The Ontological Argument Essay, Research Paper
The Ontological argument is a group of different philosophers arguments for the existence of God. “Ontological” literally means talking about being and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of God. The main component of the Ontological argument can be found in the Anselm’s “Proslogion” which is a short work that tries to demonstrate both the existence and the nature of God. His main aim in writing the Proslogion is not to directly prove the existence of God but to moreover, to show the relationship between faith and reason. Anselm wanted to understand the object of the belief. He is also not trying to defend his belief against the atheist and neither is he trying to convince the atheist that God exists. The ontological argument differs from other arguments in favour of God as it is an ‘a priori’ deductive argument, a priori meaning that can come to a conclusion by the use of reason and not proof. A deductive argument means that if the premises that are put into the argument are true, then the conclusion must be true. Thus, Anselm tends to base his argument on the definitions and terminology used.
Anselm’s first form of the argument is that God is “that than which none greater can be conceived”. Firstly, it must be emphasised that Anselm’s definition does not limit God to being the “greatest” but makes it known that nothing greater can be thought than God himself. Therefore, God should not in any way be linked to terms such as ‘omnipotent’ as terminology such as this limit him to what he really is. With this definition, he attempts to prove that not only does God exist in the mind but also in reality. Anselm uses the example of “the fool” to prove his point on God’s existence. He says that when “the fool” says that “There is no God” in Psalms, he must therefore understand what he hears , and what he understands in his intellect by the term “God”. Therefore, if he knows what God is, God must exist as it is impossible to know what something is if it does not exist.
In chapter three in the ‘Proslogion’, Anselm contributes his second form to the argument. This form of the argument is that of ‘necessary existence’. He says that “that than which can be thought not to exist is not as great as that which cannot be thought not to exist.” Therefore, to say that God can be thought not to exist if the definition of God is “that than which none greater can be conceived” contradicts the previous statement and this indicates that God necessarily exists.
(b) Examine the responses of various scholars to this argument
Various philosophers did question Anselm’s argument in favour of the existence of God. One of these philosophers was Gaunilon, Anselm’s contemporary who argued against Anselm’s first form of his argument. Gaunilon said that Anselm’s sense and reasoning would bring about a ridiculous conclusion if it was applied to any other field other than the existence of God. He attempts to set up an argument which is parallel to Anselm’s ontological argument by using the example of a perfect island. Gaunilon using the idea of this perfect island came to the conclusion that for it to be a ‘perfect island, it must exist both in mind and reality. This conclusion is ridiculous. Therefore, Anselm argued back at Guanilon by saying that that “the most perfect island” is part of the “contingent world” so cannot endure the same reasoning as is used for the most “perfect conceivable being”. This indicates that Anselm is justifying why his principle does not apply to the “perfect island” example and he seems to be highlighting the importance of the idea of his second form of the argument which is that of “necessary existence” He is stressing the point that God is unique and that the reasoning of the ontological argument applies only to the most conceivable perfect being which has necessary existence.
Descartes moderated the ontological argument and said that “a supremely perfect being” must exist as existence is a defining predicate. He attempts to prove this concept by trying to portray it by using an example of a triangle. He says that “existence can no more be separated from the essence of God than the fact that its three angles equal two right angles can be separated from the essence of the triangle”. Descartes is basically saying that by definition, a triangle must have three angles and in the same way, he is saying that that ‘existence’ must be a predicate that is included in the defining qualities that God holds.
The Cartesian version of the ontological argument was then challenged by Immanuel Kant. Kant completely disagreed with the concept that ‘existence’ as a predicate, however he momentary let this pass and accepted the fact that ‘existence’ is a predicate in order to prove another point. Kant disputes Descartes theory that God exists on the basis that “it does not follow that the subjects combined with their predicates exist because the subjects are linked to their predicates.” Therefore, he says that if it someone knows that a triangle exists, then that same triangle must have three angles as this is one of the triangle’s defining predicates. He then tries to follow up on this notion by using the same theory but now linking it to the ‘perfect supreme being’. He says that if someone knows that there is a ‘perfect supreme being’, then that supreme being must exist as existence in this case is the defining predicate. By using this theory, Immanuel Kant has clearly demolished Descartes argument of the existence of both the “perfect supreme being” and the “triangle”.
Kant does in fact, disagree with Descartes notion that existence is a predicate of God. He rejects this idea of an object that necessarily exists as he says that it is not possible to qualitatively compare whether existence in reality is greater than existence in the mind or not and therefore, possible and necessary existence cannot be compared either as one cannot say that either necessary or possible existence exists more than the other. With these arguments, Kant seems to have successfully demolished Anselm’s main argument.
Norman Malcolm, a twentieth century philosopher also attempted to strengthen the Ontological argument. Malcolm was very careful in his attempt to prove that God existed. His argument was based on two statements. The first was what if God exists, then his existence is necessary. The second statement argues that if God does not exist, his existence is impossible. However, since we cannot say that God’s existence is impossible, his existence is therefore necessary.
Davis weakens this argument by arguing that the use of the word ‘impossible’ is not used in a consistent manner throughout the argument. The word ‘ impossible’ in the second statement means that it cannot happen whereas the use of the word in the conclusion which is drawn up from the two premises means that God’s existence cannot be held without contradiction. As Malcolm changes the meaning of this word right in the middle of his argument, the two meanings of the word contradict one another and since the second premise is incorrect, the conclusion that God’s existence is necessary is also incorrect.
(c) To what extent does the argument remain strong in the light of these responses?
Several of the various versions of the ontological argument seem to have weakened. Anselm’s argument has been weakened by various philosophers, however, there are some elements that tend to show that his argument remains strong.
Anselm’s first form of the ontological argument was criticised by his contemporary Gaunilo. He drew parallels between the supreme being and a perfect island. He attempted to show proof that there is a ‘perfect island which no greater can be conceived’. Anselm disputed against Gaunilo’s attempt to weaken his argument by saying that the idea of God is unique. The concept of a ‘perfect island’ can never be consistent as every individual would tend to have their own idea of what a perfect island really is whereas the idea of “the most perfect being” seems to be a common idea that seems decided upon. This criticism tended to be ineffective and remained strong in this sense.
Kant does successfully however, destroy Anselm’s first form of the argument and indirectly also demolishes the argument on the ‘necessary existence’ though his criticism. He criticises and successfully attacks the Cartesian version that in order for there to be a ‘supreme being’, existence must be predicate of God (the supreme being). Norman Malcolm then tried to save this argument by coming up with an argument which Davis seems to have demolished successfully.
Although the argument does not seem to remain too strong in the light of these responses, we can say that although Anselm failed to show ‘the fool’ that God existed, he by acquiring more knowledge and understanding about the Christian beliefs seems to fortify his faith as a believer. Anselm’s second form of the argument seems has kept philosophers interested and fascinated with it throughout time.
The very fact that philosophers such as Descartes, Kant, Malcolm have been intrigued by the ontological argument strongly shows that it is a very important and complex argument which is in favour of the existence of God. Although a final and ultimate answer to the question of God’s existence has yet to be attained, it is still considered to be a remarkable argument.
337
Другие работы по теме:
Ren Descartes Essay Research Paper Prove
Ren Descartes Essay, Research Paper Prove It I dare YOUProve It, I Dare YouFor many years philosophers have disputed argued, dissected and used countless of other devices in order to prove God’s existence. Is there someone or something that has been there since time started? All my life I was raised to believe that God exists.
St Anselm
’S Ontological Argument For The Experience Of God. Essay, Research Paper God’s existence may vary from philosopher to philosopher, but according to the late St. Anselm,
St. Anselm
’s God Necessarily Exists Essay, Research Paper Throughout history It has been man kinds quest to find a proof of the existence of God. Even today, religious archeologist, plunder the Earth, looking for Noah’s Ark, The Ark of the Covenant, or the site Jesus Christ was thought to have been buried. These men and women are searching for artifacts to prove the existence of God to people who believe there is no God.
Why Does Descartes Think He Can Be
Sure That A God Who Is No Deceiver Exists Essay, Research Paper Why does Descartes think he can be sure that a God who is no deceiver exists? Are his arguments convincing?Descartes
St Anselm Essay Research Paper Now we
St. Anselm Essay, Research Paper ?Now we believe that You are something that which nothing greater can be thought. Or can it be that nothing of such a nature does not exist, since ?the Fool has said in his heart, there is no God? (II).? *
Analyzing An Argument Essay Research Paper Analysis
Analyzing An Argument Essay, Research Paper Analysis of an Argument In Attacking Faulty Reasoning, T. Edward Damer defines an argument as a group of statements, one or more of which (the premises) support or provide evidence for another (the conclusion). The premises of an argument are those statements that together constitute the grounds for affirming the conclusion.
Decartes Meditations Essay Research Paper In Descartes
Decartes Meditations Essay, Research Paper In Descartes Meditations he talks about many different things. Two things he talks about are his arguments on Dreams and what he calls the “Evil Demon”. Both of them have to do with deceiving the mind into believing in things that may be untrue.
Anselm
’s Ontological Argument Essay, Research Paper As a theologian and philosopher, Saint Anselm strove to prove the existence of God in reality. The bulk of his argument is found in Chapter II of Proslogium.
Anselm Ontological Argument Essay Research Paper Anselm
Anselm Ontological Argument Essay, Research Paper Anselm s ontological argument is an explanation that Anselm came up with to prove that God exists. He uses a step by step procedure to persuade you into believing that since we canpicture and think of God as the greatest being, then he must exist. In the beginning of hisdiscussion , Anselm asks what is it that we mean when we speak of God.
Aquinas Essay Research Paper According to Aquinas
Aquinas Essay, Research Paper According to Aquinas everything is created was created by God. Aquinas made five proofs to proof the God exists and HE created everything. His five proofs are motion, efficient cause, possibility/necessity, gradation, and governance of the world.
How Do We Know That God Exists
? Essay, Research Paper Throughout history there have always been questions that we as humans are just unable to answer. The questions surrounding the topic of God seem to be ever elusive, just beyond our reach. The human race has made strides to answer these difficult questions. Unfortunately, as with all knowledge we find ourselves asking more difficult questions.
Beef It
’s What’s For Dinner Essay, Research Paper Abstract #1: American Beef Consumption in the United States In my research argument, my working thesis claim will be that American people should consume more of American beef products and be less afraid of, and more correctly informed about, the benefits of eating beef products.
Logic
– Features Of Argumentation Essay, Research Paper Features of Argumentation The logic of everyday argumentation should be based upon common data or information that is accepted by everyone. A warrant need to be used in order to relate the evidence that is presented in an argument to the claim that is being made.
Indians Essay Research Paper In her argumentative
Indians Essay, Research Paper In her argumentative essay, Jane Tompkins, an avid reader and researcher of the European-Indian relationships, delves into one of the most perplexing aspects of studying history in our world. Because we are such a diverse society–continuously prioritizing the fight for our own causes, there is much room left for the entrance of cultural subjectivity and perspective.
Argument Essay Essay Research Paper In today
Argument Essay Essay, Research Paper In today s society there are many couples that live together. Why let unmarried couples live together? There isn t a specific problem with unmarried couples that live out in the American Society. People are getting divorced left and right in today s age. More than 50% of marriages broke up during the decade of the 90 s.
Socraric Method Essay Research Paper The Socratic
Socraric Method Essay, Research Paper The Socratic Method of philosophy is basically a series of question leading to an answer. In order for this method to work though, two conditions must be met. The first one is that the interlocutor has to say what he believes. The second is that the answers must be kept short.
The Ontoligical Argument Essay Research Paper Many
The Ontoligical Argument Essay, Research Paper Many people have tried to prove through many ways that God exists. Anselm used the ontological argument, proposing that if God could be thought of and perceived, then God has to exist. At the center of the ontological argument is the idea or concept of existence.
Does Goe Exist Essay Research Paper Does
Does Goe Exist Essay, Research Paper Does God exist? Theology, cosmological, teleological and ontological arguments are all have ways to prove the existence of God. With all of these great arguments how can one
The Cosmological Argument Essay Research Paper The
The Cosmological Argument Essay, Research Paper The cosmological argument was first introduced by Aristotle and later refined in western Europe by the celebrated Christian theologian, Thomas Aquinas (d.1274 CE). In the Islamic tradition, it was adopted by Al-Kindi, and Ibn Rushd (Averroes). The argument has several forms, the basic first-cause argument runs as follows.
Onthological Argument Essay Research Paper The Ontological
Onthological Argument Essay, Research Paper The Ontological Argument (a) Give an account of the Ontological Argument for the existence of God? The Ontological argument is a group of different philosophers arguments for the existence of God. “Ontological” literally means talking about being and so in this case, that being is the existence or being of God.
Metaphysis Essay Research Paper Hello I
Metaphysis Essay, Research Paper : Hello: : I need help, I have somes question would help me. 1. do the criticisms that hume makes of Design Arguments all apply to Thomas’ Teleological Argument?
Descartes Meditations Essay Research Paper In Descartes
Descartes Meditations Essay, Research Paper In Descartes? Meditations on First Philosophy, he offers two main arguments from which he concludes the existence of God. In the Third Meditation, Descartes proposes his metaphysical argument, which states that God must exist, because his real existence is the only cause, which could have produced Descartes? own idea of God.
Descartes Essay Research Paper Descartes
Descartes Essay, Research Paper Descartes’ “Wax Argument” In this essay I will refer to the “wax argument” presented by Rene Descartes and explain that it is a valid argument, but not so sound. In Descartes argument, he observes a piece of wax, from a hive, and using his judgment and senses, analyzes the structure and properties of the wax.
The Existance Of God Essay Research Paper
The existence of God has been a philosophical question that has been discussed for centuries. Many theories have come about, trying to explain and prove the existence of God. From the Cosmological Argument, to the Teleological Argument, and including the Ontological Argument, all have been argued at one time or another.
Argument About The Exist Of God Essay
, Research Paper Argument About The Exist of God The following paper will provide a sound argument in favor of the existence of God. By demonstrating that an Atheist world cannot account for the
Cosmological Argument Essay Research Paper How Well
Cosmological Argument Essay, Research Paper How Well Does the Cosmological Argument Hold Water? The Cosmological Argument is one of the most heavily disputed arguments for God’s existence of our time. The argument in its simplest form is: “Everything has to be caused by or created from something else . . . therefore there must be a first cause, namely God.” The very basis of the argument, everything is caused, is what makes it an argument.
Social Role Essay Research Paper About Its
Social Role Essay, Research Paper About Its Social Role Waxing eloquent about stakeholder management and corporate social responsibility is in some circles the surest way to stifle a business conversation, if not a business career. Corporate philanthropy brings satisfaction to those who give and receive, the argument goes, but let us not get carried away by talk of give-aways.
Gffdg Essay Research Paper B A B
Gffdg Essay, Research Paper B A B paper is generally focused on a more particular problem or issue; it reveals that the author has gone through brainstorming
Can The Existence Of God Be Proved
A Priori? Essay, Research Paper The existence of God can be proved a priori by a logical deduction from the concept of God, when we think about the idea of God we realise that real
The Existence Of God 2
The Existence Of God – Approaches/Criticisms Essay, Research Paper There are three major arguments that attempt to explain the existence of God. Firstly, it is important to establish a definition of God. According to philosophers God is an infinitely perfect being that upholds a divine unity of ultimate goodness and of ultimate power.
Argument From Design Essay Research Paper Hume
Argument From Design Essay, Research Paper Hume s criticism in regard to the Design Argument, although complex, can be summarized quite simply. It is first important to understand the main elements of the Design Argument. Hume s theory in opposition to that of the Design Argument contests the suggestion that the simple things in the universe must be compared with the greater to appreciate their complexity as a component of the system of the universe.
The Fallacy Of Personal Attack Essay Research
Paper Fallacy of Personal Attack The fallacy of personal attack involves assaulting the arguer rather than the argument. This fallacy is very common. Personal attack is like not accepting a argument
Crosscultural Communication Barriers Essay Research Paper Thesis
Cross-cultural Communication Barriers Essay, Research Paper Thesis: A number of different factors contribute to cross-cultural communication barriers. This thesis will be proven through the examination of Canada?s past history, current policies and future plans concerning immigration and assimilation of immigrants into Canadian society.
Philosophy 2
Philosophy – God Question Essay, Research Paper Philosophy as defined by our required text is said to be “the love of wisdom. It is the search for the larger picture, the demand for knowledge.” There are many questions in philosophy, many involving the subject of religion. Does God exist? Should we believe in God? Is belief in God justified? These are just some of the questions attempted to be answered in philosophy.
How To Writing A Research Essay Essay
, Research Paper How To Writing A Research Essay The toughest part of the essay, for me, was taking all the information I had gained and reduce it to a mere few pages essay. After all, quality is better