, Research Paper
Is Hulliung right?
Hulliung discusses how people understand Machiavelli and what he thinks of some of Machiavelli?s concepts. In the chapter of ?interpreting Machiavelli?, Hulliung argues in the issues of means and ends, idealism Vs realism, political violence and weather Machiavelli is a pagan. His ideas somewhat seem to be convincing. However, the question is, is Hulliung fair in judging Machiavelli? Or is he immoral?
Hulliung thinks that there are no differences between ends and means. In other words if the means are violent, in his view, the ends will be violent as well. What Hulliung says is that nothing can justify a means except the end that it is intended to serve. Hulliung points out that if an action is morally bad in itself, it cannot really serve a good end, even though it may on the surface appear to do so. In other words, men in power have often tried to condone their use of violence or fraud by making it appear that their injustice to individuals is for the social good and is, therefore, justified. But since the good society involves justice for all, a government, which employs unjust means fails the end.
The issue of ends and means has a bit to do with Machiavelli being a realist, as he thought that for Machiavelli realism and idealism were both the same. A realist ruler when it comes to ends and means usually asks himself: Will it work? Will this means, if employed, accomplish the purpose I have in mind? If not, it is certainly not the right way to use. Usually after raising the question if he were right morally, in taking whatever steps, it might serve as means to his end. When the answer is yes, one would not hesitate to use his means. If not, then he is not morally justified in employing such means. Since a bad end is one that we are not morally justified in seeking, we are not morally justified in taking any steps whatsoever toward its accomplishment. Hence, no means made morally right, by a bad end, can be justified. Nonetheless, we are always morally justified in working for accomplishing good ends. We are then, also morally justified in using any means which will work; for if the end is good, and if the means serves the end and does not defeat it in any way,
then there can be nothing wrong with the means. The end then justifies it, and we are justified in using it. For example, in education sometimes the means justifies the end, even if the end is not what you would have chosen. If you teach like you believe one should teach and you end up not satisfying those who think they agree with you or those who don’t, you’ve still accomplished something that might be called education.
.
In criticizing Machiavelli Hulliung did not only mention means and ends, and realism versus idealism, but he had also criticized Machiavelli?s use of violence. He stated that Machiavelli uses violence as a means of attaining glory. However, this method could at sometimes be successful. It is indeed sometimes the only solution or the only treatment that could be flourishing. In the context of economic globalization, many methods of rule described in The Prince are used today in many countries around the world, especially those that do not have a democratic heritage and clearly do not share one?s idealistic views of what is right and what is wrong. That entire one needs to prove this is to look at the political climate that exists. For example, like in many of the third world nation violence is often used, and it often serves the good of the country. Many companies who do business in many developing nations probably utilize Machiavellian principles themselves (unless they are legally forbidden by the nation of their incorporation or by some treaty) if they want to have any chance of success in those countries.
In addition to all what hulliung said about Machiavelli, he accused him of being a pagan. Machiavelli’s ambiguous treatment of religion has fueled a contentious and prolonged s debate among people. Whereas some insist that Machiavelli is a Christian because of some of his ideal points, Hulliung maintains he is a pagan. His examination of Machiavelli?s violent ideas about the treatment of the citizens made him thinks he was not a religious man. However, morality has very little to do with any religion. Certainly one must have morals to be considered religious, but some people are agnostic and have much higher values than most of the more common
“believers”. The strife between the religions of the world has usually been perpetrated by the masses in the “name” of said religion, when in reality it has been our own ignorance and hatred of those that are different that leads us to act with little integrity. Maybe if we look at our beliefs and search to understand why things are the way they are we would be able to come to some common ground on the states of things. My point being that if we follow the rules to get to heaven we have not understood what life is about. We have done all for ourselves and have cheated others out of just due respect. Now if there is no heaven the situation is still going to be the same. No understanding leads toeing self-centered and unhappy. Morality is giving with want for no return. It is selfless and cannot be found in the doctrine of any religion but only in the hearts of those willing to understand.
Hulliung had shed the light on many of Machivelli?s expressions that could be understood wrongly. It is only when we do not look too closely into the matter that we can be fooled by the statement ?the end justifies the means?. We fail to ask whether the end in view is really good, or we fail to examine carefully how the means will affect the end. This happens most frequently in the game of power politics or in war, where the only criterion is success and anything that contributes to success that one thinks of it as it is justified. Success may be the standard by which we measure the expediency of the means, but expediency is one thing and moral justification is another. Hulliung has also accused Machiavelli of being a pagan. However the issue of religion is not something we should really care about. It is reasonable to use religion in the pursuit of power; but it is certain that there are many politicians or leaders of organized crimes to this day go to church. The point is not to be religious, but to be seen to be religious. The people want piety in their leaders, even if in their private lives they have no respect for religion.
hulliung, mark Interpreting machuiavelli, princeton press, princeton, 1963
Другие работы по теме:
Machiavelli Opinions Of A Perfect Princedom Essay
, Research Paper Niccolo Machiavelli?s work The Prince is a letter he wrote, while he was in exile to Lorenzo Medici. In his work he sought to establish a state capable of resisting foreign attack. His writings are concerned with the principles on which a state is founded, and how they are maintained. He describes the methods by which a prince can acquire and maintain political power.
Machiavelli VS King George III Essay Research
Paper MACHIAVELLI VS. KING GEORGE III During colonial times, King George III was a tyrant ruler. He was unstable and constantly inflicted hardship upon the people of the American Colonies. King George III thought that imposing more demands on the colonists would allow him to reach his goals such as bringing in more money for the British government.
Is It Better To Be Feared Than
Loved Essay, Research Paper Machiavelli was a man who was not worried about what was morally correct, but rather, what was politically deserved. He was in fact an honest and religious man, but he has become known for trickery and double-dealing. He thought that princes would have to start tricking his enemies, or even his people for the good of his state.
Machiavelli Essay Research Paper The first great
Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper The first great political philosopher of the Renaissance was Nicolo Machiavelli (1469-1527). His famous treatise, The Prince, stands apart from all other political
Is Napoleon Bonaparte Machiavellian In Nature Essay
, Research Paper In 1513, Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a piece of work called, “The Prince”. It was written to all principalities, and that which is parallel to what Machiavelli suggests is often referred to as being “Machiavellian”. The purpose of this essay is to ask the question “Is Napoleon Bonaparte Machiavellian in Nature?” By the evidence found from Napoleon’s life and accomplishments it can said that he was not Machiavellian in nature, which can be demonstrated by numerous accounts as well as some suggested characteristics given by Machiavelli, to support this theory.
Henry Iv Essay Research Paper Henry IV
Henry Iv Essay, Research Paper Henry IV, A Look at a Machiavellian Ruler When looking at Henry IV while studying Niccolo Machiavelli’s The Prince, one can see that henry was extremely Machiavellian in his ways. The Prince, written by Machiavelli, was written to guide a ruler in the key concepts of being able to have a kingdom that endures and to obtain and control and power in order to succeed during his reign.
The Prince Essay Research Paper Of Princes
The Prince Essay, Research Paper Of Princes and Statesmanship Niccol Machiavelli, historically recognized as one of Italy s most prominent political theorists of the late fifteenth and early sixteenth centuries, witnessed the temporary downturn of his homeland s welfare due to foreign invasions from France, Spain, and Germany.
Machiavelli Essay Research Paper The PrinceMAJOR THEMEMachiavelli
Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper The Prince MAJOR THEME Machiavelli had a true and abiding love for Florence. He wanted to make Florence great and also find himself a job, as he lost his when the Medici family came into power. He dedicated his book on political science, The Prince, to Lorenzo Medici in the hopes that Lorenzo would be impressed and offer him a job.
MachiavelliThe Prince Essay Research Paper Assignment
Machiavelli/The Prince Essay, Research Paper Assignment # 7 Nicolo Machiavelli was the first great political philospher of the Renaissance. He was born in 1469 and died in 1527. He was born in Florence, Italy. At the time he was born, the country was in political upheaval. It was diveded between four dominant city-states, although each was always at the mercy of the stronger, more unified surrounding foreign governments.
Machiavelli Essay Research Paper MachiavelliThe Prince
Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper Machiavelli The Prince “The Prince”, written by Machiavelli, was a guide for all the rulers of his time who wanted to become major powers and to find all the solutions to their political problems. In his book, Machiavelli mentions a great amount of key points that guide rulers to the road of success.
Was Machiavelli Satan Essay Research Paper The
Was Machiavelli Satan? Essay, Research Paper The Church accused Niccolo Machiavelli of being Satan for writing his book The Prince. Machiavelli completed The Prince in 1513. He wrote it as a gift to Lorenzo Medici, called the Magnificent, ruler of Florence. The political views Machiavelli expressed in his book went against the theology of the Church, specifically the Ten Commandments and the Beatitudes.
Machiavelli Vs Arendt Essay Research Paper Tales
Machiavelli Vs. Arendt Essay, Research Paper Tales There are some similarities between Machiavelli’s, “Qualities of the Prince,” and Arendt’s, “Ideology and Terror.” Hannah Arendt’s piece deals with governmental leadership using totalitarianism as its backbone. Machiavelli’s piece deals with how a prince should properly keep his power over the country in which he rules.
Dealing With The Ideas Of Niccolo Machiavelli
Essay, Research Paper Muhd Fawwaz Dealing with the ideas of Niccolo Machiavelli This essay is about the idea of Niccolo Machiavelli ideas about politic and leadership. A lot of his ideas are interesting and a lot of it does not have good aspects in morality. A lot of it tells us that as a leader, we should know how to lie in a way that can help us as a leader.
The Qualities Of The Prince Essay Research
Paper Essay on Niccolo Machiavelli Niccolo Machiavelli recommends a very practical course of action for the prince: obtain power by direct and effective means, which is necessary. In the story "The Qualities of the Prince" by Niccoli Machiavelli, the concept "The ends justify the means" is saying that a prince should hold absolute control of their territories, and they should use any means of resort necessary to accomplish this end, including violence and deception.
The Prince By Niccolo Machiavelli Essay Research
Paper The Prince, a treatise by Niccolo Machiavelli, was arguably one of the greatest works of the renaissance. Its new ideas in political theory, although very controversial at its time, were revolutionary and remarkably similar to today’s political system. In the following paragraphs I will give a brief summary of this great work and then give my personal thoughts on these revolutionary ideas
Niccolo Machiavelli Essay Research Paper Niccolo Machiavelli
Niccolo Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper Niccolo Machiavelli tells of the methods that have been the most successful in gaining and maintaining power in non-democratic governments in his classic novel, The Prince. Through a meticulous analysis of political history up to his point in time, he tells of the political strategies that had worked for rulers time and time again and also of those that had failed.
The Prince By Niccolo Machiavelli 14691532 Essay
, Research Paper Machiavelli’s prime motive in writing The Prince was to encourage Lorenzo the Magnificent to unite Italy. Like many writers during the Renaissance, Machiavelli was a student of history;
Is The Phrase The Ends Justify The
Means A Useful Summary Of Machiavellis The Prince Essay, Research Paper In Machiavelli’s ‘The Prince’ it would appear, at first, that Machiavelli is advancing the argument that ‘the ends justify the means’. However, I am unsure that this is a useful summary of ‘The Prince’ and that it may be an over simplification and even a misunderstanding.
Policraticus By John Bishop Of Salisbury And
The Prince, By Niccol Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper Policraticus, by John, Bishop of Salisbury, and The Prince, by Niccol Machiavelli, show distinguishable differences in thinking between the Middle Ages and the period of Renaissance. The two books were written in different eras, and they both talk about the true meaning of prince as a ruler and how he should conduct himself in order to maintain his power.
Niccolo Machiavelli Essay Research Paper Machiavelli Niccol
Niccolo Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper Machiavelli, Niccol Niccol Machiavelli was born on May 3, 1469 and died on June 21, 1527 in Florence, Italy. He was an Italian historian, statesman, and a political philosopher. He was an upright man, a good citizen, a good father, and a loving patriot. He had five children with his wife, Marietta Corsini.
Prince 2 Essay Research Paper The PrinceMachiavelli
Prince 2 Essay, Research Paper The Prince Machiavelli’s the Prince The Prince, written in 1513 by Niccolo Machiavelli is regarded as one of the most crucial yet controversial works in the field of political science. It holds Machiavelli’s observations and reflections on Italian political history. It was written in response to the decay of the Italian states system.
The Prince Essay Research Paper The PrinceWhat
The Prince Essay, Research Paper The Prince What is Machiavelli’s view of human nature? While reading The Prince, I have come to a conclusion that Machiavelli demonstrates a view of governing a state that is so different from that of humanists of his time thought. The humanists of Machiavelli’s time believed that an individual had a lot to offer to the well being of the state and should be able to help in whatever way necessary.
Different View Point On Human Nature Essay
, Research Paper Different Viewpoints on Human Nature Throughout history there have been arguments about anything and everything that is disagreeable. People innately have there own and often different opinions. A prominent discussion topic throughout history has been the nature of mankind. Many have written works about human nature but few are discussed in greater detail than Candide, The Prince, and Essay on Man.
Machiavelli Essay Research Paper In The Prince
Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper In The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli, Machiavelli goes against the traditional mindset that a prince derived his power from God. Machiavelli believed that the rulers were given no divine right. He said that a ruler achieved his power through hid own efforts and skills.
Machiavelli 2 Essay Research Paper Niccolo Machiavelli
Machiavelli 2 Essay, Research Paper Niccolo Machiavelli was born in Florence on May 3, 1469. While working as a clerk in the government, he gained stature when the Florentine Republic was established in 1498. Machiavelli supervised the military operations of the republic. He also was the secretary of the ten-man council that conducted the diplomatic negotiations.
LaoTzu Vs Machiavelli Essay Research Paper Laotzu
Lao-Tzu Vs. Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper Lao-tzu vs. Machiavelli Lao-tzu and Machiavelli are political philosophers writing in two different lands and two different times. Lao-tzu was an ancient Chinese philosopher from 6th century BC, the author of Tao-te Ching, and Machiavelli was an Italian philosopher who lived 2000 years after Lao-tzu s time, author of Prince.
Analysis Of Machiavelli
’s The Prince Essay, Research Paper In secular democracies, power is necessarily derived from the will of the governed. That power is then entrusted to a leader, who Machiavelli would understand to be a prince . Inherently, his book, The Prince, has been close at hand for most politicians for centuries, as it provides general, historically proven advice for principalities and republics on how to govern and maintain relations with their most important resource and the very core of their power, which would be the people themselves.
The Prince Essay Research Paper The Prince
The Prince Essay, Research Paper The Prince is by far Machiavelli’s most well known and important work. In 1513, after his exile from Florence, Machiavelli began this great work. In The Prince, Machiavelli dedicated it to Lorenzo de Medici, who never responded to the privately sent copy. Interestingly enough , the line of the Medici family represented the ineffectual leadership that Machiavelli disliked in The Prince.
Machiavelli Essay Research Paper Machiavelli
Machiavelli Essay, Research Paper Machiavelli Machiavelli’s views revolved around the ideas that one must do anything within his (Machiavelli did not refer to ?her’) power to keep the influence and
Interview Essay Essay Research Paper Interview Essay
Interview Essay Essay, Research Paper Interview Essay As a new student in college you meet many people from many different walks of life. The campus is a conglomerate of lifestyles and personalities. Everyday there is someone new to meet and something new to talk about. I got to know Mark Thompson and learned a lot about him and his way of life.
Niccol Machiavelli
– The Qualities Of The Prince. Essay, Research Paper Machiavelli s views on human nature are unjust; nevertheless, his philosophy, or rather instructions, is reasonable in capturing the selfishness of men. As written in The Qualities of the Prince by Machiavelli, Men are ungrateful, fickle, simulators and deceivers, avoiders of danger, greedy for gain; and while you work for their good they are completely yours, offering you their blood, their property, their lives, and their sons when danger is far away; but when it comes nearer to you they turn away.
Client Essay Research Paper The Client
Client Essay, Research Paper ?The Client? / John Grisham 1. I enjoyed reading this interesting book. It talks about eleven years old Mark Sway and his younger