Being Human? Essay, Research Paper
Do people have some rights just by being human?
This question is concerned with whether or not it is possible for ‘natural rights’ to exist. ‘Natural’ rights are rights which we have ‘naturally’ as humans, in other words rights which we inherently have, just by being human. A large problem with answering this question is that of defining the term ‘rights’, a question to which the answer has been very elusive throughout the history of political analysis. The following investigation into the possibility of ‘natural rights’ will begin with an attempt to create a working definition of a rights, and will then proceed to examine the essence of humanity and the roots of what is a ‘right’, to see if it is possible to have a ‘right’ simply by being human. Questions concerning society, freedom and morality will all be seen to arise, and will be dealt with accordingly.
A most important attempt at defining rights is Richard Dworkin’s metaphor of ‘Rights as Trumps’. This is essentially comparing a rights to a trump in a card game, one which overrides what would otherwise have one the hand. Put in a political scenario, this metaphor functions as thus: Society may have and hold a set of rules and laws imposing on and restricting individuals behaviour. A right is something to which the individual is entitled that will be ensured over and above the civil laws and rules of the land. The existence of these rights is a way that individuals have a degree of sovereignty over the state, where civil laws are the tools of the state’s sovereignty over individuals. This balance should create a situation which is morally justifiable.
A problem with this doctrine when it comes to ‘natural rights’, however, is the reliance on the existence of society to provide a definition of a right. A ‘natural right’ is one which should be able to be derived without the existence of a society, since it should be inherently clear from our humanity. It is possible to conceive of a situation in which a human being exists outside of society, indeed many philosophies are based on there having been a pre-social period of human existence. Although this is dubitable, it is important to justify a natural right through examining a single human being, since it is in the essence of humanity where the ‘natural right’ must be found.
Another problem with this attempt at a definition of rights, is that it puts little emphasis of the importance of morality when making statements about rights. Dworkin’s thesis defines a right without reference to any morals, yet any judgement over rights is almost always a moral judgement. It shall be seen that any investigation of rights boils down to a moral investigation, and this presents significant problems. These shall be tackled at a later stage, but first this analysis will see how deep it is possible to penetrate the question of ‘natural rights’ without drifting into moral arguments.
The historically most significant way of justifying ‘natural rights’ is through statement such as ‘Men are born free’. This kind of statement, although not explicit in stating a ‘right’ as such, nevertheless has been the root of a number of political institutions, such as the French and American revolutions. The statement above implies an inherent equality and freedom in mankind, and this has been taken by scholars to means that it implies certain ‘natural rights’. Equality is seen from the implication of statements such as the one above that there is no reason for society to arbitrarily assign a certain individual higher status – from the colour of their skin, gender, or situation into which they were born.
Possible objections to the use of statements such as these are rarely publicly voiced, as they would seem to clash with what seems to be the basis of any just society, yet it is not difficult to find problems with assumptions like ‘men are born equal’. Firstly, and perhaps most significantly, there is little empirical evidence to suggest that this statement is true. If anything, evidence shows that humans have widely varying attributes such as intelligence, physical ability, beauty, etc. Also, it could be argued that the statement by no means implies equality – the statement is simply a moral picture of what the world should be, but in actual fact is not, like. Therefore, as this statement is not a reflection of what human kind actually is, it is then not possible to derive the existence of ‘natural rights’ from it, as any conclusion must be of the form: It is morally desirable that mankind should have natural rights. This does not mean that there are natural rights, simply because we are human.
A more detailed examination of natural rights can be done by scrutinising a pre-social individual – a hypothetical human who exists on his own. It must be seen whether or not it is possible to derive any ‘rights’ from this person’s existence alone, and any rights thus derived are clearly ‘natural’. One common definition of what it is to be human is that humans have free will. Clearly, this individual who lives in the world by himself has this attribute – he is capable of choice, and therefore has a degree of freedom. This does beg the question, however, of whether or not the fact that this man is inherently free due to his capability of choice means that he has the right to be free. Many political philosophers point this out as the one right that can best be described as ‘natural’. This assertion shall be scrutinised here.
The right to freedom, although it immediately appears to be a very desirable attribute for any individual to have and for any society to guarantee, upon further examination proves to be more controversial. Firstly, a definition of freedom is required, and this question alone has created veritable mountains of philosophical argument. For simplicity’s sake, here, the definition of the right to freedom shall be the right to be without obstacle to fulfil one’s wants. This raises several questions which cast doubts on the practicality of speaking of an inherent ‘right to freedom’.
Firstly, there is the question of internal obstacles to fulfilling one’s wants. Internal obstacles are those such as weak-heartedness and selfishness which must be overcome when trying to achieve some long-term, higher goal. It would seem that these obstacles, as they deal with conflict in one’s own wants, are irrelevant to the question of rights, although they do have a bearing on freedom. To solve this problem it is necessary to leave out internal barriers from our definition of freedom when discuss a human’s right to freedom.
The second such problem is that it may be, in some circumstances, for society to be morally justified in placing external barriers to an individuals freedom. This is a fundamental problem, as can be seen by referring back to the original definition and purpose of a right as stated above. If a right is a ‘trump’ that protects against state oppression, and is by definition morally correct, then it can not be the case that it is possible for the state to be morally justified in violating an individual’s right to freedom. This does seem to raise doubts that it is justifiable to speak of a ‘natural’ right to freedom.
This final point seems to show that it is impossible to proceed in our discussion of natural rights without beginning to make moral statements. It can be seen that in every case of conflict between rights of individuals, and civil laws, there is a moral assumption over what is most beneficial for society. This reflects the fact that most society function on a form of utilitarianism, where the greatest good for the greatest number generally seems to be the aim of state and society. This is not followed in its strictest from, but when making judgements over whether or not it is allowable for a form of the right to freedom to be violated, it is generally investigated to see if more people in the society will benefit from the violation of that individual’s rights. One example is traffic codes. The restriction on any individual from driving however they please, although a violation of their right to freedom, creates greater safety for a great number of people, and thus is morally desirable.
As can be seen, then, the discussion of natural rights is an inherently moral one. Moral question create fierce arguments, as it is nearly impossible to define a complete set of definite moral standards, taking into account different cultures and conflicting beliefs and interests. It is possible, however, to take the investigation of natural rights a fair distance before reaching the trap of making moral statements. It can be seen that a right, although it is only functional as protection against state oppression, can be derived from that existence of a single individual, in the form of the right to freedom. This does raise many other questions about freedom in general, and how it is possible to relate the roles of the individual and society using the rights of an individual and the laws of society.
365
Другие работы по теме:
Civil Liberties Essay Research Paper Civil LibertiesThe
Civil Liberties Essay, Research Paper Civil Liberties The term civil liberties refers to the “freedoms that individuals enjoy and that governments cannot invade”. These rights include a persons freedom of speech and religion.
Equal Rights Essay Research Paper Throughout history
Equal Rights Essay, Research Paper Throughout history equal rights has always been a major issue in the United States, and around the world. People have fought and even died to protect their rights and the rights of others in this country. Most people assume that colored citizens are the only one?s that are affected by the lack of equal rights, but that?s not true.
Basic Iseals Of Declaration Of Independance Essay
, Research Paper The introduction to the Declaration of Independence posses the basic of ideals of America. Four of the ideals extolled in the document are; equality, natural rights, consent if the
Limiting Rights Essay Research Paper Government is
Limiting Rights Essay, Research Paper Government is justifiable in limiting the rights of the people it governs for the welfare of the group, and even themselves (the people). If people has use of their absolute rights, meaning they were allowed to do anything because they have the right to do anything they choose, rights of other people would be infringed on.
Right Theory Essay Research Paper Right Theory1
Right Theory Essay, Research Paper Right Theory: 1. Rights create obligations, type of moral discourse & involve agents, being who act & are acted upon. People are given obligations to respect your rights. There is no right to obligate other people rights. (Conventional rights: Created by group of people as law or regulation in our society.
Ethics 3 Essay Research Paper EthicsThere are
Ethics 3 Essay, Research Paper Ethics There are many people in the world today that want their lives to end in a certain way. Some want to fulfill a dream or do something they weren t able to do before; yet there are some people who want to feel like they have done something for others which have helped another person in there live today.
The Revolutionary Trend Essay Research Paper In
The Revolutionary Trend Essay, Research Paper In every revolution, there seems to be a few guidelines that it must follow. It seems that almost all revolutions, in their radical phases, tend to have the characteristics of excessive cruelty, extreme violence, and denials of the rights of freedom. But the question that befuddles many is why they always become this way.
Renaissance Essay Research Paper Throughout history there
Renaissance Essay, Research Paper Throughout history there has always been a struggle for power between absolute rulers and the people and somewhere in the middle they compromise at democracy. In the past the people have written documents to that limited the of the king and obtain their natural rights. The Magna Carta became known as one of the first documents to ever degrade the power of a king.
Nixon Essay Research Paper NixonI Civil
Nixon Essay, Research Paper Nixon I. Civil Rights A. Some people, mostly blacks, did not get equal rights. B. Nixon believed fundamentaly in responsible civil rights policy on
Nazi Essay Research Paper John Mendes 83000Critical
Nazi Essay, Research Paper John Mendes 8/30/00 Critical Thinking Philosophy 100 Singer?s Final solution Singer and the Nazis both took away the rights of other human beings. Both men took away rights because of physical ability, self-awareness, or intelligence.
Stealing Our Rights Essay Research Paper Stealing
Stealing Our Rights Essay, Research Paper Stealing Our Rights From the dawn of the first organized communities, to the powerful United States of America today, there have always been power hungry people who
AntiFederalists Essay Research Paper AntiFederalists were people
Anti-Federalists Essay, Research Paper Anti-Federalists were people who opposed the ratification of the Constitution. They believed strongly that the Constitution would not be able toe maintain a system of republican government because the Federalists were proposing a government that was the opposite of what they believed in.
Decleration Of Independence Essay Research Paper NamedatehourMy
Decleration Of Independence Essay, Research Paper Namedatehour*My Declaration of Independence* In congress, July 4. The unanimous declarations of the thirteen United States of America, When during the course of people lives, people try eliminate political groups that have been combined with another political groups, and to assume the other countries that live on this planet, and to respect the God given rights to all people and creatures of this Planet, and that you would have a decent respect of the people, that you would lets us be separate from you.
Legalizing Euthanasia Essay Research Paper Legalizing euthanasia
Legalizing Euthanasia Essay, Research Paper Legalizing euthanasia in the United States gives rights to the people. Rights to those who endure the irrefutable agony of pain and suffering, rights to those who want to be cured of their pain, and rights to those that struggle to end their suffering. Euthanasia is the answer to end their suffering.
Cows Have Rights Too Essay Research Paper
Cows have rights too Attention getter – GEEZ!!! They didn’t give me any mustard! Introduction- I’m not saying that I am a vegetarian or anything but I believe that cows should have rights. You know that cows do have feelings to.
Are We Losing Our Freedom Essay Research
Paper ?Are We Losing Our Freedom? Many people today feel that living in America has more privileges than living anywhere else. But do we have enough freedom here in the United States? Many people can argue on their outlook on freedom. I personally feel that we are given many opportunities then other people in the world.
Air Pollution And Government Itervention Essay Research
Paper It is generally accepted that the cause of air pollution is the ill-defined private property rights on air. But transaction costs matter too. Market is costly. After the defination of private property rights on air, it is very difficult, even impossible to charge the people who pollute air. The transaction costs of doing so is considerable.
Womens Rights Essay Research Paper Women rightsThroughout
Womens Rights Essay, Research Paper Women rights Throughout history of Western civilization, deep-seated cultural beliefs allowed women only limited roles in society. Many people believed that women’s natural roles were as mothers and wives. These people considered women to be better suited for childbearing and homemaking rather than for involvement in the public life of business or politics.
Utopian Society Essay Research Paper The utopian
Utopian Society Essay, Research Paper The utopian society in The Handmaid?s Tale by Margaret Atwood is very different from what most people would consider a utopian society. The power of this society rests upon a small percentage of the population. In this society, men are superior to the women. Women have virtually no rights or say in what goes on in their lives and women with rights are only a few.
Untitled Essay Research Paper As John Stuart
Untitled Essay, Research Paper As John Stuart Mills, I believe that my philosophy on government will satisfy the needs of the society. Throughout the 1880?s people have revolted under the circumstances that the government is focused on the society and the individual. My system focuses on liberty, meaning the rights and principles of the individual of a society.
Negative And Positive Rights Essay Research Paper
Throughout societies in history and presently, we can see the employment of two primary forms of rights: positive and negative. The bulk of the following attempts to highlight the differences between the two. The proponents of each will also be discussed.
For Their Rights As Citizens Essay Research
Paper For Their Rights as Citizens During the Civil War, almost 200,000 African Americans fought alongside white people. What did these African Americans fight for? Some fought for the freedom of
Bill Of Rights Essay Research Paper The
Bill Of Rights Essay, Research Paper The Bill of Righs was written for the American people for two reasons. The first was to pacify the Anti-Federalist’s fears of an overwhelmingly powerful central government provided by the Constitution and the second was, in fact, to protect the freedoms secured by the Americans after their war for independence.
Capitalism Essay Research Paper The protection from
Capitalism Essay, Research Paper The protection from force, that is, the protection of individual rights, would be achieved through the use of a police force to protect the rights of citizens at home; a military, to protect the rights of citizens from foreign aggression; and a court system to enforce contracts and settle disputes between citizens.
Freedom And Rights Essay Research Paper Freedom
Freedom And Rights Essay, Research Paper Freedom and Rights How would you feel if your individual rights and freedoms were stripped from you during a national crisis? In many countries, the people s individual rights and freedoms are supposed to be protected by the government. But, in some cases, those individual rights and freedoms were taken away from the people during a national crisis.
The Bill Of Rights Essay Research Paper
The Bill of Rights Bill of Rights The first ten amendments to the US constitution are called the Bill of Rights because they provide basic legal protection for individual rights. The
Government 2 Essay Research Paper In order
Government 2 Essay, Research Paper In order to have a good government, the people are the most important part. It is ultimately the people who have to live with what they choose. The government has to protect the people’s natural rights and beliefs. It has to do whatever is necessary to look out for the peoples best interests.
What Is Human Rights Abuse Essay Research
Paper What are Human Rights Abuses? Human Rights Abuses are occurrences where there are violations on an individual’s right to act in a way to make moral decisions. Tis includes violations against an individual’s political rights,worker rights, and freedom of religion,speech, press,peaceful assembly and association.
Persuasive Essay Gay And Lesbian Rights Essay
, Research Paper Persuasive Essay – Gay and Lesbian Rights “If anyone says, ‘I love God,’ yet hates his brother, he is a liar. For anyone who does not love his brother, whom he has seen cannot love God, whom he
Human Rights Essay Research Paper Human RightsThroughout
Human Rights Essay, Research Paper Human Rights Throughout history, people?s human rights have been violated, but efforts have also been made to address the violations, and protect their rights. Human rights are rights as regarded as belonging fundamentally to all persons. Today, everyone is entitled to the same rights.
The people must fight for their laws as for their walls
We should promote the growth of patriotism in the minds of our chidren in order to grow the generation that will be interested in the wealth of its country and will be proud to live in it and give birth to their children in this country.