Federalists Vs. Antifederalists Essay, Research Paper
Federalists vs. Antifederalists
To amend the Articles of Confederation, unanimous approval by all thirteen colonies was a necessity. Instead of reforming the preexisting document, it was decided that once approved by nine states, a newly written document would become the supreme law of the land. Framers of the constitution were voted on by the individual colonies to amend the existing law, the Articles of Confederation, but instead, created something entirely different altogether. They wrote the new document and gave it to the people, who were amazed and frightened at the new piece of legislation. Because of the introduction of such a radical change, conflict sprouted throughout the country over views of how government should be, and the rights that it should grant the people.
People who were against a strong federal government were the antifederalists. They were in opposition of the federalists who supported the constitution and a strong central government. The antifederalists consisted mostly of the poorer classes, those who were poorly educated, backcountry dwellers, single-horse farmers, etc. Along with them were debtors who feared that a strong central government would force them to pay off their debts. Antifederalists suspected that the aristocrats were up to something sinister and trying to somehow trick them.
Federalists were more respectable and cultured people. They mostly owned property and lived in settled areas, unlike the antifederalists. who lived in the backcountry. Many of them were former loyalists who had a conservative attitude.
Antifederalists voiced strong objections about the constitution. It had been drawn up by the aristocrats, and therefore was believed to be undemocratic. They spoke out about the loss of sovereignty of the states, and how the freedoms of individuals were in jeopardy because of an absence of a bill of rights. They criticized that there would no longer be annual elections for congressional representatives, the creating of a standing army, the exclusion of any reference to God, and how only two thirds of the states needed to ratify the document.
Special elections for federalists and antifederalists, were held in different states, and were elected based on the pledges for or against the constitution. Four small states and Pennsylvania ratified the document early on. Massachusetts ratified the document as well, but only after the promise that it would include a bill of rights. Three more states then approved the Constitution. All states had agreed upon it except Virginia, New York, Rhode Island, and North Carolina. Although these states had not yet approved, the document was officially adopted on June 21,1788. Virginia had a strong anti-federalists population, but Rhode Island was close to ratify, and because Virginia could not stand as an independent state, the Virginians agreed. Because New York permitted a manhood-suffrage vote, the majority of people were anti-federalists. Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison wrote a series of articles in New York newspapers that were the most convincing commentary ever written about the Constitution. New York soon ratified as well, with the realization that it could not prosper on it?s own. North Carolina and Rhode Island were the last two states to agree. They did so, unwillingly, only after the new government had been in effect for several months. Although no one died because of the Antifederalists-Federalist battle, it was very heated and involved many riots and disagreements. The last four states to ratify did so involuntarily because they knew that in order to survive; they needed to be part of the union.
Другие работы по теме:
Marbury Vs Madison Essay Research Paper Under
Marbury Vs Madison Essay, Research Paper Under the administrations of Washington and his successor, John Adams, only members of the ruling Federalist Party were allowed to be on the bench, and under the Constitution, they held office for life during “good behavior.” So when the Republicans won the election of 1800, the Jeffersonians found out that even though they controlled the presidency and Congress, the Federalists still had control of the judiciary.
AnitFederalism Essay Research Paper Perhaps the greatest
Anit-Federalism Essay, Research Paper Perhaps the greatest document of all time, the Constitution of the United States of America was not easily created. Fifty-five great men were needed to hammer out all the details of the Constitution in a long grueling process. As James Madison, architect of the constitution said, ?The [writing of the Constitution] formed a task more difficult than can be well conceived by those who were not concerned in the execution of it.
Whigs V Federalists Essay Research Paper Although
Whigs V. Federalists Essay, Research Paper Although historically represented as distinct parties, the Federalists and the Whigs in fact shared a common political ideology, represented many of the
Parties Now And Then Essay Research Paper
Back in the 1780’s, when the constitution was still being written, there were no Democrats or Republicans; the political groups that were most present were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. These two groups eventually formed into the political groups of today, with their ideas changed. Basically the Anti-Federalists believed that the idea of a Representative Government wouldn’t work in a large scale, they said that it could only work in small communities where the people all held similar beliefs and interests.
Untitled Essay Research Paper Essay on Jefferson
Untitled Essay, Research Paper Essay on Jefferson Jefferson had destroyed political traditions. From his contradictions and defecting his priciples, Jefferson destroyed the political precedent and is a exemplatory hypocrite, which can be seen throughout his administration. Jefferson was an admired statesman who was grappling unsuccessfully with the moral issue of slavery.
Benefits Of Federalists Essay Research Paper Benefits
Benefits Of Federalists Essay, Research Paper Benefits of Federalists It is beneficial that Federalists had the most power in the American government for a time before the Republicans gained power. During the Federalist s rule they were successful in creating foundations that allowed others to build upon, but not radically change, the progress of the nation.
John Quincy Adams Essay Research Paper John
John Quincy Adams Essay, Research Paper John Quincy Adams was a major influence in the history of the United States. John Quincy took part in more important events, and held more important positions than any person in United States history. Some of the important positions he held were he was American Ministers to four different European Countries (Hague, Prussia, Russia and England), a State Senator representing Massachusetts, peace negotiator to England, a member of the House of Representatives, Secretary of the State, and President of the United States.
The Regan Ruth Essay Research Paper The
The Regan Ruth Essay, Research Paper The American Revolution, arguably the most significant era in United States history, is what is mainly responsible in shaping our country into what the strong nation it
Federalists
& Democratic Part. Essay, Research Paper Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans The great country of the United States did not just appear over night. Many hours, days, and years of study and decisions have taken place to bring these country were it is today. Difference had to be settled, and dents worked out of the governmental plans.
Characterization Of Democratic Republicans Essay Research Paper
The Democratic Republicans were almost always characterized as believing in following the strict construction of the constitution. They were opposed to the loose interpretation the Federalists used. The presidencies of Jefferson and Madison proved this characterization to be somewhat accurate. It is true that both Jefferson and Madison supported the ideas of the Democratic Rebublicans but, they also did many things that contradicted them.
A Definite Difference Of Opinions Essay Research
Paper During the development of the young country of the United States of America, everyone had the ability to include their opinions on any subject. But many times, only a few voices were actually listened
AntiFederalists Essay Research Paper AntiFederalists were people
Anti-Federalists Essay, Research Paper Anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the Constitution. They believed strongly that the Constitution would not be able toe maintain a system of republican government because the Federalists were proposing a government that was the opposite of what they believed in.
Federalists Vs AntiFederalists Essay Research Paper The
Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay, Research Paper The Battle Over States RightsThe Framers of the Constitution had the large job of producing a new government, different from the Articles Of Confederation, that would unite a newly born country, freed from the tyrant King of England. This government have to appease both sides and resemble a working model that showed potential and showed promise that the recent chain of events would never happen, or have to happen again.
AntiFederalists Vs Federalists Essay Research Paper Essay
Anti-Federalists Vs. Federalists Essay, Research Paper Essay Question # 7: Federalists v. Anti-Federalists The Constitution of the United States is the system of fundamental laws of the United States of America. The Constitution was drawn up by 55 delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia during the summer of 1787 and ratified by the states in 1788.
Federalists Vs AntiFederalists And Their Common Arguments
Essay, Research Paper Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists, and Their Common Arguments The Constitution, when first introduced, set the stage for much controversy in the United States. The two major parties in this battle were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, such as James Madison, were in favor of ratifying the Constitution.
Comparing And Contrasting Federalists And Antifederalists Essay
, Research Paper 1. The federalist and anti-federalists were very different in the opinions they shared on how the government should be run. The Federalists had very high class and social men while the Anti-federalists had farmers. The Federalists wanted a republican government with a strong executive branch, while the Anti-Federalists wanted a participatory democracy with a minimum executive branch.
Federalists Vs Jeffersonian Republicans Essay Research Paper
The Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans held opposing views on many issues. The Federalists, who included Hamilton and Adams, and the Republicans, who included Jefferson and Madison, had contrasting ideas and beliefs. Four of these issues were their idea of who should rule the government, the power of the government, national debt, and banks.
Jeffersonian Republicans Vs Madison Administratoin Essay Research
Paper In the time period between 1801 and 1817 the Jeffersonian Republicans were regarded as strict constructionists however this political party made many decisions that were characterized as broad constructionism. The Federalists who were characterized as broad constructionism also abandoned their method of interpreting the constitution more than once and interpreted the constitution quite strictly.
Governmental Parties Essay Research Paper The Federalist
Governmental Parties Essay, Research Paper The Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties fought for control over the government in the early 1800s. Although these two parties had great differences, they each had many supporters.
Political Parties In America Essay Research Paper
In many lands across the world political parties has often taken a drastic and violent turn. Groups defected at the polls have resorted to violent terms of action to advane their cause. The stroy of political parties in the United States is both brief and peaceful.
Differences In The Whig And Federalist Parties
Essay, Research Paper I believe that the Whigs and Federalists, although historically represented as distinct parties, in fact shared common political ideology, represented many of the same interest groups and proposed similar programs and policies. Although there were some differences.
Constitution And Tariffs Essay Research Paper Between
Constitution And Tariffs Essay, Research Paper Between 1801 and 1817 the two parties in the national government of the United States traded sides on the issue of loose construction vs. strict construction of the Constitution because they had also traded sides of the power table. The Democratic-Republicans having gained power seemed to have abandoned their strict constructionist beliefs and adopted a broader perspective.
US Constitution Ratification Debates Essay Research Paper
On September 28, 1787, after three days of bitter debate, the Confederation Congress sent the Constitution to the states with neither an endorsement nor a condemnation. This action, a compromise engineered by Federalist members, disposed of the argument that the convention had exceeded its mandate; in the tacit opinion of Congress, the Constitution was validly before the people.
Federalist Paper
#51 Essay, Research Paper Federalist Paper #51 I believe there should be a Constitutional Convention because many of us find the government structure defective. The only answer that can be given is that as all these exterior provisions are found to be inadequate the defect must be supplied, by so contriving the interior structure of the government as that its several constituent parts may, by their mutual relations, be the means of keeping each other in their proper places.”
Untitled Essay Research Paper A Biographical Report
Untitled Essay, Research Paper A Biographical Report on Thomas Fitzsimons Thomas Fitzsimons, or Fitzsimmons as his last name was sometimes spelled, was born during 1741 and died on August 26, 1811. Originally from Ireland,
Federalists Vs Anti Federalists Essay Research Paper
Federalists vs Anti Federalists The Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists When the revolutionary war was over, the American colonists had found themselves free of British domination. Due to the fact that they were free
Articles Of Confed V The Constitution Essay
, Research Paper The Great Debate After the ratification of the Articles of Confederation, many problems arose due to its weaknesses. This form of government was created to unite the states under one law, and was intended to strengthen patriotism as well as the economy. Ironically, it had the opposite effect- economic and social depression spread throughout the country.
Exploration Essay Research Paper Ratificating the constitutionThe
Exploration Essay, Research Paper Ratificating the constitution The US Constitution was written and ratified in 1787. It is over 200 years old. People think that this document has always been honored, but this is not true. There were many people who supported this Constitution who they were called the Federalists and people who opposed it who were called the Antifederalists.
The Alien And Sedition Acts Essay Research
Paper The Alien and Sedition Acts were four laws passed in 1798. The Naturalization Act raised the number of years of United States residency required for naturalization from 5 to 14. The Alien Act empowered the president to arrest and deport aliens considered dangerous. The Alien Enemies Act provided for the deportation of subjects of foreign powers at war with the United States.
Bill Of Rights Essay Research Paper The
Bill Of Rights Essay, Research Paper The Bill of Righs was written for the American people for two reasons. The first was to pacify the Anti-Federalist’s fears of an overwhelmingly powerful central government provided by the Constitution and the second was, in fact, to protect the freedoms secured by the Americans after their war for independence.
Legitimacy Of Public Administrator Essay Research Paper
THE LEGITIMACY OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE STATE The question of legitimacy of public administration was raised two centuries ago. This was the case as the Federal Constitution did not specifically call for the government to have the support of such an organization. Justification was based on the fact that governments need support to meet their duties and responsibilities.