations, Rene Descartes attempts to prove the existence and reality of himself and things external to himself. In order to fulfill such a feat, Descartes decides to doubt all that he knows, for he knows not whether that can be relied upon. He doubts his knowledge for three main reasons.
Descartes Used The Existence O Essay Research
Paper Descartes used the existence of God as a foundation for all of his thinking. In the time of Descartes, the Catholic Church played a very important role in everyone life, including the life of Descartes. Descartes grew up and remained as a Catholic all his life. So being a Catholic, Descartes has to prove the existence of his belief before he prove anything around him existed.
Hume And Descartes On The Theory Of
Ideas Essay, Research Paper Hume and Descartes on The Theory of Ideas David Hume and Rene Descartes are philosophers with opposing views about the origination of ideas. Descartes believed there were three types of ideas
Does God Exist To Descartes Essay Research
Paper Upon cursory examination, one might assume that Rene Descartes is a ?non-believer? in the existence of a heavenly being, a God that presides over humans and gives us faith. However, this is simply not the case ? Descartes is simply trying to destroy all of the uncertainties that have come about by the attempted scientific explanations of such a supreme being.
On Descartes Meditations I
& Ii Essay, Research Paper On Descartes Meditations I & II Descartes uses his Meditations on First Philosophy to consider one of philosophy s greatest questions: what is truth? He dedicates this writing to outlining a rational, logical process of determining the answer, as well as his own conclusions in the matter.
The Soul Essay Research Paper Out of
The Soul Essay, Research Paper Out of all the philosophers we have examined in this unit, Ren? Descartes (On Thinking and the Soul) presents the best argument about what a soul and body are. In contrast, I believe that Locke?s interpretation of the body, mind, soul and self was my least favorite interpretation.
Descartes Essay Research Paper Descartes Ren
Descartes Essay, Research Paper Descartes, Ren Ren Descartes was born on March 31, 1596 and died on February 11, 1650. Ren Descartes was a man of many things. He was a French mathematician, philosopher and scientist. He made contributions to the theory of equations and his rule of signs, but the most distinguished contribution that Descartes made to the world of mathematics was analytic geometry.