Platonic Paradox Essay, Research Paper
Platonic Paradox
To research Plato s paradox in the Meno, we can first consult the definition of what platonism is. Websters defines platonism as “actual things are copies of transcendent ideas and that these ideas are the objects of true knowledge apprehended by reminiscence.” For this essay, we will assume that trancendency is- “that which is beyond comprehension”, and reminiscence as “past experience”. The Meno is a dialogue between Socrates, a scholar and Meno, who eventually became an explorer. For this essay, however, we will assume that Meno is at the time of the dialogue, an upper-class citizen of average to better than average intelligence and superior stubbornness. The piece, according to the translation by G.M.A. Grube is thought to have taken place in approximately 402 B.C. in Athens, Greece. Late in the text, a third character, Anytus, a politician, who would eventually be an accuser of Socrates, joins in the dialogue. In the text, Meno in trying to define virtue accidentally slips in to a paradox or contradictory statement, which Socrates immediately refutes. It is the purpose of this paper to recognize the paradox, examine how Socrates disproves the paradox through argument and evidence. Socrates also brings up a key distinction between true opinion and knowledge, relating to the paradox, which will too be examined. Socrates then gives basis for more argument regarding the paradox, and why he does this will also be examined.
The initial argument takes place when Socrates challenges Meno to define virtue. Meno does not realize here what he has started. Meno has before inquired whether virtue is a quality that can be taught or if it is a natural trait, that men are born with. Socrates, in method true to form, twists the question and re-poses it to Meno to see if Meno can answer it all on his own. Meno lists what he thinks are virtuous qualities, and is content at that simple definition. Socrates then says:
“I seem to be in luck, Meno, while I am looking for one virtue, I have found you to have a whole swarm of them.”
Meno s frustration begins to set in. He tries theatrical metaphor to define virtue, as well as relating to physical philosophy and philosophers such as Empedocles.
Meno at this point gives up and hands the philosophy to Socrates. Socrates presents Meno with a paradox:
“….He cannot search for what (a debater) knows- since he knows it, there is no need to search- nor for what he does not know, for he does not know what to look for.”
In an obscure manner, Socrates points out that sometimes, we accidentally stumble on to the unknown. The paradox exists here: One can search and search for something all of their existence and never find it, and another can never even be searching for the same thing and come across it in a flash. If one does look for and find, they may be severely disappointed. The other may find what the first was looking for and not even care, and the inverse is also true. To sum up in modern layman s terms, “You are darned if you do and you are darned if you do not.” The paradox can appear to be quite obscure but has an undertone for the rest of the text. As the argument ends in doubt, in a sense, so does the question of the paradox; it is left to the reader to ponder on his own.
To refute the paradox, Socrates pulls aside a common slave boy of Meno s to show that in even complicated matters, there is always some form of wisdom. He draws a square and divides it in to four equal smaller squares, each side of the larger square we are told is two feet, making it an eight foot figure total, or so the boy believes. What we are told is that
“the eight foot square is double the four foot square and half the sixteen foot square, double the square based on a line two feet long, and half the square based on a four-foot side, so it must be based on a line between two and four feet in length. The slave naturally suggests three feet, but that gives a nine foot square and is still wrong”
Another paradox has been created. That which we thought was very simple makes no sense at all without careful thinking, and even then, can make no sense. What Socrates has done is he has taken a simple thing and made it complex. What he does next is to take this complex problem and make it even simpler than it was before. He builds up the square to make it a sixteen foot square by joining two more four foot squares. He adds three quarters of a four foot square with one two foot section missing. He then fills in another two foot square to complete the sixteen foot square. Then, through practicality, he solves the puzzle of how long the line should be by asking the slave to measure the line on his own. Socrates then suggests to Meno:
“So the man who does not know has within himself true opinions about the thing that he does not know?”
Socrates is trying to prove to Meno that people may posses knowledge that they do not even know of. Perhaps, this relates back to the original argument of virtue. Men posses virtue instinctively, and do not know that they have virtue until they have already used it, just as the slave had the knowledge to solve the problem, but did not know that he did until he had solved it.
Meno has begun to learn something. He has become more three-dimensional in his thinking. Meno suggests that virtue is a kind of knowledge. This is the next point that they ponder. They agree that virtue is a good quality and that good qualities benefit us. Socrates then appears to strike down the same argument that he has just nurtured when he explains this to Meno:
“….do they not at times harm us, at other times benefit us? Courage, for example, when it is not wisdom but like a kind of recklessness: when a man is reckless without understanding, he is benefited.”
This provides for an accurate definition of knowledge, with Socrates explaining that knowledge, while it can be virtuous, that virtue is subject to a sort of corruption. This makes for an interesting query. What, then if knowledge is virtue and subject to corruption, is true (or in this translation, right) opinion? We turn to a different translation here for a quote:
“Then right opinion is not a whit inferior to knowledge, or less useful in action; nor is the man who has right opinion inferior to him who has knowledge?”
Meno affirms this.
“Then true opinion is as good a guide to correct action as knowledge; and that was the point which we omitted in our speculation about the nature of virtue, when we said that knowledge only is the guide of right action; whereas there is also right opinion.”
Meno then suggests that he who has knowledge is always right, but he who has right opinion will sometimes be right and sometimes be wrong. Socrates, refutes this point in a key line in the dialogue:
“I mean to say that they are not very valuable possessions if they are at liberty, for they will walk off like runaway slaves; but when fastened, they are of great value, for they are really beautiful works of art. Now this is an illustration of the nature of true opinions: while they abide with us they are beautiful and fruitful, but they run away out of the human soul, and do not remain long, and therefore they are not of much value until they are fastened by the tie of the cause; and this fastening of them, friend Meno, is recollection, as you and I have agreed to call it. But when they are bound, in the first place, they have the nature of knowledge; and, in the second place, they are abiding. And this is why knowledge is more honorable and excellent than true opinion, because fastened by a chain.”
Socrates says that those who focus and utilize their virtue and use it wisely are most likely to be using their true opinions. He states that knowledge is better than true opinion because knowledge is bound forever while opinions can, and indefinitely will change.
The distinction that Socrates raises about true opinion and knowledge raises an interesting topic for debate. The possession of true opinion and knowledge combined with the search for virtue and whether or not it should be sought after. This re-opens the debate about the paradox for several reasons. If someone has true opinion, should they search for the meaning of virtuousness? Or, should they accept the fact that they will sometimes be wrong and simply let it come to them? The argument should be re-opened for another rebuttal for the inverse reasons as well: Should he who possesses knowledge then seek the meaning of virtue or simply be content to know that he possesses it? Can he who possesses true opinion ever be virtuous? These questions are all left to the reader by Plato, and would provide for excellent debate. There is no reason not to open up any point for rebuttal simply because every argument has a side.
In closing, the Meno has many arguments in it but leaves the reader even more confused coming out of the book than they were going in. Virtue, certainly is a trait that we to this day may never understand, and it is quite possible that Plato, himself was none too certain when he wrote this text. We can paradox ourselves to death and try to analyze that which we do not understand, but to concern ourselves with one small aspect of our lives, thus trivializing our existence will result in nothing. Even if tomorrow a wonderful universally agreed upon definition of virtue is revealed to the world, that it would not overhaul society as we know it. Plato though, has raised an interesting point. Can we call each other a title when we do not know the real meaning ourselves? That is a question for us and future generations to ponder, which was the goal of the Meno in the first place.
Другие работы по теме:
Justice In Plato Versus Justice In Aristotle
Essay, Research Paper Justice in Plato vs. Justice in Aristotle Usually when you hear that someone is a teacher you tend to believe that the ideas of his or her pupils would be somewhat similar to those in his or her teachings. Often enough the student decides to take what he or she learns from his teacher and expands or even opposes his teacher’s ideas.
The Pigman Essay Research Paper The Pigman
The Pigman Essay, Research Paper The Pigman Theme Essay In the novel The Pigman by Paul Zindel, many themes appear throughout the book. However, the most prominent are: older people can be friends but shouldn’t be looked at as parent figures, platonic relationships should stay strictly platonic, and the last main theme is: underage drinking and smoking are very harmful.
Conducting
“Business By The Book” Essay, Research Paper Conducting Business by the Book This exercise of examining the relative values of Christianity, Judaism and Platonic values in order to discover which is more applicable to today s business environment is in no way intended to be condemnation of the two passed over.
Golden Age Greek Criticism Of Henry MooreS
Reclining Woman Essay, Research Paper Golden Age Greek Criticism of Henry Moore?s Reclining Woman Both the shape and body of the Reclining Woman sculpture totally tear down our standards as Golden Age Greeks. Not at all can I make out whom this sculptor is representing. Sure I can make out the basic female figure.
Othello By William Shakespeare 1564
– 1616) Essay, Research Paper Shakespeare’s Othello epitomizes the playwright’s masterful ability to weave his characters’ intricate motives and acts into
Of Love Essay Research Paper Of LoveFeeble
Of Love Essay, Research Paper Of Love Feeble I, sick of life, stranded, in the youth of sins Went down the abyss of sorrow’s sea like a fish with no fins, Deeper into dark, not a thing to see, to the land of no return
Relations Between Women In The 18th And
19th Centuries. Essay, Research Paper Relations between women in the 18th and 19th centuries. Theme: Relations between women in the 18th and 19th centuries.
Nishilism
& Nietzsche Essay, Research Paper You’re Really Nothing at All Nihilism is the characteristic value-disease of our times. The word comesfrom the Latin root for “nothing”, with more ancient connexions with theword for “trifle”. Nihilism is the general phenomenon of human valueshaving no evocatory power, in that questions about meaning fail to yieldanswers that are trustworthy or in the truth, but rather a void ofsenseless silence.
Charges Against Socrates Essay Research Paper One
Charges Against Socrates Essay, Research Paper One of the most famous philosophers of all times, Socrates, was put to trial in Athens around 347 BCE in behalf of three major counts. First of all he was indicted for corrupting the youth of Athens. Secondly, he was indicted for not believing in the gods in whom the city of Athens believed in; thirdly he was charged for believing in other new divinities which were not traditional to the city.
Christanity And Sin Essay Research Paper How
Christanity And Sin Essay, Research Paper How far do Christians go to explain the human condition?Although there is a consensus that sin is that which sets up man in place of God, that same consensus does not exist when looking at all aspects of the nature, origin and consequence of sin. The earliest arguments can be seen with the views of Pelagius and Augustine.
Bestowed Existence Essay Research Paper Sam Vaknin
Bestowed Existence Essay, Research Paper Sam Vaknin’s Psychology, Philosophy, Economics and Foreign Affairs Web SitesKnives and forks are objects external to us. They have an objective – or at least an intersubjective – existence. Presumably, they will be there even if no one watches or uses them ever again.
Socrates Vs Thrasymachus In The Republic Essay
, Research Paper The Republic is one of the finest examples of a Platonic dialog. The subject matter discussed therein is difficult to summarize, at best. Covering subjects such as politics, the fine arts, education, it is no wonder so many have written volumes analyzing its various aspects. However, the driving force behind the many discussions is pursuit of the answer to the simple, yet evasive question, “What is justice?”
To His Coy Mistress 2 Essay Research
Paper To His Coy Mistress ” To His Coy Mistress,” a poem by Andrew Marvell, generates an understanding of death and paradox through the expressive language of the speaker to the mistress. In the poem, he implements metaphors with hypothetical situations while describing his love for her in a timeless world.
Probability Essay Research Paper Probabilities are not
Probability Essay, Research Paper Probabilities are not readily available in the world around us. Expressing uncertainty, probability represents precisely what is epistemically unavailable to us. Also the concepts chaos and free choice indicate a lack of predictability of the world. Probability is distinct from chaos and free will in that it presupposes some type of long run regularity.
Loss Of Humanity In 1984 Essay Research
Paper Our humanity is every thing that makes us human; our emotions, dreams, sexuality, opinions and aspirations. If these were to be taken away, we would become adverse mutations of ourselves. That is what happens in George Orwell’s 1984. . In 1984, Orwell discusses the dilapidation of society under a totalitarian regime.
The Death Of Americas Ideal The Great
Gatsby Essay, Research Paper The Death of America’s Ideal The 1920’s, although often represented as a time of irresponsibility, was more accurately a decade of bingeing on hopes, dreams, and aspirations. The illusionary ambitions of Americans, however, led them to many a downfall. The American Dream varied from person to person, but ultimately, its quest resulted in a personal dissolution.
Consciousness Essay Research Paper The relation of
Consciousness Essay, Research Paper The relation of consciousness to the material world is puzzle, which has its origin in dualism, a philosophy of mind which posits their fundamental separation. Dualism, in turn, has its roots in folk wisdom. The belief that humans are more than bodies and that there is something in human nature that survives bodily death has its origins in prehistory; it becomes explicit in the mythology of Ancient Egypt and Assyria and was formulated into a philosophical position in the Platonic thought of Ancient Greece.
St Augustine Confessions Essay Research Paper Saint
St. Augustine Confessions Essay, Research Paper Saint Augustine s Confessions Saint Augustine was believed to be the Christian Plato. He describes Plato with the adulation of an admirer and follower. He achieved most of his knowledge through the interpretations of the immensely popular neo-Platonists.
Chivalry Essay Research Paper When Chivalry first
Chivalry Essay, Research Paper When Chivalry first began, many citizens felt this was mostly for the courtship of women. However, this also included such things as proper etiquette at the dinner table, generosity toward females, and the aspect of religion to the church.
The Life Of Johannnes Kepler Essay Research
Paper Johannes Kepler (1571-1630) HIS LIFE Johannes Kepler was a German astronomer and mathematician ho discovered that planetary motion is elliptical. Early in his life, Kepler wanted to prove that the universe obeyed Platonistic mathematical relationships, such as the planetary orbits were circular and at distances from the sun proportional to the Platonic solids (see paragraph below).
Aristotle Essay Research Paper Aristotle was perhaps
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Aristotle was perhaps the first and greatest of all polymaths, being credited with the founding of logic. He is said to have transformed every field of logic that he touched (apart from mathematics where Plato and Platonic thought remained supreme). He divided human knowledge into separate categories, which enabled our understanding of the world to develop in systematics fashion.
Introduction To The Crucible
– Summary And Translation Essay, Research Paper The Crucible starts off giving incite on one of the main characters in the story, and it also ends on foreshadowing of what will happen in the first act. In the introduction, it also gives us incited on what happened, and why it happened. Were there really witches? Were their really devils? Or was it all a big hoax?
Time Travel Essay Research Paper The Twins
Time Travel Essay, Research Paper The Twins Paradox uses Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity to explain that time travel is possible. Let’s say two twins are on Earth. They are both twenty years old. One leaves in a spaceship. She is gone for sixty years. When she returns the twin that remained on Earth is eighty years old, she on the other hand appears to be about thirty.
The Republic By Plato 427
– 347 B.C.) Essay, Research Paper The Republic is one of the foundational writings of Western philosophy and civilization. We see Platonic thought and Socratic methodology still vitally evolving in today’s world. Dialectic
Aristotle Essay Research Paper Aristotle b 384
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Aristotle (b. 384 – d. 322 BC), was a Greek philosopher, logician, and scientist. Along with his teacher Plato, Aristotle is generally regarded as one of the most
Aristotle Essay Research Paper Aristotle 384 BC
Aristotle Essay, Research Paper Aristotle (384 BC -322 BC) was a Greek philosopher, logician, and scientist. Along with his teacher Plato (author of The Republic), Aristotle is generally regarded as one of the most influential ancient thinkers in a number of philosophical fields, including political theory.
PlatoPlatonic Love Essay Research Paper Platonic love
Plato-Platonic Love Essay, Research Paper Platonic love is defined as love conceived by Plato as ascending from passion for the individual to contemplation of the universal and ideal or a close relationship between two persons in which sexual desire is nonexistent or has been suppressed or sublimated.
Boethius
’ Argument Against Universals Essay, Research Paper Boethius’ Argument Against Universals In the essay From His Second Commentary on Porphyry s Isagoge Boethius discusses
Infinity Essay Research Paper The concept of
Infinity Essay, Research Paper The concept of infinity has been evaluated many times throughout history. Only recently, in the nineteenth century, has major progress evolved in the field. The chapter “Beyond Infinity” answers the questions, “what is mathematics and why should I study it?” by reviewing several mathematician’s theories of infinity.
ALL YOU ZOMBIES Essay Research Paper In
ALL YOU ZOMBIES Essay, Research Paper In the story, All You Zombies, there are many paradoxes that Heinlein touches upon. One being, the ability to travel back and forth through time. This jumping from one time to another would allow one to arrive at a time that he or she is already in causing there to be two of the same person at once.
Analisis Essay Research Paper A Historical DramaThe
Analisis Essay, Research Paper A Historical Drama The 1996 Luhrmann version of Romeo and Juliet is unusual because it takes place in modern times. This creates an interesting setting for a play written in the 15th century. Luhrmann manages to create a movie that is remarkably faithful to the play’s vision and sense of tragedy without drastically changing the play.
Identity Crisis Of Enkidu And Gilgamesh Essay
, Research Paper In this paper, I seek to explore the identities and relationships between Gilgamesh and Enkidu in the epic poem of Gilgamesh, up through Enkidu s death. I will explore the gender identity of each independently and then in relation to each other, and how their gender identity influences that relationship.
PLATONIC IDEALS OF LOVE Essay Research Paper
SHAKESPEARE’S SONNET 116 AND SONNET 130 BOTH DESCRIBE LOVE IN DIFFERENT WAYS BUT BOTH SHOW THE IDEALS OF PLATONIC LOVE. THE THREE STAGES OF PLATONIC LOVE IS THE LOVE OF BODY, THE LOVE OF MIND AND THE LOVE OF SOUL.
Bertrand Russell
’s Platonic Universals Essay, Research Paper The consideration of Platonic universals consequently rouses controversy among philosophers. Thinkers like Bertrand Russell and Thomas Hobbes contribute reflective explanations for the undeniable usage of question-begging ideas in language and thought.
Power Corruption In The Book Kindred
Essay, Research Paper Power itself contains two sides, depending on the individual who possesses it. Power is like a plague, very contagious. Power in the right hands creates freedom, peace and fairness. Power in the wrong hands induces despotism, tyranny and persecution. In the novel “Kindred”, composed by Octavia Butler, power corrupted characters constantly.