, Research Paper
I. Introduction
With the adoption of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, Canadian courts have increasingly played a role in Canadian politics. Peter Russell describes the impact of the Charter on Canadian politics as having “judicialized politics and politicized the judiciary.” The Charter has given the courts the power of judicial review, that is, the examination of laws and state conduct in light of their constitutionality. The Supreme Court of Canada’s Judges are not elected, they are appointed. This would seem undemocratic to some, how can these appointed judges overturn the legislature decided upon by the majority of Canadians.
…judicial review, it is alleged, is illegitimate because it is anti-
Democratic in the unelected officials (judges) are overturning
elected representatives (legislatures).
The Charter has allowed our judges to become legislators; judges can over rule laws when their individual opinion is inconsistent with the Charter. This is where enormous controversy arises. How can the interpretation of an individual overrule what is considered the law by the elected representatives of parliament? When a Supreme Court Judge implements “their view” in the judicial review process, they are putting “their view” up against the collective view of parliament. The argument that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is anti-democratic is a viable one under this light. It is not easy to answer the question “Is the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms Anti-democratic?” Democracy is broader than the notion of majority rule. The Charter is a document set out to protect the rights of minorities, and the equality of Canadian citizens. Equality and minority rights are key characteristics of justice within a democracy. In a democratic society it is important to protect minorities from the possibility of the tyranny of the majority. Charter supporters may argue that it is the Charter that grants people power. The Charter limits provincial and federal governments from ruling arbitrarily and grants citizens the power to take issues to court that they feel have denied or impaired their rights. The limiting of government power would transfer more power into the hands of the people. This is what democracy is all about, power in the hands of he people. This is the argument that the Trudeau government tried to get across to Canadians in the early 80’s when they were publicizing the Charter in an attempt to gain support. They did not explain the Charter in the context that non-elected judges would be able overrule legislation, legislation supported by Canadians through elected representatives. Another common belief about the Charter, held mainly by Supreme Court judges, is that they do not legislate, they merely interpret the Charter.
Quite simply, it is not the courts which limit the legislatures.
Rather, it is the constitution, which must be interpreted by the
Courts, that limits the legislatures.
It is obvious however that the courts are not just interpreting the law, they are going much further than that. Rory Leishman argues in his article, Legislators for Life, that “the Supreme Court of Canada has routinely struck down laws enacted by Parliament or a Provincial legislature on grounds of policy, amended statutory laws from the bench, ignored the law altogether, and told legislatures what laws to enact.”
Leishman is quite obviously a critic of the Charter and provides many contemporary examples of Charter violating and discrediting legislation. The examples he provides present the Charter not as an apologist of democracy, but as antidemocratic literature. Upon review of some of the historical and contemporary influences the Charter has had on Canada, we will see that the Charter of Rights and Freedoms has had an antidemocratic effect on Canada. The Charters legalization of politics is also an example of the Americanization of Canadian politics. The latter issue should be taken most seriously if we want to continue to have a voice in politics and not have to fear that one day who our Prime Minister is will be decided upon in the courtroom.
II. The Charter is Antidemocratic.
The process of judicial review that has been sponsored through the Charter of Rights and Freedoms gives Supreme Court judges legislative power. This process is undemocratic for one important reason; the judges that are over turning and generally meddling in legislative affairs are not elected, they are appointed. In Canada the difference between a Judge and a Legislator is a judge is appointed and a legislator is elected. The legislator is accountable to its electorate; the judge is accountable to no one. This is the root of responsible government, when legislators decide they no longer want to be accountable to the people in which they represent they will not get re-elected and therefore the will of the people will rule and a more accountable representative will be elected. When a Supreme Court judge implements his or her “view” or “interpretation” of the law, he or she is accountable to no one, and therefore suffers no consequences from their decision.
A good example of Supreme Court Judges lack of accountability and the surfacing of the consequences of their judgements was in R. v. Askov (1990). In this case charges were dismissed against the accused that waited 23 months to stand trail. The Supreme Court of Canada ruled it violated section 11b of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which states “any person charged with an offence has the right to be tried within a reasonable amount of time;” If the courts had left it at the conclusion that 23 months was too long to wait to stand trial they would have been fine, however, they did not leave it at this. The Supreme Court went on to rule that “in the range of some six to eight months between committal and trial might be deemed to be the outside limit of what is reasonable.” The consequences of this decision were reported by Knopff and Morton in the book Charter Politics: “In Ontario, 43,640 charges were stayed, dismissed, or withdrawn on the basis of Askov by mid-1991. These included at least one charge of manslaughter, 817 ‘extreme assault’ offences (e.g., assault with a weapon, assault on a police officer, or assault causing bodily harm), 290 sexual assault charges, 402 lesser sex offences and 11,623 charges of impaired driving.” The Supreme Court in this case only suffered an extreme backlog within the courtroom, but the MP responsible for such a miscalculation would be held much more accountable and would risk not being re-elected.
Parliament, in opposition to judges, would not be as likely
355
Другие работы по теме:
Civil Liberties Essay Research Paper Civil LibertiesThe
Civil Liberties Essay, Research Paper Civil Liberties The term civil liberties refers to the “freedoms that individuals enjoy and that governments cannot invade”. These rights include a persons freedom of speech and religion.
R V Keegstra Essay Research Paper Mr
R. V. Keegstra Essay, Research Paper Mr. Keegstra was a high school teacher in the small Alberta town of Eckville, where he also acted as mayor for a short duration.
The Failure Of The Meech Lake Accord
Essay, Research Paper The Meech Lake Accord was an attempt by Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney to get Quebec to sign the 1982 Constitution. Quebec, led by Premier Robert Bourassa, submitted five demands. The first demand, a formal voice of Quebec in Supreme Court appointments. Second, say on immigration policy toward Quebec.
Getting Rid Of The Death Penalty Essay
, Research Paper At present, there are thirty-six states in the United States and over one hundred countries that have legislation enforcing capital punishment for crimes of murder or rape. In Canada the death penalty was abolished in 1976, due to the fact that it infringes on the rights of Canadians as documented by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.1 Also, there was much influence from the citizens of the country to debate this very serious topic.
Canadians And Americans Two Different Societies Essay
, Research Paper Canadians and Americans There is much that has distinguished the Canadian experience as different from that which has, and continues to, define the American experience. At first glance, superficially
14th Amendment Essay Essay Research Paper More
14th Amendment Essay Essay, Research Paper More often than not, most Americans look upon the constitution as the guiding light of our country. Recent events occurring in our national election no doubt prove that. There are many important amendments to our Constitution regarding our rights as citizens and the delegation of powers to branches and states.
CanadaUsa Independences Essay Research Paper The signing
Canada/Usa Independences Essay, Research Paper The signing of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1775 severed the Thirteen American colonies not only from Allegiance to the British Crown, but also from its neighboring colonies to the north. Having declared their independence, Americans were then required to win it on the battlefield in what became known as the Revolutionary War.
What My Country Means To Me Essay
, Research Paper When I think of my county, the United States of America, many different things come to mind. The most important over all thought is that of freedom. There are many different freedoms in the United States. These include the right to bear arms; the right to a quick and speedy trial: due process rights and others as written into our body of laws.
Bill Of BS And Some Amendments Too
?? Essay, Research Paper ?Home of the brave, and land of the free? is it quite that simple? I think not. First of all, who ever came up with that phrase was obviously a Republican and obviously insane (same thing right?). My point is, even though we have all these freedoms and privileges, if we can?t defend them on an every day bases they might as well not exist at all.
Legal Status Of Children Essay Research Paper
Introduction The legal status of children in society is in itself a complicated issue. Children are the most vulnerable members of society. The Canadian legal system protects the children through established institutions and laws. These laws and institutions are enforced within both the legal system and the community to ensure that the rights of the children are protected.
The Four Fundamental Freedoms Of The Charter
Of Rights And Freedoms Of Canada Essay, Research Paper Ignorance, pride, hatred and a disregard for the wellbeing of others in society. These are the seeds allowing the roots of activities promoting racial discrimination to sprout. Out of that, comes the growth of a fearful social epidemic, in which uneducated persons put their destructive thoughts and viewpoints into action.
Law Paper Essay Research Paper The Canadian
Law Paper Essay, Research Paper The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is being cited more frequently as a basis for Canadian lawsuits. One such case that has received much attention in the Canadian, as well as International spotlight is that of Ernst Zundel. Mr. Zundel contends that Government parties denied him his freedom of speech as protected under the Charter .
Notwithstanding Clause In The Canadian Charter Of
Rights And Freedoms Essay, Research Paper The inclusion of the Notwithstanding Clause in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was an invaluable contribution in the evolution of the liberal democratic state. Not an endpoint, to be sure, but a significant progression in the rights protection dynamic.
Canadian Charter Of Rights Essay Research Paper
Canadian Charter of Rights Introduction: The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is one of the most important ingredients of the Canadian Constitution. By having the Charter entrenched in the
Crime Control Vs Due Process Essay Research
Paper Crime control and due process are two different ideal types of criminal justice. One could say they are extremes on a continuum. The role of crime control is to get the criminal off the street and to protect the innocent. The due process model of criminal justice is like an obstacle course, you have to keep going through legal obstacles to ensure in the end you convict the right person.
Civics Questions Essay Research Paper 1
Civics Questions Essay, Research Paper 1. How is government authority in the United States limited? Give one example. The government can not interfere with those rights granted to the people through the Constitution
Was The Internment Of Japanese Canadainas During
World War 2 Justified Essay, Research Paper By the eve of Pearl Harbor, nearly 23,000 people of Japanese descent lived in Canada, principally in British Columbia. Three quarters of these people were Canadian born citizens. After the bombing of Pearl Harbor by the Japanese Army, the Canadian government put the War Measures Act in effect and interned all of Canada s Nikkei.
The French Language Charter Essay Research Paper
Expository Essay – The French Language Charter In 1977, the French Language Charter (Bill 101) was introduced to the residents of Quebec by the Parti Quebecois . It made French the official language in the province. Bill
Bill Of Rights Essay Research Paper The
Bill Of Rights Essay, Research Paper The Bill of Righs was written for the American people for two reasons. The first was to pacify the Anti-Federalist’s fears of an overwhelmingly powerful central government provided by the Constitution and the second was, in fact, to protect the freedoms secured by the Americans after their war for independence.
Freedom And Rights Essay Research Paper Freedom
Freedom And Rights Essay, Research Paper Freedom and Rights How would you feel if your individual rights and freedoms were stripped from you during a national crisis? In many countries, the people s individual rights and freedoms are supposed to be protected by the government. But, in some cases, those individual rights and freedoms were taken away from the people during a national crisis.
The Bill Of Rights Essay Research Paper
The Bill of Rights Bill of Rights The first ten amendments to the US constitution are called the Bill of Rights because they provide basic legal protection for individual rights. The
Human Rights Essay Research Paper Human rights
Human Rights Essay, Research Paper Human rights are universal, indivisible and interdependent. Human rights are what make us human. When we speak of the right to life, or development, or to dissent and diversity, we are speaking of tolerance. Tolerance will ensure all freedoms. Without it, we can be certain of none.
Police Corruption Essay Research Paper THERE
Police Corruption Essay, Research Paper ?? THERE ARE SOUND REASONS for such special concern with police corruption. The police have a unique place in our society. The policeman is expected
Charles River Bridge Essay Research Paper The
Charles River Bridge Essay, Research Paper The Proprietors of the Charles River Bridge Company erected the Charles River Bridge in 1785. It was used to link Charleston to Boston. A toll charge was placed on the bridge for forty years under the corporation charter issued by the state of Massachusetts. The bridge opened on June 17, 1786.
Canadian Senate Essay Research Paper The Canadian
Canadian Senate Essay, Research Paper The Canadian SenateToday the Canadian Senate does not do all that much for the Canadian government. It no longer does the job that it was created to do. It barely stops any bills that go through. They re paid a lot of money to just sit and do nothing. The Canadian Government could work fine without the Senate.
The Canadian Senate Essay Research Paper The
The Canadian Senate Essay, Research Paper The Canadian Senate By Andrew Donogh Today the Canadian Senate does not do all that much for the Canadian government. It no longer does the job that it was created to do. It barely
What Price Freedom Essay Research Paper No
What Price Freedom? Essay, Research Paper No country allows as much personal freedoms like the United States of America. The Supreme Court has passed laws which allow more freedom of expression than ever before. By hearing this, you may think that everyone is happy in the U.S. Well, a lot are, but to gain these freedoms, there was once a price to pay.
Combarison Between Us Bill Of Rights And
Charter Of Rights And Freedoms Essay, Research Paper BACKGROUND OF THE BILL OF RIGHTS The United States Bill of Rights came into being as a result of a promise made by the Fathers of Confederation to the states during the struggle for ratification of the Constitution in 1787-88. A great number of the states made as a condition for their ratification, the addition of amendments, which would guarantee citizens protection of their rights against the central government.