Supreme Court Essay, Research Paper
On the eve of his last day in office outgoing President John Adams, a Federalist, appoints 82 Federalist justices. These “midnight judges” as they were called represented a threat to incoming President Thomas Jefferson, a Democrat-Republican. Jefferson feared Federalist interpretation of the law for the next 20 years, a fear that ended up coming to fruition. The new administration did not take their offices until March of 1801. The Federalists wanted to ensure a continued Federalist presence in the government so they packed the judgeships with loyal Federalist supporters, some positions which had been created for this specific purpose by Congress in 1801. Adams signed the commissions for these at Marbury v. Madison
Background
the end of his term. When the new administration took office, the new Secretary of State, James Madison, discovered that some of these commissions had not yet been delivered. President Jefferson, angry with Federalists, ordered that they not be delivered. William Marbury, one of the people whose commission had not yet been received, applied to the Court for a writ of mandamus to force Madison to complete the delivery of the commissions, as per the Judiciary Act of 1789 which gave the Supreme Court this power. The Court found that although Marbury was entitled to his position, they did not have jurisdiction over the case since it came to them on original jurisdiction as per a clause in the Judiciary Act of 1789.
Constitutional Issue
This case did not fit any of the types of cases they could except on original jurisdiction as per Article III, Section 2, Clause 2.
Conclusion
The Court decided that part of the Judiciary Act giving them those powers was null and void (unconstitutional). Through this case, the Supreme Court assumed the power of judicial review, the power to declare an act of Congress unconstitutional.
Opinion
I don?t believe that Madison was obligated to sign the papers giving Marbury the position of Judge of Appease. James Madison was working for a new president of his own party and why should he give a job to a person of the other party. He had no choice with the other jobs given, because they were already signed by the previous president however this one wasn?t so it didn?t have to be given.
Roe v. Wade (1973)
Background
A single, pregnant, Texas woman, under the pseudonym of Jane Roe, challenged anti-abortion laws by stating that they violated her rights under the Constitution.
Constitutional Issue
The constitutional amendment that was involved was The Fourteenth Amendment, which states that no state can “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” The Supreme Court had to decide whether a fetus was a person or not. Technically a fetus is not a person just a step in the process of becoming a person.
Majority Opinion
The Court held that a woman’s right to an abortion fell within the right to privacy (recognized in Griswold v. Connecticut) protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The decision gave a woman a right to abortion during the entirety of the pregnancy and defined different levels of state interest for regulating abortion in the second and third trimesters. As a result, the laws of 46 states were affected by the Court’s ruling.
Dissenting Opinion
White B. Rehnquist was the only judge to have a dissenting opinion however he was out numbered by 4 other justices.
Conclusion
The Court upheld Roe’s claim that her right to privacy entitled her to an abortion. However, they went on to say that the right to privacy is not absolute. The Court ruled on this by saying: 1. Abortions in the first three months of pregnancy cannot be limited by the states excepting that they may require that doctors perform them. 2. The state may set the conditions under which abortions may performed during the second three months of pregnancy to safeguard the health of the mother. 3. The state may outlaw abortions during the last three months of pregnancy to protect the “viable fetus,” excepting cases in which the mother’s life or health is threatened.
Opinion
The Court?s decision makes sense because if a pregnant woman?s life is threatened by the baby, not being able to have an abortion would be taking the life of the mother and that is against the Fourteenth amendment.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)
Background
Clarence Gideon, a man in Florida, was charged with breaking into a pool hall and taking money from vending machines there. In Florida, this was considered a felony. At his hearing, Gideon asked that the court appoint a lawyer to represent him since he could not afford one. The court denied him this, the trial judge ruled that Gideon was competent enough to handle his own defense as well as any man. noting a Florida law, which allowed counsel only in capital-offense cases. Put to trial before a jury, Gideon conducted his defense about as well as could be expected from a layman. He made an opening statement to the jury to the best of his capability, cross-examined the State’s witnesses, presented witnesses in his own defense, declined to testify himself, and made a short argument “emphasizing his innocence to the charge contained in the information filed in this case.” The jury returned a verdict of guilty, and petitioner was sentenced to serve five years in the state prison.
Constitutional Issue
While in jail Gideon borrowed some books and he learned that he had the right to be appointed an attorney. After learning this he applied for an appeal for his decision. He appealed to the Supreme Court, stating his right to counsel under the Fourteenth Amendment had been violated. The Court agreed to hear his case and council was appointed to him.
Conclusion
The Sixth Amendment provides, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right…to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.” Gideon went back to trial and this time he was found innocent of the charges. The Supreme Court found in favor of Gideon, overruling Betts v. Brady.
Opinion
I believe that Gideon deserve to be found innocent, maybe not totally but because he was denied one of his rights he deserved to be innocent. I know that if I was denied a lawyer at my trial I would have done the same thing as Gideon did.
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
Background
Dorlee Mapp was suspected of having information in her home that would implicate a suspected bomber. The police came to her home and asked if they might search the residence. Ms. Mapp called her lawyer and was advised to ask for a warrant. They police did not have a warrant and were asked to leave. Hours later the police returned and forcibly entered the residence. Mrs. Mapp demanded to see the warrant and a piece of paper was waved in her face. Mrs. Mapp grabbed the paper and tucked it in her blouse. A struggle ensued where Ms. Mapp was knocked to the ground as police retrieved the supposed warrant. Outside Ms. Mapp’s attorney arrived on the scene but was prevented from entering the residence. The police found pornographic materials in the house and Ms. Mapp was arrested for possession of lewd materials. Ms. Mapp was convicted of this crime. Ms. Mapp appealed her conviction on the grounds that the search of her home was in violation of her rights.
Constitutional Issue
The Fourth Amendment was violated, which basically states that the police cannot enter your home without permission, or with liable cause, along with a search warrant. The court ruled that the evidence obtained in the search was inadmissible because it was seized in an illegal search. In ruling this way the court created the “exclusionary rule” which makes illegally obtained evidence inadmissible in court. This ruling upheld the principles of the fourth amendment. The reason why the court ruled this way is because they have to have a reason to go in and search for something. Police can?t go in and find something to justify their illegal entry, they have to have hard evidence which would enable them to obtain a search warrant, and then what is found can be used in the court against the accused.
Opinion
I really don?t know what to say about this case. How would they have a liable cause to check her house without going in and looking around. Otherwise I am with Mapp, I wouldn?t want my privacy invaded without liable cause either.
Другие работы по теме:
Abortion Essay Research Paper ConceptionI believe that
Abortion Essay, Research Paper Conception: I believe that life begins at the ending of the first trimester through the pregnancy. I consider it a human when there is a beating heart and a brain that is functioning. A beating heart to me represents that there is life, and that there is signs of growth, while still in the mother’s womb.
Amistad Essay Research Paper The Portuguese abducted
Amistad Essay, Research Paper The Portuguese abducted a group of Africans, and shipped them to Havana, Cuba. The Africans were then purchased by two Spanish men and put aboard the schooner Amistad for a voyage to Principe. The Africans seized the ship, killed two of the crew, and ordered the schooner to be navigated for the coast of Africa.
Case Study Amoco Oil Co V Borden
, Inc Essay, Research Paper Amoco Oil Co. v. Borden, Inc. 889 F.2d 664 (5th Cir. 1989) Plantiff and Defendants: The Plantiff is Amoco Oil Company. The defendant is Borden, Inc.
Innocently Executed Essay Research Paper Innicent men
Innocently Executed Essay, Research Paper Innicent men have been executed in the United States. According to a report published by the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty, or the NCADP, 23 innocent men have been executed in the U.S. this century. About 4.5 people are wrongly convicted of capital crimes each year.
Law Essay Research Paper 1 The trial
Law Essay, Research Paper 1. The trial court is bound by the Supreme Court s decision under Stare Decisis. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the judicial system. All other courts are most likely to follow a higher courts decision. The only time a precedent would change is if it is out of date, the situation is different, or if the ruling is found invalid.
Miranda Vs Arizona Essay Research Paper In
Miranda Vs Arizona Essay, Research Paper In 1966 the Supreme Court made a ruling that every American would always know and remember. The case was Miranda versus The State of Arizona.
Gideon V Wainwright Essay Research Paper Gideon
Gideon V. Wainwright Essay, Research Paper Gideon v. Wainwright What most people don’t know is that in the past those arrested for a crime did not really have “the right to an attorney” unless they had money. This became a right because Clarence Gideon, a prison inmate who did not have the money for a lawyer, took a pencil in his hand and wrote his own petition to the United States Supreme Court.
Gideon V Wainwright Essay Research Paper Clarence
Gideon V. Wainwright Essay, Research Paper Clarence Earl Gideon was charged in a Florida state court with having broken and entered a poolroom with intent to commit a misdemeanor. Appearing in court without funds and without a lawyer, Gideon asked the Florida state court to appoint counsel for him, whereupon the following troubles took place.
Supreme Court Gideon Vs Wainwright Verdict Essay
, Research Paper Supreme Court Gideon vs. Wainwright- Verdict In the Supreme Court case of Gideon v. Wainwright, the ruling is obviously in favor of Mr. Gideon. His rights of the accused were evidently violated. His rights to a fair trial as well as the right to counsel were severely abridged, and his liberties guaranteed by the Constitution were defied in the name of the state of Florida and its refusing to pay for proper counsel.
Amistad Essay Research Paper In the beginning
Amistad Essay, Research Paper In the beginning of the movie Amistad, slave hunters abducted a large group of Africans from Sierra Leone in Africa and shipped them to Cuba to be traded. The Africans were purchased by Spanish men and put aboard a ship called Amistad. This abduction and trade violated treaties that then existed, because you could not be bought or sold as a slave unless you were a natural-born slave, which they were not.
Marbury V Madison Trial Essay Research Paper
Marbury v. Madison The issue before the Supreme Court was the question of the court?s own constitutional authority, and to decide whether or not to issue the writ and if this would
Madison Vs Marbury Essay Research Paper Between
Madison Vs. Marbury Essay, Research Paper Between 1800 and 1835, the Supreme Court dealt with many cases of great importance to the United States of America. John Marshall served as the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court during this time. The case of Marbury v. Madison, in 1803, was one of the most crucial court cases and decisions made in this time period.
Civil Rights
– Brown V. Board Of Education Essay, Research Paper Brown v. Board of Education In 1896 the Supreme Court had held in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was permissible as long as equal facilities were provided for
New York Times Co Vs United States
Essay, Research Paper New York Times Co. v. United States U.S. Supreme Court, 1971 The New York Times printed allegedly classified documents that leaked from the Pentagon
Econ Essay Research Paper The federal progressive
Econ Essay, Research Paper The federal progressive income tax has been an issue that has been argued on the floors of Congress, in front of the United States Supreme Court, in front of television cameras, and around the dinner table. The tax served its purpose in supplementing revenue during the Civil War and World War I, but continued taking from Americans’ income in peacetime, allowing fewer dollars to be spent on goods and services.
Canada Essay Research Paper This ISP is
Canada Essay, Research Paper This ISP is is about my views on the Canadian Constitution and what I think needs to be changed in it. Some topics I have chose to discus,
Examination Of The Federal Judiciary Essay Research
Paper The federal judiciary of the United States is split into, essentially, one court system for the national government and one for each of the states. The federal courts are then split up further. The first level of federal courts are the district courts, including the U.S. Tax Court, followed by the U.S. courts of appeal, which includes the U.S.
Al Gore Essay Research Paper Democratic presidential
Al Gore Essay, Research Paper Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore went to the Florida Supreme Court today to call for an immediate count of some 14,000 disputed Florida ballots. Meanwhile, the Bush team pressed ahead with transition plans, and Florida legislators considered a special session to name electors.
Judicial Review Essay Research Paper Judicial ReviewThe
Judicial Review Essay, Research Paper Judicial Review The Supreme Court is the only court designated in the constitution. Within it is the Chief Justice of the United States, and eight associates. Being the highest court it is the last resort for all federal court questions. The Supreme Court has the power to determine whether something is constitutional or not, which makes them the final authority.
John Marshall Essay Research Paper John MarshallIn
John Marshall Essay, Research Paper John Marshall In early American history, the powers of the executive and legislative branches of the government were already well defined. However, the judicial branch needed to establish its position as an equal of the other two branches. John Marshall was crucial in making this happen.
The Supreme Court What Do They Have
To Hide Essay, Research Paper Matthew J. Vowell Ms. Lanctot English 122 Dec. 5, 2000 The Supreme Court: What Do They Have To Hide? The tone of this article is pretty much summed up in the first sentence. The author writes, “ I wonder what the pompous justices on our Supreme Court have to hide by not letting their actions be viewed live on national television?” (Aldrich 6B) He is obviously angry that we have been somewhat shut out from the Supreme Court decision on the Florida recount.
The Supreme Court New Essay Research Paper
Today the Supreme Court agrees to hear about 7,000 cases each year. In the early days of the Supreme Court (1790-1801) the court heard only 87 cases. This number slowly increased up until recently where they have shown a dramatic increase. The court has original jurisdiction over all cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, and those in which a Sate shall be a party.
John Marshall Influence On The Supreme Court
Essay, Research Paper In the beginning years of the United States Constitution, the Supreme Court was a struggling institution due to the lack of effectiveness of the Chief Justices and was not highly regarded by the executive and legislative branches of the government. The third Chief Justice in only twelve years, John Marshall put an end to the Supreme Court’s lack of influence after his appointment by President John Adams in 1801.
Supreme Court Essay Research Paper Supreme Court
Supreme Court Essay, Research Paper Supreme Court Research The Supreme Court is the highest in the United States. It is the “final court of appeal and the expositor of the U.S. Constitution”. The United States Supreme Court is now located in Washington D.C. There are presently nine justices that sit upon the court.
Federalism Essay Research Paper Federalism the balanced
Federalism Essay, Research Paper Federalism, the balanced division of state and federal powers, is an essential principle of the United States Government. On occasion this balance is contested or violated and court cases ensue. These court cases over time have shaped and defined federalism and the powers, rights, and position of state and national governments.
Affirmative Action Essay Research Paper Regents for
Affirmative Action Essay, Research Paper Regents for the University of California v. Bakke The Constitutional grounds which each side based its arguments the 14th amendment s equal protection clause and the civil rights of 1964. The argument for Bakke was based on a policy built on racial quotas. The argument for the University of California was that certain minorities are disadvantages from the day they are born.
Supreme Court Bakke Essay Research Paper BakkeI
Supreme Court Bakke Essay, Research Paper Bakke I do not wish to reverse history and go back to the period of time, where discrimination was present and influential in every aspect of our society. However, I do wish to make sure that while making sure that the once oppressed minorities do not have to endure the discrimination ever again, the rights of persons such as myself are not violated in the name of doing the supposed higher good.
Roe V Wade Essay Research Paper Roe
Roe V. Wade Essay, Research Paper Roe v. Wade Roe v. Wade was in many ways the most controversial decision enacted by the Supreme Court, and no other court decision has been more bitterly attacked. The right of privacy is the main issue upon
Judicial Activism Vs Judicial Restraint Essay Research
Paper Judicial activism and judicial restraint are two opposing philosophies when it comes to the Supreme Court justices’ interpretations of the United States Constitution; justices appointed by the President to the Supreme Court serve for life,and thus whose decisions shape the lives of “We the people” for a long time to come.
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay Research Paper is
Cohen Vs Virginia Essay, Research Paper is Cohens vs. Virginia, in which the question arose as to the right of the Supreme Court to exercise its appellate jurisdiction over the judgment of a state court involving the validity of state legislation. The contention of the counsel for the state struck at the very root of the judicial system of the Union, with its authority to review state decisions which involved the binding effect of the Federal Constitution and laws: and so to the discussion of this fundamental question Marshall brought his heaviest artillery.
The Incorporation Doctrine Essay Research Paper The
The Incorporation Doctrine Essay, Research Paper The Incorporation Doctrine The Incorporation Doctrine was devised by the Supreme Court to apply the state rights that are enumerated in the Bill of Rights. This is to ensure that the individual states are not by-passing the Bill of Rights in their decision making process.
ROe V Wade Essay Research Paper Daniel
ROe V Wade Essay, Research Paper Daniel DellaCroce Law and the Legal System Roe v. Wade 410 U.S. 113 The case of Roe v. Wade started back in the state of Texas. This was where a single pregnant woman brought a class action challenging the constitutionality of the Texas abortion laws. This is where in Texas it is a criminal offense to have an abortion.
Bob White Essay Research Paper Shariff Elkordy
Bob White Essay, Research Paper Shariff Elkordy 11/27 Professor Lang A case of negative impact: Bob White v. Texas After reading this article, I was surprised that this injustice happened in the United States not to long ago. Bob White had many of his civil rights violated. He spent seven days in jail with no charges being held against him.
Med Marijuana Essay Research Paper Medical Marijuana
Med. Marijuana Essay, Research Paper Medical Marijuana The U.S. Supreme Court may turn Nevada s plan to have sick patients use marijuana into a ruling Monday. They provided no legal leeway for medicinal use of the drug. Assemblywoman Chris Giunchigliani, a Democrat from Las Vegas, who sponsored Nevada s medical marijuana bill, said that the ruling doesn t affect the current plan before the Legislature that would allow patients to join a state medical registry and grow up to seven plants for personal use.