, Research Paper
The United States Constitution defines the laws of the land as the Constitution itself and those laws or legal documents that are constitutionally passed through legislature. The role of upholding these laws and interpreting them in cases are assigned to the judicial branch. Our judicial system is to be one that follows common law, so ultimately laws do come from courts. Although the Supreme Court essentially has final say, the Constitution does not grant it the power of forming laws by a majority vote out of nine justices. These laws formed by court decisions should be based on the text of the Constitution and legislative laws and in times of ambiguity original intent of these legal texts should be used. The impact of these decisions has on society should not be from a new law formed but should be from having more clarity on application of the Constitution to laws.
Although there is much debate as to what should govern justices of the Supreme Court in their decisions, we cannot ignore that the Constitution clearly defines that it is the role of the justices to interpret the law and only that. Making the laws that are not covered in the Constitution are left to the federal and state legislatures. It is beyond my belief that anyone can argue that they believe the framers of the Constitution entrusted nine justices of the Supreme Court to make decisions that will affect all of the nation using their own moral philosophy.
After fighting so hard to gain our independence, I am sure that the original intent for the justices of the Supreme Court were to ensure that the basic natural rights that were so hard earned and clearly defined in the Constitution are to be the only jurisdiction of the individuals of the Supreme Court. By stating that something is constitutional or unconstitutional there will ultimately be effects that justices must take into consideration before their decisions. These effects must not conflict or go beyond the original intent of the Constitution.
Justice William Brennan argues that the death penalty ?is under all circumstances cruel and unusual punishment prohibited by the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment.? Interpretations of words can lead to such reasoning but original intent is completely ignored in its application. Brennan argues this point despite the fact that the death penalty has been around since the founding of these amendments. Perhaps our values have progressed since the Constitution but through proper legislation, our laws have and will continue to progress along with the values of our nation. We do not need to result to judicial activism taken at the bench to guide our society on what may seem to be the right path.
These forms of judicial activism takes the words of the Constitution and other forms of law and gives new meaning to them with the blatant disregard for the original intent. Although it can be argued that original intent is hard to define, then it should be the practice of justices to use what is clearly seen as original intent, all else should not be decided by the justices of the Supreme Court.
Justices cannot base their decisions on what they believed to be the moral philosophies of the framers or what they believe were the very values that the Constitution was framed on. Great philosophical minds would not be able to agree on a set of moral values that they believe to be consistent with all the framers. Justices are limited to protecting the rights defined and deciding whether something is constitutional or unconstitutional. In deciding that a law is unconstitutional, the Supreme Court is stating that the law is violating things defined in the Constitution and that their interpretation is consistent with the original intent of the words or phrased used in the Constitution.
In the case Roe v. Wade, the justices erred in declaring that the abortion statutes of the state of Texas were unconstitutional. It based its decision on interpretations of the Ninth Amendment, through the Fourteenth Amendment. Though I believe that the right to having abortions is a right our society should continue to allow, I do not believe that the original intent of these amendments covered abortions.
Perhaps the justices of the court made its decision because it is a right they wanted to protect and knowing that their words will declare it a constitutional right. However, in doing so, they are overstepping their boundaries of interpretation in defining certain abortion laws as unconstitutional. Since it is not something clearly defined in the Constitution, simply saying that it is constitutional is what they should have done. In doing so, it does not advocate that the Supreme Court condones outlawing abortions.
Promoting rights such as abortions should be left to the majority to decide. We live in a democracy, with rights protected and through laws and legislation we are also subjected to limits in rights. It is not to say that we shouldn?t have the rights that are banned by law and not constitutionally protected. Although such a positivistic stance on how to interpret the law is sometimes criticized for being outmoded by the aging of the Constitution, justices should not feel that they have an enlightened understanding of society?s changing values and disregard plain reading of the text. If in the future our society does come to the conclusion that abortions are immoral and ?ought? to be outlawed, legislation cannot be passed without another decision or interpretation of the Supreme Court.
Enlightened understanding of what laws ?ought? to be can be left to philosophers and advocacy groups to promote laws to be formed through the voting process. If it is a right that these justices can clearly see as a natural right, then it should be assumed that people will vote to keep that right and vote to void any laws that deny that right if it is not protected by the Constitution. If it fails the vote, let the truth be that it is not a natural right that we all agree upon. Wielding the power of the bench to ensure rights the court believes in can hurt the democratic values that we all have.
The common man is not trained to understand the philosophical meanings that each word can contain. Although justices are able to do so through mastery of the English language and experience in manipulating words, it would be unjustified to expect that anything but the plain meaning of the law be respected by all men. Through their understanding of the plain meaning of legal documents, citizens of the United States know what laws will be upheld and how to participate in forming new laws. Conjuring up anything explicitly stated in the text and using it without original intent, can only discourage voters from feeling as though they understand the law and have had a part in forming it.
Natural rights and laws are only legitimate if we all collectively agree on them. The Constitution already guarantees certain unalienable rights, all other rights I will relinquish the right to have it governed and limited for the sake of democracy. The Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and the Bill of Rights assures me that our nation is grounded by the natural law theory and perhaps it may be seen as a na?ve trust but I do trust that our country will not pass a law that will abridge any right of mine that would seem apparently immoral. The structure that the Constitution has outlined for us does not allow such things to happen.
If our system of government and lawmaking has helped us progress so significantly in values, I can only believe that we will continue to fix injustices as we have in the past. We have moved beyond slavery and segregation. If justices are to interpret the Constitution to keep up with the times we will lose a very important aspect of our society. The Constitution gives us something that we all feel is real and constant. Being conservative on issues involving the bench does not mean that we are forwarding conservative legislations. The framers only wanted certain things to remain the same through all times.
5fe
Can Den Haag, Ernest. ?Not Above the Law.? National Review. National Review Inc., Oct. 7, 1991.Hadley, Arkes. ?Lincoln, Nietzsche, and the Constitution.? First Things. April 200.Scalia, Antonin. ?For Lawyers Only: ?A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the law.?? The Law and Politics Book Review. Denton, Texas.1997.Roe v. Wade, Supreme Court of the United States, 410 U.S. 959; 93 S. Ct. 1409; 1973 U.S. LEXIS 3282; 35 L. Ed. 2d 694, Feb. 26, 1973.Sikkenga, Jeffrey. ?Lest we Forget: Clarence Thomas and the Meaning of the Constitution.? On Principle. Ashland University, Dec. 1998.Troy, Daniel E. ?The Court?s Mr. Right.? National Review. August 9, 1999.
Другие работы по теме:
Interpreting
Hypothesis: “Simultaneous interpreting is the fastest method in achievement of mutual understanding between the people of different nations”
AnitFederalism Essay Research Paper Perhaps the greatest
Anit-Federalism Essay, Research Paper Perhaps the greatest document of all time, the Constitution of the United States of America was not easily created. Fifty-five great men were needed to hammer out all the details of the Constitution in a long grueling process. As James Madison, architect of the constitution said, ?The [writing of the Constitution] formed a task more difficult than can be well conceived by those who were not concerned in the execution of it.
Jefferson Essay Research Paper I feel that
Jefferson Essay, Research Paper I feel that I would be considered a Jeffertonian because I think the common man should run the federal government, like Jefferson thought. I think the federal government
Essay Interpreting
‘One Art’ By Elizabeth Bishop Essay, Research Paper Essay interpreting “One Art” by Elizabeth Bishop In “One Art” by Elizabeth Bishop, the speaker’s attitude in the last stanza relates to the other stanzas in verse form and language. The speaker uses these devices to convey her attitude about losing objects.
The Constitution As A Source Of Discord
In The Union Essay, Research Paper By the 1850 s the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created. It is true that the Constitution was seen as a source of conflict.
TheSortOfEconomic Constitution Essay Research Paper The SortOfEconomic
The-Sort-Of-Economic Constitution Essay, Research Paper The Sort-Of-Economic Constitution The Constitution was written to provide the thirteen colonies with universal rules, laws, and regulations on all concerning issues. Many subjects were discussed; distributions of power locally and nationally, enforcement of the terms of the distribution, taxation, and commerce.
14th Amendment Essay Essay Research Paper More
14th Amendment Essay Essay, Research Paper More often than not, most Americans look upon the constitution as the guiding light of our country. Recent events occurring in our national election no doubt prove that. There are many important amendments to our Constitution regarding our rights as citizens and the delegation of powers to branches and states.
Lawgrtt Essay Research Paper The Constitution of
Lawgrtt Essay, Research Paper The Constitution of the United States and Madison’s Federalist Paper 51 draw upon the philosophy of John Locke, as expressed in his Second Treatise of Government. Madison and the framers of the Constitution looked to Locke’s ideas for justification and guidance. The Preamble of the Constitution reflects the intentions of its authors and shows the influence of Locke’s ideas.
Strict Or Loose Constructionism Essay Research Paper
Strict or Loose Constructionism Today our courts are faced with many hard decesions, but the decision that is the hardest is the way that the justices conform to the constitution. There is a spectrum of interpretation. Some justices believe in strict constructionalism, but others believe in loose constructionalism.
AntiFederalists Essay Research Paper AntiFederalists were people
Anti-Federalists Essay, Research Paper Anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the Constitution. They believed strongly that the Constitution would not be able toe maintain a system of republican government because the Federalists were proposing a government that was the opposite of what they believed in.
Jeffersonian Republicans Vs Madison Administratoin Essay Research
Paper In the time period between 1801 and 1817 the Jeffersonian Republicans were regarded as strict constructionists however this political party made many decisions that were characterized as broad constructionism. The Federalists who were characterized as broad constructionism also abandoned their method of interpreting the constitution more than once and interpreted the constitution quite strictly.
The Contemporary Debate Over Constitutional Interpretation Essay
, Research Paper The debate over the role of the judiciary in the government has been going on for a long time. Some say that the Supreme Court has overstepped the boundaries that it is to operate by, while others believe that much of the Constitution was written in such a way that it needs to be interpreted according to the situations that have arisen in today’s society.
American Fed Essay Research Paper American federalism
American Fed Essay, Research Paper American federalism is a form of government in which the constitution distributes governmental powers between the national government and the subsidiary governments of the states. Article I, Section 8, and the Tenth Amendment are good examples of this definition. In Article I, Section 8, the Constitution defines the powers delegated to the national government, such as the power to regulate commerce and to enact laws necessary and proper for the execution of its powers.
Constitution Essay Research Paper The Constitution of
Constitution Essay, Research Paper The Constitution of the United States of America We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, ensure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
American Government And Politics Essay Research Paper
American Government and Politics The founders of this country wanted a government with have power, but they didn t want a government with too much of it. To accomplish this they wrote ways to limit the government s use of power. By doing this they also enable the citizens of he country to remain free and not have to worry about the government have too much power.
Animal Farm 10 Essay Research Paper Animal
Animal Farm 10 Essay, Research Paper Animal Farm Animal Farm, by George Orwell, is a science fiction story based on the Russian Revolution, where instead of humans, the animals are the main characters. The story is predominantly about how power can overcome people who don t know how to use it correctly and from that, in almost any situation comes a revolution or as it was stated in Animal Farm a rebellion.
Framers Of The Constitution Essay Research Paper
Framers of the Constitution The constitution was never in any way a perfect document. Opponents of thisopinion say that the framers meant it to be that way, leaving much space for change,when the changes became necessary. The constitutionhas had to have many changes made,which makes it look as if the original writers of the constitution had no idea of whatwould come of this country in the future.
Social Democracy Essay Research Paper Austria is
Social Democracy Essay, Research Paper Austria is a democratic, federal republic. The constitution of Austria provides for a distinct division of power among the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government. Basic human rights and liberties are granted by the constitution and so are the rights of minorities granted as well.
Method Of Election Essay Research Paper 4
Method Of Election Essay, Research Paper 4. Should the method of electing a president be further amended? If so, how? The constitution was like the bible to most politicians back then. They went by it like the Ten Commandments. So of course that is where they would turn to when they were in a sticky situation.
Majority V Minority Essay Research Paper Democracy
Majority V. Minority Essay, Research Paper Democracy is defined by Merriam – Webster’s dictionary as “government by the people; especially: rule of the majority.” America was founded to protect individual’s rights and freedoms from being violated by the government. Our Constitution and the Bill of Rights were specifically written to limit the powers of the government.
Judicial Review Essay Research Paper Judicial ReviewThe
Judicial Review Essay, Research Paper Judicial Review The Supreme Court is the only court designated in the constitution. Within it is the Chief Justice of the United States, and eight associates. Being the highest court it is the last resort for all federal court questions. The Supreme Court has the power to determine whether something is constitutional or not, which makes them the final authority.
Constitutional Reform Essay Research Paper Explain and
Constitutional Reform Essay, Research Paper Explain and evaluate both the limits placed on Commonwealth power under the Constitution and the extension of that power through international law and elements of the Constitution.
Constitutionalism Essay Research Paper The seventeenth century
Constitutionalism Essay, Research Paper The seventeenth century, which witnessed the development of absolute monarchy, also saw the appearance of the constitutional state. While France solved the question of sovereignty with the absolutist state, England evolved toward the constitutional state.
Exploration Essay Research Paper Ratificating the constitutionThe
Exploration Essay, Research Paper Ratificating the constitution The US Constitution was written and ratified in 1787. It is over 200 years old. People think that this document has always been honored, but this is not true. There were many people who supported this Constitution who they were called the Federalists and people who opposed it who were called the Antifederalists.
Bill Of Rights Essay Research Paper The
Bill Of Rights Essay, Research Paper The Bill of Righs was written for the American people for two reasons. The first was to pacify the Anti-Federalist’s fears of an overwhelmingly powerful central government provided by the Constitution and the second was, in fact, to protect the freedoms secured by the Americans after their war for independence.
Federal Government Essay Research Paper How does
Federal Government Essay, Research Paper How does the constitution divide power between the national government and the states? The constitution did not give the national government or the states total supremacy. Instead, power was distributed. The national government was given certain express powers, while some powers were reserved to the states.
Motives Of The Founding Fathers When Tey
Wrote The Constitution Essay, Research Paper When a group of 55 men gathered in Philadelphia, they would write a document which truly benefited themselves, the upper class and the elite. They were educated people and very wealthy people. (The reason that the people who wrote the constitution were all wealthy is because they needed to be able to afford to take off from work for such a long time to write the constitution).
Government By The People For The People
Essay, Research Paper Government by the People, For the People The new constitution, thought to bring to power a centralized form of Government, actually establishes a Democratic Republic. In “Federalist #39″, Madison’s
The Beginning Of The Constitution Essay Research
Paper The Beginning of the Constitution The constitution was made up of many impressive and historic documents, which when combined made one of the most historic documents in world history. The constitution takes many of the most historic facts from other resources. For example, the Magna Carta and the Leviathan.
The Right To Privacy By Robert Bork.
. Essay, Research Paper The Right to Privacy by Robert Bork. Robert Bork’s The Right of Privacy examined the landmark case Griswald v. Conneticut. Bork’s “originalist” view proclaimed that Justice Douglas