’s Social Contract Essay, Research Paper
When Jean Jacques Rousseau wrote the Social Contract, the concepts of liberty
and freedom were not new ideas. Many political theorists such as Thomas Hobbes and
John Locke had already developed their own interpretations of liberty, and in fact Locke
had already published his views on the social contract. What Rousseau did was to
revolutionize the concepts encompassed by such weighty words, and introduce us to
another approach to the social contract dilemma. What would bring man to leave the state
of nature, and enter into an organized society? Liberals believed it was the guarantee of
protection – liberty to them signified being free from harm towards one’s property.
Rousseau’s notion of freedom was completely different than that of traditional liberals. To
him, liberty meant a voice, and participation. It wasn’t enough to be simply protected
under the shield of a sovereign, Rousseau believed that to elevate ourselves out of the
state of nature, man must participate in the process of being the sovereign that provided
the protection.
The differences between Rousseau’s theories and those of the liberals of his time,
begin with different interpretations of the state of nature. Thomas Hobbes described the
state of nature as an unsafe place, where the threat of harm to one’s property was always
present. He felt that man could have no liberty in such a setting, as fear of persecution and
enslavement would control his every action. From this dismal setting, Hobbes proposed
that man would necessarily rise and enter into a social contract. By submitting himself to
the power of a sovereign, man would be protected by that same power, thereby gaining his
liberty. Rousseau’s version of the state of nature differs greatly. He makes no mention of
the constant fear which Hobbes believed would control man’s life in the state of nature,
rather he describes the setting as pleasant and peaceful. He described the people in this
primitive state as living free, healthy, honest and happy lives, and felt that man was timid,
and would always avoid conflict, rather than seek it out.
Building from this favorable description of the state of nature, why would man
want to enter into a social contract of any kind? If Rousseau was so fond of the state of
nature, why would he be advocating any form of social organization? The answer is two
fold. Firstly, Rousseau recognized that 18th century Europe was indeed very civilized, and
that it would be impossible for man to shake off these chains and return to a state of
nature. Secondly, Rousseau felt man in a state of nature was really quite ignorant and
undeveloped. He says in the Social Contract that they were rather simple, shy, and
innocent in the state of nature. Therefore for personal growth and self-actualization, man
must enter into a society with his fellow man. “We begin properly to become men,”
Rousseau said, “only after we have become citizens.” From here, Rousseau embarks on
his mission, envisioning a society which would embody all of the freedoms man had in the
state of nature yet one which would allow him to grow intellectually.
In setting out his Social Contract, Rousseau’s purpose is clear: “Find a form of
association that defends and protects the person and goods of each associate with all the
common force, and by means of which each one, uniting with all, nevertheless obeys only
himself and remains as free as before.” Rousseau wanted the best of both worlds, a
combination of the freedoms evident in the state of nature, and the intellectual
surroundings of civilized society. Utilizing the principle that the whole would be stronger
then the sum of the collective parts, Rousseau laid out a society in which all the individuals
would give up their individual powers in return for a new kind of equality and a new kind
of power. By this theory, if all members gave up their powers equally and wholly, they
would in effect reduce themselves to being equals amongst each other. He states this by
saying “Since each one gives up his entire self, the condition is equal for everyone, and
since the condition is equal for everyone, no one has an interest in making it burdensome
for the others.” This brought man one step closer to Rousseau’s Utopian view of the state
of nature where “Living in this happy savagery men enjoyed substantial equality; there
were few relations to beget inequality.” It was inequality which would bring about the
opportunity for oppression, which it turn took away a man’s liberty. For Rousseau this
solved the problem of inequality in conventional societies, because “The social contract
established an equality between citizens such they all engage themselves under the same
conditions and should all benefit from the same rights.”
Thus, by giving up his individual powers, man would enter equally into a society in which
a full, moral life was possible. Rousseau’s next task was to show how this full, moral life
would be a good one, and how this equality would be maintained. By entering into a social
contract, man wouldn’t simply submit himself under the power of a sovereign, rather he
would submit himself to become part of the sovereign. Each citizen would have a voice in
this “organic society”, which could be viewed as a living person whose interest was the
protection of itself (and therefore its composite members). The citizens of this society
would have to give themselves up wholly and completely to the state, and make its best
interests their own. In return, since the sovereign was a composite of everyone in the
society, it would naturally take on as its best interests, the interests of all. For these
reasons, direction for the new sovereign would come from what Rousseau referred to as
the “general will”.
This general will would be the combination of the wills of each person in the society. Since the sovereign was directed by this general will, it would be impossible for
the its interests to conflict with the priorities of the citizens, since this would be doing
harm to itself. It would also be impossible for the sovereign to create laws which were
immoral, since its morals were simply a collection of all of the citizens morals. The general
will could not be swayed by any one section of the society, since it represented the entire
body. It would be impossible for anyone to will unfavorable conditions on another, since
these conditions would also be placed on them. Since Rousseau claims that man’s “first
law is to attend to his own preservation, his first cares are those he owes himself”, the
sovereign’s first concern would be for the liberty of it’s members. Therefore the general
will, by transferring man’s individual wills to the will of the sovereign, would guarantee
each man freedom under the new society.
Although Rousseau’s view of the social contract seems fairly logically, it does
contain some holes, which limit the existence of such a society. Rousseau does little to
establish how the general will is to be collected, and passed on to the sovereign. We are
left to assume that if general will is to drive the actions of the sovereign, this necessarily
demands a completely democratic society. Rousseau also states that “sovereignty, being
only the exercise of general will, can never be alienated, and that the sovereign, which is
only a collective being, can only be represented by itself.” Since it has been established
that all members of the society must take an active role in the sovereign, and here it is
stated that this power is not transferable, the citizens can only be represented by
themselves. This necessitates democratic voting by all members of society, on all issues.
Here the problem is obvious, especially in 18th century Europe. This will drastically limit
the size of a society, as well as the area it may cover. A country such as Canada could never be ruled without some form of representative democracy, but since Rousseau feels
that these powers are inalienable, we could therefore never enter into such a social
contract.
A second issue of contention arises when Rousseau’s logic is carefully examined.
He begins his essay by stating that man is by his very nature a selfish being, concerned
only with his own preservation. He goes on from here to place man in such a society, free
from inequalities, in which he must place his fellow citizen’s wills on an equal level with
his own. Rousseau feels man will subject himself to such a society because selfishly he will
see that it is to his own advantage to do so, as it will guarantee his own preservation.
Rousseau mentions the most basic form of a society as being the family, yet even a family
has its obvious inequalities. Perhaps if man was coming from the state of nature as
described by Hobbes he would see this advantage, however with the state of nature as
described by Rousseau, this “advantage” would not be abundantly obvious. In a world in
which man’s life is described as free, healthy, honest and happy why would he feel the
need to join a society under such a social contract? Rousseau solves this by expressing
that morals could be developed only in an environment in which people related to and
interacted with each other. After he has already established that man in a state of nature
is simple, ignorant, crude, unsophisticated and “more animal than human”, where would
man all of a sudden acquire the insight to realize that his life should be more fulfilling?
Granted even the most primitive tribes in Africa and elsewhere subject themselves to
societies, yet this is clearly for the preservation of each member, not for moral growth.
These primitive societies also come with their own hierarchy of power, and are far from
being free of inequality. Rousseau is in effect talking out of both sides of his mouth here: describing man in a negative light to originally suit his purpose, and then assuming him to
be more intelligent and introspective, when it serves the argument to do so.
The motivating force behind Rousseau’s vision of a perfect society is clear: he is
obviously displeased with the inequalities and oppression in the civilized societies he sees
in 18th century Europe. This becomes clear in the first line of his discourse: “Man was/is
born free, and everywhere he is in chains.” The society which he presents certainly solves
many of the problems present in these societies, and it appears that the citizens certainly
would benefit from its formation.
Bibliography
The Social Contract, Jean Jacques Rousseau
Другие работы по теме:
Enlightnement Thinkers Essay Research Paper Enlightenment philosophers
Enlightnement Thinkers Essay, Research Paper Enlightenment philosophers have had a profound impact on the progress of society, they quite simply have provided the structure for government today. European thinkers such as John Locke, Baron de Montesquieu, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are some of the European political thinkers who have changed the course of history.
World Civilization Essay Research Paper World Civilization
World Civilization Essay, Research Paper World Civilization II January 14, 2000 The Lesser Half When Jean Jacques Rousseau wrote about the inequalities of women it was acceptable for that time period. During the 1700’s a women’s role was primarily to bear and raise their children, which is emphasized by Rousseau in Emile.
Jean Jacques Rosseau Essay Research Paper Rousseau
Jean Jacques Rosseau Essay, Research Paper Rousseau was born in Geneva, the son of a watchmaker. His mother died shortly after his birth, and his aunt and uncle raised him. At 16 he set out on into the world which brought him into contact with Louise de Warens, who became his patron and later his lover. She arranged for his trip to Turin, where he became a Roman Catholic convert.
The State Of Nature
– Jean-Jacques Rousseau Vs. John Locke Essay, Research Paper In this essay, I will attempt to show how Jean-Jacques Rousseau s view of the state of nature differs from that of his predecessor John Locke. I will then compare certain aspects and themes central to each thinker s views and interpretations of the state of nature.
Rousseau Essay Research Paper Jean Jacques Rousseau
Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Jean Jacques Rousseau a French philosopher and theorist, has had an effect on societies of in the past by his expression of general will. In the general will freedom and equality are presupposed. Governments of the past and present have had Roussean content. Freedom and equality have presupposed each other by way of the general will and compelled obedience.
A Comparison Of Hobbes Rousse Essay Research
Paper Hobbes state of war is the basis for his philosophical discourse on human nature. Where Rousseau says that man is compassionate and good to others in his nature, Hobbes argues that man is only out for himself.
Debate Over Man Being Inherently Good Or
Evil Essay, Research Paper The debate over man being inherently good or evil is a debate which has raged since the beginning of time. Rousseau and William Golding do not shy away from taking a stance on the subject. But while Rousseau believes “nothing can be more gentle than man in his primitive state,” Golding’s believes quite the opposite.
Inferring Freedom And Equality Essay Research Paper
John Wise Sturgeon Honors World History: G 28 October 1995 Inferring Freedom and Equality Many of Earth’s organisms and processes depend on each other to survive the natural world. Jean Jacques Rousseau employed this aspect of natural dependency to connect the ideas of freedom and equality together. Rousseau theorized many ingenious ideas for an upcoming legitimate government.
911 And JeanJacques Rousseau Essay Research Paper
L?Etat C?est Moi : Absolutism in the Age of ReasonBy analyzing the Taliban regime and their motives, Jean-Jacques Rousseau?s ideas, and by comparing the two, it will be made evident that Jean-Jacques Rousseau?s ideas of government rule over people?s lives is true in this specific case.
JeanJacques Rousseau Essay Research Paper Jean Jacques
Jean-Jacques Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Jean Jacques RousseauRousseau, Jean-Jacques, was born on June 28, 1712 in Geneva, Switzerland. Since his mother passed away three days after he was born he began his life with one of his aunts and his father. Rousseau was forced to move from home to home, living with various people.
The Influence Of Enlightenment On The French
Revolution Essay, Research Paper What is enlightenment? The 18th century Enlightenment was a movement of the intellectuals who dared to prove all the aspects in life scientifically. German philosopher Immauel Kant proclaimed the motto of the enlightenment : ?Dare to know!: Have the courage to use your own intelligence!? People were greatly impressed by the scientific revolution.
Mary Wollstonecraft Essay Research Paper The neglected
Mary Wollstonecraft Essay, Research Paper The neglected education of my fellow-creatures is the grand source of the misery I deplore. -Mary Wollstonecraft, A Vindication of the Rights of Women. Rousseau and Wollstonecraft believed that children should be allowed to grow freely and learn to use their education practically.
Role Of Property Philosophers Of Glorious Revolution
? In England Essay, Research Paper The Role of Property In the seventeenth-century, England was recovering from the “Glorious Revolution” and political thought centered on the issues of nature and the limits of government. Two great political thinkers, John Locke and Thomas Hobbes took a scientific approach to analyze government and focused on the state of nature and natural rights of individuals.
MacKinnon Essay Research Paper Rousseau and Marx
MacKinnon Essay, Research Paper Rousseau and Marx spearhead the movement of the worker. They attempt to alter current, unjust, stifling situations and bring a natural equivalence to all. Yet, throughout their works, they hardly mention the role of women. Marx does, at one point, acknowledge that women should no longer be known as “private”, but as “collective”: open and free to all men.
Rousseau And Totalitarianism Essay Research Paper Rousseau
Rousseau And Totalitarianism Essay, Research Paper Rousseau and Totalitarianism Rousseau clearly promotes totalitarianism in The Social Contract, and hints at it in a few passages from his Second Discourse. He desperately attempts to lay down a form of government that eliminates any chance for the people to be victims.
Political Philosophers Essay Research Paper Political PhilosophersJeremy
Political Philosophers Essay, Research Paper Political Philosophers Jeremy Bentham figured that laws should be socially useful and not merely reflect the status quo. While he believed that men inevitably pursue pleasure and avoid pain, Bentham thought it to be a sacred truth that the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation.
Listening To The Past A New
Way To Educate Children Essay, Research Paper Listening To The Past: A New Way to Educate Children Rousseau lobbies against an educational system that tries to teach children concepts and facts before such time, as they would make use of them. He believes that a child should not neglect those studies, which meet his present needs, in order to learn that which he may acquire in later years.
Intellect ManS Greatest Power Essay Research Paper
Can intellectual advancement lead to a general regression in our existence? Both Rousseau and Virilio deal with this question, but in very different ways. Rousseau examines this question in the broadest sense, by back tracking to the origin of intellect. Virilio, on the other hand, speaks of a very specific type of intellectual advancement, namely-the invention of a long range nuclear missile.
Rousseau And Education Essay Research Paper Rousseau
Rousseau And Education Essay, Research Paper Rousseau’s profound insight can be found in almost every trace of modern philosophy today. Somewhat complicated and ambiguous, Rousseau’s general philosophy tried to grasp an emotional and passionate side of man which he felt was left out of most previous philosophical thinking.
Rousseau Essay Research Paper Rousseau and ReligionRousseau
Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Rousseau and ReligionRousseau concludes his Social Contract with a chapter on religion. His view on the subject is subtle and interesting; and moreover, I maintain that it provides us with one of the keys to Rousseau’s thought. Rousseau’s near-deification of the General Will has led many analysts to argue that Rousseau’s state is merely secularized Christianity.
Good Citizen Hobbes Vs Rouseau Essay
, Research Paper For one to be a good citizen, there are certain expectations a person must follow to achieve this goal. While many people have their own ideas of what makes a good citizen, there is little consensus to exactly what this would be. Thomas Hobbes and Jean-Jacques Rousseau, in their books The Leviathan and The Social Contract, create a system of political governing where the citizen plays a certain role and has certain expectations to carry out this role for the governmental system to work properly.
Locke In Rousseau
’s Eye Essay, Research Paper The state of nature, as described by Locke, is a state of perfect freedom, a state in which man is completely free, but would Rousseau agree with this? The answer to this question is more complex than it seems. Locke and Rousseau, both great philosophers of their time, have similar ideas, but the similarities between them end at that.
Theater And Govt Essay Research Paper Government
Theater And Govt Essay, Research Paper Government is an interesting concept developed by humans in order to come together and form a better way of life. Government often times has stepped in to judge what this better way of life should be. In current times, there has been the near censorship of art and in the past theatrical world, the morals of a community are mandated by government.
Man And The State Of Nature Essay
, Research Paper Man in the State of Nature Man’s transition from the state of nature into society is a topic that has been discussed by many philosophers in the past centuries. What is the state of nature for Rousseau and how does man go from it into society? I will explain and occasionally criticize how this happens according to Rousseau.
Rousseau And The Ideal Society Essay Research
Paper Rousseaue and the Ideal Society “Has the progress of the arts and sciences contributed more to the corruption or purification of morals?” Rousseau criticized social institutions for having corrupted the essential goodness of nature and the human heart. Rousseaue believed that by becoming “civilized”, society has actually become worse because good people are made unhappy and are corrupted by their experiences in society..
What Is Liberty Essay Research Paper What
What Is Liberty Essay, Research Paper What is Liberty? During the age of enlightenment many philosophes had different views on the definition of liberty. In the opinion of the philosophes , Voltaire, Smith, Montesquieu and Rousseau the four ideals were almost identical. Voltaire stated, Liberty is the life of the soul.
Rousseau Origin Of Inequality Essay Research Paper
The Origin of Inequality In Rousseau s Discourse on the Origin of Inequalities , Rousseau tries to explain the birth and evolution of inequality between humans dating back to savage man in the pure state of nature. Rousseau proposes that it was not man that progressed toward inequality as much as it was the state of nature itself.
Laws
– Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Laws. We all must obey them, but why? For fear of going to jail, or being fined? Those are the individual effects of civil disobedience, but what happens what is the purpose of law in society? Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau all attempted to interpret the need for laws in society, in order to maintain the good of the whole and the individual.
Hobbes Locke And Rousseau On Social Contract
Essay, Research Paper “Social Contract, agreement by which human beings are said to have abandoned the “state of nature” in order to form the society in which they now live. HOBBES, LOCKE, and J.J. ROUSSEAU each developed differing versions of the social contract, but all agreed that certain freedoms had been surrendered for society’s protection and that the government has definite responsibilities to its citizens.
Locke And Rousseau
– Compare/Contrast Essay, Research Paper Although their ideologies sometimes clashed, and they came from two distinctly different epochs in the course of political development, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau?s fundamental arguments address several similar points. These five main themes which significantly overlap and thus cannot be addressed separately, are the state of nature, the basis for the development of government, the primary intent of government, the state of war, and the ultimate effect of the state on the individual and vice versa.
Should You Obey An Unjust Law Essay
, Research Paper Should you obey an unjust law? According to the theory of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 18th century French political philosopher, ?in a democratic society the state represents the general will of the citizens, and that in obeying its laws each citizen is pursuing his own real interests.? Thus, in an ideal state, laws express the general will.
Hobbes Locke Rousseau Essay Research Paper Thomas
Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau Essay, Research Paper Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau developed theories on human nature and how men govern themselves. With the passing of time, political views on the philosophy of government gradually changed. Despite their differences, Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau, all became three of the most influential political theorists in the world.