Creationism Essay, Research Paper
Creationism is a religious metaphysical theory about the origin of the universe.
It is not a scientific theory. Technically, creationism is not necessarily
connected to any particular religion. It simply requires a belief in a Creator.
Millions of Christians and non-Christians believe there is a Creator of the
universe and that scientific theories such as the the theory of evolution do not
conflict with belief in a Creator. However, fundamentalist Christians such as
Ronald Reagan and Jerry Falwell, have co-opted the term ‘creationism’ and it is
now difficult to refer to creationism without being understood as referring to
fundamentalist Christians who (a) take the stories in Genesis as accurate
accounts of the origin of the universe and life on Earth, and (b) believe that
Genesis is incompatible with the Big Bang theory and the theory of evolution.
Thus, it is commonly assumed that creationists are Christians who believe that
the account of the creation of the universe as presented in Genesis is literally
true in its basic claims about Adam and Eve, the six days of creation, and not
an allegory. Creation science is a term used by certain creationists to indicate
that they believe that Genesis is a scientific account of the origin of the
universe. Reading the Bible as if it were a scientific text contradicts the Big
Bang theory and the theory of evolution. "Creation scientists" say
those theories are false and that scientists who advocate such theories are
ignorant of the truth about the origins of the universe and life on Earth. One
of the main leaders of creation science is Duane T. Gish of the Institute for
Creation Research, who puts forth his views in conjunction with attacks on
evolution. Gish is the author of Evolution, the Challenge of the Fossil Record (
San Diego, Calif.: Creation-Life Publishers, 1985) and Evolution, the Fossils
Say No (San Diego, Calif.: Creation-Life Publishers, 1978). Another leader of
this movement is Walt Brown of the Center for Scientific Creationism. Neither
Gish nor Brown seem to understand the difference between a fact and a theory.
They loudly proclaim that evolution is just a theory and that it is false.
Scientific theories are neither true nor false. They are explanations of facts.
That species evolved from other species is considered by 99.99% of the
scientific community to be a scientific fact. How species evolved is what a
theory of evolution is supposed to explain. Darwin’s theory of how evolution
happened is called natural selection. That theory is quite distinct from the
fact of evolution. Other scientists have different theories of evolution, but
only a negligible few deny the fact of evolution. Gish is not doing science when
he argues against the fact of evolution. He has no interest in scientific facts
or theories. His interest is in apologetics: defending the faith against what he
sees as attacks on God’s Truth. All his arguments are defensive; they are
attempts to show that the evidence does not support the scientific fact of
evolution. Creationists, mistaking the uncertain in science for the
unscientific, see the debate among evolutionists regarding how best to explain
evolution as a sign of weakness. Scientists, on the other hand, see uncertainty
as simply an inevitable element of scientific knowledge. They regard debates on
fundamental theoretical issues as healthy and stimulating. Science, says
evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould, is "most fun when it plays with
interesting ideas, examines their implications, and recognizes that old
information may be explained in surprisingly new ways." Thus, through all
the debate over evolutionary mechanisms biologists have not been led to doubt
that evolution has occurred. "We are debating how it happened," says
Gould (1983, p.256). Creation science, on the other hand, is not science but
pseudoscience and it is connected to a particular group of fundamentalist
Christians. Most Christians, fundamentalist or not, probably never heard of
creation science. Like creationists of all sorts, "creation science"
puts forth its claims as absolutely certain and unchangeable. It assumes that
the world must conform to the Bible. It assumes that the Bible needs no revision
and can contain no error. Where creation science differs from creationism in
general is in its notion that once it has interpreted the Bible to mean
something, no evidence can be allowed to change that interpretation. Instead,
the evidence must be refuted. Compare this attitude to that of the leading
European creationists of the 17th century who had to admit eventually that the
Earth is not the center of the universe and that the sun does not revolve around
our planet. They did not have to admit that the Bible was wrong, but they did
have to admit that human interpretations of the Bible were in error. Today’s
creationists seem incapable of admitting that their interpretation of the Bible
could be wrong. Creation scientists can’t be seen as real scientists because
they assume that their interpretation of the Bible cannot be in error. They put
forth their views as irrefutable. Hence, when the evidence contradicts their
reading of the Bible, they assume that the evidence is false. The only
investigation they seem to do is in an effort to prove some scientific claim is
false. Creation science sees no need to test its theories, since they have been
revealed by God. A theory that is absolutely certain cannot be empirically
tested, but empirical testability is the hallmark of a scientific theory. Claims
of infallibility and the demand for absolute certainty characterize not science
but pseudoscience. What is most revealing about the militant creationists lack
of any true scientific interest is the way they willing and uncritically accept
even the most preposterous of claims, if those claims seem to contradict
traditional scientific beliefs about evolution. In particular, any evidence that
seems to support the notion that dinosaurs and humans lived together is welcomed
by militant creationists. The theory of scientific creationism is a good example
of a non-scientific theory because it cannot be falsified. "I can envision
observations and experiments that would disprove any evolutionary theory I
know," writes Gould, "but I cannot imagine what potential data could
lead creationists to abandon their beliefs. Unbeatable systems are dogma, not
science" (Gould, 1983). What makes scientific creationism a pseudoscience
is that it attempts to pass itself off as science even though it shares none of
the essential characteristics of scientific theorizing. Creation science will
remain forever unchanged as a theory. It will engender no debate among
scientists about fundamental mechanisms of the universe. It generates no
empirical predictions that can be used to test the theory. It is taken to be
irrefutable. It assumes a priority that there can be no evidence that will ever
falsify it. The history of science, however, clearly shows that scientific
theories do not remain forever unchanged. The history of science is not the
history of one absolute truth being built upon other absolute truths. Rather, it
is the history of theorizing, testing, arguing, refining, rejecting, replacing,
more theorizing, more testing, etc. It is the history of theories working well
for a time, anomalies occurring (i.e., new facts being discovered that don’t fit
with established theories), and new theories being proposed and eventually
partially or completely replacing the old ones. Of course, it is possible for
scientists to act unscientifically, to be dogmatic and dishonest. But the fact
that one finds an occasional oddball in the history of science (or a person of
integrity and genius among pseudoscientists) does not imply that there really is
no difference between science and pseudoscience. Because of the public and
empirical nature of scientific debate, the charlatans will be found out, errors
will be corrected and the honest pursuit of the truth is likely to prevail in
the end. This will not be the case with pseudosciences such as creation science,
where there is no method needed for detecting errors (since it can’t err) much
less of correcting them. Some theories, like creationism can’t be refuted, even
in principle, because everything is consistent with them, even apparent
contradictions and contraries. Scientific theories allow definite predictions to
be made from them; they can, in principle, be refuted. Theories such as the Big
Bang theory and the steady state theory can be tested by experience and
observation. Metaphysical theories such as creationism are "airtight"
if they are self-consistent. They contain no self-contradictory elements. No
scientific theory is ever airtight.
Другие работы по теме:
Creation Vs Evolution Essay Research Paper In
Creation Vs. Evolution Essay, Research Paper In society, there are many diverse issues that raise intense controversy. An ongoing conflict has been between the science world and the religious society. This topic happens to be the theory of creation, versus the theory of evolution. Naturally the science world is backing evolution, while the religious community is strongly supporting creationism.
Creationism Essay Research Paper In a typical
Creationism Essay, Research Paper In a typical American high school, Mr. Doe, the science teacher begins his discussion on the theory of evolution. John, a student opposes the idea the humans came from apes and evolved. John believes that men came from God and that man was created in 6 days. Jane hears this and argues against John, How could anything possibly be created in 6 days? This sort of project would take millions of years! By using up all 45 minutes of class time discussing creationism and evolution, this is a metaphor to the eternal debate as to the origin of the human species.
The Mystery Of Human Origin Essay Research
Paper The mystery of human origin is an often-debated topic. It is an issue that can never be proven, something as vague as the existence of God, the proof of a human soul, or even as evasive as the human psyche itself. The debate itself is divided between two main camps: the Evolutionists, who concur with Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest, and natural selection.
The Selfish Gene Essay Research Paper Creationism
The Selfish Gene Essay, Research Paper Creationism is a Bible based view of human origin that states humans were created in their current form and have not changed, or evolved, throughout the years. However the belief that our species has changed over time to suit our environment is considered evolution.
Falsificationism Essay Research Paper There is often
Falsificationism Essay, Research Paper There is often a heated debate on whether or not a theory is scientific. This debate brings to light a problem named the demarcation problem. This problem simply asks how one distinguishes between science and non-science. This is a very important question especially in examining separation of church and state.
Evolution Is Schools Essay Research Paper Position
Evolution Is Schools Essay, Research Paper Position on Evolution In 1925, schools had a very standard and general curriculum. Much of this curriculum was based on Christian beliefs and morals. No one dreamed of challenging these values. Especially in the school classroom, where budding minds strived for new knowledge, and any new ideas could possibly spark secular beliefs totally contradictory to what was taught in Christian households.
Gradualism Vs Punctuationism Essay Research Paper Gradualism
Gradualism Vs Punctuationism Essay, Research Paper Gradualism versus Punctuationism Although modern evolutionists are thought to be divided on the issues surrounding evolutionary theory, a close look at the evidence suggests that both the gradualist school of thought and the punctuationist school of thought share many characteristics in common.
Cloning Essay Research Paper Cloning Recently we
Cloning Essay, Research Paper Cloning: Recently, we have all seen the controversy over whether or not we should attempt to clone. If you haven’t heard: A group of scientists in Scotland announced the birth of a sheep cloned from embryonic cells, presaging Dolly. Dolly’s was the birth heard round the world.
Creation Has No Place In Our Schools
Essay, Research Paper Creationism Has No Place In Public Schools In society there are many diverse issues that raise intense controversy. An ongoing conflict has been on what to tech the children in public schools about human creation. Many religious leaders and churchgoers would like to have the biblical theory of creation taught to the children in place of the scientific theory of evolution.
Craetion Vs Evolution Essay Research Paper Creationism
Craetion Vs Evolution Essay, Research Paper Creationism vs. Evolution The majority of people in this world believe that a spiritual being created earth. In fact, “most religions and cultures believe the universe was created by a ‘creative hand,’ either a sky god or some other physical object” (Encarta 1).
Evolution Vs Creationism Essay Research Paper If
Evolution Vs. Creationism Essay, Research Paper If God and Darwin were in the same room together would they fight it out to the end? This would truly be the ultimate celebrity death match. But who would win? This battle over evolution versus creationism has been going on for over 100 years and the question still stands? who is right? And what should we teach our children?
The Father The Son And The Holy
Spirit. Essay, Research Paper The last line of the Lord’s prayer is, “In the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.” It is a key line in the Christian religion. The intention of this is reminding one of where we came from and to thank Jesus Christ for giving his life to remove humanitie’s sin. There are many key points in the Bible that tells us how we came to be, reminding us everyday to be thankful for what God has done for us.
Much Better Than The Other Darwin Paper
Essay, Research Paper When Charles Darwin released his findings on Natural Selection in 1858, he did not do so in a vacuum. Many factors contributed to the formulation of his theories, and many popular misconceptions contradicted his conclusions to the point that he was reluctant to publish them for sixteen years.
Science And God Essay Research Paper With
Science And God Essay, Research Paper With each new development in science comes conflict, mostly from those who don’t believe that science follows the teachings of their religion or allies with their beliefs in an almighty power or God. Looking back in history at some of the great names in human scientific achievement, such as Copernicus, Galileo, and Darwin, we see that with each genius discovery came some outcry from religious groups.
Creationism Essay Research Paper Creationism Genesis 11In
Creationism Essay, Research Paper Creationism Genesis 1:1?In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.? This quote, taken from the Hebrew Bible describes the belief that religious Jews and Christians follow. These two religions think that man, the earth, and the rest of the universe were originally created instead of the theory of evolution.
Evolutionism Vs Creationism Essay Research Paper Joshua
Evolutionism Vs. Creationism Essay, Research Paper Joshua T Hermsmeyer T TH 2-3:30 Essay 1 Evolutionism vs. Creationism The theory of evolution and the belief in a Creator have long been considered separate and mutually exclusive realms of human thought . Strict interpretations by scientists of Darwin?s theory of species adaptation through natural selection must inherently run contrary to equally strict interpretations of Genesis I.
Creationism Vs Evolutionism Essay Research Paper Evolutionism
Creationism Vs Evolutionism Essay, Research Paper Evolutionism vs. Creationism Two separate stories are the basis for how the World was created. The first theory is Evolution. Evolution states that we evolved through time and eventually turning into man. Creation states that God created us and that everything was created at once.
Darwin In Theater Essay Research Paper Darwin
Darwin In Theater Essay, Research Paper Darwin and the Theatre Charles Darwin made himself known in the late 19th century when he published his book On the Origin of Species. He challenged the religious philosophies of Creationism which became a very controversial topic of that era. He did not mean to attack any theological systems, but merely introduced a new theory on how human beings came to be.
The Creation Of The Universe Essay Research
Paper The Creation of the Universe In my short life on this planet I have come to question things that many take upon blind faith. We all know that we must some day die; yet we
Religion Vs Science Essay Research Paper
“Science vs Religion” The question as to whether or not religion belongs in a science classroom is a very complex and difficult question. Religion can be looked at from different angles,
Creationists And Darwinists Essay Research Paper Questions
Creationists And Darwinists Essay, Research Paper Questions on the origin of life and of the universe must have challenged human curiosity and imagination as soon as early man had time for activities other than survival. In 1859, Charles Darwin published the Origin of Species, and since then, people have debated between the creationism and evolutionism theories.
Anthropology Essay Research Paper AnthropologyMuch better than
Anthropology Essay, Research Paper Anthropology: Much better than the other Darwin paper July 20, 1998 ——————————————————————————– When Charles Darwin released his findings on Natural Selection in 1858, he did not do so in a vacuum. Many factors contributed to the formulation of his theories, and many popular misconceptions contradicted his conclusions to the point that he was reluctant to publish them for sixteen years.
How Social Darwinism Influenced Imperialism Essay Research
Paper Social Darwinism fueled imperialism by making imperialistic nations believe that their imperialistic ventures were a natural turn of events and not a cruel, opressionistic system of government. These imperialistic nations exploited other nations and cultures and their troops motivation was the glory of the nation and the eradication of the weaker races on earth.
Evolution Essay Research Paper Evolution vs CreationEvolution
Evolution Essay, Research Paper Evolution vs. Creation Evolution versus Creationism is a hot topic that is in constant debate among scientists and Christians. Held in high regard to the world of science, Evolution, is the theory that groups of organisms change with passage of time, mainly as a result of natural selection, so that descendants differ morphologically and physiologically from their ancestors.
The Crucible And Inherit The Wind
– Injustice Essay, Research Paper Both Cates, in Inherit the Wind by Lee and Lawrence, and Procter, in The Crucible, by Arthur Miller, are both subjected to unjust laws. Both demonstrated that , “if the law is of such a nature that it requires one to be an agent of injustice toward another, then I say break the law,” as stated by Henry David Thoreau.