& The Death Penalty Essay, Research Paper
Dr. K: Physician-Assisted Suicide & the Death Penalty
Liana R. Prieto (November 1997)
We are faced with a case involving two morally disputed issues that involve life and death. Questions will arise as to the morality of physician-assisted suicide, and though I will address them, they are essentially irrelevant in this case because it is presently illegal. The morality of the death penalty will also be called into question and I will establish that it the just and necessary punishment in this instance. Dr. K, in assisting a patient to commit suicide, has violated the law of this state and should be put to death.
In theory, physician-assisted suicide would bring about an end to the suffering of terminally ill patients who do not want to spend their last days in agony. Physician-assisted suicide was legalized on the assumption that this theory would prove true because there was no prior evidence on which to base the decision. A person’s right to refuse life-saving treatment is affirmed by the 14th Amendment, which says that no citizen can be deprived of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of the law”. (Rehnquist, 162) This idea is based on the principle of autonomy in our society. Since this principle is accepted in cases involving the removal of life-support it can also be seen to apply to physician-assisted suicide in which a competent person takes a lethal dose of medicine. The principle grants individuals to do with their lives as they please as long as they do not infringe on the rights of others. Another justification for physician-assisted suicide is compassion. If our goal is to reduce suffering only it is better to end a terminally ill patients’ life quickly than to let them die slowly without treatment. ((Rachels, 172) These two arguments led to the legalization of physician-assisted suicide.
Sadly, in practice, it has led to murder in the form of involuntary euthanasia. Many of the arguments against physician-assisted suicide have now proven true. It was feared that the sanctity of life would be lost if life were defined as simply a “physiological condition or function”. (Stevens, 165) The loss of the distinction between the refusal of treatment and physician-assisted suicide has led to the loss of the concept of the sanctity of life and , thereby, the practice of euthanasia. “The relief of suffering, which is surely a time-honored role for the physician, does not extend to an act that presupposes that the life of a patient who is suffering is not worthy to be lived.” (Dyck, 171) However, this is just the idea that became prevalent after the legalization of physician-assisted suicide and allowed physicians to make themselves into judges and executioners in the cases of their patients.
The utilitarian principle of minimizing suffering was a convincing argument for accepting physician-assisted suicide but we have now seen that suffering actually increased. Since the legalization there have been numerous instances of terminally ill patients being coerced into suicide and of involuntary euthanasia. Both of these cases are, at their bases, murder. These victims and their families suffer as much as terminally ill patients. Imagine the constant fear a terminally ill person who wants to live to their last day will feel knowing that when their physician judges them unworthy of life they may give them a lethal dose of medication without their knowledge. Involuntary euthanasia of terminally ill patients was only the first horrible consequence of legalized physician-assisted suicide. If the practice had been allowed to continue it might be only a short time before others deemed unworthy of life, such as the elderly and handicapped, were euthanized at the will of physicians.
The concept of an autonomous individual who can dispose of his life as he sees fit was a powerful argument for physician-assisted suicide. Its’ legalization was simply an extension of an autonomy enjoyed in other aspects of life. However, it led to physicians having a grotesque power over their patients that canceled out the autonomy of the patient. The many unfortunate consequences of legalized physician-assisted suicide are what led to its being outlawed. Now we must decide what is to be done when this law is violated.
Dr. K has been convicted and some punishment must be administered; the options are imprisonment or the death penalty. In this case capital punishment is morally justified and is the only proper course of action. Dr. K deserves the death penalty for having a hand in the death of another person and blatantly disobeying a law enacted for the good of society. The retributivist view based on desert alone justifies Dr. K’s execution. (Glover, 384) Dr. K violated the ban on physician-assisted suicide, which was drafted to protect the vulnerable, making physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia live options. A severe punishment will demonstrate to any others who were considering physician-assisted suicide that the practice is unacceptable. Therefore by the utilitarian principle of minimizing the amount of life lost capital punishment is justified. (Mill, 66)
The death penalty is also justified because it will serve to maintain law and order in our society. Dr. K was aware that he was acting in violation of the law. He is also aware that physician-assisted suicide is legal in other states. Instead of acting illegally and facing the penalty of doing so he could have gone elsewhere. In the Crito Plato presents the idea that “if he does not like us when…he has seen the ways of the city…he may go where he pleases and take his goods with him; and none of us laws will forbid him or interfere with him.” By remaining in this state Dr. K. “entered into an implied contract” requiring him to act within the parameters et by society. (Plato, 355) The breaking of this contract must not be permitted and Dr. K.’s actions must be met with the severest punishment. He must be punished in a way that makes other adhere to this contract or we jeopardize our entire way of life. “In part capital punishment is an expression of society’s moral outrage at particularly offensive conduct. This function may be unappealing to many, but it is essential in an ordered society that asks it citizens to rely on legal processes.” (Stewart, 379)
Objections will be raised by those who feel that the death penalty is unjustified for various reasons. It has been argued that since the death penalty has not been proven to be a greater deterrent than imprisonment it should not be used. (Glover, 389) In the majority opinion on Gregg v. Georgia, Justices Stewart, Powell and Stevens concede that the death penalty has not yet been proven to be a greater deterrent, but that there are “carefully contemplated murders… where the possible penalty of death may well enter into the cold calculations that precedes the decision to act”. (379) Physician-assisted suicide is one such case. A physician must carefully consider many factors before helping a patient to die and if the threat of their own death is included in these considerations, it is unlikely that they will go through with it.
The death penalty is condemned as ‘cruel and unusual’ and as “judicial murder” by some. Absolutists completely reject some kinds of punishment because they cause too much suffering. They argue that though the punishment may have beneficial consequences they are unimportant. (Glover, 385-6) It is impossible for everyone in society to come to an agreement as to how much suffering to too much. The second flaw of the absolutist view is that “punishment is inflicting harm” first and foremost and if the criminal does not suffer the punishment does not accomplish its purpose. (Perlmutter, 391)
Dr. K. feels that suicide is not morally wrong and therefore the government is wrong in making it illegal. Those who agree with him can argue that he disobeyed the law with the hope of changing it and therefore the death penalty is too severe. “We have a responsibility toward those who disobey the draft laws out of conscience, and…we may be required not to prosecute them, but rather change our laws or adjust our sentencing procedures to accommodate them.” (Dworkin, 371) This argument is strong when presented by Dworkin in cases of civil disobedience, but it is invalidated in cases of life and death. The state has a duty to protect its citizens and will be doing so by executing Dr. K.
If physician-assisted suicide had worked in practice as it seemed it would we would not be faced with our current dilemma. Consequentialist fears can be disregarded before the fact but the reality of physicians committing murder using the law as their justification could not be overlooked. The sad results of legalized physician-assisted suicide were shocking and repulsive to society and it was once again made illegal. Dr. K has shown no respect for law or human life by continuing the practice. It is morally permissible to sentence Dr. K. to death. The loss of life is always unfortunate but in this case it is necessary to prevent widespread legalized murder.
Другие работы по теме:
Should Assisted Suicide Be Legalized Essay Research
Paper Should assisted suicide be legalized? As the society has been developed, the needs of its people’s freedom and right have also increase. People even touch the domain of death which many other are scare of. The question about legalizing assisted suicide is one the most argumentative topic. Lots of people support the legalization of assisted suicide, but many of them have wrong assumptions about suicide.
Case Queen Versus Dudley And Stephens Essay
, Research Paper In the case Queen versus Dudley and Stephens the criticism that is most applicable is the third one about moral inconsistencies in the law. In this case the law teaches us that, in a situation such as the one Dudley and Stephens found themselves in, it is more moral to sacrifice our lives than to preserve it.
Physician Assisted Suicide Essay Research Paper Scott
Physician Assisted Suicide Essay, Research Paper Scott DeBoer DeBoer 1 9-26-2001 Physician Assisted Suicide How could someone wake up every day sick, in constant pain and feeling horrible every minute of existence? This is not a good way to live from anybodies point of view. The time may come when suffering, just is not worth living.
Physican Assisted Suicide Essay Research Paper Physicianassisted
Physican Assisted Suicide Essay, Research Paper Physician-assisted suicide occurs when a physician helps a person take his or her own life by giving advice, writing a prescription for lethal medication, or assisting the individual with some device which allows the person to take his or her own life. The physician lends expertise, but the person does the act.
Assisted Suicides Essay Research Paper The background
Assisted Suicides Essay, Research Paper The background for this work is that the existing conflict over legalizing assisted suicides and euthanasia could bring our values down and society apart. The problem is not legalizing or opposing to it, the real problem is to find a way to care for the terminally ill.
Doctor Assisted Suicide Essay Research Paper Physician
Doctor Assisted Suicide Essay, Research Paper Physician Assisted Suicide The issue of whether doctors should be allowed to assist patients in suicide has been a very sensitive and emotional topic for people of both sides. With machines to substitute organs and blood, there is no doubt technology have saved and prolonged many lives.
Assisted Suicide Cannot Be A Right Essay
, Research Paper Everyone who is born will die. All humans face death sooner or laterin their lifetime. It is the wish of many, especially sufferingindividuals, to die peacefully and without pain. Death is beyond ourcontrol, but should we be allowed to decide the time of our death?There are proponents on both sides of this controversial issue, butwith all the complications and dangers associated with legalizingassisted suicide, it should not become an option available toanyone.Many believe that individuals suffering immensely physically deservethe right to end their pain.
Assisted Suicide Essay Research Paper Imagine you
Assisted Suicide Essay, Research Paper Imagine you have just found out you are going to die within three months. Recently the questions have been changed from, |What am I going to do with the rest of my life?X to |When should I kill myself?X With painful and crippling diseases such as AIDS and cancer, and Alzheimers along with doctors such as Dr.
Right To Die 2 Essay Research Paper
Right to Die Physician-assisted suicide presents one of the greatest dilemmas to families across the nation today. There are many who are suffering unnecessarily everyday, who want to partake in physician -assisted suicide. Should someone who is mentally competent, but labeled terminally ill, be allowed to engage in physician -assisted suicide? According to society, the terminally ill do not have the right to take their own life or be assisted.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Assisted SuicideA great
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Assisted Suicide A great deal of debate surrounds the practice of assisted suicide. Lately, laws against voluntary euthanasia have been eased, although serious moral and legal questions still exist. Most opposition of assisted suicide comes from religious groups, including Christianity, Judaism, and Islam.
Assisted Suicide Essay Research Paper People are
Assisted Suicide Essay, Research Paper People are probaly confused at the fact that society approving people to be euthanized. Obviously, if it was stated in a letter to the editor in the Detroit Free Press entitled, “Death, Dignity.” The writer is simply saying it’s okay to end lives. It also states that John Engler, our state government, is supporting two important projects that assist in these suicides.
Assisted Suicide Essay Research Paper Questions concerning
Assisted Suicide Essay, Research Paper Questions concerning the right to end one’s life have long generated storms of controversy. These questions, involving intensely personal views on issues no less profound than the meaning of life and liberty, are unlikely to disappear any time soon. The conservative nature of the medical profession, and the organized opposition of the “right to life” movement, along with disagreement among disabilities rights organizations, perpetuate the controversy.
Death With Dignity Essay Research Paper Death
Death With Dignity Essay, Research Paper Death With Dignity Euthanasia is a controversial subject that has been a longstanding and multifaceted debate. The argument over patient rights and physicians responsibilities has been on going since the 1950’s. Suicide is a legal act that is theoretically available to all, however many people think that euthanasia is far worse than suicide.
Assisted Suicide 2 Essay Research Paper An
Assisted Suicide 2 Essay, Research Paper An advocate of assisted-suicide, Dr. Kevorkian, has recently been convicted of 2nd degree murder for an assisted-suicide and faces up to 25 years. Kevorkian claims to have assisted in over 130 suicides since 1990. Three earlier juries have acquitted him, and a mistrial was declared in his fourth case.
Dr Jack Kevorkian Disrupting The Universe Essay
, Research Paper Dr Jack Kevorkian: Disrupting the Universe Mike Cunningham 12-27-96 Social Studies 2, Mr. Johnson Dr. Jack Kevorkian did something that most people would never even think
Assisted Suicide 4 Essay Research Paper ASSISTED
Assisted Suicide 4 Essay, Research Paper ASSISTED SUICIDE I feel that assisted suicide is a practice that should not only be legally acceptable, but socially acceptable as well. No one should be forced to live a life of pain and suffering. After all, aren’t we all guaranteed the rights of life, liberty, and happiness? If happiness means freedom from pain and suffering, then assisted suicide should be legalized.
DoctorAssisted Suicide Essay Research Paper Doctor Assisted
Doctor-Assisted Suicide Essay, Research Paper Doctor Assisted Suicide An issue of great controversy boomed in the United States approximately ten years ago. Doctor-assisted suicide was brought to the attention of Americans in the mid-1980s, but did not become the issue it is today until the nineties.
Doctor Assisted Suicide Essay Research Paper DAS
Doctor Assisted Suicide Essay, Research Paper D.A.S Murder, death, suffering. All these horrific terms are related to an extremely important and devastating issue. Doctor assisted suicide is a very important subject that many people know little about. We need to finally shut this murdering out of Oregon for good.
Euthanasia And Assisted Suicide Essay Research Paper
EUTHANASIA AND ASSISTED SUICIDE In today’s society, euthanasia and assisted suicide is a major discussion. People, who are terminally ill or are depressed, are sometimes looking for a way out. They feel that their only hope is to kill themselves. Other people in the world feel that euthanasia and assisted suicide are morally wrong.
Assisted Suicide 3 Essay Research Paper Is
Assisted Suicide 3 Essay, Research Paper Is Physician-Assisted Suicide A Solution ? Physician assisted suicide (PAS) is a very important issue. It is also important tounderstand the terms and distinction between the varying degrees to which a person can be involved in hastening the death of a terminally ill individual.
The Controversial Issue Of DoctorAssisted Suicide Essay
, Research Paper The Controversial Issue of Doctor-Assisted Suicide Imagine youu have just found out you are going to die within three months. Recently the questions have been changed form, “What am I going to do with the
Assisted Suicide Essay Research Paper Should assisted
Assisted Suicide Essay, Research Paper Should assisted suicide become totally legal in the U.S.? Well, that is the question that Mr. Stephen Carter seems to brutally review in his article ?Rush to a Lethal Judgement,? where it appears that he takes a stance against assisted suicide. He makes a very week argument though, and I feel he would fail at convincing most anyone.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Euthanasia and Physician
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide Should it be legalized? Whose life is it, anyway? Euthanasia is a word that means good death. Euthanasia normally implies that the act must be initiated by the person who wishes to commit suicide. But, some people define euthanasia to include both voluntary and involuntary termination of life.
Dr Kevorkian Essay Research Paper History and
Dr. Kevorkian Essay, Research Paper History and BackgroundDr Jack Kevorkian, a 70-year-old retired pathologist, has devoted most of his life to the campaign for assisted suicide. He has admitted helping more than 130 people to end their lives. To date only 48 have cases been documented, including the assisted suicide documented on 60 MinutesDr Kevorkian was born in 1928 in Pontiac, Michigan, to a family of Armenian immigrants.
Is Phyiscian Assisted Suicide Ethical Essay Research
Paper Physician-Assisted Suicide is Ethical Jack Kevorkian addresses many aspects of physician-assisted suicide. First, he addresses the Hippocratic oath, stating that there is no oath concerning a doctor?s moral codes. Next, he addresses the slippery slope argument. Kevorkian states that the only way the slippery slope argument will take place, is if everyone is insecure and cannot control their individual actions.
Assited Suicide Essay Research Paper If you
Assited Suicide Essay, Research Paper If you had incurable disease that gave you six months to live and you were in incredible pain and were suffering, would you want to hang on for those last moments of torture? Assisted suicide is a very controversial topic. There are many people supporting it and many people opposing it.
Patient Assited Suicide Whose Example Should Be
F Essay, Research Paper Patient Assisted Suicide:Whose example should be followed? There are many different methods of approaching patients facing the end of their lives. Since technology has increased the ability to sustain life longer, patient assisted suicide has become an increasingly more popular avenue for doctors to explore.
Euthanasia Essay Research Paper EuthanasiaOriginally the term
Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Euthanasia Originally, the term “physician assisted suicide” meant the provision by a physician of the means of which a suffering, terminally ill patient could initiate his or her death. The “euthanasia” means the killing of a terminally ill person to end his or her suffering.
The Controversy Over Euthanasia Essay Research Paper
The controversy over euthanasia is based on the same ethical and social platform from which the debates for abortion and capitol punishment stem. These social dilemmas all revolve around the sanctity of life and how far government can go in making choices involving individual rights. Although the debate over euthanasia is just heating up in the American judicial system, the practice of assisted suicide has been around for centuries, Modern advances in medicine and technology have helped doctors in prolonging life.
Assited Suicide Essay Research Paper The man
Assited Suicide Essay, Research Paper ?The man who, in a fit of melancholy, kills himself today would have wanted to live had he a week.?(Voltaire) In the U.S. assisted suicide has become all too common. Mr. Jack Kevorkian, otherwise known as Dr. Death, might be the reason for this unethical uprising. Assisted suicide in those who fear they are too old, mentally unstable, or suffering from an incurable illness, doesn?t solve any problems.