Essay, Research Paper
Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists, and Their Common Arguments
The Constitution, when first introduced, set the stage for much controversy in the United States. The two major parties in this battle were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, such as James Madison, were in favor of ratifying the Constitution. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, such as Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee, were against ratification. Each party has there own beliefs on why or why not this document should or should not be passed. These beliefs are displayed in the following articles: Patrick Henry’s “Virginia Should Reject the Constitution,” Richard Henry Lee’s “The Constitution Will Encourage Aristocracy,” James Madison’s “Federalist Paper No. 10,” and “The Letters to Brutus.” In these documents, many aspects of the Constitution, good and bad, are discussed. Although the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had very conflicting views, many common principals are discussed throughout their essays. The preservation of liberty and the effects of human nature are two aspects of these similarities. Although the similarities exist, they represent and support either the views of the Federalists or the Anti-Federalists.
Patrick Henry makes his views very clear in his Letter. He is obviously against ratifying the Constitution. His main argument’s consists of the sovereignty of the states, the system of checks and balances and the senate, the leaning towards a monarchy, and absolute power. Henry thinks that the uniting of all the states under one government would take away the sovereignty of the states. He states that, “Here is a resolution as radical as that which separated us from Great Britain. It is radical in this transition; our rights and privileges are endangered, and the sovereignty of the states will be relinquished” (Henry in Unger, p. 115). Another argument that Henry makes is about the system of checks and balances. He thinks that this system would never really be followed. The senate, he says, is not structured well enough to protect the rights of the people. One of his main points is the leaning towards a monarchy. He describes that it would be very easy for the President to become a king. Henry seems to also contradict himself on this point when he says that he would rather have a king and lords than a chief who controls the army. Henry’s final point is about the creation of an absolute ruler. Like he says about the monarchy, it would be easy for this to happen. If the President has control of the army, it would be easy to declare himself an absolute leader.
Richard Henry Lee is another Anti-Federalist who displays his views throughout his article. Lee discusses some arguments, but the main point of his article is about how the Constitution came to be and the problems associated with it. He says “by making tender, suspension, and paper money laws, have given just cause of uneasiness to creditors. By these and other causes, several orders of men in the community have been prepared, by degrees, for a change in government” (Lee in Unger, p. 119). Lee believes that if these things had not occurred, the idea of a new government would have never been thought of. Another point that Lee makes is about the delegates that were chosen to go to the convention. He says that the intentional purpose of the convention was to amend the Confederation. There was no word about devising a new governmental plan, and because of this, states were very willing to attend the convention. Another problem with the convention was the appointment of the delegates and who actually attended the convention. Lee says that many men who could have made a difference at the convention did not attend and therefore the nation has suffered. He believes that many groups were not represented well at the convention, and that if more men had attended the outcome would have been very different.
The third document, “Letters to Brutus,” reflects many different views on why the Constitution should not be ratified. Like Henry this article discusses the fear of absolute power arising. Other arguments include the difficulty of one government controlling such a big and diverse nation, confidence in rulers, and standing armies. The main argument of the article is the difficulty of controlling a nation so big. Brutus uses the example of the Grecian republic and also the government of the Romans. He claims that they started out small and eventually expanded their empire, which led to their downfall. Also, in such a large country, people can not have the faith in their rulers as in a smaller government. The strength of a government depends on the support of its citizens. Another argument that goes hand in hand with the size of the Untied States, is the diversity of it. Each state had it’s own laws, and many of these laws are very conflicting with one another. Brutus quotes that, “In a republic of such vast extent as the United States, the legislature cannot attend to the various concerns and wants of its different parts” (Brutus, p. 99). Finally, Brutus discusses the effects of having a “standing army.” He says that if the United States has a “standing army” to enforce laws that it would create fear and eventually lead to an absolute power.
The article that display’s the Federalist’s point of view is James Madison’s, “Federalists Paper No. 10.” This article not only explains the benefits of the Constitution, but it also gives reasons to why the old government will not work in American society. Madison believes that having many factions will result in chaos and violence. It is natural for man to have conflicting views, and as a result of this, factions are formed. The paper also discusses the system of representatives. Madison says, “The Constitution forms a happy combination in this respect; the great and aggregate interests being referred to the national, the local and particular to the State Legislatures” (p. 105). The system that the Constitution proposes provides a fair representation of all the citizens of the United States in a central government.
These articles all display different views of the Constitution, but they also have some similarities. One common interest in two of the articles, is absolute power. When power is given to a handful of men, it can be easily abused. A good example of this is in “Letters of Brutus,” when he states, “Besides, it is a truth confirmed by the unerring experiences of ages, that every man, and every body of men, invested with power, are ever disposed to increase it, and to acquire a superiority over every thing that stands in their way” (p. 96). Patrick Henry also displays his fears on this issue. He claims that it would be very easy for the President to declare himself an absolute leader. Henry also claims that because the President has control of the army, it makes this even easier to take place.
Although the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had very opposing views, some of the topics discussed are similar. For Example, Brutus and Madison both discuss the effects of human nature, and how this can effect the government. Sometimes things that men do can not prevented, and because of this, cause problems in governmental activities. Brutus states that it is human nature to want power. This is displayed by going back to the example that Brutus gives about the governments of the Grecian and of the Romans. Because of human nature they extended their empire to be as big and powerful as possible. When power is given to someone, they want to expand it and make it absolute. Brutus uses this to support his view on the Constitution. Having one central government would result in an absolute power. Madison gives some more points on human nature in his paper. He describes that factions are caused by human nature. Men naturally have different beliefs and opinions and as a result of this, different and sometimes opposing groups are formed, thus resulting in factions. These factions can become violent, because they can all have conflicting views. This is one of the problems Madison discusses as to why this is not a good form of government.
Another common interest of the Federalists and Anti-Federalists is the preservation of liberty and government. Although they both discuss these points, it is in support of their cause. Patrick Henry believes that if a central government is formed it will take away the liberty of its people. This will happen because he believes that with a central government, it will inevitably turn into an absolute power, therefore taking away the liberty of its citizens. Henry also discusses the “roots” our liberty. He says that:
We are descended from a people whose government was founded on liberty: our glorious forefathers of Great Britain made liberty the foundation of every thing. That country is become a great, mighty, and splendid nation; not because their government is strong and energetic, but sir, because liberty is its direct end and foundation. (Henry, p. 116)
Henry uses his views on the preservation of liberty to further support his argument. On the other hand, Madison discusses the topic of liberty in that it is what fuels factions. He says that removing liberty is one of the only ways to destroy a faction. He proceeds to state that this is not probable, and that factions can not be destroyed, but we must control their consequences in order to have a stable government. Madison believes that the Constitution preserves man’s liberty by fairly representing them in a central government.
All of the topics discussed in these essays are very relevant to their respective causes. They are all backed up with valid information and examples. These essay’s were written by very respectable men and show much insight on the subject of whether or not the Constitution should be ratified. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists had very opposing views, but used some of the same topics to support their point of views.
Другие работы по теме:
AnitFederalism Essay Research Paper Perhaps the greatest
Anit-Federalism Essay, Research Paper Perhaps the greatest document of all time, the Constitution of the United States of America was not easily created. Fifty-five great men were needed to hammer out all the details of the Constitution in a long grueling process. As James Madison, architect of the constitution said, ?The [writing of the Constitution] formed a task more difficult than can be well conceived by those who were not concerned in the execution of it.
Whigs V Federalists Essay Research Paper Although
Whigs V. Federalists Essay, Research Paper Although historically represented as distinct parties, the Federalists and the Whigs in fact shared a common political ideology, represented many of the
Federalists Vs Antifederalists Essay Research Paper Federalists
Federalists Vs. Antifederalists Essay, Research Paper Federalists vs. Antifederalists To amend the Articles of Confederation, unanimous approval by all thirteen colonies was a necessity. Instead of reforming the preexisting document, it was decided that once approved by nine states, a newly written document would become the supreme law of the land.
Parties Now And Then Essay Research Paper
Back in the 1780’s, when the constitution was still being written, there were no Democrats or Republicans; the political groups that were most present were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. These two groups eventually formed into the political groups of today, with their ideas changed. Basically the Anti-Federalists believed that the idea of a Representative Government wouldn’t work in a large scale, they said that it could only work in small communities where the people all held similar beliefs and interests.
Benefits Of Federalists Essay Research Paper Benefits
Benefits Of Federalists Essay, Research Paper Benefits of Federalists It is beneficial that Federalists had the most power in the American government for a time before the Republicans gained power. During the Federalist s rule they were successful in creating foundations that allowed others to build upon, but not radically change, the progress of the nation.
The Regan Ruth Essay Research Paper The
The Regan Ruth Essay, Research Paper The American Revolution, arguably the most significant era in United States history, is what is mainly responsible in shaping our country into what the strong nation it
Federalists
& Democratic Part. Essay, Research Paper Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans The great country of the United States did not just appear over night. Many hours, days, and years of study and decisions have taken place to bring these country were it is today. Difference had to be settled, and dents worked out of the governmental plans.
Characterization Of Democratic Republicans Essay Research Paper
The Democratic Republicans were almost always characterized as believing in following the strict construction of the constitution. They were opposed to the loose interpretation the Federalists used. The presidencies of Jefferson and Madison proved this characterization to be somewhat accurate. It is true that both Jefferson and Madison supported the ideas of the Democratic Rebublicans but, they also did many things that contradicted them.
A Definite Difference Of Opinions Essay Research
Paper During the development of the young country of the United States of America, everyone had the ability to include their opinions on any subject. But many times, only a few voices were actually listened
AntiFederalists Essay Research Paper AntiFederalists were people
Anti-Federalists Essay, Research Paper Anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the Constitution. They believed strongly that the Constitution would not be able toe maintain a system of republican government because the Federalists were proposing a government that was the opposite of what they believed in.
Federalists Vs AntiFederalists Essay Research Paper The
Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay, Research Paper The Battle Over States RightsThe Framers of the Constitution had the large job of producing a new government, different from the Articles Of Confederation, that would unite a newly born country, freed from the tyrant King of England. This government have to appease both sides and resemble a working model that showed potential and showed promise that the recent chain of events would never happen, or have to happen again.
AntiFederalists Vs Federalists Essay Research Paper Essay
Anti-Federalists Vs. Federalists Essay, Research Paper Essay Question # 7: Federalists v. Anti-Federalists The Constitution of the United States is the system of fundamental laws of the United States of America. The Constitution was drawn up by 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia during the summer of 1787 and ratified by the states in 1788.
Comparing And Contrasting Federalists And Antifederalists Essay
, Research Paper 1. The federalist and anti-federalists were very different in the opinions they shared on how the government should be run. The Federalists had very high class and social men while the Anti-federalists had farmers. The Federalists wanted a republican government with a strong executive branch, while the Anti-Federalists wanted a participatory democracy with a minimum executive branch.
Federalists Vs Jeffersonian Republicans Essay Research Paper
The Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans held opposing views on many issues. The Federalists, who included Hamilton and Adams, and the Republicans, who included Jefferson and Madison, had contrasting ideas and beliefs. Four of these issues were their idea of who should rule the government, the power of the government, national debt, and banks.
Jeffersonian Republicans Vs Madison Administratoin Essay Research
Paper In the time period between 1801 and 1817 the Jeffersonian Republicans were regarded as strict constructionists however this political party made many decisions that were characterized as broad constructionism. The Federalists who were characterized as broad constructionism also abandoned their method of interpreting the constitution more than once and interpreted the constitution quite strictly.
With Effort We Can Get Through A
Narrow Mind Essay, Research Paper In the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, narrow-minded is defined as lacking in tolerance or breadth of vision. A narrow-minded person can be considered as marked by or reflective of narrow interests, sympathies, and/or outlooks. However, the previous consideration is a somewhat broad assumption.
Political Parties In America Essay Research Paper
In many lands across the world political parties has often taken a drastic and violent turn. Groups defected at the polls have resorted to violent terms of action to advane their cause. The stroy of political parties in the United States is both brief and peaceful.
Differences In The Whig And Federalist Parties
Essay, Research Paper I believe that the Whigs and Federalists, although historically represented as distinct parties, in fact shared common political ideology, represented many of the same interest groups and proposed similar programs and policies. Although there were some differences.
Constitution And Tariffs Essay Research Paper Between
Constitution And Tariffs Essay, Research Paper Between 1801 and 1817 the two parties in the national government of the United States traded sides on the issue of loose construction vs. strict construction of the Constitution because they had also traded sides of the power table. The Democratic-Republicans having gained power seemed to have abandoned their strict constructionist beliefs and adopted a broader perspective.
The Forms And Limits Of Adjudication Essay
, Research Paper Adjudication is the process of judgement within the government as well as within relations in common society. Any person who stands to judge an action of another person is participating in adjudication. Creating social order if the defining principles of adjudication, The The relation of men to regulate one another.
Socrates Arguments Regarding Moral Conventionalism Essay Research
Paper In assessing the validity of Socrates? arguments regarding moral conventionalism, Plato presents a multitude of premises on which Socrates? argument is based. These premises both support and weaken Socrates? beliefs against Sophist teachings. Using The Crito and The Apology, it is relatively easy to understand Socrates? reasoning in opposing the sophistic position of moral relativism.
US Constitution Ratification Debates Essay Research Paper
On September 28, 1787, after three days of bitter debate, the Confederation Congress sent the Constitution to the states with neither an endorsement nor a condemnation. This action, a compromise engineered by Federalist members, disposed of the argument that the convention had exceeded its mandate; in the tacit opinion of Congress, the Constitution was validly before the people.
Descartes First Meditation Essay Research Paper Descartes
Descartes First Meditation Essay, Research Paper Descartes first meditation, his main objective is to present three skeptical arguments to bring doubt upon what he considers his basic beliefs. Descartes believes this to be an intricate part of his complete epistemological argument. Descartes skeptical arguments are not intended to be a denial of his basic beliefs.
Kentucky Virginia Resolution Essay Research Paper The
Kentucky Virginia Resolution Essay, Research Paper The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions The Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions were authored in secret by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in response to the repressive Alien and Sedition Acts passed in 1798. In the opinion of Jefferson and Madison, the Acts were unjust.
Metaphysis Essay Research Paper Hello I
Metaphysis Essay, Research Paper : Hello: : I need help, I have somes question would help me. 1. do the criticisms that hume makes of Design Arguments all apply to Thomas’ Teleological Argument?
Federalists Vs Anti Federalists Essay Research Paper
Federalists vs Anti Federalists The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists When the revolutionary war was over, the American colonists had found themselves free of British domination. Due to the fact that they were free
Articles Of Confed V The Constitution Essay
, Research Paper The Great Debate After the ratification of the Articles of Confederation, many problems arose due to its weaknesses. This form of government was created to unite the states under one law, and was intended to strengthen patriotism as well as the economy. Ironically, it had the opposite effect- economic and social depression spread throughout the country.
Exploration Essay Research Paper Ratificating the constitutionThe
Exploration Essay, Research Paper Ratificating the constitution The US Constitution was written and ratified in 1787. It is over 200 years old. People think that this document has always been honored, but this is not true. There were many people who supported this Constitution who they were called the Federalists and people who opposed it who were called the Antifederalists.
Importance Of The First Amendment Essay Research
Paper The Importance of the First Amendment The First Amendment of the Constitution written during the summer of 1789 was the first added to The Bill of Rights. Although they were not a part of the original Constitution they came as the first addition. The Bill of Rights came about mainly as a result of Antifederalists who had criticized the Constitution for its lack of individual rights.
Bill Of Rights Essay Research Paper The
Bill Of Rights Essay, Research Paper The Bill of Righs was written for the American people for two reasons. The first was to pacify the Anti-Federalist’s fears of an overwhelmingly powerful central government provided by the Constitution and the second was, in fact, to protect the freedoms secured by the Americans after their war for independence.
Congress And Term Limits Essay Research Paper
Whether or not Congress should have term limits has been a long debated question that is proposed as an amendment to the qualifications clause of the Constitution. There are excellent arguments on either side of the issue;