– Marbury V. Madison Essay, Research Paper
Constitutional Law
Marbury v. Madison
Marbury v. Madison, one of the first Supreme Court cases asserting the
power of judicial review, is an effective argument for this power;
however, it lacks direct textual basis for the decision. Marshall
managed to get away with this deficiency because of the silence on many
issues and the vague wording of the Constitution. During the early
testing period when few precedents existed, there was much debate about
fundamental issues concerning what was intended by the words of the
Constitution and which part of government should have the final word in
defining the meaning of these words. Marshall used the Marbury case to
establish the Supreme Court’s place as the final judge.
Marshall identified three major questions that needed to be answered
before the Court could rule on the Marbury v. Madison case. The first of
these was, “Has the applicant a right to the commission he demands?” The
Constitution allows that “the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment
of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President
alone, . . . ” (Art. II, ? 2). The Judiciary Act of 1793 had given the
President the right to appoint federal judges and justices of the
peace; there is no dispute that such an appointment was within the scope
of the president’s powers. Debate arises because the Constitution is
silent on the exact time at which the appointment is considered
complete. The Supreme Court ruled that “when a commission has been
signed by the president, the appointment is made; and that the
commission is complete, when the seal of the United States has been
affixed to it by the [secretary of state].” This ruling does not have
direct constitutional support, but it is not an unreasonable decision.
The second question which Marshall addressed was, “If [Marbury] has a
right, and that right has been violated, do the laws of this country
afford him a remedy?” The answer is logically yes although there are no
specific words in the Constitution to support such an answer. Based on
the type of government intended by the Constitution, the government is
expected to protect individual liberty. As Marshall says, “[The
government] will certainly cease to deserve [to be termed a government
of laws, and not of men] if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation
of a vested right.” However, with this assertion Marshall established
the power of the Supreme Court to review actions of the executive branch
- a power that does not stem directly from the Constitution.
The third and final question which Marshall addressed was whether
Marbury “is entitled to the remedy for which he applies.” Marshall
further divides this question into two parts: the nature of the writ and
the power of the Supreme Court. In examining the nature of the writ,
Marshall solidifies further the Supreme Court authority over members of
the executive branch. Marshall admits that “the officer to whom [the
writ] is to be directed, must be one to whom, on legal principles, such
writ may be directed . . . ” and that the Supreme Court cannot “enquire
how the executive, or executive officers, perform duties in which they
have discretion.” Yet Marshall insists that the Supreme Court can issue
a mandamus “[where the head of a department] is directed by law to do a
certain act affecting the absolute rights of individuals.” This
assertion does not have Constitutional basis. The Constitution does not
expressly grant the Supreme Court power over either of the other
branches of government.
Finally Marshall gets to the question based on which he decides the
case – the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction over this case. For the first
time in this case, Marshall uses direct constitutional basis to make his
ruling. He argues that,
“If it had been intended to leave it in the discretion of the
legislature to apportion the judicial power between the supreme and
inferior courts according to the will of that body, it would certainly
have been useless to have proceeded further than to have defined the
judicial power . . . The plain import of the words seems to be, that
in one class of cases its jurisdiction is original and not appellate; in
the other it is appellate, and not original.”
He bases this ruling on Art. III ? 2, which enumerates the cases in
which the Supreme Court shall have original jurisdiction. Marshall
further maintains that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.
In this contention as well Marshall has constitutional basis in Art. VI,
which states, “This constitution, and the Laws of the United States
which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; … shall be the supreme Law
of the Land.”
In his typical style, Marshall follows this constitutionally based
statement with one of the most controversial rulings, which has no
constitutional basis. He asserts, “It is emphatically the province and
duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.” There is
nothing in the Constitution that assigns the duty of review solely to
the judicial department.
Although his decision loosely construes and even stretches the meaning
of the Constitution, Marshall’s ruling on this case overall is not
detrimental to the well-being of the American people. The Supreme Court
is the only branch of government that could act to strengthen the
national government during the early history of the Constitution.
Clearly, Congress could not take on the states’ rights advocates and the
state legislatures. If an early Congress had passed a law which a state
government objected to, the state legislature might have simply
nullified the law, thus forcing the national government into a
precarious situation. Congress would have to risk causing the state to
leave the Union to force them to comply with the new law. Furthermore,
the president also was not in a position to allow the federal government
more leeway in interpreting their powers. He does not make any laws of
his own and has no power to settle any questions of the states. Clearly,
the Supreme Court was the branch that could most easily facilitate the
strengthening of the national government into an effective and unified
nation rather than thirteen independent countries as the states had
seemed under the Articles of Confederation.
Critics will protest that the people do not elect the Supreme Court
Justices and therefore the Supreme Court should not have the power of
judicial review. As McCloskey points out, “No institution in a
democratic society could become and remain potent unless it could count
on a solid block of public opinion that would rally to it’s side in a
pinch.” Clearly, the Supreme Court is ultimately responsible to the will
of the people. By maintaining independence from politics, the Justices
avoid the major problems of political parties and party platforms.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court’s small size allows the Constitution to
speak with a unified voice throughout the country.
353
Другие работы по теме:
Violence Against Women Act Essay Research Paper
The Violence Against Women Act creates a right to be “free from crimes of violence” that are gender motivated. It also gives a private civil right of action to the victims of these crimes. The
Great Compromises Essay Research Paper Would the
Great Compromises Essay, Research Paper Would the United States of America ever be united if it were not for compromises? I would say the chances are slim. During the early years of the new nation, there was a lot of conflict and turmoil. During the Constitutional Convention of 1786, one of the most essential compromises of the early United States was the Great Compromise.
TAX DOLLARS SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR
PRIVATE SCHOOLS Essay, Research Paper Tax Dollars Should Not Be Used For Private schools Should parents be allowed to choose their children?s schools? This is a question that goes much farther than simply just choosing schools. Do parents really have a choice? Some parents can afford to send their kids to a private religious school but some don?t have the funds to do this.
Abortion Essay Research Paper Many have pondered
Abortion Essay, Research Paper Many have pondered upon the meaning of abortion. The argument being that every child that is born should be wanted and others who believe that every child that is conceived should be born. The choice of a woman whether or not she wants to conceive a child is called abortion. Abortion preserves a woman?s constitutional right, relieves the undesired child of future distress, and establishes a peaceful society.
Demolishing The Constitution Essay Research Paper Demolishing
Demolishing The Constitution Essay, Research Paper Demolishing the Constitution Few Policy debates have been as dominated by emotion as the one on gun control. Perhaps one reason why this issue is so heatedly discussed is because it tampers with our right to bear arms. The calls for gun restrictions or for bans on guns are calls for change in our social and constitutional system.
Marbury V Madison Trial Essay Research Paper
Marbury v. Madison The issue before the Supreme Court was the question of the court?s own constitutional authority, and to decide whether or not to issue the writ and if this would
The Constitution Essay Research Paper When the
The Constitution Essay, Research Paper When the framers decided to write a constitution, they were faced with several problems, one of which was how to set up the national government. The framers had to create a government that had strong central power but still maintained civil liberties for the people.
Pro Choice Essay Research Paper Without a
Pro Choice Essay, Research Paper Without a woman’s right to do what she chooses with her body, her freedom and liberty are taken away. If for personal reasons, a women wants
Boundaries Essay Research Paper This article tells
Boundaries Essay, Research Paper his article tells us the early conflicts, fears, vagueness and historical backgrounds over territorial expansion. The United States had been established with obscure concept of national boundaries. The constitution itself did not articulate geographic limit of the states, partly because the members of the constitutional convention were unsure of their territorial limit and expansion.
Constitution Essay Research Paper Brandi Petelle33970266592199Our constitutional
Constitution Essay, Research Paper Brandi Petelle 339-70-2665 9/21/99 Our constitutional rights and civil liberties come into conflict with each other periodically because of certain disagreements and new issues that arise. This week a new conflict has come into play between the U.S. Constitution and ?voluntary school prayer.?
September 11 Essay Research Paper Todays military
September 11 Essay, Research Paper Today?s military has seen numerous changes that have taken place since Sept. 11 2001. Why is it before the 11th of September, the people that the military protects was basically badmouthing and putting us down? Why are they so proud to wave the American flag? Why wasn?t the flag flown high with pride before the 11th of September? It amazes the military because flags are often flown when terrorist?s acts take place and not when there is constitutional freedom.
Thomas Jefferson 2 Essay Research Paper
Thomas JeffersonThomas Jefferson, a man whose actions were instrumental in establishing tradition in our country, is one of the finest presidents that the United States of America has ever seen. One’s inaugural speech ultimately has one purpose; this purpose being too elaborate on your plans, and more importantly your goals for the forthcoming presidential term.
Electoral College Essay Research Paper ELECTORAL COLLEGEElectoral
Electoral College Essay, Research Paper ELECTORAL COLLEGE Electoral College, the constitutional system for the ELECTION of the PRESIDENT and VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES. It is the collective name for a group of electors, nominated by political parties within the states and popularly elected, who meet to vote for those two offices.
An Argument Against Burning The American Flag
Essay, Research Paper Having been called a bleeding heart leberal several times in my life, this is one issure that you could not accuse me of being wishy-washy about. The needs to be a constitutional amendment outlawing he burning of the Flag of the United States of America. In my mind, this is no debating this issue.
Gary Nash Essay Essay Research Paper In
Gary Nash Essay Essay, Research Paper In the essay written by Gary Nash, he argues that the reason for the American Revolution was not caused by the defense of constitutional rights and liberties, but that of ?material conditions of life in America? were not very favorable and that social and economic factors should be considered as the driving factor that pushed many colonists to revolt.
Magna Carta Essay Research Paper Magna CartaThe
Magna Carta Essay, Research Paper Magna Carta The Magna Carta, or the Great Chapter was the first step toward constitutional liberty for English-speaking people everywhere in the world. The Magna Carta was signed in 1215. King John and his nobles had no clue that they were laying the foundations for this new kid of government.
Judicial Review Essay Research Paper Judicial ReviewThe
Judicial Review Essay, Research Paper Judicial Review The Supreme Court is the only court designated in the constitution. Within it is the Chief Justice of the United States, and eight associates. Being the highest court it is the last resort for all federal court questions. The Supreme Court has the power to determine whether something is constitutional or not, which makes them the final authority.
Federalist Paper
#51 Essay, Research Paper Federalist Paper #51 I believe there should be a Constitutional Convention because many of us find the government structure defective. The only answer that can be given is that as all these exterior provisions are found to be inadequate the defect must be supplied, by so contriving the interior structure of the government as that its several constituent parts may, by their mutual relations, be the means of keeping each other in their proper places.”
Constitutionalism Essay Research Paper The seventeenth century
Constitutionalism Essay, Research Paper The seventeenth century, which witnessed the development of absolute monarchy, also saw the appearance of the constitutional state. While France solved the question of sovereignty with the absolutist state, England evolved toward the constitutional state.
Articles Of Confederation Weaknesses Versus Constitution Strengths
) Essay, Research Paper The Constitutional Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation ended up resulting in the overthrow of the Articles and the writing of the Constitution. Originally, the Articles of Confederation had provided America with a loose form of government that gave more power to the states than anything else.
Roe V Wade Essay Research Paper Roe
Roe V. Wade Essay, Research Paper Roe v. Wade Roe v. Wade was in many ways the most controversial decision enacted by the Supreme Court, and no other court decision has been more bitterly attacked. The right of privacy is the main issue upon
Constitution Essay Research Paper Constitutional Movements During
Constitution Essay, Research Paper Constitutional Movements During the Ottoman Period Constitutional movements during the Ottoman period commenced towards the end of the 18th century. During the period of the 1789-1808, Sultan Selim the Third envisaged the formation of an advisory assembly, called the Meclis-i Meshveret, within the context of the New System (called the Nizam-i Cedid) that he wanted to have set up, which is seen as a major step towards a constitutional government system.
Whats Wrong With Communism Essay Research Paper
Whats Wrong With Communism Aaron Dummer 2/24/97 Period 5 I would go to Russia. I would speak on Government. This is what I would say: I am here today to tell you about freedom. I am here to tell you
The Bill Of Rights Essay Research Paper
The Bill of Rights Bill of Rights The first ten amendments to the US constitution are called the Bill of Rights because they provide basic legal protection for individual rights. The
Constitutional Convention Essay Research Paper The Constitutional
Constitutional Convention Essay, Research Paper The Constitutional Convention Our country was based upon the idea that every citizen has certain rights that can not be taken away from him/her; these inalienable rights form the backbone for our democracy. Our constitution, which secures our rights and how we are governed, was not an easy task to write.
Patrick Henry Fight Against The Constitution Essay
, Research Paper Although Henry refused to serve on the Constitutional Convention, Madison needed Henry’s persuasive ways. Henry had a way to make people agree with his ideas. Even though Henry didn’t serve on the Constitutional Convention, he was still present to put in his word. As soon as the meetings opened, Henry began to argue against the Constitution.
John C. Calhoun
’s Stance On Southern Succession Essay, Research Paper In 1828 John C. Calhoun had begun the protracted Nullification Crisis by asserting the constitutional right of states to “nullify” national laws that were harmful to their interests. Calhoun argued , as others have since, that the states’ rights doctorine protected the legitimate rights of a minority in a democratric system governed by majoruty rule.
A Plan In The Making The Constitution
Essay, Research Paper A Plan in the Making Some people have always wondered whether the making of Constitution of the United States was, in fact, supposed to happen at the Constitutional Convention or if it was even supposed to be drawn up in the way it was. In this essay, I will summarize to different views on what went on at the Constitutional Convention and how the Constitution of the United States come about.
Quick Look At Gun Control Essay Research
Paper Quick Look at Gun Control- Gun control has been a controversial issue for years. A vast majority of citizens believe that if gun control is strictly enforced
The Right To Privacy Essay Research Paper
The word “privacy” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution, though a number of Supreme Court opinions have held that the Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments offer some constitutional backing for a right “to” (as opposed to an enumerated right “of”) privacy. This right has been applied to cases involving privacy versus law enforcement, voyeurs, freedom of the press, the release of personal information, and personal choices.